[Grasp]

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 04:45 PM, said:

vote grasp.

For suggesting a paired scum mechanic that requires signaling to identify each other while not seeing the logical fallacy of his purposefully misleading speculation.

Nice twist on what I said. What I actually said was it looked liked MAYBE paired scum voting each other on thread after discussing it in off thread comms to maybe distance from each other.

Pay more attention, or are you purposely trying to mislead the game?

[Denesmet]

When is fake signaling or joke voting each other advantageous for both parties concerned? And off thread coms to discuss this action beforehand? Logic fail. Seems like you are digging for a rational rationale and coming up with cat shit.

[Grasp]

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 05:40 PM, said:

When is fake signaling or joke voting each other advantageous for both parties concerned? And off thread coms to discuss this action beforehand? Logic fail. Seems like you are digging for a rational rationale and coming up with cat shit.

Bullshit.

You are putting a spin on this that is not there. What is your motive?

What ticked my radar was the timing. Two minutes between posts. Look for yourself.

[Denesmet]

Looking for someone overdoing the townie angle and using poor mechanistic speculation to buff up their street cred. You fit the bill.

Voting for someone before they are on thread stands out. Roled players stereotypically are more careful. More logical, AF is at the start of the player list.

[Kadagar Fant]

Grasp, on 23 November 2015 - 10:15 PM, said:

<snip>

anyhoo I am a bit suspicious of the interaction of Hanas and AF right of the bat. The quick voting for each other then the vote removals. AF hadn't even posted when Hanas threw out the out of the blue vote on AF only to have AF right there within two minutes. Like maybe they were talking off thread and decided to come on and vote each other. Paired scum? Maybe, maybe not. Just throwing it out there.

With not much time left today, I think this is the best we have on a day 1 case.

I'll vote Aparal for now, and check back later.

[Grasp]

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 05:50 PM, said:

Looking for someone overdoing the townie angle and using poor mechanistic speculation to buff up their street cred. You fit the bill.

Voting for someone before they are on thread stands out. Roled players stereotypically are more careful. More logical, AF is at the start of the player list.

Your blatantly poor attempt at "strawman"ing me begs to point back at you possibly being a symp.

[Denesmet]

A little early in the game to be calling strawman. It is day 1 after all. Quick to call symp as well. Any other cliched defenses u wanted to try?

[Grasp]

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 05:59 PM, said:

A little early in the game to be calling strawman. It is day 1 after all. Quick to call symp as well. Any other cliched defenses u wanted to try?

You started this. I just pointed out what was at the time the only thing that seemed a bit off.

So how about we skip right to insults then.

Eat a bag of dicks douche bag.

[Denesmet]

And dissembling... feel like I am seeing the twisted version of the five stages of grief.

[Hanas]

Denesmet is making a good sales pitch.

[Grasp]

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 06:20 PM, said:

And dissembling... feel like I am seeing the twisted version of the five stages of grief.

And if you are the symp, you are playing the role with a Vengeance.




plus I think Grief plays much better that this.

[Hanas]

Grasp, on 24 November 2015 - 06:03 PM, said:

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 05:59 PM, said:

A little early in the game to be calling strawman. It is day 1 after all. Quick to call symp as well. Any other cliched defenses u wanted to try?

You started this. I just pointed out what was at the time the only thing that seemed a bit off.

So how about we skip right to insults then.

Eat a bag of dicks douche bag.

Grasp, on 24 November 2015 - 06:31 PM, said:

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 06:20 PM, said:

And dissembling... feel like I am seeing the twisted version of the five stages of grief.

And if you are the symp, you are playing the role with a Vengeance.




plus I think Grief plays much better that this.

Appeals to authority now?

Remove Vote
Vote Grasp

[Grasp]

Hanas, on 24 November 2015 - 07:01 PM, said:

Grasp, on 24 November 2015 - 06:03 PM, said:

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 05:59 PM, said:

A little early in the game to be calling strawman. It is day 1 after all. Quick to call symp as well. Any other cliched defenses u wanted to try?

You started this. I just pointed out what was at the time the only thing that seemed a bit off.

So how about we skip right to insults then.

Eat a bag of dicks douche bag.

Grasp, on 24 November 2015 - 06:31 PM, said:

Denesmet, on 24 November 2015 - 06:20 PM, said:

And dissembling... feel like I am seeing the twisted version of the five stages of grief.

And if you are the symp, you are playing the role with a Vengeance.




plus I think Grief plays much better that this.

Appeals to authority now?

Remove Vote
Vote Grasp

You are apparently to new to see the complement I gave him.

[Ultama]

Allright

Denesmet is way too eager for regular d1 case imho. How can be too early to call strawman btw? How is it connected with game phase? Don't like AF being put at light?

I don't like Hanas's vote, only their reason they provided is reference to a fucking joke and I don't accept that.

So much eagerness because of this:

Grasp, on 23 November 2015 - 10:15 PM, said:

<sniff>

anyhoo I am a bit suspicious of the interaction of Hanas and AF right of the bat. The quick voting for each other then the vote removals. AF hadn't even posted when Hanas threw out the out of the blue vote on AF only to have AF right there within two minutes. Like maybe they were talking off thread and decided to come on and vote each other. Paired scum? Maybe, maybe not. Just throwing it out there.

?

Seems distracty(new word, suck it).

[Grasp]

Ultama, on 24 November 2015 - 07:17 PM, said:

Allright

Denesmet is way too eager for regular d1 case imho. How can be too early to call strawman btw? How is it connected with game phase? Don't like AF being put at light?

I don't like Hanas's vote, only their reason they provided is reference to a fucking joke and I don't accept that.

So much eagerness because of this:

Grasp, on 23 November 2015 - 10:15 PM, said:

<sniff>

anyhoo I am a bit suspicious of the interaction of Hanas and AF right of the bat. The quick voting for each other then the vote removals. AF hadn't even posted when Hanas threw out the out of the blue vote on AF only to have AF right there within two minutes. Like maybe they were talking off thread and decided to come on and vote each other. Paired scum? Maybe, maybe not. Just throwing it out there.

?

Seems distracty(new word, suck it).

Hence why I called Denesmet Venge. Because no one can swing a train like Venge can when he is playing a symp.

And because of this BS train swing I'm going to

Vote AF

It is starting to look like I may have been on to something.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 8 hours and 48 minutes remaining

13 Players still alive: Aparal Forge, Denesmet, Fanderay, Grasp, Hanas, Kadagar Fant, Korlat, Lock, Merrid, Olar Ethil, Shadow, Telas, Ultama

7 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.

3 Votes for Aparal Forge ( Shadow, Kadagar Fant, Grasp )
1 Vote for Kadagar Fant ( Merrid )
3 Votes for Grasp ( Denesmet, Telas, Hanas )

Players not voted: Aparal Forge, Fanderay, Korlat, Lock, Olar Ethil, Ultama

[Ultama]

I'm not going to vote with Den because his arguments suck.

I'm ok with voting AF because I just don't like his posts and the distraction thing.

vote Aparal

[Merrid]

Let's think outside the box and lynch Kadagar. Maybe he will form an opinion about something.

[Shadow]

Merrid, on 24 November 2015 - 07:44 PM, said:

Let's think outside the box and lynch Kadagar. Maybe he will form an opinion about something.

Well they won't if they're lynched. Dead people don't have many opinions. Why Kadagar specifically?

[Merrid]

Kadagar Fant, on 24 November 2015 - 05:52 PM, said:

Grasp, on 23 November 2015 - 10:15 PM, said:

<snip>

anyhoo I am a bit suspicious of the interaction of Hanas and AF right of the bat. The quick voting for each other then the vote removals. AF hadn't even posted when Hanas threw out the out of the blue vote on AF only to have AF right there within two minutes. Like maybe they were talking off thread and decided to come on and vote each other. Paired scum? Maybe, maybe not. Just throwing it out there.

With not much time left today, I think this is the best we have on a day 1 case.

I'll vote Aparal for now, and check back later.

Oh he actually mentioned the elephant!

Wow. Only needed other people to give an opinion first