Path-Shaper, on 02 July 2016 - 01:21 AM, said:
Buffy: I didn't say I'd never slay another vampire. It's not like I have all these fluffy bunny feelings for them, I'm just not gonna get way extracurricular with it.
Merrid has been killed. She was a vampire named Darla, played by EmperorMagus.
Telas, on 04 July 2016 - 10:50 PM, said:
Okay, after running around most of the day, I gots me some free time. Not home, mind, so playing off my phone and so no quotes unless I go back, and then it'll be single-post quotes only.
Good job to whomever offed Merrid, a powerful named vamp is not good thing to be around.
Now, what I thought was interesting is the "sire of Angel" bit. I'm gonna throw some noob questions (my data cap for the month is almost dead. Only thing I'm using it for is mafiaz, which is why I can't just go and wiki stuff myself).
Angel in what little of Season 1 that I saw was Buffy's "other" mentor- Giles was the official teacher, while Angel was the tall, dark and handsome, who dropped by to give hints and tips, and occasionally lend a helping hand. And it's discovered fairly early on he's a vamp, but a "good" one, in that he wants other vamps dead. I didn't ever see the spinoff, but also assuming he was a good guy/demon there.
So now, the question becomes: was he a good guy in this set up (if he is a part of it)? Would he have known who Darla was? I'm trying to wrap my head around the mafia mechanics in this scenario.
Those are just thoughts out loud. I'm also gonna look why AF may have been a target, and where to go from here. Fanderay, KF and Togg seem to be pretty clearly anti-vamp, whether students or smth else. So I'm inclined to see who was poking them for now.
Luckily I peeked in on thread over the weekend. I note that the CF has been edited to remove "sire of Angel" by PS. For those who watched, Angel and not Angelus is very indicative of the alignment of that character and that the character is present in game.
For those that didn't: Liam was bitten in Ireland a while back and took the name Angelus from what his little sister thought he was when he returned to visit (and eat) his family after having been dead & buried. Also the distant past he ate a load of gypsies which narked them off. In revenge they cursed him to have his soul back to his undead vampire body which also returned conscience etc. Changed his name to Angel as a gesture of hos he has changed. Said soul curse is lifted when Angel has a moment of "pure happiness." Angel has such a "moment" with Buffy late in Series 2, shedding his soul and becoming evil again. Of course as you'd expect, over the next few series he gets his soul back, gets killed by Buffy, returns from hell, gets his own series. You know, the usual stuff.
In game terms he's either with the Scoobies or has non-conflicting VCs and is unlikely to know what alt she was in because he's not on Team Bad this series.
In other posts, I see that Kessobahn is flailing madly and making some curious defences for not voting for Merrid. What occurs to me here is that anyone on a team knows that it is likely they'll have to throw someone under the bus or at least look like they're willing to in order to distract attention from themselves. Kesso has failed utterly to do this leaving me wondering if he actually wanted the no-lynch. Is there precedent for someone with a role only getting a kill if there is no lynch? Either that or he's part of a 3rd faction that gains from no-lynch.
Furthermore, the insistence on the role of a Guard being in game is likely indicative of off-thread knowledge. Someone been guarding you Kessobahn?
Fanderay catches my eye for being so quick to forgive Kesso not putting a vote down in
#242.
Kessobahn, on 05 July 2016 - 05:17 PM, said:
And yeah, we benefit from killing a vampire, so Merrid going down isn’t a bad outcome. But I think it could have been much better, because after Kadagar’s reveal, Merrid was a dead man anyway. And we arrive in D4 without ever confirming anyone from another faction, which puts them at a HUGE advantage.
Sorry, you seem to be claiming some knowledge of the functioning of the Vampire faction here. Because to those without a vamp PM for all we know every vamp can bite (recruit) therefore once you know who one is you kill them to stop them spreading. Leaving them alive even an extra day is bad. Since you're not thinking that you must have some pretty direct knowledge as to what they can do.
Kessobahn, on 05 July 2016 - 05:17 PM, said:
And finally, Korlat and Emurlahn, two players I wanted to give a closer look.
[...]
There’s more content for Emurlahn. With the 3rd vote on Anomandaris, they pretty much kicked off the train but it was so early in the game I wouldn’t read into it too much. But then we have something interesting:
[...]
Emurlahn, on 29 June 2016 - 08:51 AM, said:
It's almost like Demelain knew there'd be no kill isn't it. For the moment I'm inclined to vote that way but am going to see how day develops before taking it any further.
Anyone want to speculate as to why there was no NK?
As obvious a target as Demelain was, you need to really work your imagination to read from that posts that Dem was speculating no NK. So here’s a red flag. Then there’s commentary about people reading too much into the fluff posts from PS (but are they?). Then Emurlahn boards the Dem train, next they vote me because of my mention of recruiting, and finally jump to Merrid train. All of the votes actually have some merit.
You had me all excited for a moment. That wasn't really that interesting at all.
Telas, on 05 July 2016 - 11:56 PM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 05 July 2016 - 11:29 PM, said:
My point with the above question being, is there some kind of evidence for that right now, or does this seem just a distraction?
1) if all we have is vampires and School, it's kinda hard to see it as a "faction" game
2) The OP mentioned "vampires, demons, and forces of darkness"
The rest is conjecture beyond this point.
Technically vampires are both demons and forces of darkness...
Vote Kessobahn