[Khellendros]

Gnaw, on 30 April 2018 - 03:08 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 30 April 2018 - 03:03 PM, said:

D, on 30 April 2018 - 01:10 AM, said:

ItGnaw shows Khell a PN

And is there something you would like in return, if I do accept it?

Hell if I know. What have you got?

In terms of material things, not much at all. But I can offer influence, if you want me to distribute my votes in certain directions, either to be taken up now or in the future - as long as it's not immensely harmful to myself, obviously

[Tattersail_]

Nico, how about we exchange PN's?

You can see how my PN benefits you. When we refresh commodities I'm still open to trade with you.

[Tattersail_]

Tapper I've passed so its back to you.

[D'rek]

IH shows Nico two promissory notes

Tatts shows Nico one promissory note

[Nicodimas]

D, on 30 April 2018 - 04:42 PM, said:

IH shows Nico two promissory notes

Tatts shows Nico one promissory note

Parleys all around it seems.

[twelve]

Nicodimas, on 30 April 2018 - 07:05 PM, said:

D, on 30 April 2018 - 04:42 PM, said:

IH shows Nico two promissory notes

Tatts shows Nico one promissory note

Parleys all around it seems.

I'll parley too. What do you want to leave the neighborhood? I'm not a big fan of things turning up missing.

[Gnaw]

twelve, on 30 April 2018 - 07:15 PM, said:

Nicodimas, on 30 April 2018 - 07:05 PM, said:

D, on 30 April 2018 - 04:42 PM, said:

IH shows Nico two promissory notes

Tatts shows Nico one promissory note

Parleys all around it seems.

I'll parley too. What do you want to leave the neighborhood? I'm not a big fan of things turning up missing.

Afraid of turning into an ‘eleven’?

[twelve]

No, of being reduced to zero.

[Gnaw]

Seeing as how we're almost to the agenda phase...


I'm a strong against vote on plowshares. Not certain I care about the other one.


Thoughts from others? Or attempts to buy my votes?

[Nicodimas]

I guess I forgot to do this over here.

Shows tatts PN.

[Nicodimas]

Tell me if your in and we can reach a fair accord.

[twelve]

Gnaw, on 01 May 2018 - 12:44 AM, said:

Seeing as how we're almost to the agenda phase...


I'm a strong against vote on plowshares. Not certain I care about the other one.


Thoughts from others? Or attempts to buy my votes?

Of the 2 I actually would like the plows hares to pass but since so many are against I'm abstaining. As for the disarement I placed my votes already

[Gnaw]

twelve, on 01 May 2018 - 01:49 AM, said:

Gnaw, on 01 May 2018 - 12:44 AM, said:

Seeing as how we're almost to the agenda phase...


I'm a strong against vote on plowshares. Not certain I care about the other one.


Thoughts from others? Or attempts to buy my votes?

Of the 2 I actually would like the plows hares to pass but since so many are against I'm abstaining. As for the disarement I placed my votes already

And you voted how?

[twelve]

Believe it or not for one of my own

[Gnaw]

Provisional submitted. Good morning to some of you, good night to the rest.

[Tattersail_]

Gnaw, on 01 May 2018 - 06:13 AM, said:

Provisional submitted. Good morning to some of you, good night to the rest.

And to you sunny

[Morgoth]

Sure Khel, what do you want for it?

[Tapper]

twelve, on 01 May 2018 - 01:49 AM, said:

Of the 2 I actually would like the plows hares to pass but since so many are against I'm abstaining. As for the disarement I placed my votes already

I must say, I like how you admit you bank on others doing their "civic duty" and vote the way you expect them to, while you freely vote where your profit lies.
Not sure if admitting that on thread was the very best way to handle it, though, because, as the Oracle Kkanye says:

Man, it is so hard not to act reckless
To whom much is given much is tested

And like any Oracle, many meanings can be found, but this is how the High Leader Kkim sees it:

On the one hand, it means that the Hacan's abilities bring them great riches and the opportunity to flog Speaker tokens, PNs and promises all over the board.
On the other hand, it means they are uniquely suited to be held ransom on issues like this, especially when they present a weakness and have money in their coffers.

And a weakness Hacan has: the removal of their Infantry at Thibah would cost them a turn before they can colonize Lodor.
As such, the Space Kitties have a stake in avoiding this particular scenario.

I am looking for (at the least) two other players willing to vote for Thibah, with 8 votes each.
Of course, no donkey walks when threatened with the stick: there should always be a carrot.

As such, the deal we offer Blend is the following: if Blend pays us a TG or PN each, we do not vote Thibah, but instead we vote whichever planet Twelve wants us to vote. From the profits, Twelve can (choose to) compensate Blend.
So, anyone else willing to commit at the least 8 votes on Thibah for the Compensated Disarmament?

[Tattersail_]

Am I missing something Tapper? You are talking to Twelve about Blend.

The two agendas are:

Quote

COMPENSATED DISARMAMENT (DIRECTIVE) -- Elect a Planet
Destroy each ground force on the planet. For each unit destroyed, the player who controls that planet gains 1 trade good.

Would it not be better to vote for someone with low infantry on one planet rather than lots, because they'd be getting a lot of TG's. What are people asking here?

Quote

SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES (DIRECTIVE)FOR: Each player destroys half of their infantry (rounded up) on each planet. Each player gains a trade good for each unit they destroyed.

AGAINST: Each player gains 1 infantry on each planet they control.

Personally I'd be against this one because everyone gets a free GF.

Edit:
I only have 7 votes. So my opinion can only sway one agenda I think.

This post has been edited by Tattersail_: 01 May 2018 - 08:15 AM

[Nicodimas]

Yell at me tatts if your good for that deal of PN...

Otherwise on the vote I have lil sway so

Will find out what ya all are doing in the morning.

This post has been edited by Nicodimas: 01 May 2018 - 08:25 AM