[Obdigore]

Vengeance, on 09 September 2013 - 08:13 PM, said:

Tapper,

Shane Vereen broke a bone in his wrist yesterday. Out for a couple of weeks.


Venge

I just saw that. I'm so happy. It feels wrong but so very right to be happy about an injury to a player.

[Tattersail_]

Good first week for the underdog. My C rated team by Yahoo beating Obdi's A rated team. I think it was a freak weekend of games though and the cream always rises to the top.

Who do I have next week? Twelve.

Close match up by "rankings" or "projections". Who do we think is going to perform?

Has anyone else downloaded the app for their phone? I did it today and it is very easy to use. I am glad I have it.

[Brujah]

Have you given any thought to my trade offer in-game, Tatts?

[Tattersail_]

Brujah, on 10 September 2013 - 01:18 PM, said:

Have you given any thought to my trade offer in-game, Tatts?

I have just rejected it.

I am happy with my starting team. I may add and drop my bench to suit me for that week but I do not want to drop a monster like Fitzgerald when he is one of my better players.

[Brujah]

Does anyone need a decent or good TE? Tatts definitely does, but not sure if anyone else does. I have one or two too many.

Anyone interested in:
Zach Sudfield - TE - NE
Jermichael Finley - TE - GB
Julius Thomas - TE - DEN
James Jones - WR - GB
Bilial Powell - RB - NYJ ( Starting RB for NYJ )
Mark Ingram - RB - NO (Backup RB for NO, and even though he fell short week 1, hes being projected this week at over 9 points. Decent enough for a flex option if pulls off
Steve Smith - WR - CAR


Basically, I'm spread out too much in WR and TE, and just hoping to maybe trade a WR, TE, and/or RB for one better WR or RB. Aiming at teams who may be sitting on a really good WR or RB and aren't using, and could use a better TE or needs a secondary back, etc....

Let me know. Trying to consolidate. For example, if someone had a top 10 WR they could part with in return for a top 25 WR plus better TE, or secondary Back.

[Brujah]

Ganoes Paran, on 10 September 2013 - 01:22 PM, said:

Brujah, on 10 September 2013 - 01:18 PM, said:

Have you given any thought to my trade offer in-game, Tatts?

I have just rejected it.

I am happy with my starting team. I may add and drop my bench to suit me for that week but I do not want to drop a monster like Fitzgerald when he is one of my better players.

Yeah, NP man.

[Tattersail_]

Have you not looked elsewhere for a WR? There were some sick scorers not claimed this week.

[Tattersail_]

Leonard Hankerman or whatever his name is scored 20 points this week. I have already tried for the guy above him

I needed some WR cover as I had 3 RB's sitting on my bench.

This post has been edited by Ganoes Paran: 10 September 2013 - 01:41 PM

[Tattersail_]

Obdigore, on 19 July 2013 - 08:48 AM, said:

Ganoes Paran, on 19 July 2013 - 08:20 AM, said:

I'm in, the only slight problem I had was remembering my Yahoo log in details. I changed my name from Dassem's Bodyguards to Shivakamini Somakandarkram /> I hope she brings me luck

God damnit Tatts, stop preemptively copying me, that was going to be my name!

Also Obdi, the battle of the Shiva has already begun. If I continue to win, you will rue my choice of name for weeks to come. If Iwin the whole thing, which I very much doubt, you will want Holy Revenge!

[Brujah]

Ganoes Paran, on 10 September 2013 - 01:41 PM, said:

Leonard Hankerman or whatever his name is scored 20 points this week. I have already tried for the guy above him

I needed some WR cover as I had 3 RB's sitting on my bench.

Of the three RB you had sitting on bench, which scored most this week. Oh, Ryan Matthews. That guy is so inconsistent. But oh well. You willing to trade him? What do you need in return.

[Tapper]

Obdigore, on 10 September 2013 - 01:22 AM, said:

Vengeance, on 09 September 2013 - 08:13 PM, said:

Tapper,

Shane Vereen broke a bone in his wrist yesterday. Out for a couple of weeks.


Venge

I just saw that. I'm so happy. It feels wrong but so very right to be happy about an injury to a player.

Saw it, and it's a pity as I believed enough in Vereen to reach by a round or more for him, but he will be back in 2/3 weeks which is hardly season-ending.
For now, it means I will be looking at a stop-gap flex.

By the time Vereen's back Darth Hoodie will either be happy enough with Ridley again to reduce Vereen to a Sproles role, ambivalent enough to go for a RBBC, or so pissed off that Blount gets the carries. In the first case, it's the role I drafted him for but he loses upside, in the other two cases, I might have found 2013's CJ Spiller.
That's not even taking into account that Sudfeld and Thompkins looking pretty bad against the Bills and Amendola being made of glass.

[Tattersail_]

Brujah, on 10 September 2013 - 01:48 PM, said:

Ganoes Paran, on 10 September 2013 - 01:41 PM, said:

Leonard Hankerman or whatever his name is scored 20 points this week. I have already tried for the guy above him

I needed some WR cover as I had 3 RB's sitting on my bench.

Of the three RB you had sitting on bench, which scored most this week. Oh, Ryan Matthews. That guy is so inconsistent. But oh well. You willing to trade him? What do you need in return.

Is Thomas a good swap? I don't know enough. Maybe Julius Thomas for Vick Bollard?

[Brujah]

Ganoes Paran, on 10 September 2013 - 01:56 PM, said:

Brujah, on 10 September 2013 - 01:48 PM, said:

Ganoes Paran, on 10 September 2013 - 01:41 PM, said:

Leonard Hankerman or whatever his name is scored 20 points this week. I have already tried for the guy above him

I needed some WR cover as I had 3 RB's sitting on my bench.

Of the three RB you had sitting on bench, which scored most this week. Oh, Ryan Matthews. That guy is so inconsistent. But oh well. You willing to trade him? What do you need in return.

Is Thomas a good swap? I don't know enough. Maybe Julius Thomas for Vick Bollard?

Thomas is my TE I'm gonna start, actually. After last week, I'm hoping he ain't just a fluke. Plus I wouldn't even take Vic Ballard because him and Ahmad Bradshaw are sharing starter role.

[Tapper]

Vengeance, on 09 September 2013 - 08:09 PM, said:

Brujah, on 09 September 2013 - 07:41 PM, said:

Vengeance, on 09 September 2013 - 02:51 PM, said:

Brujah, on 09 September 2013 - 02:48 PM, said:

Anybody deep enough at WR that they could trade one good WR for something like a middle WR(James Jones or Steve smith, plus a TE if you need one(Zach studfield or jermichael Finley) and a starting RB(Bilial Powell). He may be on a shit team, and not close to one of the best RBs, but he is starting, and if you're short in that slot, better than nothing.

So a medium WR to replace the Good WR, and tossing in good TE and RB starter.

Would even consider trading Julius Thomas if the WR in question was tip top.

Doubt anyone is in this boat, but can't hurt to ask.

You don't need another fucking WR to put on your bench. Hold your shit together. It has only been one week.

Let me get Anquan Boldin and Brian Hartline, then..

I will give you Hartline for Steve Smith and Finley. Come on Brujah you know you want to toss your season away after the first game. Or if you prefer I will trade you Hartline for Dez and Finley.

I agree with Venge. There's no need to panic at all. If you do want to improve a little bit, just sort out your roster - with Julius Thomas, Sudfeld and Finley you have 3 TEs which is definately 1 and probably 2 too many. If you feel you DO need to drop someone, drop Sudfeld as you have Finley and Thomas, both of whom are athletic TEs in passing offenses that run the ball less than NE does.
If you need someone as Flex/WR2 (don't see why you'd need a WR2, Dez Bryant as WR1 is going to produce and Steve Smith is good up until the moment he gets hurt, which is not that often), play the waiver-wire, get a boom-bust guy (Marlon Brown, Baltimore, Michael Floyd, Arizona) instead of a TE or someone like Edelman (who I see you targeted already). That's more than enough to sort it out for now.

This post has been edited by Tapper: 10 September 2013 - 02:05 PM

[Brujah]

It's still too soon, but if things go lucky for Denver and Thomas, he could end up as valuable as a Jimmy Graham. So the only way I'd trade Thomas was if it was extremely note worthy, and I could just start Sudfield instead. But I'm still a noob at fantasy. So all my thoughts are freaky guesses.

[Brujah]

You can cancel that other trade too, Tatts. Even if we did work something out, I'd have to redo it with adding the correct players

[Brujah]

Tapper, on 10 September 2013 - 02:05 PM, said:

Vengeance, on 09 September 2013 - 08:09 PM, said:

Brujah, on 09 September 2013 - 07:41 PM, said:

Vengeance, on 09 September 2013 - 02:51 PM, said:

Brujah, on 09 September 2013 - 02:48 PM, said:

Anybody deep enough at WR that they could trade one good WR for something like a middle WR(James Jones or Steve smith, plus a TE if you need one(Zach studfield or jermichael Finley) and a starting RB(Bilial Powell). He may be on a shit team, and not close to one of the best RBs, but he is starting, and if you're short in that slot, better than nothing.

So a medium WR to replace the Good WR, and tossing in good TE and RB starter.

Would even consider trading Julius Thomas if the WR in question was tip top.

Doubt anyone is in this boat, but can't hurt to ask.

You don't need another fucking WR to put on your bench. Hold your shit together. It has only been one week.

Let me get Anquan Boldin and Brian Hartline, then..

I will give you Hartline for Steve Smith and Finley. Come on Brujah you know you want to toss your season away after the first game. Or if you prefer I will trade you Hartline for Dez and Finley.

I agree with Venge. There's no need to panic at all. If you do want to improve a little bit, just sort out your roster - with Julius Thomas, Sudfeld and Finley you have 3 TEs which is definately 1 and probably 2 too many. If you feel you DO need to drop someone, drop Sudfeld as you have Finley and Thomas, both of whom are athletic TEs in passing offenses that run the ball less than NE does.
If you need someone as Flex/WR2 (don't see why you'd need a WR2, Dez Bryant as WR1 is going to produce and Steve Smith is good up until the moment he gets hurt, which is not that often), play the waiver-wire, get a boom-bust guy (Marlon Brown, Baltimore, Michael Floyd, Arizona) instead of a TE or someone like Edelman (who I see you targeted already). That's more than enough to sort it out for now.

Yeah. I would just like to not have to use waiver yet. I'm alrdy down at 10th. I do want to grab another RB, even though Matthews is as sketchy as they come. And Tatts def could use a better TE. Plus whatever other player(s) he needs.

[Tattersail_]

Brujah, you are looking to beat your opponent this week. Your projected points are a lot better than his.

[twelve]

Brujah, on 10 September 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:

Does anyone need a decent or good TE? Tatts definitely does, but not sure if anyone else does. I have one or two too many.

Anyone interested in:
Zach Sudfield - TE - NE
Jermichael Finley - TE - GB
Julius Thomas - TE - DEN
James Jones - WR - GB
Bilial Powell - RB - NYJ ( Starting RB for NYJ )
Mark Ingram - RB - NO (Backup RB for NO, and even though he fell short week 1, hes being projected this week at over 9 points. Decent enough for a flex option if pulls off
Steve Smith - WR - CAR


Basically, I'm spread out too much in WR and TE, and just hoping to maybe trade a WR, TE, and/or RB for one better WR or RB. Aiming at teams who may be sitting on a really good WR or RB and aren't using, and could use a better TE or needs a secondary back, etc....

Let me know. Trying to consolidate. For example, if someone had a top 10 WR they could part with in return for a top 25 WR plus better TE, or secondary Back.

Guess you shouldn't have taken Sudfield from me when you already had a good TE. I'll wait until you drop him and then pick him up off of waivers. I need some help at RB. Foster laid an egg for a first rounder. Against San Diego of all teams. I wouldn't mind picking up either Ingram or Powell off of you though. I have a week 8 problem I need to fix.

[Brujah]

Ganoes Paran, on 10 September 2013 - 02:39 PM, said:

Brujah, you are looking to beat your opponent this week. Your projected points are a lot better than his.

True, but too bad that don't always hold true. Because last week, week 1, I had the highest preliminary point projections out of all 12 teams. And then I end up very bottom, so can't hold that as truth.