Malazan Empire: gIV Malazan Empire Eclipse - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 297 Pages +
  • « First
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

gIV Malazan Empire Eclipse R9 player order: Twelve,IH,MorCF,Tapper,Khell,D'rek,Tatts,Gnaw

#3241 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 07:38 PM

Round 5 Rep Draws


Start draw pile is:
  • 11 ones
  • 7 twos
  • 5 threes
  • 2 fours



382
Rep draw:
  • Khell 1
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • four
    • (screenshots will be posted later.)
    • keeps the four and puts a two back
  • IH 3 I fucked this one up.
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • one
    • three
    • keeps the three and returns a two
  • IH 3
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • two
    • two
    • discards all

309
Rep draw:
  • D'rek 2
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • keeps the two. draw pile is reduced to 24
  • D'rek 2
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • keeps the two. draw pile is reduced to 24.
  • Gnaw 1
    • There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • three
    • discards

307
Rep draw:
  • Khell 1
    • There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • discards
  • Tatts 4
    • There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • one
    • two
    • keeps the two. pile is reduced to 23.



228
Rep draw:
  • Gnaw 2
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • three
    • discards. Doh. shouldn't even be rolling for gnaw. or Khell
  • Khell 1 doesn't roll
  • Tatts 1
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • discards.
226
Rep draw:


  • D'rek 2
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • one
    • discards
  • Gnaw 1 doesn't roll
204
Rep draw:
  • IH 2
  • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
  • two
  • one
  • discards
108
Rep draw:
  • IH 2
  • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
  • one
  • two
  • discards

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 09 December 2013 - 08:08 PM

0

#3242 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 09 December 2013 - 07:39 PM

I'm crossing my fingers that I can eek out one more round from the supernova. I don't want to have to blow my science on a wormhole generator when I can move the ole fashion way. And by old fashion way I mean the supercool science fiction space travel from one solar system to another that probably won't be invented for at least a few hundred more years type of way.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#3243 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 09 December 2013 - 07:46 PM

What happened to my battle with the ancient?
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#3244 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 09 December 2013 - 07:54 PM

View PostMorgoth, on 09 December 2013 - 07:46 PM, said:

What happened to my battle with the ancient?



I think he paused the battle with IH as he wants IH to confirm retreat and where he wants to retreat to before he moves onto the battle with the ancients.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#3245 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 07:59 PM

View Posttwelve, on 09 December 2013 - 07:54 PM, said:

View PostMorgoth, on 09 December 2013 - 07:46 PM, said:

What happened to my battle with the ancient?



I think he paused the battle with IH as he wants IH to confirm retreat and where he wants to retreat to before he moves onto the battle with the ancients.


^^ that
0

#3246 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:21 PM

Ok, I'm going to process his retreat order. Can't do discoveries until after battles are done anyways.
0

#3247 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:26 PM

Battle 13: 105 said:

105a said:

Morgoth vs IH

Nukes: yes
Missiles: no
Shields: no
Computers: yes
Specials: Absorption Field

IH: 1x cruiser. 3 init, 5/5 health, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4
Morgoth: 1x Cruiser. 4 init, 5/5 health, +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4

Firing order: Morgoth -> IH

Retreat is possible for Morgoth and IH

Battle orders: ?

  • IH: Battle orders vs morgoth, shoot until he hits me. If he has been hit for 3 or more damage by this point, to the death!
  • Morgoth: retreat if 3 pts of damage with no hits on IH


Engagement One:

IH 5/5 health, Morgoth 5/5 health.

r5 105a Eng One. Morgy: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.
http://orokos.com/roll/154012#
Description
r5 105a Eng One. Morgy: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.
Results
1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=3]
miss

r5 105a Eng One. IH: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4.

http://orokos.com/roll/154013#
Description
r5 105a Eng One. IH: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4.
Results
1#1d6x4: 1 # 1 [1d6x4=5]
IH hits for one.

both survive 5/5 and 4/5


Engagement Two:

IH ?/5 health, Morgoth ?/5 health.

r5 105a Eng Two. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.

http://orokos.com/roll/154014#
Description
r5 105a Eng Two. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4
Results
1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=1]
miss

r5 105a Eng Two. IH: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4.

http://orokos.com/roll/154016#
Description
r5 105a Eng Two. IH: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4
Results
1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=1]
miss

both survive 5/5 and 4/5

Engagement Three:

IH ?/5 health, Morgoth ?/5 health.

r5 105a Eng three. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.

http://orokos.com/roll/154018#
Description r5 105a Eng three. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4
Results 1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=1]
miss

r5 105a Eng three. IH: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4.
http://orokos.com/roll/154019#
Description r5 105a Eng three. IH: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x ION cannon. 1#1d6x4
Results 1#1d6x4: 1 # 2 [1d6x4=6]
hit for one

both survive 5/5 and 3/5

Engagement four:


r5 105a Eng four. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.

http://orokos.com/roll/154021#
Description r5 105a Eng four. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.
Results 1#1d6x4: 1 # 2 [1d6x4=6]
hit for two damage 3/5

Contingent triggered: IH: Battle orders vs morgoth, shoot until he hits me. If he has been hit for 3 or more damage by this point, to the death!
IH health 3/5, Morgoth health 3/5

contingent says retreat.

Confirm please


IH begins retreat. Hex to be determined.
Engagement five:

r5 105a Eng five. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.
http://orokos.com/roll/154041#
Description
r5 105a Eng five. Morgy: 1x Cru. +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4.
Results
1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=1]
miss
IH successfully retreats.

Rep Draw: Morgoth 1

0

#3248 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:32 PM

Battle 13: 105 said:

105b said:

Morgoth vs Ancient ship

Nukes: yes
Missiles: no
Shields: no
Computers: yes
Specials: Absorption Field

Morgoth: 1x Cruiser. 4 init, 3/5 health, +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon - 1#1d6x4
Ancient: 1x standard ship. 2 init, 2/2 health, +1 comp, 2x ION cannon. 1#2d6x5

Firing order: Morgoth -> ancient

Engagement One:

r5 105b Eng One. Morgoth: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon. 1#1d6x4. Anc: 1x Base, +1 comp, 2x ION cannon. 1#2d6x5

http://orokos.com/roll/154042#
Description
r5 105b Eng One. Morgoth: 1x Cru, +2 comp, 1x PLASMA cannon. 1#1d6x4. Anc: 1x Base, +1 comp, 2x ION cannon. 1#2d6x5
Results
engagment
1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=2]
1#2d6x5: 1 # 1 [2d6x5=4, 5]
Ancient hits for one point. 2/5

1#1d6x4: 1 # 2 [1d6x4=6]
Ancient destroyed.

1#2d6x5: 1 # 2 [2d6x5=6, 3]
1#1d6x4: 1 # 0 [1d6x4=1]
1#2d6x5: 1 # 0 [2d6x5=2, 2]

Morgoth takes hex.




0

#3249 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,612
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:32 PM

Aww. I think that means that you'll ever so slightly survive your impending financial apocalypse, Gnaw :D

This post has been edited by D'rek: 09 December 2013 - 08:33 PM

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#3250 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:42 PM

Battle 14: 001 said:

Tapper vs GCDS

Nukes: yes
Missiles: no
Shields: Yes (Tapper -1 and GCDS -2)
Computers: yes (GCDS only)
Specials: Anti Matter Splitter

Tapper: 4x Int 3 init, 1/1 health, -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 4#1d6x6
GCDS: SP1 option 2 4 init, 5/5 health, +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

Firing order: GCDS -> Tapper

Retreat is possible for Tapper

Battle orders: to the death


Engagement One:

GCDS 5/5 health, Tapper 4x 1/1 health
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154044#
Description
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6
Results
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=1, 5]
miss and miss.

r5 001 Eng One: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 4#1d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154045#
Description
r5 001 Eng One: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter.
Results
4#1d6x6: 4 # 2 [1d6x6=6] 0 [1d6x6=3] 0 [1d6x6=3] 0 [1d6x6=3]
one hit for four points of damage
Engagement two:

GCDS 1/5 health, Tapper 4x 1/1 health
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154047#
Description
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6
Results
1#2d6x6: 1 # 2 [2d6x6=5, 6]
2 hits. 2 destroyed interceptors wrong, wrong. 1 hit, 1 destroyed. All results from here void.

http://orokos.com/roll/154048#
Description
r5 001 Eng two: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 2#1d6x6
Results
2#1d6x6: 2 # 0 [1d6x6=3] 0 [1d6x6=4]
2 misses
Engagement three:

GCDS 1/5 health, Tapper 2x 1/1 health
r5 001 Eng three: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154049#
Description
r5 001 Eng three: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6
Results
1#2d6x6: 1 # 2 [2d6x6=6, 1]
one hit

http://orokos.com/roll/154050#
Description
r5 001 Eng three: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 1#1d6x6
Results
1#1d6x6: 1 # 0 [1d6x6=5]
miss
Engagement four:

GCDS 1/5 health, Tapper 1x 1/1 health
r5 001 Eng four plus: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6 Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 1#1d6x6


http://orokos.com/roll/154053#
Description
r5 001 Eng four plus: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6 Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 1#1d6x6
Results

four
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=1, 3]
1#1d6x6: 1 # 0 [1d6x6=4]

Five
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=2, 1]
1#1d6x6: 1 # 0 [1d6x6=3]

Six
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=1, 3]
1#1d6x6: 1 # 0 [1d6x6=4]


http://orokos.com/roll/154054#
Description
r5 001 Eng four plus: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6 Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter.
Results

Seven
1#2d6x6: 1 # 2 [2d6x6=6, 3]
hit. interceptor destroyed.

1#1d6x6: 1 # 2 [1d6x6=6]
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=4, 1]
1#1d6x6: 1 # 0 [1d6x6=4]
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=2, 3]
1#1d6x6: 1 # 0 [1d6x6=4]
GCDS retains hex

Rep draw: Tapper 1


This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 09 December 2013 - 09:17 PM

0

#3251 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:57 PM

Gnaw does Tapper have gauss shields on his blueprint? Because during round one you had a 5 for the GC defenses as a miss but in round 2 you have a 5 as a hit. Which is it?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#3252 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 08:58 PM

Round 5 Rep Draws


Start draw pile is:
  • 11 ones
  • 7 twos
  • 5 threes
  • 2 fours



382
Rep draw:
  • Khell 1
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • four
    • (screenshots will be posted later.)
    • keeps the four and puts a two back
  • IH 3 I fucked this one up.
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • one
    • three
    • keeps the three and returns a two
  • IH 3
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • two
    • two
    • discards all

309
Rep draw:
  • D'rek 2
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • keeps the two. draw pile is reduced to 24
  • D'rek 2
    • There were 25 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • keeps the two. draw pile is reduced to 24.
  • Gnaw 1
    • There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • three
    • discards

307
Rep draw:
  • Khell 1
    • There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • discards
  • Tatts 4
    • There were 24 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • one
    • two
    • keeps the two. pile is reduced to 23.



228
Rep draw:
  • Gnaw 2
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • three
    • discards. Doh. shouldn't even be rolling for gnaw. or Khell
  • Khell 1 doesn't roll
  • Tatts 1
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • discards.
226
Rep draw:


  • D'rek 2
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • one
    • discards
  • Gnaw 1 doesn't roll
204
Rep draw:
  • IH 2
  • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
  • two
  • one
  • discards
108
Rep draw:
  • IH 2
  • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
  • one
  • two
  • discards
105
rep draw:
  • IH none
  • Morgoth 2
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • one
    • two
    • discards
001
  • Tapper 4
    • There were 23 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
    • two
    • one
    • three
    • four
    • keeps the four and returns a three to the pile LAST FOUR

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 09 December 2013 - 09:29 PM

0

#3253 User is offline   Tapper 

  • Lover of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 6,676
  • Joined: 29-June 04
  • Location:Delft, Holland.

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:04 PM

View Posttwelve, on 09 December 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:

Gnaw does Tapper have gauss shields on his blueprint? Because during round one you had a 5 for the GC defenses as a miss but in round 2 you have a 5 as a hit. Which is it?

I do have them. Basically, my round 2 shots and further should be re-rolled, I guess? (Or one die rolled for the undestroyed inty?)

This post has been edited by Tapper: 09 December 2013 - 09:06 PM

Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
0

#3254 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:13 PM

View PostTapper, on 09 December 2013 - 09:04 PM, said:

View Posttwelve, on 09 December 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:

Gnaw does Tapper have gauss shields on his blueprint? Because during round one you had a 5 for the GC defenses as a miss but in round 2 you have a 5 as a hit. Which is it?

I do have them. Basically, my round 2 shots and further should be re-rolled, I guess? (Or one die rolled for the undestroyed inty?)


Absolutely correct on the shields. I gave him a +2 computer and a -1 shield. It was the other way around.

Nope. That was a pure and simple mis-read on my part.

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 09 December 2013 - 09:16 PM

0

#3255 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:25 PM

Battle 14: 001 said:

Tapper vs GCDS

Nukes: yes
Missiles: no
Shields: Yes (Tapper -1 and GCDS -2)
Computers: yes (GCDS only)
Specials: Anti Matter Splitter

Tapper: 4x Int 3 init, 1/1 health, -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 4#1d6x6
GCDS: SP1 option 2 4 init, 5/5 health, +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

Firing order: GCDS -> Tapper

Retreat is possible for Tapper

Battle orders: to the death


Engagement One:

GCDS 5/5 health, Tapper 4x 1/1 health
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154044#
Description
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6
Results
1#2d6x6: 1 # 0 [2d6x6=1, 5]
miss and miss.

r5 001 Eng One: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 4#1d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154045#
Description
r5 001 Eng One: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter.
Results
4#1d6x6: 4 # 2 [1d6x6=6] 0 [1d6x6=3] 0 [1d6x6=3] 0 [1d6x6=3]
one hit for four points of damage
Engagement two:

GCDS 1/5 health, Tapper 4x 1/1 health
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154047#
Description
r5 001 Eng One: GCDS +1 comp, -2 shield, 2x AntiM cannon. 1#2d6x6
Results
1#2d6x6: 1 # 2 [2d6x6=5, 6]
1 hit, 1 destroyed.

r5 001 Eng two re-roll: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 3#1d6x6

http://orokos.com/roll/154059#

Description
r5 001 Eng two re-roll: Tapper -1 shield, 1x AntiM cannon with splitter. 3#1d6x6
Results
3#1d6x6: 3 # 0 [1d6x6=5] 0 [1d6x6=3] 2 [1d6x6=6]

GCDS destroyed.

Tapper takes hex.

Rep Draw: 4


This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 09 December 2013 - 09:29 PM

0

#3256 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:31 PM

IH, which hex do you want to retreat to? :D

IH, which hex would you have retreated to if you had made the decision before knowing outcomes of 105 and 001?
0

#3257 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:32 PM

I'll get a post combat map ready shortly.
0

#3258 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:36 PM

THE GC IS OURS!!


We did it! We beat them all! Your stupid Nova Burst was a mere delay, for nothing can stop us!


What?





Oh er, that is, you did it Tapper. By yourself, without us doing much in the way of aiding. The GC is yours.


Go team?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
1

#3259 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 09:53 PM

We are still in combat phase btw.
0

#3260 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 09 December 2013 - 10:05 PM

View PostMorgoth, on 09 December 2013 - 07:10 PM, said:

And off all the lousy rolls. Good thing it's not critical yet.


You're a PhD in engineering. Random is random is random is random. (Except it's never truly random but that math is so far over my head I don't even know the name of the sub-field that 'proves' it.)
0

Share this topic:


  • 297 Pages +
  • « First
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

8 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users