Studlock, on 23 January 2015 - 05:11 PM, said:
Would you say it keeps reinserting itself? I've recently read a historical article on the subject and the authors argued that American Exceptialism actually originated in the the split between England and the colonies. The underlining idea was that the Founding Fathers believed they were literally creating a better, freer society when compared to Europe (which I'd definitely agree with up to a point). So I'm wondering if this idea is a constant one that is simply restructed with ever great historical event in American history or rather a bunch or different but similar and related ideas?
I don't agree with that theory (of the colonies establishing themselves as superior to the British, Spanish or French models in their declarations of independence) as the true beginning of American Exceptionalism.
My thinking is that once the colonies began mass-importing slaves - essentially shifting into the mindset that indentured servants weren't cost-effective and we had to go full bore into the "another human and all the humans belonging to that group are inferior to us because of some combination of skin color/place of birth/difference" - that is when the elite and the government runners began believing in American exceptionalism.
Essentially, because the colonists could shift so readily to slavery, make it pay off in astounding riches and not encounter any serious repercussions, the colonies/United States got away with it and that mindset grew semi-logically into "We are the best". I'd argue that the Spanish/French Caribbean colonies would have developed the same mindset - if they weren't island nations and limited in land and resources.
Look at the Victorian empire period of the British and how they acted in India/Pakistan/Bangladesh. That's a similar type of exceptionalism and it was done by subjugating the natives and stealing from them for many, many decades. Winston Churchill was directly responsible for something like 1.5 to 2 million deaths in the 1943 Bengali famine for refusing to ship them food that was coming from Australia to go to Europe for "uncertain future consumption needs". Churchill literally made comments to the effect that the "underfed Bengalis" were worth less than the Europeans who would later eat the food.
To answer your final questions: I believe that this is a single set of ideas that keep mutating and popping up, rather than evolutions of disparate lines of thinking that continually arrive at the same point of American exceptionalism. I don't think we've gone through radical enough changes to completely level the old thinkings - despite Civil Wars, Global Wars and massive societal change - to require new ones produced out of whole cloth and then sliding into the same conclusion of exceptionalism.
This post has been edited by amphibian: 23 January 2015 - 06:35 PM
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.