Tattersail_, on 02 July 2014 - 10:07 AM, said:
Sorry but this is a case, and EM and now Inane has ignored it. EM you said you cannot see him being that overt yet he signalled me a lot more overt than that. Second of all, we would not be looking at those posts if HO did not kill ST, ST would know of his partner and this would have been a closer game. I am fine with being lynched, we need a lynch but when I am gone, HO should be next.
Your case Tatts has a problem, it is that you start but assuming that Messermb IS the symp, then take every post that concerns him out of context and make it look like he is signalling.
For example:
Messremb, on 30 June 2014 - 03:18 PM, said:
HiddenOne, on 30 June 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:
at least he admitted it
Are we actually going to plan a town strategy, because I'm not sure that I remember doing that before.
I would like to note that this may be about to turn into serious business
Look out, HO has been possessed already. Poor attempt to stay in character there whoever you are, HO can't post more than a couple of sentences at a time!
Everyone is aware of HO's low posting habits, Messermb comments on it and because you're sure he is the symp and HO is scum, you use this as proof.
But for someone who is not sure about either of them, this just looks like faulty logic.
Even if I believed Messermb was symp, It is far more likely for you to be his master than anyone else.(As you yourself pointed out.)