[Ampelas]

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:40 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:39 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:

I HAVE RETURNED

AND THERE WAS MUCH REJOICING

but actually i've been super busy over the last 24 hours. so let me read some...jesus, pages. ok then

A post-by-post response to every post would be much apprecited

already on it

i would have added a wink there but apparently that is confusing people so i guess smilies are off limits

so if i starting winking no one is going to shit their pants anymore?

[Kessobahn]

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

[Eloth]

Amp, a good start would be to explain your disappearance. I actually have you on my probably town list based upon a single comment that you made that echoed something in my role PM. So, no, i can't quote your line without breaking that rule.

HOWEVER: your outrage over me hammering GL before he could answer questions really does make me wonder why you left him at l-1 in the first place.`

[Kessobahn]

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

Amp, a good start would be to explain your disappearance. I actually have you on my probably town list based upon a single comment that you made that echoed something in my role PM. So, no, i can't quote your line without breaking that rule.

HOWEVER: your outrage over me hammering GL before he could answer questions really does make me wonder why you left him at l-1 in the first place.`

I thought that was you, I found that hammer scummy tbh, haven't got to that part in the review

[Bek Okhan]

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:32 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:30 PM, said:

the more I read Ampelas the more I find it interestin he caught onto Tiam and Galayn within the first 40 posts. Thats an amazing scumdar. too good to be true? or incredibly astute?

Which post do you mean?

Sorry just posted it. Think Ampelas was the one that originally had us pegging Monok as master.

I just had an odd thought about MO. That "pull up a sandbag and tell war stories". Movie quote or whatever. It could also be read as "get to spamming".

hmmmn. Ok I also noticed theres almost ALWAYS a link between players with a story exempting them from building cases or delivering substance. Monok and Denul have the best excuses.

In the Malazans game Venge was throwing up tables on the subject of picking on the "working man". Starting to think excuses don't always mean scum but scum always seek excuses.

[Rikkter]

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:43 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:33 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:28 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:25 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 02 April 2014 - 09:17 PM, said:

Also, vote count on a phone is a real nasty work. I'll skip it for now with (or without) your permission.
I will be mord thorough in the morning.

Ok, leveling question before you zonk out.

Say we lynch somebody at post 442 while you're asleep. People keep posting. We go over 460 before you wake up.

How would that affect the levels and any abilities tied to them?

Shit I didn't think of that...Theres that gap.

Yes. And that gap could be very harmful to us.

Yeah I thought about this and I think if anything I'm on the hit list. Today may be the only chance I get to REALLY pile it in so I'll try stay up late and keep posting. If I push at it I think we can make 600. especially now that we have more people in.

If anything you'd be on the hit-list because you're the only one who hasn't demonstrated the ability to post in the timespan between PMs getting sent out and thread opening - a narrow window that everyone else has cut into although Korabas is a very close second. Of course the convo doesn't have to have been two way, GL may just have been posting as much as he could into the convo before it was shut off for day (if indeed it was shut off for day) so that his partner would get a sense of his strategy and plans

[Rikkter]

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

I'll try to do so, just to keep you happy

[Rikkter]

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

I'll try to do so, just to keep you happy

Oops, IGNORE ME KESSO

[Rikkter]

I mean

IGNORE ME KESSO

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

I'll try to do so, just to keep you happy

Oops, IGNORE ME KESSO

[Kessobahn]

I don't think a convo would have opened at all if it were going to be closed in the day, that would create an unfair advantage

[Rikkter]

IGNORE ME KESSO

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

I mean

IGNORE ME KESSO

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

I'll try to do so, just to keep you happy

Oops, IGNORE ME KESSO

^Yeah, uh, that is okay right?

[Bek Okhan]

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:44 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:43 PM, said:

Monok Ochem, on 31 March 2014 - 02:35 PM, said:

lets pull up a sandbag and chat about the fucking war shall we?

next you asshats will be high fiving each other over the 'fucking eaters'



fifth or something

This one?

Anyone understand this reference? I've got nothing

uh think its The first Law. Think the bloody nine and Biaz

[Ampelas]

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

Amp, a good start would be to explain your disappearance. I actually have you on my probably town list based upon a single comment that you made that echoed something in my role PM. So, no, i can't quote your line without breaking that rule.

HOWEVER: your outrage over me hammering GL before he could answer questions really does make me wonder why you left him at l-1 in the first place.`

no problem

i have a job and other responsibilities that kept me from playing for most of today and all of last night. however now work is finally slowing down and i need a beer and i can post. until i get home, where the beer is, and then the posting shall increase even more.

as for gl lynch --

first, YOU are the one who fucked up the hammer by 2 fuckin hours. so i dont think you're in any position to point fingers. if you go back and read my posts, i was hesitant to put gl at l-1 for a while but then with less than 2 hours i put my vote down because well, i fucking thought he was scum

he didn't show up till like less than an hour before timeout saying he was gonna explain and everyone there had either voted or was holding their votes so i wasn't worrying about a driveby like you made, esp out of nowhere. was that like your first post or something? i can't remember much from what you said on day 1, genuinely.

[Kessobahn]

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

I mean

IGNORE ME KESSO

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

I'll try to do so, just to keep you happy

Oops, IGNORE ME KESSO

so kind of you, just get the bold part first

[Eloth]

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:49 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

Amp, a good start would be to explain your disappearance. I actually have you on my probably town list based upon a single comment that you made that echoed something in my role PM. So, no, i can't quote your line without breaking that rule.

HOWEVER: your outrage over me hammering GL before he could answer questions really does make me wonder why you left him at l-1 in the first place.`

I thought that was you, I found that hammer scummy tbh, haven't got to that part in the review

I dropped my vote without realizing there was a 6th vote on. I was looking at the post count and didn't want to not get a vote in before 240. Hitting post without checking to see what's been said while I was busy typing in the reply window.

[Rikkter]

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:53 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

I mean

IGNORE ME KESSO

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

I'll try to do so, just to keep you happy

Oops, IGNORE ME KESSO

so kind of you, just get the bold part first

There's a bold part?

Also, anyone else noticing the forum is sloooowing down? I had a 504 Gateway Time-out error just now. Are we breaking forum? Decamp to the backup?

[Ampelas]

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 08:25 PM, said:

Tiamatha, on 01 April 2014 - 08:04 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 01 April 2014 - 07:46 PM, said:

question

so the lock vote is kinda out of nowhere, we have just a few hours or less left and you are putting your vote on a new train? that doesn't seem like you are trying to get a lynch today. would you prefer a no-lynch? didn't you suggest just voting night at some point? basically you're either trying to derail the day 1 lynch, you want distance from GL, or you are voting lock mostly based on gut as you said. i'm not going to hassle you about your vote choice but are you willling/not willing to switch to gl to get a lynch? your suspicion of lock has been registered, perhaps unnecessarily. also that you are conviced gl is town, well, it is still day 1. i agree his actions seem to line up that way but at this point i don't know how you PI somebody on day 1 without some clear evidence

who else would you vote besides lock? you didn't really say, but basically just cleared alkend, mo, and gl from your list and pulled lock's name out of a hat.

anyway curious to hear your thoughts back...

I should have voted earlier to be fair, but I was hoping something more concrete might come up. It didn't, so I'm putting out where my suspicions lie, even if they're not backed up by strong evidence.

My statement of voting night was sarcastic in the extreme, not serious.

I do want to get a lynch today, even though we likely have Denul's modkill coming up. I just don't think GL is the right way to go, and out of the people with votes currently on them, I'm most convinced by that out of all of them. Out of the other ones with votes on them, I would be least against voting for Bek Okhan.

If you look at the way Tiam talks about modkill it all but echoes GL

Galayn Lord, on 01 April 2014 - 01:09 PM, said:

It looks like Denul will get Modkilled at this rate. I hope not but there is no point in voting for them. I have only just noticed Okral Lom hasn't posted either.Remove VoteI want to go back and have a look at Bek Okhan, he rubbed me the wrong way on a few posts.

Both of them seem a bit hard pressed about this modkill possibility...I wonder

If Denul was absent during night that would also explain our lack of a night event assuming Denul is a killer that is. and that the story behind not being online at all and not knowing when the game would start is true....

hmmn. I don't know if I'm reaching but it just looks really strange to have a signalling case attached to GLs vote on Denul and then this echoed lament.

i basically agree with this, barring what i don't know about denul yet, but if you loook at tiam's post and how he responded to me, it's extremely subtle in that he "should have voted earlier" (???) and he doesn't answer my questions about who he thinks is scum. that is really odd. even bad townies usually think they have some feel for scum even if it isn't massive case worthy shit, gut is enough. but tiam refuses.

[Bek Okhan]

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:56 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:49 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

Amp, a good start would be to explain your disappearance. I actually have you on my probably town list based upon a single comment that you made that echoed something in my role PM. So, no, i can't quote your line without breaking that rule.

HOWEVER: your outrage over me hammering GL before he could answer questions really does make me wonder why you left him at l-1 in the first place.`

I thought that was you, I found that hammer scummy tbh, haven't got to that part in the review

I dropped my vote without realizing there was a 6th vote on. I was looking at the post count and didn't want to not get a vote in before 240. Hitting post without checking to see what's been said while I was busy typing in the reply window.

I get that reasoning and GL was on at a very nervous time if I recall correctly? Didn't he come in at a level threshhold? would have hurt us to hear him out but we passed the threshold anyway on our own so cant really say we were better for the early hammer.

Edit: switched came to come.

This post has been edited by Bek Okhan: 02 April 2014 - 10:02 PM

[Kessobahn]

happened to me as well




I should say All Caps part

[Ampelas]

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:56 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:49 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

Amp, a good start would be to explain your disappearance. I actually have you on my probably town list based upon a single comment that you made that echoed something in my role PM. So, no, i can't quote your line without breaking that rule.

HOWEVER: your outrage over me hammering GL before he could answer questions really does make me wonder why you left him at l-1 in the first place.`

I thought that was you, I found that hammer scummy tbh, haven't got to that part in the review

I dropped my vote without realizing there was a 6th vote on. I was looking at the post count and didn't want to not get a vote in before 240. Hitting post without checking to see what's been said while I was busy typing in the reply window.

l2preview post noob. you said before that there were 4 votes when you were typing up - when you got called on it later you said you actually saw vote 5 - and then two hours later you post without realizing you're the hammer. i don't like this very much, it doesn't strike me as scum as much as bad play and then bad explanations that make you look bad. so you said it was 4 votes at first - then you said you knew there were 5? why lie about this? even on your phone, you can't open a new fuckin tab and check the thread after your exhaustive 2 hour post marathon? l2p imo. posting with a vote like that at EOD is just bad play