[Silanah]

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 04:17 PM, said:

I chose Tulas and Togg as night 5 attack targets based off of my info that they had been sent invitations on night 4. Since I didn't know the sender, I figured taking out one of the possible recruits was next best.

That's a reasonable number of abilities you're claiming.

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 04:17 PM, said:

Owning up to the attack is also all about the sender of invitations. I have info that a night action was submitted to send one to Tulas and Togg. Tulas claims not to have received one. I would really like to hear from Togg before continuing my line of thought here but sooner or later Korbas is going to remember he can make me post in pictures or something else stupid and game information censoring.

If Togg and Tulas did not receive invitations? then the person who submitted the 'stalk' action on night 4 knows who the sender is. I don't know who did the stalking but I know who the target of that action was. That should be a two step verification process to 'test the finder'. Assuming that the person who did the stalking is willing to vote for the person they stalked.

Now you have me curious. Tulas and Togg say they didn't didn't receive invitations then someone who did something else knows who the sender is? Explain the logic there to me. So you know who 'stalk' was used on, how does that figure out the sender of the invitations? Not really seeing the logic here. Explicitly state what you're getting at, perhaps?

Also, what's with setting text in that post explicitly to size 3?

[Silanah]

Silanah, on 29 January 2015 - 04:49 PM, said:

Now you have me curious. Assume Tulas and Togg say they didn't didn't receive invitations then someone who did something else knows who the sender is? Explain the logic there to me. So you know who 'stalk' was used on, how does that figure out the sender of the invitations? Not really seeing the logic here. Explicitly state what you're getting at, perhaps?

Also, what's with setting text in that post explicitly to size 3?

Missing word

[Tellan]

Silanah, on 29 January 2015 - 04:49 PM, said:

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 04:17 PM, said:

I chose Tulas and Togg as night 5 attack targets based off of my info that they had been sent invitations on night 4. Since I didn't know the sender, I figured taking out one of the possible recruits was next best.

That's a reasonable number of abilities you're claiming.

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 04:17 PM, said:

Owning up to the attack is also all about the sender of invitations. I have info that a night action was submitted to send one to Tulas and Togg. Tulas claims not to have received one. I would really like to hear from Togg before continuing my line of thought here but sooner or later Korbas is going to remember he can make me post in pictures or something else stupid and game information censoring.

If Togg and Tulas did not receive invitations? then the person who submitted the 'stalk' action on night 4 knows who the sender is. I don't know who did the stalking but I know who the target of that action was. That should be a two step verification process to 'test the finder'. Assuming that the person who did the stalking is willing to vote for the person they stalked.

Now you have me curious. Tulas and Togg say they didn't didn't receive invitations then someone who did something else knows who the sender is? Explain the logic there to me. So you know who 'stalk' was used on, how does that figure out the sender of the invitations? Not really seeing the logic here. Explicitly state what you're getting at, perhaps?

Also, what's with setting text in that post explicitly to size 3?

text is chrome on os x cut/paste quirky thing


If I say who the target of the stalk command is, then anyone can make the claim.

I have a use once every x days ability find and an attack. two abilities.

[Venesara]

I'm not following the logic either, can you take us through it? What does one have to do with the other? Why does the person who submitted 'stalk' supposedly know who the invitation sender is?

Hmmm.

Is it that you stalked the stalker and so saw what they saw (that invitations were sent out to Tulas and Togg) but not who they stalked in the first place?

If that's what stalking even is.

[Tellan]

I have a list of actions submitted on night 4. No clue who used them or if they succeeded.

one of those is sending an invite to Togg and Tulas Shorn

another of those is stalk X.


if Togg and Tulas did not receive invites, then presumably the 'stalk' could be a guard action which would mean that the person who was stalked is the person sending out the invites.

[Venesara]

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 05:35 PM, said:

I have a list of actions submitted on night 4. No clue who used them or if they succeeded.

one of those is sending an invite to Togg and Tulas Shorn

another of those is stalk X.


if Togg and Tulas did not receive invites, then presumably the 'stalk' could be a guard action which would mean that the person who was stalked is the person sending out the invites.

Ah well, that both makes more sense and is simpler. Thanks for explaining.

[Tellan]

Venesara, on 29 January 2015 - 05:46 PM, said:

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 05:35 PM, said:

I have a list of actions submitted on night 4. No clue who used them or if they succeeded.

one of those is sending an invite to Togg and Tulas Shorn

another of those is stalk X.


if Togg and Tulas did not receive invites, then presumably the 'stalk' could be a guard action which would mean that the person who was stalked is the person sending out the invites.

Ah well, that both makes more sense and is simpler. Thanks for explaining.

thank you for making me make more sense.

I am obviously not ok with a summer/winter culture hunt. I would be good with a low poster hunt.

But if I'm going to go I'd at least like to attempt to get the 3rd party out of the invite business.

[Korbas]

Vote Tellan

Also thanks for reminding me.

Tellan I order you to post only in pictures from now until the end of the day

[Korbas]

Venesara I order you to speak in Rhyme for 4 hours.

[Tellan]

Korbas, on 29 January 2015 - 06:23 PM, said:

Vote Tellan

Also thanks for reminding me.

Tellan I order you to post only in pictures from now until the end of the day

[Tulas Shorn]

[Venesara]

Korbas, on 29 January 2015 - 06:24 PM, said:

Venesara I order you to speak in Rhyme for 4 hours.

Speak in rhyme?
But what if I don't have the time?!
Or can't think of a line?
Perhaps then I should just mime?


Which calls to mind, you ordered me to speak,
But here all I can do is leak
Out words onto a page,
Type it all out in a rage.
No vocal chords used,
No speaking infused



So perhaps I should just stop writing in rhyme?

[Tellan]

Venesara, on 29 January 2015 - 07:26 PM, said:

So perhaps I should just stop writing in rhyme?

[Togg]

Never got an invitation to anything. Never interacted with anyone offthread in any capacity, it's why I'm still sitting here wondering wtf I even need to do, and let me tell you that is fucking depressing. Don't know what you are talking about with that invitation.

Vote Tellan

Restoring the balance is our best bet here.

[Tellan]

Tellan, on 29 January 2015 - 05:35 PM, said:

I have a list of actions submitted on night 4. No clue who used them or if they succeeded.

one of those is sending an invite to Togg and Tulas Shorn

another of those is stalk X.


if Togg and Tulas did not receive invites, then presumably the 'stalk' could be a guard action which would mean that the person who was stalked is the person sending out the invites.

Togg, on 29 January 2015 - 09:07 PM, said:

Never got an invitation to anything. Never interacted with anyone offthread in any capacity, it's why I'm still sitting here wondering wtf I even need to do, and let me tell you that is fucking depressing. Don't know what you are talking about with that invitation.

Vote Tellan

Restoring the balance is our best bet here.

Vote Tennes

[Tellan]

Spoiler

 team member.jpg (196.63K)
Number of downloads: 0

Remove Vote


Vote Tellan




edit: spoiler tags

This post has been edited by Tellan: 29 January 2015 - 11:33 PM

[Tellan]

Remove Vote


Vote Tennes

[Tiamatha]

What the fuck does that mean?

Whatever. I'm fine with getting rid of Tellan, even though it seems to be somewhat queen driven. Look at that list of votes right after the queen spoke.

Vote Tellan

[Tellan]

[Silanah]

Would you spill the beans about everyone else who got targeted with an action please?