[Korbas]

Anthras, on 05 May 2014 - 06:40 PM, said:

This is just a checking in post.

Check in.

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 02:07 PM, said:

Not really surprising that no one took Shapeshifting. That could easily be one contract that stays open all game.

Comment on the one that didn't get taken. But seems to be assuming it's a conscious decision rather than somebody not putting a request in. (Which could very well be.)

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 05:03 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 29 April 2014 - 04:09 PM, said:

GAME MECHANICS

1 - General Structure
Players may begin posting as soon as the mods announce that the game has started on the thread. The game begins during the day. The day ends when when a sufficient number of people have voted to lynch a player (remove that player from the game) or voted to end the day without a lynch. Many games also have time limits on the days, and if no consensus is reached when the time expires, the day ends with no lynch. When the day phase has ended, night begins. The mods will then post a scene reporting the outcome of the day. Players may continue posting in the thread (unless they've been voted out) but no voting is allowed. Night ends when the mods post the morning scene reporting the outcome of the night actions. Day and night phases continue to alternate until the game ends.

2 - Day Phase
During the day, players may post in the thread and vote. Some roles may have special powers which can be used during the day.

2.1 - Voting Mechanics
To vote for a player: bold "vote" and that player's name.
To vote to end the day without a lynch: bold the phrase "vote night".
To remove your vote without casting a new vote: bold the phrase "remove vote".
To change your vote for a player: First bold remove vote then vote for the new player.

The vote should be positioned at the end of a post, and be clearly seperated from the rest of the post. Example:

Quote

your text, many quotes, brilliant arguments and a clever and convincing conclusion. Alternatively, a lame joke.

remove vote

vote Killer

Tholen, on 06 May 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 04:16 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 03:51 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 03:50 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 03:30 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:

Whoever has rupture: please, please be a good townie and hold onto that like it's a bottle of Glenfiddich. Never let it go and only open it on a very special occasion.

That is exactly what i would have done, if I was townie and I had received that role. So hopefully a townie did get it and will hold it back.

Interesting choice of wording in that sentence.

That IS a good catch - what do you mean IF you were a townie, Ven?

Well I am scum obviously! Hurr durr.

I am not really, I wouldn't be that loose with my wording. I see what you see, and to be honest, would be all over it if it was one of you guys!

I think this is the only thing I see right now. This plus your erratic style from the start with the weird joke votes. I'm going with Ven. I want to secure a vote in the chance something prevents me from coming back in time. I do plan on being here before that though. Until something substantially happens. vote Ven

Why don't you make the bare minimum effort at separating your vote from the rest of your post.

Bitches about bolding.

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 05:10 PM, said:

Yes I am here and getting caught up. I think that the first contract that was gone when I first posted was the antitank rifle materialization. I am very busy in RL and don't know how much I will be able to post today. I would be willing to vote for Venesara based on the if I was town slip. Unless something else come up before my RL day ends I will most likely be dropping a vote there.

I'm busy but willing to vote for the slip. Reasonable.

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 08:25 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 07:58 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 04:27 PM, said:

I'll hold back on voting for now, but I wouldn't mind going Venesara's way if that's where it goes. It could very well just be poor choice of words for a townie, but it could also be a slip. For a Day 1 case it's better than many we've seen in the last few games.

I wouldn't let it go if it was one of you guys. I totally meant it though. Are we allowed to divulge what contact we went for? I haven't read the rules properly.

Can we let people know if we have one currently?

What sort of things can be revealed to help you decide I am in fact town and the wording was poorly done?

You can not reveal anything about the contract that you currently hold. Do not reveal anything about the contract that you currently hold. It is against the rules to talk about any contract that you currently hold.

Bald statement that can be read as "don't say anything that will fuck up the lynch train forming on you"

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 08:33 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 08:05 PM, said:

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 05:10 PM, said:

Yes I am here and getting caught up. I think that the first contract that was gone when I first posted was the antitank rifle materialization. I am very busy in RL and don't know how much I will be able to post today. I would be willing to vote for Venesara based on the if I was town slip. Unless something else come up before my RL day ends I will most likely be dropping a vote there.

Anthras are you saying that when you posted there was only one contract showing as registered or that you noticed that it was registered and others might have been but you didn't notice?

When I checked in after the thread opened. I think that I was 4th. I noticed that there was a contract gone. The contract was the antitank rifle materialization. I did not notice any others (not that there wasn't but I don't think that there was). I thought that it was funny that scum went for that one first rather then one of the top two. Since the PM's went out way earlier then the game started I figured that scum went through and choose which contracts they wanted and that it had nothing to do with the people who posted before me. Now the next time that I checked the thread several more contracts were taken.

The answer to my query.

[Korbas]

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 08:37 PM, said:

I am taking off. I feel that Venesara has to be lynched. Failure to lynch them will cast a shadow over them for the rest of the game. Scum will use that shadow to hide in for as long as possible. If it was a slip that sucks. But due to the WIFOM Venesara has to be lynched. We will just be making the game harder on ourselves if we do not lynch Venesara today.



Vote Venesara

Vote.

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 08:38 PM, said:

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 08:35 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 08:30 PM, said:

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 08:25 PM, said:

How long do we have left today?

I highly doubt Venesara is scum but if that is the only option it beats getting no lynch, at least he will be known to be whatever he is and that question will be put to bed.

I'm not set in stone against Venesary, I'm certainly willing to go another route. What you thinking, low poster?

One of the low posters would be a better bet than venesara imo, if he IS scum he will give us plenty more chances fo screw up once people start having actualy STUFF to build cases on, but a low poster could coast through the entire game watching us eat ourselves.

Who are the lowest posters at the moment, Ryllandaras and Demelain?

I disagree. A low poster can come on and post. Leaving Venesara alive past today will create WIFOM and that is only useful for scum.

Oh no, let's not look at anyone else.



That is the totality of Anthras' contributions.

[Korbas]

Remove Vote


Vote Anthras

[Anthras]

Korbas calm down guy. There are a couple of reasons I didn't think that it was vital

A. Ps asked in the sign up thread for people to put in provisionals.

Path-Shaper, on 03 May 2014 - 06:29 PM, said:

Alts have been sent out. Let me know if there's any troubles logging in. I especially recommend the people who will be gone during the bank holiday try them out now if you have the chance.

Furthermore, the full contract list will be posted soon. If you want to submit a provisional request now, you can.

And

B

I was busy yesterday and wasn't really paying that much attention. The only reason I payed any attention is that it wasn't what I would have done so it caught my eye a bit.

C

And this I can't stress enough. You are assuming that ps was around to process the contracts as they came in. However if ps was busy during the day. She does have a job the she might have had a list if several but only time to do one then time to do a couple more. That is the problem with basing things off of what time ps did things. You don't know what ps was dealing with. I understand that you want an edge and that you think that there might be one in the time but it is such a potential wifom situation that I minimize its significance to the point of huh well that is interesting.

[Ay Estos]

If I saw just the one registered contract I'd think it was a mistake on PS's part and probably PM him about it. But I wouldn't mention it on thread in case it was, and if it was legit play (as it reasonably appears to be) I wouldn't mention it at the time, but would F5 the living hell out of the page until the first half of the registrations at least appear to keep an eye on what scum take. Unfortunately at the moment we have only Anti tank then bam, 4 more.

[Korbas]

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 09:24 PM, said:

Korbas calm down guy. There are a couple of reasons I didn't think that it was vital

A. Ps asked in the sign up thread for people to put in provisionals.

Path-Shaper, on 03 May 2014 - 06:29 PM, said:

Alts have been sent out. Let me know if there's any troubles logging in. I especially recommend the people who will be gone during the bank holiday try them out now if you have the chance.

Furthermore, the full contract list will be posted soon. If you want to submit a provisional request now, you can.

And

B

I was busy yesterday and wasn't really paying that much attention. The only reason I payed any attention is that it wasn't what I would have done so it caught my eye a bit.

C

And this I can't stress enough. You are assuming that ps was around to process the contracts as they came in. However if ps was busy during the day. She does have a job the she might have had a list if several but only time to do one then time to do a couple more. That is the problem with basing things off of what time ps did things. You don't know what ps was dealing with. I understand that you want an edge and that you think that there might be one in the time but it is such a potential wifom situation that I minimize its significance to the point of huh well that is interesting.

I will acknowledge that it's thin and based on the very subjective "I would have done..". Hence:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 09:07 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 08:56 PM, said:

I don't understand the point you're trying to make here...

I want to know why Anthras didn't feel that letting others know that contracts were being handed out was important. He remembers thinking it was funny that it wasn't one of the top two. So he can't say that he didn't think about it at all.

@ everyone else: would you not have commented on it? If I'm just imagining import where there is none, tell me before I waste more time on it.

[Anthras]

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 09:22 PM, said:

Remove Vote


Vote Anthras

Attempting to derail a fellow scums lynch train while using faulty logic.

Check

Doesn't say anything until I say that I am leaving for the day. Panic scum behavior
Check


Assumes that ps is going to do things that ps doesn't say they will. Such as do all contracts at the end of 18 hours. It does not say that in the op.
Making things up to fit a narrative.
Check

Panic posting as a train is starting on someone.
Check


I feel just fine with my vote and now I have my eye on you.

[Anthras]

Oh and korbas look at the time between my first posts. There were all of 4 people on when I got on and one of the contracts where taken. Why would I assume that was weird when none of the other posters did. It is a high tmdi game there is a lot of stuff I just take as ps says.

[Korbas]

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 09:30 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 09:22 PM, said:

Remove Vote


Vote Anthras

Attempting to derail a fellow scums lynch train while using faulty logic.

Check

I'm not fond of the train on Venesara. I think it's thinly based day 1.

Doesn't say anything until I say that I am leaving for the day. Panic scum behavior
Check

Didn't say anything because you hadn't answered my query until half an hour ago.

Assumes that ps is going to do things that ps doesn't say they will. Such as do all contracts at the end of 18 hours. It does not say that in the op.
Making things up to fit a narrative.
Check

I'm not the only one who assumed that.

Panic posting as a train is starting on someone.
Check

Nothing panicky in my posting. I went through Venesara because the train was forming. I went through you for the stated reason.

I feel just fine with my vote and now I have my eye on you.

Very well. But I'm quite comfortable with my vote for the moment.

[Korbas]

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:

Oh and korbas look at the time between my first posts. There were all of 4 people on when I got on and one of the contracts where taken. Why would I assume that was weird when none of the other posters did. It is a high tmdi game there is a lot of stuff I just take as ps says.

Oh, I fully understand that I'm using 20-20 hindsight. It's not the time before you posted that bothers me. It's the empty 16 minutes after you posted. By the same logic that was used to argue that Hanas was #9, somewhere in those 16 minutes registrant #2 submitted their list.

You posted at 2:40. PS updated the contract post at 2:56 to show 5 contracts registered. (There might even have been an intermediate post that showed only 3 contracts, which would mean that the one I saw was done after registrant #4 submitted. The edit line only shows the last edit, not intervening ones.)

Hell, Anthras, I'll even give you your best defense: Even if you had slipped when you first mentioned the one contract gone, you'd have been a complete idiot to answer my query the way you did. Verifying that it was just the one gone.

But slips happen. And I think you did.

[Okaros]

Korbas, I think your case against Anthras is pretty shaky. I'll admit that I hadn't even thought to keep an eye out for when certain contracts were registered until others pointed it out, so I probably wouldn't have posted anything if I had seen just one contract taken. That doesn't preclude Anthras purposely saying nothing, I'm just saying that you're making some pretty big logic leaps, if you ask me.

Anthras makes some good points about you showing up all of a sudden with a bunch of analysis against him when the train on Venesara started taking on some steam. For now, I'm more comfortable with a Venesara lynch than an Anthras lynch. Either way, IGMEO both of Y!

[Korbas]

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 09:53 PM, said:

Korbas, I think your case against Anthras is pretty shaky. I'll admit that I hadn't even thought to keep an eye out for when certain contracts were registered until others pointed it out, so I probably wouldn't have posted anything if I had seen just one contract taken. That doesn't preclude Anthras purposely saying nothing, I'm just saying that you're making some pretty big logic leaps, if you ask me.

Anthras makes some good points about you showing up all of a sudden with a bunch of analysis against him when the train on Venesara started taking on some steam. For now, I'm more comfortable with a Venesara lynch than an Anthras lynch. Either way, IGMEO both of Y!

I said earlier that it was shaky.

As for Venesara, I got sidetracked after I posted his content and started in on Anthras. We're basing that lynch on on a single comment. (And it's one that I pointed out btw)

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 03:50 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 03:30 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:

Whoever has rupture: please, please be a good townie and hold onto that like it's a bottle of Glenfiddich. Never let it go and only open it on a very special occasion.

That is exactly what i would have done, if I was townie and I had received that role. So hopefully a townie did get it and will hold it back.

Interesting choice of wording in that sentence.

I'm willing to vote Vensara if that's what we've got. But I think he's town. Because of the emo shit later but also because that post is overtly worded so as to imply the author isn't town.

Both my opinions on those two are shaky. And gut. But I'm sticking with both for now.

[Ay Estos]

The case against Anthras

After an early check-in (possible early registration) he disappears for some time. He returns to post a single ultra-safe no content post, before disappearing for some more hours. Makes a comeback post about formatting ettiquete in a very pissy way, before saying he is willing to lynch Venesara. Clarifies for venesara the rules about revealing contracts, also in a very pissy way. Makes ONE legitimate post before announcing he is going to bed, that takes seven sentences to say "I didn't notice any others". Incites Venesara to be lynched threatening WIFOM if he survives. (Which I agreed with because a few people mentioned it, but if HE is one of the people threatening it?) As well as possibly deflecting attention from either Ryllandaras or Demelain? Later (all of this after saying he was going to sleep) he defends himself by putting blame on PS and that he "wasn't really paying that much attention".

Highly willing to go for a thin and trivial lynch, threatening WIFOM for the rest of the game if we don't follow through, staying on well after "going to sleep" to ensure the lynch because of a mistake.

Agree with Korbas who quoted a lot of relevant stuff.

Remove Vote

Vote Anthras

This post has been edited by Ay Estos: 06 May 2014 - 10:08 PM

[Ay Estos]

Heading off until after day 1 expires, for a day 1 lynch Anthras is looking like a pretty solid target to me.

[Okaros]

So we're gonna go Anthras then? I have a feeling it's not gonna make a difference (i.e. there won't be enough people online for a lynch) but I'd like to have a train started for those who'll pop on while I'm asleep. Better chance of a lynch that way. Both the cases on Venesara and Anthras are shaky at best, and I'd rather lynch Venesara than Anthras, but I'd be willing to move to Anthras if that's where you guys really think we should go. But regardless of which way we go, we'll have to look at the other one closely tomorrow.

[Ryllandaras]

Ay Estos sees Venesara being made a target.

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 07:18 PM, said:

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 07:14 PM, said:

snip

There is no reason for him to be upset at being called a PI, so there must be a better reason than THAT for this kind of reaction, maybe the phrashing just rubbed him the wrong way. He can't even be a SK because even if there is one, they were put in random order with the scum.

We may want to look at who else MIGHT have missed registering, though to be honest I can't easily imagine a scenario where someone checks in but volunteers to stay as a RI, especially as #9 in the list, plenty of good stuff still there.

Fixed in red, not going to edit something like that out, but this should avoid some the grr grr finger pointing grr grr mispeaking is punishable by death grr grr

Makes a poor wording choice (I haven't included the particular unedited post, it's the one just before this one), then corrects and highlights it themselves in bright red lettering.

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 08:02 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 07:58 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 04:27 PM, said:

I'll hold back on voting for now, but I wouldn't mind going Venesara's way if that's where it goes. It could very well just be poor choice of words for a townie, but it could also be a slip. For a Day 1 case it's better than many we've seen in the last few games.

I wouldn't let it go if it was one of you guys. I totally meant it though. Are we allowed to divulge what contact we went for? I haven't read the rules properly.

Can we let people know if we have one currently?

What sort of things can be revealed to help you decide I am in fact town and the wording was poorly done?

No you can't tell anyone anything about your contract.

I think you can SAY you have a contract in general, but even then why bother? Don't say when you got it either, that would mean talking about PS PMs and their timings.

Just continue to be a reasonable player, and also I may have saved your bacon, by burning mine, by accidentally forgetting to say "if there is one" when also talking about a hypothetical situation. Turns out people LOVE their IFs.

The only things you can talk about in regards to contracts are (a) previously held ones, and ( anything you hear from PMs through a lover connection.

No one makes a deal out of it except Ay Estos themselves again, essentially saying their slip is a bigger one than Venesara's.

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 08:35 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 08:30 PM, said:

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 08:25 PM, said:

How long do we have left today?

I highly doubt Venesara is scum but if that is the only option it beats getting no lynch, at least he will be known to be whatever he is and that question will be put to bed.

I'm not set in stone against Venesary, I'm certainly willing to go another route. What you thinking, low poster?

One of the low posters would be a better bet than venesara imo, if he IS scum he will give us plenty more chances fo screw up once people start having actualy STUFF to build cases on, but a low poster could coast through the entire game watching us eat ourselves.

Who are the lowest posters at the moment, Ryllandaras and Demelain?

'Hey guys, what about the low posters instead of Venesara?'

Ay Estos, on 06 May 2014 - 10:07 PM, said:

The case against Anthras

After an early check-in (possible early registration) he disappears for some time. He returns to post a single ultra-safe no content post, before disappearing for some more hours. Makes a comeback post about formatting ettiquete in a very pissy way, before saying he is willing to lynch Venesara. Clarifies for venesara the rules about revealing contracts, also in a very pissy way. Makes ONE legitimate post before announcing he is going to bed, that takes seven sentences to say "I didn't notice any others". Incites Venesara to be lynched threatening WIFOM if he survives. (Which I agreed with because a few people mentioned it, but if HE is one of the people threatening it?) As well as possibly deflecting attention from either Ryllandaras or Demelain? Later (all of this after saying he was going to sleep) he defends himself by putting blame on PS and that he "wasn't really paying that much attention".

Highly willing to go for a thin and trivial lynch, threatening WIFOM for the rest of the game if we don't follow through, staying on well after "going to sleep" to ensure the lynch because of a mistake.

Agree with Korbas who quoted a lot of relevant stuff.

Remove Vote

Vote Anthras

And finally hopes to be able to get traction going on Korbas' case on Anthras instead of Venesara.


In conclusion - Ay Estos really wishes that Venesara isn't lynched.

[Tholen]

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 09:46 PM, said:

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:

Oh and korbas look at the time between my first posts. There were all of 4 people on when I got on and one of the contracts where taken. Why would I assume that was weird when none of the other posters did. It is a high tmdi game there is a lot of stuff I just take as ps says.

Oh, I fully understand that I'm using 20-20 hindsight. It's not the time before you posted that bothers me. It's the empty 16 minutes after you posted. By the same logic that was used to argue that Hanas was #9, somewhere in those 16 minutes registrant #2 submitted their list.

You posted at 2:40. PS updated the contract post at 2:56 to show 5 contracts registered. (There might even have been an intermediate post that showed only 3 contracts, which would mean that the one I saw was done after registrant #4 submitted. The edit line only shows the last edit, not intervening ones.)

Hell, Anthras, I'll even give you your best defense: Even if you had slipped when you first mentioned the one contract gone, you'd have been a complete idiot to answer my query the way you did. Verifying that it was just the one gone.

But slips happen. And I think you did.

I'd be willing to bring this case up again on Day 2. Korbas has made a decent case, a very great case for Day 1 for fact. I still won't feel right about letting a first choice off our hook. It is a mistake I made once before. I am comfortable with Ven for today, and looking more into the time frame references from Korbas about Anthras tomorrow.

[Tholen]

Anthras, on 06 May 2014 - 05:03 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 29 April 2014 - 04:09 PM, said:

GAME MECHANICS

1 - General Structure
Players may begin posting as soon as the mods announce that the game has started on the thread. The game begins during the day. The day ends when when a sufficient number of people have voted to lynch a player (remove that player from the game) or voted to end the day without a lynch. Many games also have time limits on the days, and if no consensus is reached when the time expires, the day ends with no lynch. When the day phase has ended, night begins. The mods will then post a scene reporting the outcome of the day. Players may continue posting in the thread (unless they've been voted out) but no voting is allowed. Night ends when the mods post the morning scene reporting the outcome of the night actions. Day and night phases continue to alternate until the game ends.

2 - Day Phase
During the day, players may post in the thread and vote. Some roles may have special powers which can be used during the day.

2.1 - Voting Mechanics
To vote for a player: bold "vote" and that player's name.
To vote to end the day without a lynch: bold the phrase "vote night".
To remove your vote without casting a new vote: bold the phrase "remove vote".
To change your vote for a player: First bold remove vote then vote for the new player.

The vote should be positioned at the end of a post, and be clearly seperated from the rest of the post. Example:

Quote

your text, many quotes, brilliant arguments and a clever and convincing conclusion. Alternatively, a lame joke.

remove vote

vote Killer

Tholen, on 06 May 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 04:16 PM, said:

Okaros, on 06 May 2014 - 03:51 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 03:50 PM, said:

Venesara, on 06 May 2014 - 03:30 PM, said:

Korbas, on 06 May 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:

Whoever has rupture: please, please be a good townie and hold onto that like it's a bottle of Glenfiddich. Never let it go and only open it on a very special occasion.

That is exactly what i would have done, if I was townie and I had received that role. So hopefully a townie did get it and will hold it back.

Interesting choice of wording in that sentence.

That IS a good catch - what do you mean IF you were a townie, Ven?

Well I am scum obviously! Hurr durr.

I am not really, I wouldn't be that loose with my wording. I see what you see, and to be honest, would be all over it if it was one of you guys!

I think this is the only thing I see right now. This plus your erratic style from the start with the weird joke votes. I'm going with Ven. I want to secure a vote in the chance something prevents me from coming back in time. I do plan on being here before that though. Until something substantially happens. vote Ven

Why don't you make the bare minimum effort at separating your vote from the rest of your post.

My mistaken.

Vote Ven

[Pran Chole]

Hello all.

We have just a little more than 6 hours left, in the rather dead time of posting.

I will be on and off, and am willing to switch to Ven if that'll get the lynch.

My actual thoughts on the matter are that the wording slip by Ven is very thin, and can in reality be explained away fairly easily. If he's town, this is just further evidence that town has to play carefully with their wording, since the smallest things like this often become a distraction. If he's scum, well, thanks for the hint.

I like Korbas' case on Anthras. Not airtight, but not bad for day 1. I"ll leave my vote there for now, since I there is no immediate need of removal.

[Korbas]

Path-Shaper, on 06 May 2014 - 08:29 PM, said:

It is Day 1. 9 hours and 20 minutes remain.

14 players are alive: Anthras, Ay Estos, Demelain, Hanas, Hentos Ilm, Karatallid, Kaschan, Korbas, Korbalain, Okaros, Pran Chole, Ryllandaras, Tholen, Venesara

8 votes to lynch. 7 votes to go to night.

1 vote for Karatallid (Korbas)
1 vote for Anthras (Pran Chole)
2 votes for Venesara (Ryllandaras, Okaros)
1 vote for Ay Estos (Hanas)
1 vote for Korbas (Venesara)

Currently I think:
6 hours 10 minutes

8 votes to lynch. 7 votes to go to night.

3 vote for Anthras (Pran Chole, Korbas, Ay Estos)
4 votes for Venesara (Ryllandaras, Okaros, Anthras, Tholen)
1 vote for Ay Estos (Hanas)
1 vote for Korbas (Venesara)

I'm willing to switch to Venesara for the lynch. Still like my vote on Anthras.

I'll be around off and on for a couple more hours.