[Path-Shaper]

Fanderay, on 01 February 2017 - 05:15 PM, said:

I'm the Half-Orc, by the way . I figured the extra day of life would come in handy.

Oh, I forgot to mention - I also have a passive that means anyone who targets me automatically takes 1 extra point of damage from all attacks on the same night. Don't know how easy it will be to control, but might be worth bearing in mind.

It might be worth trying to focus down a few players. If you can start killing them off at night it will make it easier to press our numerical advantage on thread.

Fanderay, on 01 February 2017 - 05:36 PM, said:

Something to bear in mind - the Rogue probably has a Mage Hand in the game. Mage Hands are lynch proof and bulletproof, so there's no point targetting them with an NA. Given how many votes it took to lynch, they almost certainly were on the lynch train. It might be better to target players who aren't on the lynch train, so you can be more sure that you aren't wasting your attacks.

Ultama, on 01 February 2017 - 07:18 PM, said:

I have read what you said but I am away until the morning to reply properly. A load of alts will have 1HP so I could effectively target 2 other players instead of Lock and Sorrit. Or just keep hitting ones we suspect as heirechy with both attacks meaning 10 damage a go. Lock may be a leader the way he has played. Thoughts?

Ultama, on 01 February 2017 - 07:24 PM, said:

Mockra must be in the faction without barbs and kesso is no fan of the warlock hence putting it on thread. Unless he is quoting our team members?

Do you think Kesso is on our team and is signalling us with that post with barb and warlock abilities?

Ultama, on 01 February 2017 - 07:31 PM, said:

Either they will lynch Kesso or not. I am fully attacking Lock at night.

I intend to rage at night for now until votes will be needed and we have a block, does that make sense to you?

Fanderay, on 01 February 2017 - 09:40 PM, said:

Just been thinking about the vote counts. Most players can't draw any conclusions about them, but because we have extra info, I think we can.

- There are 5 puppets in the game, and we know about 2 of them, leaving 3 unaccounted for.
- We know that at most one of the other three puppets can affect the number of votes it takes to lynch, because on Day 1 it took 7 votes to lynch, and both my puppets count. Therefore maximum countable players is 13.
- One alt must be the Clockwork Toy, because the Rock Gnome is in the game. The Toy can't vote and doesn't count towards vote count.
- One alt is probably a Mage Hand, because there's a Rogue in the game. The Mage hand can't vote but does count towards vote count. Also has BP and LP.
- So there's also one unknown puppet that we don't know anything about. However, we can assume that it doesn't count towards the vote count, and as far as I can tell, that means its votes won't count either.

What does that tell us? Well, we know it took 9 votes to lynch Omtose. I don't buy that any of the Barbarians will have activated their Rage - they don't need their votes to count for extra to counteract anything else, because there's no second train to overcome (Did you use your Rage during the day?). So I think that means that on the train are 7 alts who can vote, and 2 puppets. And once you leave out us, that means that in the following list there are 4 voters and 2 puppets:

Kessobahn, Pallid, Alkend, Lock, Sorrit, Iparth Erule

So of the players who weren't on the train, there must be exactly one puppet. That is:

Bek Okhan, Mockra, Trake, Tulas Shorn

Ultama, on 01 February 2017 - 10:29 PM, said:

Great Spot.

Just had a look at role types and surely wizard wont have anything so either paladin or druid...

Ultama, on 01 February 2017 - 10:30 PM, said:

Hmm we definitely need to keep our one player alive as he may have healing abilities.

Fanderay, on 01 February 2017 - 11:39 PM, said:

So I think pushing on Mockra is a good shout. Pretty sure that was a slip from them. In the meantime, I'm going to focus the thread's minds on players who weren't on the train - if we can flush out one or two of those it could help with identifying the puppets. To do that, I've sent PS my day action - going to try and link Trake and Bek Okhan together and see if that stirs anything up. Key thing to look at is who dismisses it as misinformation and who thinks there might be something to it - if either of them are actually a faction leader someone might give something away.

ST

Ultama, on 02 February 2017 - 08:49 AM, said:

I said this to PS yesterday evening, so it would be announced when I was not around. Now it could get put up anytime.

Ultama, on 01 February 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Announcement please.

I got your signal. Thank you. Please attack Lock this night. Alkend you are playing well.

Ultama, on 02 February 2017 - 08:50 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 01 February 2017 - 11:39 PM, said:

So I think pushing on Mockra is a good shout. Pretty sure that was a slip from them. In the meantime, I'm going to focus the thread's minds on players who weren't on the train - if we can flush out one or two of those it could help with identifying the puppets. To do that, I've sent PS my day action - going to try and link Trake and Bek Okhan together and see if that stirs anything up. Key thing to look at is who dismisses it as misinformation and who thinks there might be something to it - if either of them are actually a faction leader someone might give something away.

ST

Okay you do that, I am more active for the next 8 hours or so. So I am around.

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 10:05 AM, said:

I like your announcement - it's going to cause the thread to start hunting for signalling. They might dig up something other teams have done for us .

ST

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 04:12 PM, said:

Just as I'd hoped, my post as Fanderay made people pay attention to the allegations about Mockra. Glad that's going well.

Something to think about - at this stage, there may be a dynamic in play where the followers are looking to their leader to decide where to vote (leaders are more likely to have alts, so if a faction sees their leader being reticent it might be a sign that they should avoid pursuing it). So I'd be looking at Trake and BO as possible leaders here.

ST

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 04:15 PM, said:

We should figure something out - do you want me to keep this connection open into Day 3? The other options I have at my disposal are:

- 2x 1 point of magic damage (eg. either to two different alts, or two shots to the same alt)
- +2 votes required to lynch me.
- Form a lover connection to someone else.

I think you might be onto something with Kessobahn - that post can be construed as a signal. Flipside is that opening a lover connection to an unknown player might be pretty risky...

Any preference? Remember that I will be able to signal to you a little bit with the day action if need be.

ST

Ultama, on 02 February 2017 - 04:41 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 04:15 PM, said:

We should figure something out - do you want me to keep this connection open into Day 3? The other options I have at my disposal are:

- 2x 1 point of magic damage (eg. either to two different alts, or two shots to the same alt)
- +2 votes required to lynch me.
- Form a lover connection to someone else.

I think you might be onto something with Kessobahn - that post can be construed as a signal. Flipside is that opening a lover connection to an unknown player might be pretty risky...

Any preference? Remember that I will be able to signal to you a little bit with the day action if need be.

ST

Honestly, I think keeping this connection open will be best because people will know you are the warlock when you open up a lover connection as there aren't many other roles in the game that will do this.

Hmm advice wanted on my night action, at the moment I have zoomed in on lock, both attacks dealing 10hp, I am going to keep it there for now. Keep our lover connection for at least one more day so we have good communication and plan of action after seeing what happens at night.

I am going to rage at night because it looks like we have lynch numbers.

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 05:05 PM, said:

OK, I'll keep the connection open. Was just thinking it might be worth sending out a couple of attacks to try and clear any "First attack to hit you will miss" type defences.

Any reason for Lock, beyond the fact you picked him yesterday? I'm just a little concerned you might be wasting all your efforts on a Mage Hand (eg. someone with an infinite BP).

[Path-Shaper]

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 05:06 PM, said:

Just in case the lover connection does drop (eg. because I'm guarded, for example), here's the code I'll use with my prestidigitation (name of the Day ability I have):

- Sparks flying from Player X's hands = I think this player is on our team
- Player A smells like Player B = I think Player B is Player A's master
- Player X smells like something bad = I think Player X is on our team
- Player X smells like something good = I think Player X would be a good target for a night action

Ultama, on 02 February 2017 - 07:25 PM, said:

We have something here. I think Mockra is still the right choice and that Trake is a puppet. Either way the remove votes stink. Feels like a "play"

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 08:32 PM, said:

Way I see it there are two possibilities:

- Sorrit is a follower of Mockra. Switches us onto Trake (either because he knows something about Trake, or because he's a convenient patsy). Alkend is a follower/puppet of Trake, kicks up a fuss in return.

- Sorrit knows Mockra is a puppet, pulls some bullshit to stop the lynch...why exactly? Maybe he's a follower who wants to try and keep control of the day time.

I don't buy that there's a Mockra/Trake connection. I don't think you publish your puppet guesses like that without any corroborating info. Might just press Sorrit on that point and see what comes out.

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 09:25 PM, said:

Might be worth rethinking your announcement, btw.

I have a plan for tomorrow:

- If Gamelon is NKed, then we play up the idea that TS contolled Gamelon and is the Warlock. Then we point out he was defending Trake and try and get him lynched as the other faction leader.

Seem like a good idea?

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 09:41 PM, said:

(If we can put out an announcement that implies Tulas Shorn is the Warlock, but is subtle enough not seem like a plant, it'll help a lot)

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 07:12 AM, said:

Day 3 I cannot vote but I use an extra attack tonight.

So going for Lock twice and Alkend once.

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 10:15 AM, said:

Sounds like a plan. I've submitted the following provisional:

If Mockra is not a faction leader:
Guard Sorrit

Else:
Guard Trake

I feel like Trake is probably a faction leader based on the way Sorrit's attack drew Alkend and Tulas Shorn out of the woodwork. But if Mockra is actually a puppet, then that means Sorrit must have finds, and finds in a faction game need to be eliminated ASAP.

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 10:21 AM, said:

Also, I've put in orders to keep this connection alive. If it drops, that means I was guarded last night.

ST

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 11:00 AM, said:

Okay, and I have your instructions from earlier. I am catching up, but I will copy them into my RPM in case this gets deleted.

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 11:04 AM, said:

I've sent a prestidigitation request to say that Gamelon smells like Tulas Shorn. I don't know if it will get processed before the end of the day though.

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 11:15 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 02 February 2017 - 05:05 PM, said:

OK, I'll keep the connection open. Was just thinking it might be worth sending out a couple of attacks to try and clear any "First attack to hit you will miss" type defences.

Any reason for Lock, beyond the fact you picked him yesterday? I'm just a little concerned you might be wasting all your efforts on a Mage Hand (eg. someone with an infinite BP).

I think Lock is someone important but it is a hunch on their playstyle and presence on thread. A lot of people are being pushed towards being lynch worthy, so I don't want to openly attack Lock on thread and draw heat from any other faction members, so I attack him off stage so to speak. If he is a leader then I don't think they have self protection. So 5HP night one, plus 10 HP night two. That leaves him on 10 HP, if you think this is fruitless in case he is a mage hand or some such then night 3 I can always spread my attacks and ask you to do the same and clear any rabble out of there.

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 11:45 AM, said:

It's probably fine. I think I'm just being paranoid. Chances of you picking out the Mage Hand Night 1 are pretty slim, and to be honest I feel more likely that it's Sorrit after all the trouble he just caused. Go with your hunch until we have some evidence to the contrary.

After today's lynch train we should be able to triangulate where the puppets are a lot better. That'll help narrow things down a lot.

ST

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 02:58 PM, said:

Sorrit and Trake must be Rock Gnome and Toy

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 03:06 PM, said:

There were 2 non-voters on the train. It's unlikely there are raging barbarians here, because the only other Barbarian in the game is on the same team. So we can split the thread like this:

2 puppets in: Sorrit, Trake, Alkend, Pallid, Tulas Shorn
1 puppet in: Kessobahn, Bek Okhan, Iparth Erule, Lock

From Night 1, we can also split them like this:

2 puppets in: Kessobahn, Pallid, Alkend, Lock, Sorrit, Iparth Erule
1 puppet in: Bek Okhan, Mockra, Trake, Tulas Shorn

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 03:08 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 03:06 PM, said:

There were 2 non-voters on the train. It's unlikely there are raging barbarians here, because the only other Barbarian in the game is on the same team. So we can split the thread like this:

2 puppets in: Sorrit, Trake, Alkend, Pallid, Tulas Shorn
1 puppet in: Kessobahn, Bek Okhan, Iparth Erule, Lock

From Night 1, we can also split them like this:

2 puppets in: Kessobahn, Pallid, Alkend, Lock, Sorrit, Iparth Erule
1 puppet in: Bek Okhan, Mockra, Trake, Tulas Shorn

Take me through your logic here

[Path-Shaper]

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 03:20 PM, said:

Actually, now that I think about it it's a little more complicated than that. We know of two players who could have changed the weight of their vote:

- Vash the Stampede, the Half-Elf Rogue
- Ethlered the Unready, a Dragonborn Barbarian

Ah, and actually, Mockra could have had a vote weight of zero if Raged at night.

That sort of screws up all my calculations .

ST

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 03:20 PM, said:

Also, some news:

- Gamelon died
- Telas took 3 HP damage
- Fanderay took 4 HP damage

Did you get hit at all?

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 03:30 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 03:20 PM, said:

Also, some news:

- Gamelon died
- Telas took 3 HP damage
- Fanderay took 4 HP damage

Did you get hit at all?

No I did not get hit. Hmm weird, what HP does that leave you all with?

Lock is still alive, that is 2 hits. Alkend is still Alive that is 1 hit.

Should I switch target? Not sure if any of my attacks are doing anything.

If Lock is a leader without protection then he should be down to around 10 HP.

Can you target him tonight, and I will double target him and he should go down, or do you think cut ties and move elsewhere?

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 05:53 PM, said:

FYI, my participation is going to dip dramatically for the next couple of days, as I have am going to be on a ski trip. Should still be able to play though.

ST

Ultama, on 03 February 2017 - 05:57 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 05:53 PM, said:

FYI, my participation is going to dip dramatically for the next couple of days, as I have am going to be on a ski trip. Should still be able to play though.

ST

Okay. Weekend anyway isn't it. Maybe keep one alt going

Fanderay, on 03 February 2017 - 06:06 PM, said:

Sorry, by days I meant Game Days. I'm away all week. But it shouldn't be too hard to maintain enough activity to keep both alts in play.

ST

Fanderay, on 04 February 2017 - 01:04 AM, said:

OK, reading through Trake's reveal, something clicked in my head. What he is describing matches up precisely with one of the abilities in my role PM. It was a familiar called a Sprite that had 1HP and could perform faction finds.

So, two options:

- Wizards or Druids can also have this ability. Trake is telling the Truth.
- Trake has seen the full Warlock ability sheet before and is trying to make it seem like the Warlock has been in contact with him. His statement that they may be in his faction is an implicit claim of being in the Fifth (and therefore Druid).

The aspect of the latter story that doesn't make sense is that if Trake has a Lover connection ability, he would have used it to open a channel to you on Night 1. To do otherwise would be stupid.

This makes me think that he must be in a different faction. Probably Bridgeburners, and he thinks he is talking to the Wizard?

Ultama, on 04 February 2017 - 09:39 AM, said:

Night one you were attacked once and night two twice. This to do with the announcement?

I have not been attacked as far as I know. So what is the difference between Fanderay and ultama on thread? Have you accused someone Ultama hasn't?

Tonight I use an attack on Lock or swap to 2 different alts? Like Pallid and Tulas?

Fanderay, on 04 February 2017 - 09:51 PM, said:

On balance, I think Lock is more likely than not to be a real player. If we target him though, I should submit my action first - that way if there are passive defenses that block the first attack my cheap attack will clear it (I asked PS about this at one point).

ST

Ultama, on 06 February 2017 - 02:48 PM, said:

How much HP do you have left?

Fanderay, on 06 February 2017 - 05:09 PM, said:

11HP with my main alt, 2HP with Telas. Will try and be more active with Telas today while he's still around.

Fanderay, on 06 February 2017 - 05:37 PM, said:

So I'm going to submit a provisional targeting Lock and Iparth Erule (I think IE is hiding where I'd expect a leader to be). After I've done that, your action should come afterwards and will avoid any defenses (hopefully).

Seem reasonable? Note this means the connection will go down for Day 4 - I think that's alright. We can use Announcement/Prestidigitation to tell each other who we're targeting.

ST

Ultama, on 06 February 2017 - 07:12 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 06 February 2017 - 05:37 PM, said:

So I'm going to submit a provisional targeting Lock and Iparth Erule (I think IE is hiding where I'd expect a leader to be). After I've done that, your action should come afterwards and will avoid any defenses (hopefully).

Seem reasonable? Note this means the connection will go down for Day 4 - I think that's alright. We can use Announcement/Prestidigitation to tell each other who we're targeting.

ST

Yes sounds good to me. Hmm any point in me distancing from Telas?

Ultama, on 06 February 2017 - 08:26 PM, said:

Pallid has revealed your faction.

Telas' anyway.

Interesting stuff. Maybe Trake is the right call?

Fanderay, on 06 February 2017 - 11:08 PM, said:

So the problem we have is that if Telas is lynched and is revealed to be an alt, it will damage Pallid's credibility and make it harder to lynch Trake/BO.

I think the solution is to argue that Pallid is probably Bridgeburners and either push a Trake lynch or try and find a leader. I actually think Alkend might be a good shout if we can swing it.

Fanderay, on 06 February 2017 - 11:23 PM, said:

I suspect Pallid (or controller) may have an ability that allows them to know when actions are performed on them. I guarded Sorrit last night with Telas. Going to try and start a train on him and see what happens.

[Sir Thursday]

Damn, I wish Ultama had told me properly about Haste! I could have put 2-and-2 together and figured out that Sorrit was on my team. I was thinking there was no way he was on our team, because he would have cast Haste on Ultama first opportunity and I hadn't heard about it, and that's why I attacked him on Night 6. Otherwise he would have survived another day and everything would have been very different.

ST

[Path-Shaper]

Ultama, on 07 February 2017 - 07:03 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 06 February 2017 - 11:23 PM, said:

I suspect Pallid (or controller) may have an ability that allows them to know when actions are performed on them. I guarded Sorrit last night with Telas. Going to try and start a train on him and see what happens.

Trake just replied as Pallid, same person. Not many extra alts so must be the leader Rock Gnome.

Ultama, on 07 February 2017 - 07:03 AM, said:

Do not forget I cannot even vote today.

Fanderay, on 07 February 2017 - 07:10 AM, said:

Can you not vote, or does your vote just not count?

Ultama, on 07 February 2017 - 08:09 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 07 February 2017 - 07:10 AM, said:

Can you not vote, or does your vote just not count?

Neither. No vote and it doesn't count.

Ultama, on 07 February 2017 - 12:27 PM, said:

Can Fanderay vote? Has he? I cannot vote, and time is runnning down.

Fanderay, on 07 February 2017 - 03:16 PM, said:

I've put my second vote in, but I don't know if it got in in time.

The connection is going to go down for tomorrow, will signal who I'm targeting via prestidigitation. I don't hold out much hope for Telas surviving until tomorrow, unfortunately.

Alkend is definitely not Fifth, so might make a good future target. Or just keep focusing down Lock, that'll pay off eventually.

ST

[Path-Shaper]

Bek Okhan:

Bek Okhan, on 01 February 2017 - 10:46 AM, said:

Night Action: Use Battleaxe on Sorrit

Bek Okhan, on 01 February 2017 - 10:51 AM, said:

Does Lock know I am in his team?

His latest post could start a shitstorm targeting him as leader

No, you know the leaders, the leaders don't know their teams.

Bek Okhan, on 02 February 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

Acid Breath on Sorrit

Bek Okhan, on 07 February 2017 - 04:44 AM, said:

battleaxe on trake

Bek Okhan, on 07 February 2017 - 04:44 AM, said:

Internet gone, playing from phone

Bek Okhan, on 07 February 2017 - 07:26 AM, said:

Night Action


Battleaxe on trake


If lynched


Battleaxe on Pallid


if killed


Battleaxe on Sorrit

Bek Okhan, on 07 February 2017 - 04:25 PM, said:

Activate Rage Day Action

Bek Okhan, on 07 February 2017 - 04:27 PM, said:

Night Action


Battleaxe on trake


If lynched


Battleaxe on Pallid


if killed


Battleaxe on Sorrit

Because you've Day Raged, you can't use a Night Action.

Bek Okhan, on 09 February 2017 - 04:26 PM, said:

Day Action: Activate Rage

Someone has cast Haste on you. You will be allowed to use the attack action one extra time tonight (so in your case, once), but will be unable to vote tomorrow.



I'm in the process of resolving night. If you get something to me before I'm done resolving, I'll accept the order. Otherwise, I'll have to process night without an action from you.



So sorry, had to resolve without you.

Unfortunately, you still can't vote during Day 6.

Bek Okhan, on 10 February 2017 - 02:24 AM, said:

Doesn't Juggernaut prevent these actions on me?

This isn't really a guard or stun, it's a Haste spell, so unfortunately the Unstoppable feature doesn't prevent it.

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit:

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

5 additional alts? Would have been fun if I had chosen mirror image...

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 04:25 PM, said:

Haste on Ultama

I'll probably shapeshift to eagle for the night but we'll see

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 04:26 PM, said:

Will Ultama get to know the name of the ability I'm targetting them with or alteast some flavour that has something to do with haste?

A player being targeted by a Haste Spell will receive a message along the lines of:

"Another player has cast a haste spell on you. You may make an additional attack action during the upcoming Night Cycle, but will be unable to vote during the next day cycle."

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 04:44 PM, said:

Omtose, on 30 January 2017 - 04:35 PM, said:

Of course given how many Barbarians are around, double-votes are likely to take care of those puppets.

Barbarians had vote-enhancing abilities? I thought they were just more vote-resistant, gotta check this

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 05:34 PM, said:

Thanks

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 07:12 PM, said:

Shapeshift eagle

Find Omtose (EM?)

for now

Fande ST?

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 10:30 PM, said:

Are Kesso and Omtose both EM's alts? I think Kesso is EM, or Khell

Or Ultama is Khell

I don't think any barbarian has ever had a puppet alt

Sorrit, on 30 January 2017 - 10:43 PM, said:

I was intending to keep atleast a bit lower than usually but I really wanted ti get the "double-time" through to Ultama so needed it to get lost between all the other shit

Sorrit, on 31 January 2017 - 09:56 AM, said:

Ultama has to be Tatts

Sorrit, on 31 January 2017 - 10:06 AM, said:

EU morning posters:
1)Ultama
2)Gamelon
3)Iparth
4)Lock
5)Fande
6)Alkend

Players naturally capable of posting EU morning:
1)Tatts
2)ST
3)Ando
4)Tatts
5)Mess
6)Khell

There are some fake alts in there for sure

Sorrit, on 31 January 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

What's he trying to say by that? It's almost as if it was a snippet from a conversation/role PM of Fandy

Sorrit, on 31 January 2017 - 04:33 PM, said:

I can't see the connection between ice cream joke and Fande's words

Sorrit, on 31 January 2017 - 04:42 PM, said:

Well

Shape shift eagle

Find Fanderay

Please consider it bolded for now, I'll do it later on the PC

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 06:16 AM, said:

Shape shift eagle

Find Telas

Because Ment.

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 06:16 AM, said:

Tulas - Khell?

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 10:39 AM, said:

Will Ultama not be allowed to place a vote at all or can he place it but it just won't count?

Gotta give me more here... Regarding what exactly?

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 03:15 PM, said:

Haste spell

Will anyone who I cast it at will not be allowed to place a vote on thread? Or their vote just won't count?

Not allowed to place a vote.


Telas used the ability "Chains of Carceri"

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 03:34 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 01 February 2017 - 03:32 PM, said:

You have been attacked for 7 points of damage, leaving you at 8 HP.

Ouch

So Telas is our heir, nice

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 03:50 PM, said:

Just found one funny thing, if you replace the "H" in haste with L, lasTe, the word will now consitute of the same letters as Telas, now I just gotta think up a way how to tell that to Ultama before someone kills me

Gotta signal Telas too. I wonder what does the spell do. According to the wiki it's something with monsters so perhaps he has a puppet alt and the spell is something related to that?

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 08:15 PM, said:

Gamelon - Ando
Iparth - Messenger
Bek - Bliss
Omtose - Kitsu
?

I feel like EM has more than one alt on thread

Is Alkend part of BBs? Is Fanderay a BB leader?

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 09:42 PM, said:

2) JPK - Omtose
3) Messremb - Iparth
4) EmperorMagus - ?
5) Mentalist - Telas
6) Andorion - Gamelon
7) Tattersail - Ultama
8) Lady Bliss - Bek
9) Sir Thursday - Fanderay
10) Khellendros - Tulas

That'd leave

Alkend, Kessobahn, Lock, Mockra, Pallid, Trake

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 09:57 PM, said:

Pallid - Bliss

Trake, on 01 February 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

I'm wondering now, why would Alkend and Gameleon stick their necks out to defend Omtose? Did they really want a 10 AP person walking around determining the winner of this game?

Found you EM!

Lock - Mess

Kess, Mockra - EM

?

Alkend - dunno

Sorrit, on 01 February 2017 - 10:16 PM, said:

I would also somehow like to ask Ultama if I should cast Haste on him again...

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 06:36 AM, said:

"The Age is just the beginning, it's time to make it beginning of Light. Cherish that."

Age as H and make it L(beginning of Light). I'm gonna post this just before the night because there's a good chance someone kills me.

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

Yeah I think that both Mockra and Kesso are EM's alts and I'm positive that Trake is. If that's the case then Mockra is puppet. Trake is laying very low and he isn't exactly nice, really not sure if that should be the main alt.

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 05:45 PM, said:

Haste on Ultama

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 06:00 PM, said:

Part of the reasoning is that EM would probably have more posts if he only had one alt.

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 06:05 PM, said:

Or Mockra is Bliss or Kitsu, again, whatever, I'm fine with lynching anyone who I don't know. It's just that I'd prefer to lynch actual players *shrug*

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 06:27 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 06:05 PM, said:

Or Mockra is Bliss or Kitsu, again, whatever, I'm fine with lynching anyone who I don't know. It's just that I'd prefer to lynch actual players *shrug*

Mockra's usage of "peons" make me think it's Bliss

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

If it really is her and Mockra really is a puppet, she should have taken advantage of the situation and somehow tried to play it like Mockra was indeed Trake's puppet

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

Mockra, on 02 February 2017 - 08:05 PM, said:

Alkend, on 02 February 2017 - 08:02 PM, said:

Mockra, on 02 February 2017 - 06:16 PM, said:

Otherwise, you guys are right. I'm a puppet, and lynching me will be nothing but a waste of your time.

I can confirm this by self-voting at l-1 if you'd like. My vote holds no weight.

Hang on just a moment here. You're making the claim of being a puppet. Everyone then piles off your train. That stinks.

All this "don't lynch puppets" BS can only be coming from puppets/puppeteers because no-one is hitting them at night and they give the puppeteers big advantages. Get rid of them any way possible.

Remove Vote

Vote Mockra

Ok. Waste the lynch today on something that has 1 hp. That makes sense.

Oh, and another thing... Did you like it when I touched you last night Kesso? I hope you did, because I'm really looking forward to it again tonight.

Y'all are gonna feel real stupid when you figure out who my real alt is.

I'm already happy because the shitstorm I've created is fucking fun as contrary to the "vote Mockra" "Vote Mockra" "vote mockra" plus nobody of my faction seems to be in danger so far so I don't really have to care about who gets lynched anyway. My shitty alting won't change that. And it's Bek.

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 08:21 PM, said:

My HPs though that is another matter...

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 09:29 PM, said:

Attack Trake

Sorrit, on 02 February 2017 - 10:17 PM, said:

attack Kessobahn

Someone has cast Haste on you. You may use your Staff attack in addition to what you had planned for your Night action (during Night 2), but unfortunately will not be able to vote during the next Day cycle (Day 3).

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 06:22 AM, said:

Uhm

Attack Lock

Extra attack Lock

I guess


I'm just hoping that nobody has cast anything that makes all the abilities I use target me

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 06:29 AM, said:

And that Lock hasn't got the ability that allows him to see who targeted him

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 06:52 AM, said:

Ment missed the "Chains of continuos posts" signal in the post right after a quote of Ultama, didn't he?

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 06:54 AM, said:

I should have cast haste on myself the first day when I had the find as my basic "attack"

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 07:02 AM, said:

Who the fuck is Alkend? Khell? Mess?

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 07:09 AM, said:

Or maybe it was Telas who cast Haste on me, I just wouldn't expect a barb to be able to do that

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 01:02 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 03 February 2017 - 01:10 AM, said:

Someone has cast Haste on you. You may use your Staff attack in addition to what you had planned for your Night action (during Night 2), but unfortunately will not be able to vote during the next Day cycle (Day 3).

Can I say on thread that I'm not allowed to place a vote?

Yep!


You have been guarded.

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 03:40 PM, said:

Ultama voted and his vote counted after I cast Haste on him D1, and considering I cast the spell during D1 I shouldn't have been guarded or anything

Honestly, I completely missed the Day 1 Haste usage... Never gave Ultama the good stuff, so can't give him the negative effects either. Extremely sorry! In the end, with the amount of extra votes placed on Mockra during Day 2 by the time I resolved, it wouldn't have made a difference.

From now on, if I don't respond to your Day action with a "Noted" comment, please poke me to ensure I've processed it.

Sorrit, on 03 February 2017 - 03:52 PM, said:

No big deal! Will do next time if there's one

Sorrit, on 06 February 2017 - 10:56 PM, said:

Just so you know I'm on little family vacation in Prague, and I admit I have a little less time for Mafiaz than expected, but primarily I reached my data limit halfway on our way here by letting my sister watch YouTube through my hotspot, I've never reached the limit before but now she made half of it vanish within a hour and half. And wi-fi here is not much better than my now very limited internet speed. Fuck, it's a bit annoying. Well I'll be home on Wednesday so if I make it there I'll be able to contribute normally then

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 04:29 PM, said:

Fuck I probably didn't even get my provisionals in did I

Nope, sorry.

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:

Attack Lock

for now then

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:

What I can shapeshifted tonight, scratch the last PM, will look into it

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 07:41 PM, said:

*wait

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 08:52 PM, said:

This is the kinda situation that I'd need to draw a relationship map to help me with under standing what's going on on thread

LoL!

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 09:54 PM, said:

Is Alkend EM's alt?

I'm really behind on all of this

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 10:46 PM, said:

Considering I told you to scratch that, thank you!

We came out relatively good it looks like

Sorrit, on 07 February 2017 - 11:15 PM, said:

Attack Lock

Just in case

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 12:54 AM, said:

Shapeshift to bat

Drain bite Iparth

Is Alkend my heir? I thought that at one point but dismissed that notion for some reason

This isn't looking good if he is and I would be in quite a shitty situation

Or he isn't and it's still shitty

I will probably start using my Haste at the end of the day on probable enemies

Would you accept preliminary provisionals regarding haste? Like if someone gave you a provisional at moment when they haven't been targeted by Haste during that day cycle that would say something like "if I have a chance to perform additional attack target X" or "if I'm targeted by Haste target X as my additional attack"?

The reread coming tommorow

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 01:00 AM, said:

same but target Kesso instead

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 01:09 AM, said:

Reason why I'm not immediately distancing is that it mighteave Alkend in the light after Ultama died, especially if Lock outs Alkend as possible master of Telas and was right about Ultama, I'm fucjed if Alkend was my heir and I'm left alone

I'm also not immediately counteracting because I don't want to make it look like there's a lot of resistance and in case Alkend is not the heir

Gotta make up my mind, I know

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 10:23 AM, said:

same but target Bek Okhan

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 01:43 PM, said:

I've just realised that my earlier alting fiasco started Trake's shitstorm and now can also be used to discredit Lock, that's nice

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 02:19 PM, said:

Alkend
Bek Okhan
Fanderay
Iparth Erule
Kessobahn
Lock
Tulas Shorn

So only 2 puppets left now. Probably none of them in my faction.

Tulas and Bek are laying real low

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 02:49 PM, said:

No Alkend ain't my heir

Alkend
Fanderay
Lock
Iparth
Bek Okhan

Here are alts with eastern posting times, atleast one of them is a puppet

NA times:

Kessobahn
Tulas

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 03:07 PM, said:

D3 end

12 Players still alive: Alkend, Bek Okhan, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Pallid, Sorrit, Telas, Trake, Tulas Shorn, Ultama

1 Vote for Pallid ( Iparth Erule )
1 Vote for Sorrit ( Telas )
5 Votes for Trake ( Kessobahn, Fanderay, Alkend, Bek Okhan, Lock )
1 Vote for Bek Okhan ( Trake )

Players not voted: Pallid, Sorrit, Tulas Shorn, Ultama


D4 end

4 Votes for Trake ( Ultama, Bek Okhan, Telas, Fanderay )
4 Votes for Telas ( Kessobahn, Trake, Alkend, Iparth Erule )

Players not voted: Lock, Pallid, Sorrit, Tulas Shorn

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 03:19 PM, said:

One of the puppets is the BH's clockwork toy

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 03:22 PM, said:

I'll just

Shapeshift bat
drain bite Lock

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 03:28 PM, said:

Alkend

Iparth Erule

Kessobahn
Tulas Shorn

BH: Fande, BO +1 (IE)

5th: Kess/Tulas

BB: Lock +1 (IE)



Alkend's patterns might suggest he's a puppet trying to hide by having different voting patterns from his master. The master might be Lock, in that case his hiding capabilities would make me think it's Khell

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 03:29 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 12:54 AM, said:

Would you accept preliminary provisionals regarding haste? Like if someone gave you a provisional at moment when they haven't been targeted by Haste during that day cycle that would say something like "if I have a chance to perform additional attack target X" or "if I'm targeted by Haste target X as my additional attack"?

Did you miss this or is it the kinda thing I'm not getting an answer to?

Sorry, didn't notice it!

No, I wouldn't accept that kind of provisional.

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 04:52 PM, said:

Yes I'm dumping my leader in order to use this to my advantage later when our heir is in trouble

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

cast Haste on BO

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 07:46 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 09 February 2017 - 06:45 PM, said:

Unfortunately your attack missed so you do not gain HP.

That's probably the lightfoot halfling's passive, so Lock's probably the BB paladin regular, dammit

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 07:46 PM, said:

Also, where's all the deaths at?

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 08:24 PM, said:

In case of the a lightfoot halfling's passive and similar abilities, how do you determine which attack comes first if there's more of them?

Attack Lock

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 08:33 PM, said:

I'd have sworn that Alkend is Ment if this wasn't D&D and I'm still unable to let that thought go even now

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 08:43 PM, said:

I just hope the two HPs I lost by missing the attack will be worth the find that Lock's probably just the BBs' elite, I can now withstand 3 3Point attack just as I would with the 2 additional HPs but any single additional point of damage I take will kill me.

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 10:33 PM, said:

I wanted to be the one to hammer so that I can cast haste on Bek as late as possible

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 02:39 AM, said:

cast Haste on Lock

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 10:51 AM, said:

My heir has guard which is good, but he probably doesn't know that I am who I am. I'm obviously saving my guard for some hopefully crucial moment and I'm targeting Lock in hope that someone else is doing so too

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 10:53 AM, said:

I could use the Chains of Carceri reference from earlier to get whoever my heir is to believe me at some point

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 10:57 AM, said:

I can finally use my eagle find the next night but I'm not sure if there is enough time for me to wait until next Shapeshift night with the use of guard

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 10:58 AM, said:

There will have to be I guess, the information from the find can be key

But I gotta see how the night plays out first

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 11:01 AM, said:

I've just realised that Telas' guard was probably the CoC ability and associated only with the alt, damn

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

So if that's true then

BBs: IE, Lock

Alkend, Fanderay, Kessobahn, Tulas Shorn - BH leader, BH puppet, BB puppet, My leader

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 04:28 PM, said:

Alkend's the BB puppet?

And Fande+Tulas are the BH leader+puppet?

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

Shapeshift Eagle

Find Fanderay

You shape-shifted on Night 5, so can't use it again on Night 6.

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 06:31 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

Shapeshift Eagle

Find Fanderay

You shape-shifted on Night 5, so can't use it again on Night 6.

That was N4?

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 08:24 PM, said:

In case of the a lightfoot halfling's passive and similar abilities, how do you determine which attack comes first if there's more of them?

Attack Lock

This was last ngiht I believe?

On Night 5 you shapeshifted into a bat and bit Lock, but missed.

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:43 PM, said:

Aaah N6, was already getting in provisionals for N7

for N6 this provisional still stands:

Sorrit, on 09 February 2017 - 08:24 PM, said:

In case of the a lightfoot halfling's passive and similar abilities, how do you determine which attack comes first if there's more of them?

Attack Lock

Okay, noted!

[Path-Shaper]

Lock:

Lock, on 29 January 2017 - 11:41 PM, said:

Basically, I've gone for difficult to kill, easy to lynch. Gulp.

Lock, on 31 January 2017 - 12:52 AM, said:

I can't remember, is it you can only do one night action per night? So, for example, I couldn't attack and do aura of warding at the same time?

1 action and 1 bonus action per cycle (day or night, though your actions will say if they're usable in day or night)

Passives are always active and are triggered by something in their description. Your Aura of Warding, for example, is always active. If you had chosen another aura spell, you would have had to choose which one was active at any given time, but a passive ability isn't an action or a bonus action.

And there are very few of them, but some actions are Free Actions, so they can be used for free whenever they are valid for.

And finally, there are a few Reaction abilities as well, which are triggered if a player is hit by an attack or otherwise hurtful ability.

This is all in the D&D Info thread, btw!

Tulas Shorn, on 01 February 2017 - 01:39 AM, said:

Attack and Thunderous Smite Fanderay for now, for no real reason other than having a provisional.

Lock, on 01 February 2017 - 05:28 PM, said:

So I took 2 points of damage but could have been 3 (or more if more than one source) without Aura of Warding. Or even more if it was weapon damage and my Dueling took off another point. And presumably I did 4 weapon damage and 1 magic damage to Fanderay (minus any protections they have). I know they're not on my team now as I haven't broken my oath, and they can't be the other Paladin.

Tulas Shorn, on 01 February 2017 - 11:39 PM, said:

Announcement: Three revelations about Fanderay have been forwarded to me. Fanderay wets the bed. Fanderay is not a Bonehunter. Fanderay's favorite color is vermillion.

Lock, on 02 February 2017 - 04:27 PM, said:

Do you have a person helping you mod? I'd have liked to have that announcement out a while back, but oh well.

Attack and Thunderous Smite Fanderay again I guess.

Sorry, had an extremely busy day at work, didn't get a chance to even get onto the forums. I'm home now, and catching up.

Lock, on 03 February 2017 - 01:07 AM, said:

Okey dokey, I guess it's Misty Step and Thunderous Smite on Fanderay then.

Thunderous Smite would only work if you attacked, and Misty Step isn't an attack, so it'll just have no effect.

Lock, on 03 February 2017 - 01:08 AM, said:

Unless Thunderous Smite is not actually a bonus attack in itself, in which case just Misty Step then!

Lock, on 03 February 2017 - 01:09 AM, said:

lol, yeah I came to that conclusion. Ok thanks, just the misty stepping then.

Tulas Shorn, on 03 February 2017 - 10:17 AM, said:

Actually, screw it. Let's Attack and Thunderous Smite Fanderay again while we still have a good amount of HP left.

Lock, on 06 February 2017 - 04:18 PM, said:

Misty Step for now, though I am tempted to attack Bek to see if I can become an Oathbreaker

Lock, on 07 February 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

6 damage after misty step, aura of warding, and duelling defences? Is ever single bastard targeting me?

There was no error in the damage that you took, I did take into account all your defenses. So yeah, you were hit pretty hard last night.

Lock, on 07 February 2017 - 05:42 PM, said:

Misty Step again. Team, what remains of it, doesn't seem to gel too well. And I've been so busy I've only paid attention for about twenty minutes per day. Not my finest game of leadership.

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 10:12 AM, said:

The ol' Misty Step again for now.

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 07:08 PM, said:

Ugh, I should have said either attack or heal if Ultama's lynched after he revealed he's the one attacking me. Just not thinking this game.

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 08:28 PM, said:

Attack Alkend and Thundering Smite Alkend.

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 10:26 PM, said:

My hope is that Alkend is the other paladin

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 10:27 PM, said:

But maybe I should heal up first. Really wish I had done that last night.

[Path-Shaper]

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 10:48 PM, said:

Alright, Lay on Hands for all 10HP on myself. (If I can't heal myself then just do the Attack Alkend thing above).

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 10:50 PM, said:

And send out the announcement:

Iparth Erule is the leader of the Bridgeburners.

Lock, on 09 February 2017 - 10:57 PM, said:

Actually, if I can't heal myself, target Kessobahn with my attacks.

Someone has cast haste on you. You can use the attack action one additional time during the upcoming Night phase, but will be unable to vote during Day 7.

I'm taking my time in resolving Day and then will take my time resolving Night so that you have a bit of time to get your extra attack order in to me. Please let me know!

Unfortunately you can't use Lay on Hands on yourself, only other players. Guess I'll need to make that clearer in the description.

Lock, on 10 February 2017 - 03:21 PM, said:

Haste is something I might see a Rogue being able to do - does the BB leader think I'm theirs, or is that just wishful thinking? Probably the latter.

Tempting, but no, a vote is too valuable now...though I might pretend I can't vote.

Just regular attack and thundering smite on Kesso, please.

No no, you don't have a choice. Haste has been cast on you. You are not allowed to vote during Day 7.

Take the extra attack, you have to suffer the negative effects whether you take it or not.

Lock, on 10 February 2017 - 03:59 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 03:26 PM, said:

Lock, on 10 February 2017 - 03:21 PM, said:

Haste is something I might see a Rogue being able to do - does the BB leader think I'm theirs, or is that just wishful thinking? Probably the latter.

Tempting, but no, a vote is too valuable now...though I might pretend I can't vote.

Just regular attack and thundering smite on Kesso, please.

No no, you don't have a choice. Haste has been cast on you. You are not allowed to vote during Day 7.

Take the extra attack, you have to suffer the negative effects whether you take it or not.

Oh. Sigh. Extra super double ultra hyper attack Kesso then.

Lock, on 10 February 2017 - 05:13 PM, said:

Obviously, I have little to no idea if IE is the BB leader or not. But I'm hoping it creates some discussion and attention on them.

Tulas Shorn, on 10 February 2017 - 07:33 PM, said:

And only now does it occur to me that I should have spread the attacks around to have a better chance of hitting Paladin. Urgh.

Tulas Shorn, on 10 February 2017 - 10:38 PM, said:

Please send the announcement:

To the remaining Fifth. Don't bother voting. That way no possibility we help lynch each other and hand victory to BBs.

Tulas Shorn, on 10 February 2017 - 10:40 PM, said:

Attack Iparth and Thundering Smite Alkend.

Lock, on 13 February 2017 - 04:11 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 11 February 2017 - 05:37 PM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 10 February 2017 - 10:40 PM, said:

Attack Iparth and Thundering Smite Alkend.

Thunderous Smite only modifies your attack, so they both have to target the same person.

Fine, both on Iparth then.

Lock, on 13 February 2017 - 04:15 PM, said:

Please send the announcement:

Quote

To the remaining Fifth. Don't bother voting. That way no possibility we help lynch each other and hand victory to BBs. And if you have any way to defend yourself at night, do it the next two nights.

[Path-Shaper]

Tulas Shorn, on 15 February 2017 - 07:25 PM, said:

Why can't I log into Lock?

Someone dominated Lock.

I tried to PM your main box, but it was full.


I assume the Rewind Time thing was just to fuck with people? Like, I don't see anything that gives you any such ability. Am I wrong?

Tulas Shorn, on 16 February 2017 - 10:23 PM, said:

Haha yes, I thought I was going to be dead and the game over so I was having some fun...then I realised from the convos that something else was going on.

[Path-Shaper]

Lock, on 17 February 2017 - 03:13 PM, said:

Urgh, now I have to wash this stink off. Will I ever feel clean again?

So I took no damage last night?

So with the death of Alkend (I was convinced earlier in the game, until yesterday really, that they were an alt, so I never thought to target them in my quest to become an Oathbreaker) I can no longer have the opportunity to resurrect. Which means it comes down to not being lynched, and not being killed in the night.

Let's do Attack and Thunderous Smite on Fanderay for now. If lynched, on Iparth Erule.

Lock, on 17 February 2017 - 03:22 PM, said:

Actually, let's Nature's Wrath Fanderay/Iparth. They might have a big ability they want to use first which needs multi-day recharging, and if we go back into day, then maybe I can quickly catch them out by voting night and attacking.

Lock, on 17 February 2017 - 06:16 PM, said:

It has occurred to me that Fanderay, as a Warlock, could very well have been the one to possess me and not Mess as I thought...but in that case, well played that person!

Lock, on 17 February 2017 - 06:16 PM, said:

It has occurred to me that Fanderay, as a Warlock, could very well have been the one to possess me and not Mess as I thought...but in that case, well played that person!

Lock, on 17 February 2017 - 06:17 PM, said:

Nature's Wrath Fanderay/Iparth actually. I guess blocking any action of one person is better than avoiding an attack but not any other kind of action.

Lock, on 17 February 2017 - 06:42 PM, said:

What a joke.

If Fandy wins, well played.

If he loses, I am going to rant at him so so much.

[Path-Shaper]

Alkend:

Alkend, on 01 February 2017 - 07:16 AM, said:

Attack Gamelon

Assuming they're not a fake alt I make that 5 damage (go on, the Chanel Divinity will double the Divine Smite too for 6 damage, you know I want you to ) and a Spellcaster-or-not find. If they are fake then 6 (or 7...)

I guess that's my actions for the next 3+ Nights sorted out...

Alkend, on 01 February 2017 - 07:20 AM, said:

Oh and if I kill Gamelon with my attack I'd like to request a picture on thread to accompany resolution. A kitten savaging something fruity/flowery that looks a little like Gamelons avatar.

Why? Because I swore an Oath of Vengeance and want to make him proud. Or, you know, rant.

Okay, so you can only attack OR do the Spellcaster find as both are considered an action, and you only get one action per cycle.

Unless you tell me otherwise before I finish resolution, I'm going to go with

Attack + Divine Smite.

You would be able to use Vow of Enmity with the above two as it's a Bonus Action, so if you'd like to do that, let me know. Otherwise, I go with the above.

Alkend, on 01 February 2017 - 06:46 PM, said:

Yeah include the Vow too please. Sorry I missread to think I could stack them all.

Alkend, on 01 February 2017 - 06:48 PM, said:

Hmm already resolved I see, guess too late or ineffective!

Do the same again tonight please

Alkend, on 01 February 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

The crashing boom thing was a Paladin ability I thought but I'm the only one. So who hit Fanderay?

Well, you aren't the only Paladin, so...

Alkend, on 01 February 2017 - 07:29 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 01 February 2017 - 07:09 PM, said:

Well, you aren't the only Paladin, so...

Oh! I read the whole list and missed that one...

Alkend, on 02 February 2017 - 08:46 PM, said:

Just to confirm:

Attack Gamelon with everything that'll stack

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 02:53 PM, said:

Your vote order at lynch is bizarre

Yeah, I don't know WTF is up with Mafia Manager...

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 02:57 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 03 February 2017 - 02:55 PM, said:

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 02:53 PM, said:

Your vote order at lynch is bizarre

Yeah, I don't know WTF is up with Mafia Manager...

Not doing something funny with fake alts is it?
Manual correction called for before someone comments?

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 04:05 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 01 February 2017 - 02:55 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 01 February 2017 - 01:55 PM, said:

vote Omtose

15 Players still alive: Alkend, Bek Okhan, Fanderay, Gamelon, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Mockra, Omtose, Pallid, Sorrit, Telas, Trake, Tulas Shorn, Ultama

7 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.

9 Votes for Omtose ( Fanderay, Kessobahn, Pallid, Gamelon, Alkend, Ultama, Lock, Sorrit, Iparth Erule )

Players not voted: Bek Okhan, Mockra, Omtose, Telas, Trake, Tulas Shorn


Omtose has been lynched. He was Redshirt the Clanless, the Wood Elf Barbarian.

Path-Shaper, on 03 February 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

Gamelon, on 03 February 2017 - 09:39 AM, said:

Vote Mockra

14 Players still alive: Alkend, Bek Okhan, Fanderay, Gamelon, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Mockra, Pallid, Sorrit, Telas, Trake, Tulas Shorn, Ultama

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

2 Votes for Trake ( Kessobahn, Bek Okhan )
9 Votes for Mockra ( Ultama, Trake, Alkend, Pallid, Telas, Tulas Shorn, Mockra, Sorrit, Gamelon )

Players not voted: Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Lock


Mockra has been lynched. He was Grrarp One-Balled the Dragonborn Barbarian.

Initial Alts:
Alkend, Bek Okhan, Fanderay, Gamelon, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Mockra, Omtose, Pallid, Sorrit, Telas, Trake, Tulas Shorn, Ultama

Blue = Real
Red = Fake Vote Counts
Purple = Fake Vote Not Counts

The two to four with no vote weight a selection from:
Alkend, Pallid, Sorrit, Ultama on both trains
Kessobahn, Lock on 1st
Telas, Trake Tulas Shorn on 2nd
Bek Okhan neither train

More data needed.

[Path-Shaper]

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 04:13 PM, said:

Elemental with vote was 4AP of the Heir Hamatsa Haidas 5AP so they're pretty neutered now. True Strike likely ability left so double vote on targeted player.


Sir Cecil Crushington has attacked Fanderay twice so potentially Oath of Vengeance taken. 10AP breakdown could be:
Thunderous Smite 1AP
Fanderay didn't vote so could have Staggering Smite in play (8AP) if no vote from him today then likely, also if hit again Oath likely.

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 04:36 PM, said:

Throw everything at Bek Okhan

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 05:13 PM, said:

Alkend, on 03 February 2017 - 04:13 PM, said:

Elemental with vote was 4AP of the Heir Hamatsa Haidas 5AP so they're pretty neutered now. True Strike likely ability left so double vote on targeted player.

D'oh, they're my faction. Damn. Oh well! Better try to distract any master hunting...

Alkend, on 06 February 2017 - 09:48 PM, said:

Kill Lock

Alkend, on 07 February 2017 - 05:06 PM, said:

Attack Lock

Alkend, on 07 February 2017 - 05:56 PM, said:

So over what timeframe do I become an oathbreaker? If I attack someone tonight can I dominate tomorrow night? Does the mere act of submitting an order that would break it cause me to swap so I can instead dominate tonight?

The order has to go through in order for you to be considered as having broken your oath. So you could submit an order tonight, if it goes through (i.e. you're not guarded), then you will have broken your Oath, and all your spells and abilities (save your Lay on Hands and Attack) will be replaced with the Oathbreaker abilities appropriate for your faction role.

Alkend, on 07 February 2017 - 06:54 PM, said:

Figured as much but thought I'd check there wasn't a shortcut I could take, ta.

If Trake really is on my faction they're a pain in the ass.

Alkend, on 07 February 2017 - 09:03 PM, said:

Dammit.

If Trake, Iparth Erule or Pallid are lynched Attack Telas

If someone else is lynched Attack Lock


I seriously hope that Trake is the fake alt but doubt it.

Alkend, on 07 February 2017 - 09:10 PM, said:

Provisional NA for the night after in event of a speed lynch

If not oathbreaker - same orders as this Night, if Lock dead then Fanderay
If oathbreaker:

Quote

Oathbreaker

An Oathbreaker is a paladin who breaks his or her sacred oaths to pursue some dark ambition or serve an evil power. Whatever light burned in the paladin's heart has been extinguished. Only darkness remains.

All your skills and abilities (except for your Lay on Hands and Attack action) are replaced with the following:

Aura of Hate (Passive) Cost - 0 AP: This aura is always active. You and your party members always take 1 additional damage from all incoming sources of damage and do 1 additional magic damage on all your attacks.

Dominate Person (Night Action) Cost - 3 AP: Once per night, you may choose a target player. You control their alt for the following day cycle. You cannot choose the same alt twice.

Dominate Fanderay

You have been guarded, which has prevented you from breaking your Oath.

Alkend, on 07 February 2017 - 10:24 PM, said:

Fuckers

Alkend, on 08 February 2017 - 09:14 AM, said:

Attack Fanderay

In the event of speed lynching my orders for each successive night are:

If I'm not Oathbroken Attack whichever is still alive at the time this order: Fanderay, Tulas Shorn, Ultama, Kessobahn, Sorrit

If/when I'm Oathbroken, Dominate in the order: Ultama, Fanderay, Bek Okhan, Lock, Sorrit, Tulas Shorn


The domination will hopefully stall speed-lynches when I'm asleep and allow us to partially control the lynch.

Question: If I throw 10HP of Heal at someone can it take them above their starting HP?

Yes

Alkend, on 08 February 2017 - 07:30 PM, said:

Lock better not get lynched, they're my easy Oathbreaker for the moment if I'm not Guarded again. Getting lynched will set me back a Day

Alkend, on 09 February 2017 - 07:20 PM, said:

Am I Oathbroken?

Yes, sorry bout that!

Give me a minute and I'll update your Role PM.

Alkend, on 09 February 2017 - 07:45 PM, said:

Cheers!

Dominate Lock, if lynched Sorrit, Fanderay, Kessobahn

Alkend, on 09 February 2017 - 11:49 PM, said:

Swap Sorrit and lock in the above order please

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 04:26 PM, said:

*cough* passwordforsorrit *cough*

I haven't even begun to resolve Night yet, calm your tits!

[Path-Shaper]

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 06:01 PM, said:

Sorrits just had a big target painted on him by IE, I need to make sure a Sorrit lynch sticks

Also, divert away from IE...

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 06:26 PM, said:

At least kick Sorrit out his alt...

Unfortunately Sorrit has died before you could take control.

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 06:54 PM, said:

Dozy fucker

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

Dominate Fanderay, if lynched Lock, Kessobahn, Tulas Shorn

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 07:29 PM, said:

Blasted Lock and Kessobahn have been both on or off of successful lynch trains. One of their votes looks like it doesn't count but whose? Kessobahn got hit by Cecil but could be a BP'd fake. Sorrit used Haste on Lock?

Dominate Fanderay, if lynched Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

Alkend, on 13 February 2017 - 05:19 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 13 February 2017 - 05:11 PM, said:

So, I think we are better off getting rid of the bonehunters leader since he could possibly bring a teammate back from the dead. There hasn't been an announcement saying that is no longer possible, so it is still out on the table.

I'll let you all in on what I know, and have figured out.

First of all, Fanderay is a real boy. I read part of his pm and he has an Entropic ward that ensures that any player targeting him with a night action will take 1 additional damage from all sources during the same night cycle.

Second, I reread the thread, and Tulas has never voted. I'm pretty sure he is the clockwork toy since his votes don't count. When I reread, I saw a lot of similarities between Fanderay's and Tulas's posts which convince me they are the same person.

vote Fanderay

First up, IE is going to get themselves killed.

Secondly, Fanderay isn't Cecil the Paladin. Not only would they not attack themselves for the booming sounds N1 & N2 but that Entropic Ward isn't a Paladin ability. Of course they're not to know that.

If Lock/Kessobahn are retarded they'll vote for Fanderay and I can lay a 3rd vote and hope that Dominate targets a real alt.

Alkend, on 13 February 2017 - 05:34 PM, said:

Discounting Tulas (again with the if they're someones primary they're a bastard) then Lock must be Cecil due to the simple fact that Fanderay and Kessobahn have had the Paladin Booms on them.

Dominate Lock, if lynched Fanderay, Kessobahn, Tulas Shorn

Alkend, on 14 February 2017 - 09:52 PM, said:

In the event of speed lynched, night votes etc cycle through surviving alts in above order.

Alkend, on 15 February 2017 - 08:08 PM, said:

Hmm. Do I Dominate Fanderay or cut down numbers?

Attack Tulas

You're fake, fucker. You're also the Toy.

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 01:19 AM, said:

Gnome Paladin
Leader of the Bonehunters / HP = 25 23 17 11 10 9

As a rock gnome, you have a natural inventiveness and hardiness beyond that of other gnomes. As a rock gnome, you automatically have the following ability:

Clockwork Toy (Passive): You control 1 additional alt. Its votes don’t count, it cannot attack at night, and it only has 1 HP, however its existence will affect the amount of people needed in order to lynch a player. If it is lynched or otherwise killed, it will CF as a Clockwork Toy.

Announcement: Once per day, you may have PS post an on-thread message from you. You can say anything you want in this message.

Lay on Hands (Night Action) Cost - 0 AP: You have a pool of 10 HP. Each night, you may choose to heal one player for 1 or more HP, until you have used up all 10 HP in your pool.

Attack (Night Action) Cost - 0 AP: You attack with your weapon. Target player takes 3 weapon damage.

Dueling: You carry a dueling saber. All weapon attacks made by you do 1 additional damage. All weapon attacks targeting you do 1 less damage.

Thunderous Smite (Bonus Night Action) Cost - 1 AP: The first attack on which you hit your target after casting this spell does 1 additional magic damage. The night scene will also include the following: "A loud crashing boom emanates from Player".



Oath of the Ancients

The Oath of the Ancients is as old as the race of elves and the rituals of the druids. Sometimes called fey knights, green knights, or horned knights, paladins who swear this oath cast their lot with the side of the light in the cosmic struggle against darkness because they love the beautiful and life-giving things of the world, not necessarily because they believe in principles of honor, courage, and justice.

Condition - Shelter the Light: You may not cause damage to other paladins, clerics, members of your own party, or any non-magical, non-player controlled creature. If you do so, you will lose half of your current HP and become an Oathbreaker (further information about being an Oathbreaker paladin will be shared with you if this happens).


Channel Divinity - Nature's Wrath (Night Action) Cost - 1 AP: Instead of your attack, you may guard target player. Their night action will automatically fail.

Misty Step (Night Action) Cost - 3 AP: If you use this as an action, the first two attacks targeting you during the night cycle will miss.

Aura of Warding (Passive Action) Cost - 5 AP: Only one aura spell/ability can be active at a time. While this aura is active, all members of your party take 1 less damage from all sources of damage. (This counts once for each attack made against you, not once for all attacks made against you).

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 01:25 AM, said:

If timer is reset to before Day - Dominate Lock

If just to start of Day - Attack Tulas as previously

If not effective to a previous Day then second set stand for the moment, *shouldn't* be a lynch...

Now if Tulas is a Real Boy then fair enough, but if he should die with Lock or get NK'd in the phase immediately after we lynched Lock then he's past the time he can submit the order as Day ended with Locks lynch and Night was being processed.

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 11:26 AM, said:

Gah this is going to be messy

[Path-Shaper]

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 12:49 PM, said:

Dammit I need to see the results of Tulas' move before I can plan properly. Orders stand for now.

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 12:51 PM, said:

Oh and you totally should have rounded my HP up not down

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 07:04 PM, said:

Dominate Fanderay

Alkend, on 16 February 2017 - 08:51 PM, said:

Attack Kessobahn with everything

Alkend, on 17 February 2017 - 12:34 AM, said:

Dominate Fanderay

Alkend, on 17 February 2017 - 01:20 AM, said:

Out of interest, the order directing my fixed vote did go in before the hammer landed, right?

Yes, though really there's no reason I should answer that.

Alkend, on 17 February 2017 - 03:31 AM, said:

Yeah I know, thanks for doing so though - saves me ranting away... ;-)