Cause, on 03 December 2014 - 09:20 AM, said:
I forget exactly when but after portraying her as a betrayer, traitor and power hungry bitch for several books suddenly there was a switch in the vein of 'tell but don't show' that she was actually not a bad person. It never sat right or made much sense. Cartheron is not the first person to suddenly have a change of heart.
We also have the problem of Kellanved and Dancer who may have wanted to be assassinated so they could ascend to godhood, they would no have been allowed to maintain rule of the empire and become gods as they would have been to strong then, taking revenge on her in GoTM.
Then we have Mallick who was a slime ball but the moment we see him become emperor he seems to achieve a lot of good.
The malazan series is either convolutedly brilliant or as I now suspect just poorly plotted out in advance. Give it enough time and we will porbably see, GODS know how, surly ascend to godhood to rule beside the Rope and Ammanas
I think you are confusing between good/bad person and good/bad ruler. The two are not necessarily equal. Often a good person may totally mess up ruling, and a bad person may be an extremely efficient ruler.
With Laseen, we get bits of everything. Lets follow her character arc:
in GotM she is portrayed as th evil, treachorous usurper who took the throne of the rightful EMperor and then destroyed his Old Guard and is now systematically murdering all the loyal soldiers.
In DG the same story kind of continues, until the end when Kalam gets to talk to her one on one and finds out how her actions were necessary, from the point of view of the Emperors needs. Combine this with MoI. The death of the Bridgeburneres was a tragic accident, the outlawing of Dujek a ruse to take out the Pannion Domin.
By TBH Laseens plans are falling apart. She had probaly underestimated the scheming skill sof Mallik and Korbolo Dom and they now occupy positions of power, occupying the vacuum of power. SHe makes a desperate bid to get the Adjunct and Kalma on her side, hoping to use them to regain power. They decline. Very importantly the Claw is now heavily corrupted by Mallik loyalists. Then comes Kalams rampage, followed by Apsalars dance. That decimates the Claw. Here is a tippng point for both Laseen and Mallik. The Claw will have to be rebuilt its loyalties newly constructed again.
In RotCG we see the true extent of Laseen's predicament. She had not eliminated the Old Guard, they had deserted her and are now back for blood, with a full-scale rebellion. But she beats them anyway, and on top of that does some hands on killing on the Crimson Guard Avowed. This is Laseens big moment. The rebellion is beaten, factions are declaring for her, the Crimson Guard is here and along with them the chance for a unifying battle. But Malliks assasin gets through at her grandest moment. Laseen was devious, but not devious enough.
Mallik as new emperor is definitely a challenge to digest. From DG through RotCG we know the extent of his ambitions, his utter unscrupulousness, basically he is a slimeball. But he is Emperor, of an Empire that stretches across four continents. And in this Mallik actually shows some ability as in SW he breask the decades old deadlock on Korel. Of course it can be argued that he simultaneously blundered seriously on Genebackis in OST as during the whole Tyrant epsiode the Malzan army did not distinguish itself. What Mallik can/will do, remains to be seen. Theres another thread in General Book Topics called Current State of the Empire which discusses this.
So basically my argument is don't get into good/bad value judgements in Malzan. Try to ascertain a characters objectives/interests and then see how far that character is succesful in attaining the same.