And once again, I apologize for the delay. Problem is, post-election things are kinda localized in Donbass. And the situation's there so freaking complicated it's hard to figure out without following non-stop. Which I stopped doing, b/c I have other obligations in my life. Plus, My dad's not working this week, so HE has been following it non-stop.
But, the gist is this. ON Sunday, there was an election.Turnout was about 18 million voters-roughly 60% turnout. For comparison, in 2010 runoff round, the turnout was 29 million. The last parliamentary in 2012-20 million. There was no voting in Crimea+Sevastopol (minus 2.5 million potential voters), majority of electoral districts in Donbass (roughly 80% of the population) were unable to vote since DNR + LNR forces did all they could to disrupt the work of electoral committees. However,
territory-wise, the elections covered most of the territory of Donbass. In Luhansk in particular, only 2 out of 12 electoral districts held elections. However, there 2 districts cover 12 out of the oblast's 18 regions in the northern part of the oblast. Due to the fact that geography and demographics of Donbass don't really match up, majority of population lives in a "belt" of industrial cities stretching from Donetsk to Luhansk, with branches following railways and coal veins. If Soviets had another 50 years to run the place, I expect we;d have had one gigantic "hyper-polis" where Donbass now is, poisoning the planet with its industrial might.
In Donetsk Oblast, the elections took place in the 4 Western regions controlled by "Dnipro" and "Donbass" batallions, as well as in the southern part of the oblast, including Mariupol. Turnout in Donbass was generally low, though, as there was a heavy propaganda from the people's republics about how the election is illegitimate and should be boycotted. A total of 200k people voted on Donbass (in 2010- almost 4 mil voters), and turnout was generally lower than usual in the South and Eastern oblasts, as many people there didn't feel there was a good candidate for them to vote (The traditional candidates for these regions were usually either Communists, or the Party of Regions, and both have discredited themselves. At the same time, the "Maydan", pro-Western, or "Orange" candidates aren't well trusted either). Nonetheless, the high turnout in the West of the country and in Kyyiv helped to boost the total turnout to about 60% of all eligible voters.
Oh, and while I was posting this, there's a picture that popped up in a tweetfeed, explaining voter activity:
Twitter opora ????????????? ....htm (206.39K)
Number of downloads: 12 teh Darker areas show higher turnout, with yeallow being occupied territory (not sure what's up with that one yellow district in the north EDIT: apparently it's the Exclusion Zone round Chornobyl).
As for the results: The oligarch Poroshenko won. HE won b/c the polls put him up as the having 40+% rating, and people wanted the election to be over in 1 round so as not to wait 3 weeks more for a runoff. He had plurality of votes in every singe electoral district, though there were huge variations for 2nd place depending on the region. Personally, I am not a fan of Poroshenko. He is very much "old guard". It was a power struggle between him and Tymoshenko that destroyed the "Orange coalition" in 2005 following the Orange Revolution. Being the godfather of one of President Yuschenko's kids, Poroshenko wanted power in exchange for his support. In fact, Yushenko promised both him and Tymoshenko the position of Prime Minister if he won, but Tymoshenko got that promise in writing. TO offset her, Yushenko made Poroshenko head of National Security and Defence Council, which he turned into a "Shadow Cabinet". the ensuing political power struggle allowed the Party of Regions to bounce back into big politics, and the disssapointment with the failures of Orange Revolution allowed Yanukovych to win the 2010 presidential election and plunge the country into criminal rule for 3 and a half years.
So, yeah. I'm not a fan of the new pres. but neither is pretty much anyone. There's a ton of civic orgs that will act as watchdogs, hounding every step of the new govt. There WILL be a new parliamentary election pretty much as soon as the Russia situation is cleared up somewhat (either in the fall, or next spring), which will (hopefully) see new parties emerge and finally leave the old political "elites" by the wayside.
I'm even less happy about Klytchko becoming the mayor of Kyyiv (he was running for mayor of the capital as Poroshenko's man). But that is a problem people of Kyyv will need to deal with. There's currently a bit of a scandal with vote-rigging for the Kyyv City council elections--a fledgling new party, Democratic Alliance, composed of civil activists is just borderline below the threshold 3%, and there are indicators their votes are being stolen to keep them out (Kyyv council is important, because they manage land rights (and building permits) in the capital, which is prime real estate). The idea of vote riggin now is despicable, but there are civic org watchdogs that are gonna be hounding them every step of the way. there's also a vote-rigging issue in Odessa, where there was a mayoral election and the "orange" candidate won according to teh exit polls, but the results are giving it to the party of Regions candidate.
And then Monday the ATO ramped up. Predictable. Since Poroshenko was all but declared winner on Sunday (although it took till yesterday to get the result protocols from Donbass districts), there's now a "legitimate" commander in chief, and a chain of command. So the armed forces perked up, with helicopters firing on checkpoints, and snipers working on those terrorists that tried to take control of Donetsk airport. Monday saw 35 terrorist casualties reported by Ministry of Defence, with DNR's own radio channeels saying 100 dead 300 wounded. It's hard to eliminate them, because of the huge number of civilians, but they are somewhat contained.
The situation there is a mess. In Donetsk Oblast, there's 3 organisations calling themselves DNR. There's also "Novorossiya", headed by the MP Tsaryov that is supposedly an amalgamation of DNR and LNR and wants to gai control over the rest of Southern and Eastern oblasts and Crimea (!!!) and become part of a federated Ukraine. The 3 DNRs don't really recognize each other. There's also 2 terrorist battalians- "oplot" ("Resistance")-which is a Kharkiv-based pro-Russian quasi-criminal "fight club" network, which was largely run out of Kharkiv, and now seems to be used as bodyguards by top Party of Regions officials, and "Vostok" ("East"), which has teh exact same name as a (supposeldy disbanded) shock troops of the Russian army, composed of Chechens. And this "Vostok" also has Chechens. Funny coincidence, that.
The border is nearly non-existant, as Ukrainian border guards repeatedly report "breakthroughs" and "breakrough attempts" by convoys of armed militants coming from Russia. Situation is turning into a slow-burning war, because the govt is unwilling to go in hard if it'll cause collateral damage. At the same time, without declaring martial law there's not enough resources to seal up the border to prevent Russian "volunteers" of seeping through.
There's incessant squabbling within the DNR (LNR seems far more stable by comparison, and it enjoys the full support of the oligarch Yefremov, who is one of the big Party of Regions bigwigs). While Luhansk is consolidated and separatists there are stronger, Donetsk oblast is a mess. People are fleeing though not en mass), businesses are stopping, crime is on the rise. The rest of the country is raising money to bring the army to shape, and organizing to keep Russian "liberators" out. Frankly, most are thankful the mess is on Donbass and not where they are. The general sentiment is, "if the people of Donbass don't start to organize resistance, no one should do it for them". The oligatrch Akhmetov has relocated to Kyyiv- a move that's pretty indicative of him losing control (his residence in Donetsk became a big subject of DNR's attention.
overall, it's complicated. The pro-Russia "Russian Spring" on Donbass is being heavily influence by 1) teh criminal tendencies of those recruited to be its footsoldiers on one side and 2) the class inequality struggle that expresses itself as ultra-left anti-big-business expropriationist rhetoric on the other. It's important to keep in mind that this "Revolution" does not enjoy widespread support. Working classes (Miners, metallurgists, factory workers) are generally pro-Russian, but not actively so--they work to put food on the table, and they need "stability". The middle class is small and intimidated--it's impossible to run an overly successful small business on the Donbass, because once it reaches a certain margin of profitability, the nice Party of Regions functioanries will arrange a raider takeover and bleed it dry. So the middle class--which was the driving force of the Revolution elsewhere in the country-is intimidated into inaction here. Which means the pro-unity supporters can only wait for the Army, or, conversely, wait for the DNR terrorists to push the average workers too far, so as to cause a violent uprising, where pissed off working mob will charge terrorists with machine guns.
So yeah, that's your week in UA in a nutshell. There's so international stuff, but i'll write about that on the weekend
EDIT: weird, picture fail. here's a twitter link:
https://twitter.com/...8190080/photo/1
This post has been edited by Mentalist: 30 May 2014 - 07:04 PM