Nimander Golit, on 29 May 2014 - 06:28 PM, said:
I saw the healer reveal before leaving, but I doubt that I would have removed and I almost certainly wouldn't have voted Barghast. Barghast's vote on Eloth makes sense to me at that point in time. Healer reveal looked like a ploy to gain a day. Easy claim to make because you can't prove it. And once revealed, if true, he's going to be dead shortly anyway. Test the reveal. And only one way to do that. And Barghast's vote on Eloth after the reveal would be incredibly stupid for scum. Why not just say, "oh, ok, well I'm not going to vote myself", wait it out, and NK him. That vote actually made a Barghast lynch more likely. Very, very ballsy or town.
No lynch, then no NK. WIFOM of course, but I find the two most likely explanations are Eloth is a killer or the killer abstained upon seeing the reveal. The latter requires that the killer did see the healer reveal and decided to throw some WIFOM into play. To be fair, I could easily be the killer under the latter condition. I'm not but somebody will bring it up.
Now that I'm looking at this through sober eyes:
Remove Vote
I still think you're scum, but I want to think on this a bit further.
So you're saying that what Barghast did was logical and sensible, but that also makes it a ballsy move for scum? You go so far as to say you would not have voted for him...I'm not sure how to reconcile those things.
Also, part of your accusation of me is about my attitude towards no lynch at the end of Day 1 (something I've explained already). Yet here you are saying you yourself would not have voted Barghast to get a lynch.