[Khellendros]

Aaah, finally changed - Kilava's nice but Khell is better


I stand by what I said in the game - I played an eminently sensible town game throughout!

[Khellendros]

Anyways, aside from the dithering on the no lynches, I thought that was a good game! Loads of debate, everyone contributing on the game-side, some surprising twists (cheers House ), and I thought both town and scum have reasons to be proud of their games, which is a rarity!

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 17 May 2017 - 02:00 PM

[HoosierDaddy]

Good game, but you are all assholes for not playing.

Mafia is a game.

Games are for fun.

If you have fun, everyone is a winner.

Instead egos took over.

[Tattersail_]

 Khellendros, on 17 May 2017 - 01:59 PM, said:

Anyways, aside from the dithering on the no lynches, I thought that was a good game! Loads of debate, everyone contributing on the game-side, some surprising twists (cheers House ), and I thought both town and scum have reasons to be proud of their games, which is a rarity!

One thing I did not do this game is try to alt people, the only way I knew Rash was Ment was because of his unshakable thirst for my blood.

Good game to play in anyway.

First time a Mod has had to call it in my memory.

[Tattersail_]

Also well done Gusty. You played such a good game because we couldn't pin you down.

[Path-Shaper]

Yeah, MotM has to go to Gusty, because though suspicions often alighted on him, EVERYONE was basically dismissing him all game.

That being said, I think House's early healer reveal really through everyone off their games. No one seemed to have any idea wtf was going on. LoL

[Lady Bliss]

Good game but it was getting old at the end with no lynches. I think Gust and Mess stood a solid chance of winning if there had been more action.

[Gust Hubb]

Thanks all for a fun game. I am officially re-addicted. Sorry Ment. I was mostly trying to get under your skin and break you so that you would just give up and vote stupid.

[Blend]

It would certainly have been better if they had actually lynched, but Nimander had a point, he basically forced the tie because he put everyone at a stalemate, and that's technically better than a loss, I guess.

[Messremb]

I'm going to take 4vs2 in a game we can't win being called to a draw as a victory

[Blend]

I would have given you guys the win if you had winnowed it down to parity, but Amp/Gust had NO IDEA that you were his symp, he was certain it was Galain/Tatts, so the chances of that happening were slim, especially with town not lynching.

[Tattersail_]

 Messremb, on 17 May 2017 - 02:39 PM, said:

I'm going to take 4vs2 in a game we can't win being called to a draw as a victory

If Rash voted you, Amp would have hammered and scum would've had 0 chance of winning.

[Gust Hubb]

As for stonewalling, I feel it was smart play. I was at risk of hitting a symp so most of my strategy had to be focused on inciting a miss lynch. A successful kill would ultimately increase the random odds of me getting lynched and would increase the odds of me hitting my sump, making my game unwinnable. Thus, logically, I had one shot to get it right, and needed a lynch to give me the best and most definitive odds (a sick dday ironically).

[Tattersail_]

I'd be voting Amp in that situation because I knew someone would have thought me their symp. No way for town to lose then.

[Gust Hubb]

 Tattersail_, on 17 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

 Messremb, on 17 May 2017 - 02:39 PM, said:

I'm going to take 4vs2 in a game we can't win being called to a draw as a victory

If Rash voted you, Amp would have hammered and scum would've had 0 chance of winning.

So true. I think what may have been a strategy to break the stalemate (esp knowing I would have killed if there was a lynch) would be to force town to lynch or lose. That would be enough motivation and ironically, given what we saw, I would have probably lost (unless they lynched galain...)

[Tattersail_]

 Gust Hubb, on 17 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

As for stonewalling, I feel it was smart play. I was at risk of hitting a symp so most of my strategy had to be focused on inciting a miss lynch. A successful kill would ultimately increase the random odds of me getting lynched and would increase the odds of me hitting my sump, making my game unwinnable. Thus, logically, I had one shot to get it right, and needed a lynch to give me the best and most definitive odds (a sick dday ironically).

Fucking think of it this way as well.

Ment hard to lynch
Mess hard to lynch
Khell hard to lynch
Gust hard to lynch

No wonder a lynch was hard to come by.

[Gust Hubb]

[Tattersail_]

I think one more day there would have been a lynch. I also think it would have been me because a CI was pointing that way.

[Gust Hubb]

So why didn't you get lynched Tatts?

[Gust Hubb]

Awesome xpost