Malazan Empire: Suicide Squad/DC Movie Fest - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 9 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Suicide Squad/DC Movie Fest

#121 User is offline   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,027
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 06 August 2016 - 12:26 PM

My turn to chime in.

I thought it was an absolute blast! Really fun flick. I think part of the issue with the critical drubbing is that those people may have walked in expecting a straighforward superhero flick. This is not that. Like even a little bit. Ayer pulls off exactly what he stepped up to pull off. A mishmash action film full of villains figuring out how to work together, and taking down an even more threatening baddie. Sure it's got the odd editing woe, and one or two plot hitches, but none of that overshadows just how much fun it is. I think if you walk into this expecting some serious dramatic action wonder...you will be disappointed...but if you walk in expecting solid character turns, fun action setpieces, great villain banter, and darkly humourous time...you'll be just fine.

It's a nice conpanion piece to BvS and MoS (including the cameos, those you know about and those you don't) but it never feels completely locked to that either.

Like the ridiculous idea of a bunch of villains in exploding dog collars being let out of a black site prison to take on a big baddie? You'll dig this.

Standouts:

Margot Robbie 100% completely NAILS HArley Quinn in live action. Every single thing she utters, and every choice she makes, and even her ass-kicking skills...are alll note perfect for that character.

Will Smith. Wow. I was prepared to not be impressed by his Deadshot. But damned if this isn't his best role in years. He gives Deadshot the joy of his love of weaponry, his sassy mouth, and his basically cool factor...but adds a gravitas to him I wasn't quite expecting. Really great.

Jay Hernandez. Christ, if there is one completely unexpected star here, it's Jay Hernandez Diablo. He is calm, cool, and collected...badass...and when needed simply amazing. He's also given his character a deep gravitas I wasn't expecting. Easily one of the best things about this flick along with Harley and Deadshot.

Jared Leto's Joker. Instead of trying to ape Ledger's Joker, he decided to create his own...which seems very much based off the New52 Joker created by Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo. This nouveau-ganbanger Joker with hipster hair and a deep voice with weird intonations. And you know what? He pulls it off. This is a very different Joker from what we've seen before...but damned if he didn't win me over. You know how Ledger's Joker was scary in a "matter-of-fact" kind of way. Like nothing you did was going to stop him, and he'd just calmy watch you sqiurm? Well Leto's Joker is much more smile 3 inches from your face, and then punch it, and then shoot it, and then laugh his maniacaly slow laugh. Really solid perfromance.

Everyone else gets much less screen time generally speaking (but then I'd say these are the people I'd have focused on anymways in a larger team), but are no less entertaining...Killer Croc, Katana, Enchantress, Cap Boomarang, Flagg all get enough time to pull some nice turns in their scenes, and never felt like they got shortchanged all that badly.

There are a FEW lines of hokier dialogue (I caught one or two cringe-worthy ones...just in the fact that they were obvious things that the script made a chaarcter point out for some reason) but overall the script is solid for an ensemble piece like this. There is a particuar scene with Harley in a bar that sells her as Harley Quinn more than any other, where she gets suprememly dark for a few moments.

I think one of the things I liked most is that for a film about villains being forced to work for the good guys...they pay close attention to the fact that every single one of them reacts to being out in the world in the same fashion...every time they get even the smallest chance to bolt, or futher their own interests...they do, no hesistation. That reads as real to me, because they could have easily just had everyone decide early on that helping is better than furthering ones agenda...but that would have felt tonally fake...so this works better.

Soundtrack is fantastic (score AND songs).

The credits in 3D are some of the finest credits I've seen in a 3D film.

Mid-credits cene was a nice one
Spoiler


Anyways, I loved this film. I loved it probably for all the reasons the critics hated it. It delivered to me exactly what I was expecting. A balls-to-the-wall action flick full of badasses, superpowers, and just plain fun...and Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn. :cry: I will probaly see it again soon provided the baby doesn't come this weekend.

@Worry:

View PostKanyemander West, on 05 August 2016 - 11:34 PM, said:

The only reviewer whose opinion I respect has chimed in and it isn't pretty. Sorry, folks, but that's a wrap.


Not sure if you're being facetious...but his premise is immediately flawed...he says this was "supposed to be DC's answer to Guardians of the Galaxy"...which is laughably incorrect. This was never that, nor was it ever marketed as that. If people decided that's what they were going to get, then they were grossly misinformed going in.

EDIT: Also, looks to be sitting pretty at the box office so far, with early returns setting it at a 140mil opening weekend (Thursday night was 20mil, and Friday was apparently another 60mil). I love it when the audience defies the critics to see the movie they've been jazzed to see for months.

This post has been edited by QuickTidal: 06 August 2016 - 12:37 PM

"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
1

#122 User is offline   Aptorian 

  • How 'bout a hug?
  • Group: The Wheelchairs of War
  • Posts: 24,785
  • Joined: 22-May 06

Posted 06 August 2016 - 12:31 PM

Interesting to see Sergiej and QTs opinions being so opposite.

I sort of want to go watch the film for Jared Leto's Joker alone and just let the rest be what ever it is.
0

#123 User is offline   Macros 

  • D'ivers Fuckwits
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,110
  • Joined: 28-January 08
  • Location:Ulster, disputed zone, British Empire.

Posted 06 August 2016 - 03:13 PM

I want to watch this now to see why the two opinions differ so much
0

#124 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 07 August 2016 - 12:20 AM

Just watched it.

Going to have to side with the critics on this one, it is pretty bad.

Harley Quinn is just about the only thing worthwhile in the movie, and you've seen her best moments in the trailers.

The problem with Leto's joker is of writing, not performance. He is 'also ran' Joker. He is Joker for the purposes for giving Harley motivations and backstory. Not funny, not particularly clever. Joker the green haired mobster. They don't show enough Joker and Harley to really give any investment in the characters, and they show too much for a plot you have no investment in.

Deadshot is fine. A couple cool scenes, and otherwise Will Smith as Will Smith.

A lot of the story drives around Flag and Enchantress, and their entire backstory is summed up in 20 seconds of flashback with voiceover.

Even the justification for putting the squad together feels off. To me, the focus of any story putting together a dirty dozen type group should be on the deniability and expendability. But they waste a lot of time selling this as an answer team as an answer to meta-humans. Which is great except so many of the squad aren't. At least three of them would be inferior to have in a fight to a run of the mill soldier. Again, if you make it just about expendable and dangerous, you can make that work. But the way they pitch it, the recruits they choose make little sense.

Slipknot is irrelevant. Katana is a seat filler. I had heard people talking about them trying to use Boomerang for comedy, but nothing he says is remotely amusing. His timing was off and awkward. They hit a better balance for a satellite squad member in El Diablo, but even his arc by the end feels forced.

So we had a fun movie that wasn't fun enough. And as a serious movie deeply flawed. Surprising reveals that are not that surprising, Plot points jammed in at inopportune times. And the squad suddenly liking each other based on a brief, not particularly deep intermission where they get to know each other. And overall, the DC universe seems to still suffer from too badly wanting to get to the 'good part'. Why do origin stories to introduce characters and built to having them together, when you can just throw them in the mix and let flashbacks sort them out?
Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#125 User is offline   Silencer 

  • Manipulating Special Data
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 5,683
  • Joined: 07-July 07
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Malazan Book of the Fallen series.
    Computer Game Design.
    Programming.

Posted 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM

Yeah, saw this last night and unfortunately I have to jump on the "not that good bordering on bad" bandwagon.

I think QTs post says it best (ironically): look at how his post is laid out. Character 1 is X. Character 2 is Y. That's this movies biggest problem imo.

The individual characters are OK to good. Diablo, Deadshot, and Harley were all good, Killer Croc, Katana, Boomerang, et al were average/irrelevant.

Together, though, they're terrible. There's no chemistry, all their interactions are forced, and while that may potentially be 'realistic' for a bunch of disparate convicts thrown together, it doesn't do the movie any favours.

The new Joker is bad. He had a couple of moments where the potential shone through, but otherwise he was both a non-entity and had no real presence. 'Bad' might not be entirely fair, but definitely not "good" and is one of the worse renditions I've seen in live action.

Overall the reason for the Squad and their application makes no sense in this film. They chose a terrible villain for them, too - no-one in the Squad as it stands except Diablo even had a hope in hell of being useful in those circumstances, and a regular military force would have been much more suitable, less risky, and you don't really need the "deniability" aspect given the scale of the villain. Never mind that the entire cause of the incident in the first place was because of the basis of the squad (and the thing that convinced people to let them be a thing). I mean, I get it, playing with fire etc etc, but seriously? As far as "plot" goes that was barely passable and required an insane level of arrogance and ignorance from half of the cast.

Pick a lower-tier villain for the Squad or actually have them die. Sheesh.


In all honesty, Batman: Assault on Arkham was a *much* better exercise in setting up the Suicide Squad and was properly executed. This just felt like a mishmash of random scenes to have our protagonists do action scenes (which, don't get me wrong, were mostly good - but nothing stellar to see here, and with no real investment in the outcome there was no weight to the scenes), when they could at least have had a coherent plot and proper set up and still had the same action. Like Nevyn posts above, rushing to "the good parts".
Also, now very suspicious of those reshoots or whatever a couple of months back. But hey, no way to tell what that changed, right?



Anyway, I went in with low expectations, so it was a decent flick, but it falls short on basically all the things it set out to do (spectacle/dark/humorous/origin story/fun popcorn moments/whatever else you might have expected from a Suicide Squad film), and the only really good parts were a few individual performances, which weren't even all that good unless they were not interacting with anyone in a meaningful way. Oh, and gun porn. Kindof.
***

Shinrei said:

<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.

0

#126 User is offline   polishgenius 

  • Heart of Courage
  • Group: LHTEC
  • Posts: 5,319
  • Joined: 16-June 05

Posted 08 August 2016 - 06:24 AM

View PostApt, on 06 August 2016 - 12:31 PM, said:

Interesting to see Sergiej and QTs opinions being so opposite.




Pah. Sergiej's just ripping me off!


Although lately me and QT have been agreeing a bit (I haven't seen SS yet though).
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
0

#127 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 08 August 2016 - 07:07 AM

Not a great movie. Editing was clearly done in a rush, and by someone other than the people who made the movie. The plot is barely sensical, the villain entirely uninteresting, and the CGI surprisingly poor. The 'brother' seemed taken straight out of a last gen console game.

Margot Robbie was fun, I thought the Joker in this game was quite well done if it hadn't been for the shitty dialogue, but then that's not Leto's fault. Their attempts to humanize Deadshot were seriously cringe worthy, but since they had Will Smith deliver the lines it wasn't too bad.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#128 User is offline   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,027
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 08 August 2016 - 02:02 PM

Minor Spoilers in my reply...

View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:


Together, though, they're terrible. There's no chemistry, all their interactions are forced, and while that may potentially be 'realistic' for a bunch of disparate convicts thrown together, it doesn't do the movie any favours.


This was exactly what it was supposed to be. Lack of chemistry. It's uncomfortable. It's haphazard, and prone to people jumping ship the moment they need to. The unity doesn't come till VERY late in the film when Deadshot spares Harley, and they hear Diablo's tale. Before that it's meant to feel completely unbelievable as far as team unity goes. Hell, even after that you aren't supposed to feel an Avengers-like unity...rather a begrudging "we can work together" vibe, tempered more positively by Diablo's more "these violent clowns are be my family now" dysfunctional gang banger aesthetic.

View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:

The new Joker is bad. He had a couple of moments where the potential shone through, but otherwise he was both a non-entity and had no real presence. 'Bad' might not be entirely fair, but definitely not "good" and is one of the worse renditions I've seen in live action.


Is it possible this is just Heath Ledger casting an extraordinarily long shadow for casual movie goers who have seen his Joker? I found that Leto embodied the New52-era Joker to a 'T' up to and including the look (minus the tattoos obviously). As to being a non-entity. I keep seeing the comment that he was not in the movie enough, or that his part was kind of just "there for no reason". I think people may have expected too much when they realized that Joker was in this. He's there for one reason and one reason only. To be a part of Harley's introduction (he's intrinsically locked to her introduction, you literally can't introduce her without him). The fact that he shows up later on attempting to save her (twice) should be looked at as unexpected bonus Joker sequences. But yeah, I thought the portrayal was amazing. Totally different from what we've had before. It's the complete opposite end of the spectrum from Ledger's portrayal and skews closer to Hamill's animated version if it were crossed with the New-52 one as well. He scared me as the Joker...and that's something I could not even put at the feet of Ledger's turn (a turn I loved...but for different reasons). I still hate the grills in his teeth though...but I HAVE heard that they are the result of Batman beating the shit out of him so hard that he knocked his teeth out...which is kind of cool.

Also, anyone else notice that Harley's 3D rap sheet text that comes up says SHE killed Jason Todd's Robin? I'm not sure if we can seriously lay that at her feet...but it's funny it's on that rap sheet.

View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:

Overall the reason for the Squad and their application makes no sense in this film.


Waller is almost as nuts as the teams she assembles. If you look her up in the DC compendium, she is deemed and antagonist and a villain who sometimes "helps" the good guys. The scene in the military boardroom is supposed to illustrate that fact. She literally holds them for ransom. "Let me build and use my team...because I have an ancient witch at my disposal, look what she can do!" Captain Subtext: "I have an ancient witch at my disposal, whom I coerced by putting her into a relationship where she fell in love, and if you don't watch out I can do what I want with her." Literally her whole conversation with the guy at the restaurant is about how bad she really is. This includes the mid-credits scene with you-know-who...who threatens her. So yeah, it makes no sense because Amanda Waller doesn't care. She wants her team, and screw everything and everyone who gets in the way of that. Further illustrated by her actions later on in the film. The fact that it all feels so disjointedly nonsensical works from a source material standpoint. But that's possibly because I've read most of the Suicide Squad comics in the New52.

View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:

They chose a terrible villain for them, too - no-one in the Squad as it stands except Diablo even had a hope in hell of being useful in those circumstances, and a regular military force would have been much more suitable, less risky, and you don't really need the "deniability" aspect given the scale of the villain. Never mind that the entire cause of the incident in the first place was because of the basis of the squad (and the thing that convinced people to let them be a thing). I mean, I get it, playing with fire etc etc, but seriously? As far as "plot" goes that was barely passable and required an insane level of arrogance and ignorance from half of the cast.


Except Diablo would not have let go fully without them present, and with a few meta's on the team who are seriously OPed like Diablo, you need the others to run the smaller gamut of tactical objectives to get him in close. Even then he had trouble and they needed the explosion to do the final work. And Look at that final act... Harley tossing her gun to Deadshot who takes that shot. Diablo was the brute force to push through the wall of power, Harley was the weapon holder, and Deadshot the final sharpshot while Croc, Katana and Boomarang kept the "minions" at bay. Was Enchantress a weird villain choice? Sure. But in the end it still forced the team to work together to pull off the win. Would I have liked to see a different villain for them to have taken on? Sure. But who? You need someone at LEAST powerful enough to deal with Deadshot's aim, and Diablo's final form power. In light of that, and tying it into the use of Flagg (through his love for her) and keeping the team together, it all worked more often than not for me.

View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:

Pick a lower-tier villain for the Squad or actually have them die. Sheesh.


Boring. I don't want a low-tier villain for a sizeable group of metahumans and villains. I want something worthy of their assemblage. It's not perfect here, but it's better than it could have been (See: THOR 1; which WAS a low-tier villain and TOTALLY got called out by audiences for that fact).


View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:

when they could at least have had a coherent plot and proper set up and still had the same action.


Could you elaborate on what you found incoherent? I thought it pretty straightforward. Bad guys are assembled by Waller. Bad Guys forced to worth together by Waller, do so poorly. Bad guys called in to stop rogue member though they don't know it. Rogue member brings in her big brother, Waller is trapped and Bad guys are set to rescue her. Bad guys save trapped Waller. Bad guys then decide to take out big bad, for shits and giggles (and possibly SOME morality) and BET, and visitation rights, and an espresso machine. End story. I fail to see how that's not coherent.

View PostSilencer, on 08 August 2016 - 01:55 AM, said:

Anyway, I went in with low expectations, so it was a decent flick, but it falls short on basically all the things it set out to do (spectacle/dark/humorous/origin story/fun popcorn moments/whatever else you might have expected from a Suicide Squad film), and the only really good parts were a few individual performances, which weren't even all that good unless they were not interacting with anyone in a meaningful way. Oh, and gun porn. Kindof.


Sorry you didn't think much of it Silencer.

Yeah, I figured I'd be in the minority here with my opinion. That's okay, I thought it was great fun still. Best Scene is Harley in the elevator.

This post has been edited by QuickTidal: 08 August 2016 - 02:03 PM

"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#129 User is offline   amphibian 

  • Ribbit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,067
  • Joined: 28-September 06
  • Location:Upstate NY
  • Interests:Hopping around

Posted 08 August 2016 - 03:40 PM

View PostBriar King, on 08 August 2016 - 04:05 AM, said:

I think we all knew Scott was going to be in denial for this one lol! Waits to see if Ben is as well.

Not the best etiquette to use real names when most of the forum doesn't know real name = forum name. I'm Ben.

I said simply that the content of superhero movie reviews have some component in the movie preceding the current one being reviewed. A bad predecessor will bend the review worse, while a good one will bend it better. So there's some element of BvS backlash even though the two movies have very little to do with each other directly. Different directors, different casts, different aims, yet the same shared universe.

I also think that there are worse movies released that get raves or reviews that don't call it the worst movie of the year. Zootopia is a perfect example of this. Rave reviews because it buried terrible concepts in cuteness and didn't dawdle.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
0

#130 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 08 August 2016 - 06:55 PM

My detailed, spoilered explanation of what I did and did not like

This is basically going to spoil the whole movie so DO NOT READ if you haven't seen. I am going into this detail to explain how it ties into the common complaints of bad editing, bad plot, little character, etc.

Spoiler


More whining later
Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#131 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,407
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 08 August 2016 - 07:06 PM

For what it's worth...

Movie and 1989 comic spoiler

Spoiler


I realize that's lost on 90% of the audience, but there it is.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
1

#132 User is offline   PLUGO 

  • Lieutenant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 14-June 16

Posted 08 August 2016 - 07:12 PM

My Biggest gripes were with those moments I've seen before.

The faceless hordes: Avengers 1 & 2 + THOR 2 & Guardians of the Galaxy, Amazing Spider-Man

The CGI doomsday machine: Fantastic Four, Avengers & Thor (again), Amazing Spider-Man 2, Man of Steel

Introducing Slipknot (in an unforunately misogynist manner) just to kill him was weak. Might as well just have Boomerang be the one who makes a run for it and dies, it's not like the character contributed that much . . . (well the DEADPOOL Unicorn joke I guess) actually more of them should have died. Leave only Waller, Deadshot, Quinn & Katana.

I thought it was most fun when it was all disjointed and non-linear. That said, even Ayer himself has stages more interesting gun-fights and heavy fire-power scenes.

Still people are going out to see it and these are the first generation of a kind of movie that doesn't progress in a linear fashion (like the building of the Avengers franchise) but more sideways. One can watch it before or after Batman v Superman.
0

#133 User is offline   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,027
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 08 August 2016 - 07:31 PM

View PostPLUGO, on 08 August 2016 - 07:12 PM, said:

I thought it was most fun when it was all disjointed and non-linear. That said, even Ayer himself has stages more interesting gun-fights and heavy fire-power scenes.


I have a feeling some of those fights were cut for running time or other reasons...but you can sense in MOST of the action scenes that there are longer cuts in there. I hope Ayer's cut is more complete in that regard.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#134 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 08 August 2016 - 07:34 PM

Continued ...

Spoiler

Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#135 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 08 August 2016 - 07:57 PM

And continued:

Spoiler

Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#136 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 08 August 2016 - 08:31 PM

And more:

Spoiler

This post has been edited by Nevyn: 08 August 2016 - 08:42 PM

Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#137 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 08 August 2016 - 08:44 PM

View PostAbyss, on 08 August 2016 - 07:06 PM, said:

For what it's worth...

Movie and 1989 comic spoiler

Spoiler


I realize that's lost on 90% of the audience, but there it is.





Spoiler

Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#138 User is offline   Nevyn 

  • Shield Anvil
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,450
  • Joined: 19-March 13

Posted 08 August 2016 - 09:21 PM

And finally:

Spoiler






Tatts early in SH game: Hmm, so if I'm liberal I should have voted Nein to make sure I'm president? I'm not that selfish

Tatts later in SAME game: I'm going to be a corrupt official. I have turned from my liberal ways, and now will vote against the pesky liberals. Viva la Fascism.
When Venge's turn comes, he will get a yes from Mess, Dolmen, Nevyn and Venge but a no from the 3 fascists and me. **** with my Government, and i'll **** with yours
0

#139 User is offline   Tsundoku 

  • A what?
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,966
  • Joined: 06-January 03
  • Location:Maison de merde

Posted 09 August 2016 - 09:55 AM

I'm getting the feeling this is going to be like BvS and I should wait for the extended (original?) cut.
"Fortune favors the bold, though statistics favor the cautious." - Indomitable Courteous (Icy) Fist, The Palace Job - Patrick Weekes

"Well well well ... if it ain't The Invisible C**t." - Billy Butcher, The Boys

"I have strong views about not tempting providence and, as a wise man once said, the difference between luck and a wheelbarrow is, luck doesn’t work if you push it." - Colonel Orhan, Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City - KJ Parker
0

#140 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 09 August 2016 - 11:31 AM

Watched it on Sunday and have to go with the majority opinion, it wasn't great. It wasn't awful, but considering the premise it was dull and unmemorable. Something Nevyn said really struck me as absolutely true: The characters don't have conversations, they just talk at each other.

I also got the sense that there was some weird cutting in the film. Some parts were just too nonsensical. I'll watch an extended cut if it ever comes to tv, but I'm certainly not going to dish out money for it (is it me being a conspiracy nut, or is this something we're seeing more of? Release a poorly reviewed film in the cinema, because you know people will see it anyway and you'll make a profit, and then release a "proper cut" in order to strengthen DVD sales? That is, deliberately make two different films).

The villains weren't villainous. They weren't even antiheroes. They were just the hero squad who were sometimes snarky. Actual bad guys were awful.

And when the film begins with half an hour of pure exposition and backstory, you know there's a problem. Perhaps they feel audiences really are that stupid and won't be able to follow, but how about filling in the backstory and characterisation over, you know, the course of this movie, as we see the characters in action and actually interacting and conversing with each other?

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 09 August 2016 - 11:32 AM

"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

Share this topic:


  • 9 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users