Atrahal, on 17 June 2014 - 09:18 PM, said:
I have just googled it and yes, they do exist. In quantities too many for me to do justice with just one attached image here.
First post. No content.
Atrahal, on 18 June 2014 - 09:23 PM, said:
Eloth, on 18 June 2014 - 01:01 PM, said:
Ampelas, on 18 June 2014 - 12:47 PM, said:
Eloth, on 18 June 2014 - 12:45 PM, said:
Kaschan, on 18 June 2014 - 12:08 PM, said:
Wow I get on this morning expecting a full fledged shit show and there surprisingly isnt much going on
Yeah, that was my reaction, too. Oh well.
Regarding the HP vote... meh. It would be something different if we were at page 6 already, but this is post #53 and it's rather hypocritical to vote for no-shows when there's nothing happening anyway, even to call the guy out.
But maybe that's just tolerant ol' me.
I am extremely tolerant, I tell you. I even let old ladies jump the queue.
The other day, two old ladies just pushed into the snack bar queue ahead of me. I said what the hell, and they were like oh we're just getting these things we'll be really quick and I was like you can be really quick behind me in the queue too, or are you afraid you're going to drop dead in the next ten seconds?
Hood, on 18 June 2014 - 02:58 PM, said:
I see it's been rather stimulating conversation so far.
Denul, the only 'catch' in all your fine work is the possible Barghast/Kaschan signal which is worth keeping an eye on. Pallid, you would have a great point if Denul hadn't ruined it by building his Kaschan 'case'. GL, I'm perfectly happy with a low poster hunt. I think we've been neglecting that particular hobby for far too long. I hope that you understand that I prefer the prey to be the low poster that isn't me.
Barghast and Kaschan scum together two games in a row? Seems on the borderlands of the realms of probability. Just sayin'.
Denul, on 18 June 2014 - 09:00 PM, said:
You would think that after 29 hours most everyone would have at least 5 posts.
You would think that, wouldn't you.
Second post. Joke, followed by dismissing an opinion of who is scum based on previous games (wtf?), Followed by joke.
Atrahal, on 18 June 2014 - 09:46 PM, said:
Vote Ampelas
Either they, Galayn Lord, or Nimander Golit - or some combination thereof - are scum. I say this because they've all been middling, with GL and Will-Never-Be-Anomander only really spouting off when they've been called into question, before then subsiding again. I chose Ampelas though because he's been even less of a non-entity than that.
Ironic coming from the guy with 3 posts? Maybe. Doesn't make it less valid though.
Your third post. Targetting me because I have been "middling" and not contributing.
Atrahal, on 19 June 2014 - 12:20 AM, said:
I'm here and can switch to try and get the lynch. I'm going to bed in like five minutes, so what's likelier/better - Pallid or Barghast?
Fourth post. Trying to secure a lynch, no problem with this one.
Atrahal, on 19 June 2014 - 12:26 AM, said:
Pallid, on 19 June 2014 - 12:22 AM, said:
Atrahal, on 19 June 2014 - 12:20 AM, said:
I'm here and can switch to try and get the lynch. I'm going to bed in like five minutes, so what's likelier/better - Pallid or Barghast?
Well I'm not going to be voting for myself

. But then I'm already on Barghast so it's no help either way. Do you have particularly strong feelings about either of us?
I don't like either of the people on your train. But then I don't think I like you either.
Fifth post. States dislike for Pallid.
Atrahal, on 19 June 2014 - 09:15 PM, said:
I've seen no reason thus far to change my thinking from yesterday.
Vote Ampelas
Always around, never substantial.
Sixth and FINAL post. Perhaps we should call you Never around, never substantial?
Christ this is embarrassing just putting together. If you want to vote someone for being a non-entity I have a great candidate lined up.
http://forum.malazan...ost__p__1130106
That's a link to my Day 1 case on Pallid, obviously incorrect now, but hardly someone trying to be insubstantial.