Atrahal, on 19 June 2012 - 01:27 AM, said:
D, on 18 June 2012 - 09:39 PM, said:
You know, originally it was because that was the order of the vote count in PS's most recent post. Actually, now I think I'm leaving it there. I was glancing over Korv's stuff and he's playing agreeable, light and fluffy. I'm trying to get in the scummy mindset to think how one would play on day 1. Best bet is to play it cool, not stand out. As I believe ansible has said (hopefully not crediting the wrong person), scum almost always play as middle posters if one leafs back through the previous games. Very cool observation.
So with Korv, he votes for Meanas, and then retracts and moves to Amp as a low poster. He teases Liz, points out D'riss' absence, and most recently agrees with the Big Tent following. All together, this is a pretty benign, even seemingly helpful (not really that helpful though) playstyle. I think we may have our first of the pair.
Because responses are expected, let's break it down:
Watch out kids I'm going to make a list!!!
1) "he votes for Meanas, and then retracts" - This is what we call the 'gag' vote. Meanas says that I don't exist, and I come back with a quote from Descartes as to why I must exist, and make a counteraccusation based on that argument. IT'S ALL RIGHT THOUGH. I wasn't REALLY going to vote Meanas based on a philosophical argument. I REMOVED THE VOTE. Particularly when I saw other people voting on him for no other reason than he already had a few.
2) "moves to Amp as a low poster" - This is a textbook response to someone posting.... WAIT FOR IT... 3 WORDS. Amp came back on to play, and the vote was removed.
3) "He teases Liz" - Guilty as charged! Hi Lizzy!

4) "agrees with the Big Tent following" - Wow, I agreed with the part in Big Tent about how people that agree with or defend OTHER PLAYERS should not be considered guilty, and I'm automatically guilty. Priceless.
Soooo in summary I think I'm guilty of teasing Liz and being a list maker. As far as crappy day one cases go, I guess you could go ahead and lynch me. I'm even getting ready to go to bed soon, so you have the perfect opportunity.
What I've been doing though is watching the interactions and making my opinions, so far (oh yeah baby another list! I'm playing with fire!!!):
1) Fener changes his vote whenever the winds change to follow someone (anyone) else.
2) Korbas is just happy to throw his vote down on anyone with a majority.
3) Karosis will continue arguing, even though he said he isn't going to, because he wants to prove something to us.
Anyway, I'm going to bed. I'll vote when I wake up tomorrow. Right now I'm leaning towards Korbas and Fener.