yuna_anomander25, on 10 December 2012 - 08:28 PM, said:
The Chathrand Voyage
The Red Wolf Conspiracy
The Rats and the Ruling Sea &
The River of Shadows
by - Robert VS Redick, i'm seriously considering this, so want to know if its good, also I'm beginning to be a major Gollancz fan/supporter, because of their simple yet stylistic covers
Read the first one, wasn't overwhelmingly impressed. They struck me as pretty harmless, so I might get back to them when I have nothing better to do.
Quote
Ketty Jay series
Retribution Falls & The Black Lung Captain - Chris Wooding,
Heard great things about them but never got round to them.
Quote
Nights of Villjamur - Mark Charan Newton
Seen this one around but never even been remotely interested in reading it.
Quote
also considering reading Sci-Fi novels, should I start w/ the original Dune (wanted the omnibus ver) and leave out the BH/KJA ones,
Leave this place and read
Dune right now. The other Frank Herbert ones are worth a read too (although I would personally stop at
God Emperor of Dune, which is where the rot set in imo) Do not UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES read the Brian Herbert/Kevin J Anderson ones.
Quote
The Expanse
Leviathan Wakes
Caliban's War &
Abaddon's Gate
by James S.A. Corey - haven't read the full review in Quick's blog of LW
Well no one - apart from the authors, their editors and their friends, I expect - has probably read the 3rd one. But they are definitely lots of fun, in a very undemanding way.
Quote
any books/series of Neal Asher, Neal Stephenson & Stephen Deas
Not read Deas.
But the Neals....
Asher (who has been known to show up here - although not recently - Hi Neal!!) is worth a read. Nothing earthshaking, but solidly entertaining. I'd go with
The Skinner first, to get into them and see if you like his stuff.
Stephenson is a bit polarising -
Snow Crash is a must, it's a classic;
The Diamond Age is also a must;
Anathem worked very well for me but, I'd imagine, irritates the hell out of others;
Reamde was less satisfying imo and far less interesting in its real world parts.
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell