Emurlahn, on 11 June 2012 - 08:35 PM, said:
*snip*
If we get the BM again then the CL's may make a play against each other. How about a proposal to the BM. We have to kill you twice to have any hope of winning but we also have to kill CL twice also. If you come clean who you are we don't lynch you today and we go for a CL. Then once one of them have gone we lynch you and then go for another CL.
*snip*
This is the quote. It's not quite outright claiming we need to kill the CLs to win, but it does suggest that we need to kill the CLs.
1. DUDE. SPEED IS TOWN'S ALLY. The faster we kill the Batman, the better. *Unless* a cult achieves plurality before we can possibly kill the Batman. In which case we're fucked because, afaik, we still don't know if recruits switch back to town at the death of their CL or if they can win without a CL.
2. We go for a CL, then we lynch the Batman, then we go for another CL? IDIOT. THAT WOULD HAND THE BATMAN THE GAME. IF BOTH CLs DIE, HE WINS.
3. You're suddenly so much more active today, spamming the thread, showing that you were clearly just a bored RI earlier. Now that you're either recruited (can't see that as enough reason, honestly) or the Batman, you're suddenly involved to the max, posting lots of ideas, but also tripping over your own lack of attention from days gone past.
Ergo, pretty sure Emur is the fricking Batman. Unless anyone has good reason why he's suddenly playing and revealing counter-town thoughts all over the place?
Vote Emurlahn