EmperorMagus, on 02 July 2014 - 10:21 AM, said:
Tattersail_, on 02 July 2014 - 10:07 AM, said:
Your case Tatts has a problem, it is that you start but assuming that Messermb IS the symp, then take every post that concerns him out of context and make it look like he is signalling.
For example:
Messremb, on 30 June 2014 - 03:18 PM, said:
HiddenOne, on 30 June 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:
Are we actually going to plan a town strategy, because I'm not sure that I remember doing that before.
I would like to note that this may be about to turn into serious business
Look out, HO has been possessed already. Poor attempt to stay in character there whoever you are, HO can't post more than a couple of sentences at a time!
Everyone is aware of HO's low posting habits, Messermb comments on it and because you're sure he is the symp and HO is scum, you use this as proof.
But for someone who is not sure about either of them, this just looks like faulty logic.
Even if I believed Messermb was symp, It is far more likely for you to be his master than anyone else.(As you yourself pointed out.)
Yeah, this is a fair point. It's essentially the same thing that Messremb did on his write up of me.
The thing is, I'm not sure I buy Tatts as killer. He's not acting any differently than usual, obviously, and other than the one post that Tatts himself points out, (again assuming Mess as symp), there isn't really anything concrete.
If we were to go on meta-posting patterns, I'd be much more concerned about HO from that standpoint. 30 + posts, and then stealth mode in Day 2 when he left the spotlight (until the last 5-ish hours). Maybe subconciously he knows how much I'll flip out if he's scum again and posted only 5 times.
