Help
This topic is locked
Gnaw: 17 votes / 7 Action Cards
Twelve: 15 votes / 4 Action Cards
Morgoth: Can’t vote / 7 Action Cards
Tapper: 13 votes / 5 Action Cards
IH: 14 votes / 11 Action Cards
Blend: 5 votes / 4 Action Cards
Nico: 3 votes / 4 Action Cards
Tatts: 7 votes / 2 Action Cards
Khell: 6 votes / 4 Action Cards
Twilight Imperium (I) - Chatty Thread
#4441
Blend 
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:59 PM
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4442
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:01 PM
Twelve, Nico, Tatts, Khell - we should all vote FOR the action card agenda. It'll force Gnaw and Morgoth to discard 4 cards each, and for most of us, just 1, none for Tatts.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4443
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:13 PM
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:
Twelve, Nico, Tatts, Khell - we should all vote FOR the action card agenda. It'll force Gnaw and Morgoth to discard 4 cards each, and for most of us, just 1, none for Tatts.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
Agreed I'm hoping people see the value in this. To sweeten the deal I will not steal an action card from anyone who votes FOR.
Plus it stops morgoth getting tech.
#4444
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:18 PM
Imperial Historian, on 14 June 2018 - 05:13 PM, said:
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:
Twelve, Nico, Tatts, Khell - we should all vote FOR the action card agenda. It'll force Gnaw and Morgoth to discard 4 cards each, and for most of us, just 1, none for Tatts.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
Agreed I'm hoping people see the value in this. To sweeten the deal I will not steal an action card from anyone who votes FOR.
Plus it stops morgoth getting tech.
For the rest of the game?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4445
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:19 PM
Well, guess Gnaw won't be voting with us. That's a shame.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4446
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:19 PM
Against what Gnaw?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4447
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:20 PM
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:18 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 14 June 2018 - 05:13 PM, said:
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:
Twelve, Nico, Tatts, Khell - we should all vote FOR the action card agenda. It'll force Gnaw and Morgoth to discard 4 cards each, and for most of us, just 1, none for Tatts.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
Agreed I'm hoping people see the value in this. To sweeten the deal I will not steal an action card from anyone who votes FOR.
Plus it stops morgoth getting tech.
For the rest of the game?
I think he means this round because Morgoth's racial rider is on AGAINST.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4448
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:21 PM
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:19 PM, said:
Against what Gnaw?
The action card agenda - i.e. Economic Sanctions.
FOR = everyone discards down to 3 action cards.
AGAINST = everyone randomly discards 1 action card.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4449
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:22 PM
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:21 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:19 PM, said:
Against what Gnaw?
The action card agenda - i.e. Economic Sanctions.
FOR = everyone discards down to 3 action cards.
AGAINST = everyone randomly discards 1 action card.
Yeah, forgot that the other one wasn't a for/against one.
But speaking of, I would like to campaign for Sakulag to be elected for the other law. Can I get votes for that in exchange for something or other?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4450
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:23 PM
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:18 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 14 June 2018 - 05:13 PM, said:
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:
Twelve, Nico, Tatts, Khell - we should all vote FOR the action card agenda. It'll force Gnaw and Morgoth to discard 4 cards each, and for most of us, just 1, none for Tatts.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
Agreed I'm hoping people see the value in this. To sweeten the deal I will not steal an action card from anyone who votes FOR.
Plus it stops morgoth getting tech.
For the rest of the game?
For this round.
#4451
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:26 PM
I figure Gnaw and Tapper are the only voters who have any interest in an AGAINST vote on Economic Sanctions.
Together, they can muster 30 votes.
If me, Twelve, Khell, Tatts and IH put all our votes on FOR, it would come up to 36.
We need to have at least 31 to ensure that we win that vote, so that means we can shift 5 votes elsewhere, unless an agreement can be reached with Tapper to vote FOR.
Together, they can muster 30 votes.
If me, Twelve, Khell, Tatts and IH put all our votes on FOR, it would come up to 36.
We need to have at least 31 to ensure that we win that vote, so that means we can shift 5 votes elsewhere, unless an agreement can be reached with Tapper to vote FOR.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4452
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:33 PM
Imperial Historian, on 14 June 2018 - 05:23 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:18 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 14 June 2018 - 05:13 PM, said:
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:
Twelve, Nico, Tatts, Khell - we should all vote FOR the action card agenda. It'll force Gnaw and Morgoth to discard 4 cards each, and for most of us, just 1, none for Tatts.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
If we place all, or most of our votes on that, the others can't flip the vote.
Agreed I'm hoping people see the value in this. To sweeten the deal I will not steal an action card from anyone who votes FOR.
Plus it stops morgoth getting tech.
For the rest of the game?
For this round.
For two rounds. This is far better for you than it is bad for anyone else.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4453
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:35 PM
If I can get some votes toward Sakulag I could put some toward FOR.
Or if the AGAINSTERS want to support my Sakulag bid, I can support them too.
Or if the AGAINSTERS want to support my Sakulag bid, I can support them too.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4454
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:42 PM
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:26 PM, said:
I figure Gnaw and Tapper are the only voters who have any interest in an AGAINST vote on Economic Sanctions.
Together, they can muster 30 votes.
If me, Twelve, Khell, Tatts and IH put all our votes on FOR, it would come up to 36.
We need to have at least 31 to ensure that we win that vote, so that means we can shift 5 votes elsewhere, unless an agreement can be reached with Tapper to vote FOR.
Together, they can muster 30 votes.
If me, Twelve, Khell, Tatts and IH put all our votes on FOR, it would come up to 36.
We need to have at least 31 to ensure that we win that vote, so that means we can shift 5 votes elsewhere, unless an agreement can be reached with Tapper to vote FOR.
They can't. Gnaw's rider means he can't vote for that agenda, no? So that's 17 votes fewer.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4455
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:45 PM
Oh yeah, totally forgout about that.
So we only really need 14 votes to ensure that we can pass FOR.
IH has 14 votes and has already said he'd likely vote on FOR - IH, if you place all your votes there, not likely that anyone will outvote you.
Thoughts everyone?
So we only really need 14 votes to ensure that we can pass FOR.
IH has 14 votes and has already said he'd likely vote on FOR - IH, if you place all your votes there, not likely that anyone will outvote you.
Thoughts everyone?
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4456
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:47 PM
Which also means he'll put 17 votes towards one of his own planets for the other one.
Gnaw - anything I can give you to give me those votes? After all, what's two extra resources to you when instead you could have my votes on a future agenda, or a ceasefire PN, or a Military Support PN, or a Political Secret PN?
Gnaw - anything I can give you to give me those votes? After all, what's two extra resources to you when instead you could have my votes on a future agenda, or a ceasefire PN, or a Military Support PN, or a Political Secret PN?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4457
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:49 PM
If IH puts all his votes on FOR the Economic Sanctions agenda, and it seems like others will be voting on the other agenda instead, I'd be willing to help you Khell.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4458
Tattersail_
- formerly Ganoes Paran
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 13,258
- Joined: 16-July 10
- Location:Wirral
-
Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
snapchat - rustyspoon84
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:50 PM
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:47 PM, said:
Which also means he'll put 17 votes towards one of his own planets for the other one.
Gnaw - anything I can give you to give me those votes? After all, what's two extra resources to you when instead you could have my votes on a future agenda, or a ceasefire PN, or a Military Support PN, or a Political Secret PN?
Gnaw - anything I can give you to give me those votes? After all, what's two extra resources to you when instead you could have my votes on a future agenda, or a ceasefire PN, or a Military Support PN, or a Political Secret PN?
He's already voting for Tappets planet
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#4459
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:55 PM
Tattersail_, on 14 June 2018 - 05:50 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 14 June 2018 - 05:47 PM, said:
Which also means he'll put 17 votes towards one of his own planets for the other one.
Gnaw - anything I can give you to give me those votes? After all, what's two extra resources to you when instead you could have my votes on a future agenda, or a ceasefire PN, or a Military Support PN, or a Political Secret PN?
Gnaw - anything I can give you to give me those votes? After all, what's two extra resources to you when instead you could have my votes on a future agenda, or a ceasefire PN, or a Military Support PN, or a Political Secret PN?
He's already voting for Tappets planet
What's he getting for that?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4460
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:58 PM
Blend, on 14 June 2018 - 05:49 PM, said:
If IH puts all his votes on FOR the Economic Sanctions agenda, and it seems like others will be voting on the other agenda instead, I'd be willing to help you Khell.
Cool, but it might not matter if Gnaw and Tapper are gonna be combining their votes.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
