ECLIPSE VI R6: IH, CF, Tatts, D'rek, Tapper, Blend , Gnaw, Twelve, Khell
#1841
Posted 17 March 2015 - 11:19 PM
If IH doesn't feel like staying up, then Khell is completely to blame for the delay.
Fuck that. No if about it. It's all Khell's fault.
Fuck that. No if about it. It's all Khell's fault.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#1842
Posted 17 March 2015 - 11:23 PM
I PASS unless D'rek/IH/Blend reacts in some terrible, terrible way.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#1843
Posted 17 March 2015 - 11:24 PM
Gnaw, on 17 March 2015 - 11:19 PM, said:
If IH doesn't feel like staying up, then Khell is completely to blame for the delay.
Fuck that. No if about it. It's all Khell's fault.
Fuck that. No if about it. It's all Khell's fault.
Let me check...nope, no, I feel no remorse. My conscience appears to be...entirely clear. Hooray!
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#1844
Posted 17 March 2015 - 11:24 PM
Khellendros, on 17 March 2015 - 11:23 PM, said:
I PASS unless D'rek/IH/Blend reacts in some terrible, terrible way.
Too fucking late. I'm drunk and you're to blame.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#1845
Posted 18 March 2015 - 01:04 AM
Gnaw, on 17 March 2015 - 11:24 PM, said:
Happy St Patrick's Day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(I know some of you might feel that was an extensive amount of exclamation points, but you're wrong. It's the perfect amount)
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#1846
Posted 18 March 2015 - 12:42 PM
Galactic Council, on 17 March 2015 - 10:17 PM, said:
I will influence (bringing me to -10 upkeep with 1 in the bank and 8 to gain), just to get a look at the tile.
If it's not +Money, then I will bankrupt the hex immediately again.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#1847
Posted 18 March 2015 - 01:14 PM
wasn't thinking entirely clearly yesterday afternoon.
Battle instructions
Ancient ship -- Go until I have 1 health left. If I haven't managed to get the ancient to 1 health at that time, I'll consider retreating.
Ancient homeworld -- Pause and await further instruction only if the ancient manages to destroy 1 of my 3 cruisers.
My understanding of ancient targeting rules is that they will go for my INT first, right? They can kill it with 1 shot so there is no way their first hit will impact a cruiser.
Battle instructions
Ancient ship -- Go until I have 1 health left. If I haven't managed to get the ancient to 1 health at that time, I'll consider retreating.
Ancient homeworld -- Pause and await further instruction only if the ancient manages to destroy 1 of my 3 cruisers.
My understanding of ancient targeting rules is that they will go for my INT first, right? They can kill it with 1 shot so there is no way their first hit will impact a cruiser.
........oOOOOOo
......//| | |oO
.....|| | | | O....BEERS!
......\\| | | |
........'-----'
......//| | |oO
.....|| | | | O....BEERS!
......\\| | | |
........'-----'
#1848
Posted 18 March 2015 - 02:22 PM
If the ancient scores two hits in one combat round (ie 2 5's etc) then it will destroy your cruiser first as it has 4 damage to assign and the cruiser is the largest ship it can destroy. If it only scores one hit however it will target your interceptor first.
#1849
Posted 18 March 2015 - 02:32 PM
Right, thanks. Forgot about that possibility.
I guess no changes to my battle orders then. If it manages 2 hits on the first go, I'll pause and reconsider.
I guess no changes to my battle orders then. If it manages 2 hits on the first go, I'll pause and reconsider.
........oOOOOOo
......//| | |oO
.....|| | | | O....BEERS!
......\\| | | |
........'-----'
......//| | |oO
.....|| | | | O....BEERS!
......\\| | | |
........'-----'
#1850
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:31 PM
Gnaw vs Twelve 397
Missiles
1 [1d6=1] 4 [1d6=4] 3 [1d6=3] Miss
Twelve 3 [1d6=3] miss
Gnaw 4 [1d6=4] miss
Twelve 1 [1d6=1] miss
Gnaw 5 [1d6=5] hit
Cruiser destroyed, Gnaw draws 3, Twelve draws 1
Missiles
1 [1d6=1] 4 [1d6=4] 3 [1d6=3] Miss
Twelve 3 [1d6=3] miss
Gnaw 4 [1d6=4] miss
Twelve 1 [1d6=1] miss
Gnaw 5 [1d6=5] hit
Cruiser destroyed, Gnaw draws 3, Twelve draws 1
#1851
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:34 PM
305 Tapper vs ancient
Ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 2 hits 3/5
Tapper 4 [1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4] miss
Ancient 3 [1d6=3] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit 2/5
Pause combat, awaiting instructions
Ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 2 hits 3/5
Tapper 4 [1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4] miss
Ancient 3 [1d6=3] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit 2/5
Pause combat, awaiting instructions
#1852
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:36 PM
Imperial Historian, on 18 March 2015 - 05:31 PM, said:
Gnaw vs Twelve 397
Missiles
1 [1d6=1] 4 [1d6=4] 3 [1d6=3] Miss
Twelve 3 [1d6=3] miss
Gnaw 4 [1d6=4] miss
Twelve 1 [1d6=1] miss
Gnaw 5 [1d6=5] hit
Cruiser destroyed, Gnaw draws 3, Twelve draws 1
Missiles
1 [1d6=1] 4 [1d6=4] 3 [1d6=3] Miss
Twelve 3 [1d6=3] miss
Gnaw 4 [1d6=4] miss
Twelve 1 [1d6=1] miss
Gnaw 5 [1d6=5] hit
Cruiser destroyed, Gnaw draws 3, Twelve draws 1
And I was just about to state that my odds against gnaw weren't that horrible and then I go and don't even hit him even after 5 rolls. Thought I would damage him at least once and maybe twice if I was lucky.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#1853
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:45 PM
301 blend vs ancient
2 x interceptor, ancient, dread
Interceptors 4 [1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 2 [1d6=2] 3 hits interceptors destroyed 3/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit (1/2 health ancient)
ancient 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 4[1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
dread 4[1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4]miss
ancient 3 [1d6=3] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 5 [1d6=5] hit 2/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 4 [1d6=4] miss
ancient4 [1d6=4] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 3 hits dread destroyed
blend draws 1 rep tile
2 x interceptor, ancient, dread
Interceptors 4 [1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 2 [1d6=2] 3 hits interceptors destroyed 3/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit (1/2 health ancient)
ancient 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 4[1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
dread 4[1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4]miss
ancient 3 [1d6=3] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 5 [1d6=5] hit 2/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 4 [1d6=4] miss
ancient4 [1d6=4] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 3 hits dread destroyed
blend draws 1 rep tile
#1854
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:47 PM
Going to cook dinner, I'll finish off the rolls in an hour or so if someone else hasn't done it beforehand.
the dice are with the defenders today!
the dice are with the defenders today!
#1855
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:52 PM
That's pretty unfortunate for Blend!
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#1856
Posted 18 March 2015 - 05:55 PM
Imperial Historian, on 18 March 2015 - 05:45 PM, said:
301 blend vs ancient
2 x interceptor, ancient, dread
Interceptors 4 [1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 2 [1d6=2] 3 hits interceptors destroyed 3/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit (1/2 health ancient)
ancient 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 4[1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
dread 4[1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4]miss
ancient 3 [1d6=3] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 5 [1d6=5] hit 2/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 4 [1d6=4] miss
ancient4 [1d6=4] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 3 hits dread destroyed
blend draws 1 rep tile
2 x interceptor, ancient, dread
Interceptors 4 [1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 2 [1d6=2] 3 hits interceptors destroyed 3/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit (1/2 health ancient)
ancient 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 4[1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
dread 4[1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4]miss
ancient 3 [1d6=3] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 5 [1d6=5] hit 2/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 4 [1d6=4] miss
ancient4 [1d6=4] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 3 hits dread destroyed
blend draws 1 rep tile
Well fuck...
EDIT: Never mind, I see it now, was reading wrong. Well this pretty much completely fucks me over.
Never mind again, rereading the rules now.
This post has been edited by Blend: 18 March 2015 - 05:59 PM
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#1857
Posted 18 March 2015 - 06:00 PM
Blend, on 18 March 2015 - 05:55 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 18 March 2015 - 05:45 PM, said:
301 blend vs ancient
2 x interceptor, ancient, dread
Interceptors 4 [1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 2 [1d6=2] 3 hits interceptors destroyed 3/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit (1/2 health ancient)
ancient 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 4[1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
dread 4[1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4]miss
ancient 3 [1d6=3] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 5 [1d6=5] hit 2/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 4 [1d6=4] miss
ancient4 [1d6=4] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 3 hits dread destroyed
blend draws 1 rep tile
2 x interceptor, ancient, dread
Interceptors 4 [1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 2 [1d6=2] 3 hits interceptors destroyed 3/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit (1/2 health ancient)
ancient 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 4[1d6=4] 2 [1d6=2] miss
dread 4[1d6=4] 4 [1d6=4]miss
ancient 3 [1d6=3] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 5 [1d6=5] hit 2/4 health on dread
dread 2 [1d6=2] 4 [1d6=4] miss
ancient4 [1d6=4] 6 [1d6=6] 5 [1d6=5] 6 [1d6=6] 3 hits dread destroyed
blend draws 1 rep tile
Well fuck...
EDIT: Never mind, I see it now, was reading wrong. Well this pretty much completely fucks me over.
Second EDIT: My interceptors have a +1 from the computer, shouldn't the one that rolled a 4 hit given this?
4 + 1 = 5
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#1858
Posted 18 March 2015 - 06:03 PM
7/16 of that ancient's rolls were 5s or 6s. You can't beat that kind of horror.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#1859
Posted 18 March 2015 - 06:44 PM
Yeah it was always going to be an uphill battle when your interceptors didn't get a hit in and then were summarily destroyed, but those ancients had some monster rolls.
CF vs ancient
int, 3 cruiser, ancient
int 4 [1d6=4] miss
cruiser x6 4 [1d6=4] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 2 [1d6=2] 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit 2/3 health
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 5[1d6=5] 2 hits cruiser destroyed
Pause combat
CF vs ancient
int, 3 cruiser, ancient
int 4 [1d6=4] miss
cruiser x6 4 [1d6=4] 1 [1d6=1] 1 [1d6=1] 2 [1d6=2] 2 [1d6=2] 6 [1d6=6] 1 hit 2/3 health
ancient 5 [1d6=5] 5[1d6=5] 2 hits cruiser destroyed
Pause combat
#1860
Posted 18 March 2015 - 06:47 PM
Gnaw vs twelve's retreating interceptors
3 [1d6=3] 4 [1d6=4] miss, interceptors retreat
Gnaw draws 1 combat rep
D'rek should definitely have moved that interceptor, she wouldn't have even lost any ships.
3 [1d6=3] 4 [1d6=4] miss, interceptors retreat
Gnaw draws 1 combat rep
D'rek should definitely have moved that interceptor, she wouldn't have even lost any ships.