Emurlahn's posts for your viewing pleasure. Make of them what you will.
Emurlahn, on 13 March 2012 - 06:41 PM, said:
Checking in.
Hail the emperor!
Emurlahn, on 14 March 2012 - 10:37 AM, said:
The inital case against Rashan is weak and I don't think it is worth a vote, but Tellans attack of Atrahal and therefore his defense of Rashan make it more interesting.However the rainbow argument between Tellan and Atrahal strikes me as innocent headbutting more than anything else.
I could be completely off here though.
In the argument between Karosis and Okaros I can see both points. I like to see how Karosis reacts before I make up my mind about them.
I find Liosans summary strange. What was it good for? The only time I recall him giving an opinion is in the post where he votes and that seems to be a rather lazy vote, as he only seemed to consider between Rashan and Fener, who where leading in votes and have been targets all day long. An easy way to go with the flow.
vote Liosan
I also dislike that the train on Fener is the largest one right now. All the votes there stem from the "Let's lynch the Fener alt" thing and it gives us no information whatsoever.
Emurlahn, on 14 March 2012 - 08:24 PM, said:
Kalse, on 14 March 2012 - 07:02 PM, said:
regarding Liosan and his RP, i am willing to let it slide on day 1. But RP is a great place to hide, as has been shown in recent games. after day 1, if anyone is still RPing, i will look at it as uncooperative to our ultimate goal, and will vote accordingly. RP in no way, shape, or form, helps out town. It's fine in the begining when the atmosphere is loose and fun, but when we get down to brass tacks... it's time to do work.
It is not the RP that bothers me. It is that he summarises half the thread and then cast a weak vote, while only looking at the two players who had the most votes and ignores other discussions going on at that time. And the post where he votes is the only on where he gives a bit of an opinion.
Right now many people have put a vote on Karosis or stated that they are willing to vote that way. If it comes to that I don't mind to change my vote to him, as he is all over the place and some of his post seem to have a holier than thou attitude that I don't like.
Emurlahn, on 14 March 2012 - 10:30 PM, said:
I'm going to bed.
remove vote
vote Karosis
Right now that is the lynch that seems the most likely to happen.
Emurlahn, on 15 March 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:
I hate people who throw themselves in front of a train.
I will catch up, now that I'm finally home.
Emurlahn, on 15 March 2012 - 09:17 PM, said:
Barghast, on 15 March 2012 - 08:56 PM, said:
hey, peoples, been hella busy today. Meant to get caught up at lunch, but other things came up., right now I got about an hour and a half to dedicate to the game (and homework) before I have to rush off to work.
I see Okaros is trying to raise some suspicions about me,basing it off my attempt to get lo-posters to contribute. Hrm, not much to add to that. some of the people on my list Fener, Emu, Ruse, Omtose) have contributed basically nothign so far. A few (Okaros, Tennes) have had a few posts but tried to make them meaningful, and Liosan continues to RP, successfully making sure that whatever points he's trying to get across
whan all is said and done, i will
vote emurlahn
because it's the oddest vote on the train.
Why exactly is my vote the oddest? The only bit of reasoning I found was this.
Barghast, on 15 March 2012 - 01:28 AM, said:
Atrahal, on 15 March 2012 - 01:17 AM, said:
I've changed my opinion on second suspect after Rashan to Tennes.
Because of his "I'm voting Karosis because Silanah is doing it" reasoning. What was that supposed to show?
Frankly I found Emu's "welp, guess i'd better get on teh train as 5th vote to make sure we get a train going" vote to be the most scum-jump-tastic thing on this train.
Nice how you paraphrase me. Really.
It was the end of the day with something like four hours left and I didn't know how much people would come on and me leaving I figured it made sense to switch to the most likely lynch target so we wouldn't have the problem of not getting enough votes together.
And pot calling the kettle for the "make sure we get a train going part"?
Edit: Added smiley to symbolise sarcasm.
Emurlahn, on 15 March 2012 - 09:30 PM, said:
It seems Lio has stopped to summarise and started to make a few more or less obvious points regarding logical fails of other players. It still feels a lot like he is upping his post count and he is still giving not much of his own opinion.
vote Liosan
Emurlahn, on 15 March 2012 - 09:35 PM, said:
Barghast, on 15 March 2012 - 09:24 PM, said:
Right, except, I said I din't like Karosis early on, and when I switched to him, I provided an actual reason--you know, like not being a sheep,
i'm not denying that it's possible you just wanted your vote where it'll do the most good, but its such lazy votes, especially when the train's not really a sure thing yet 9and it certainyl wasn't not with 4 votes, 2 of them being OMGUS votes) are inevitably the ones that end up catching people's attention.
Fair enough, just that I provided my reason in my post before, it certainly didn't came as out of the blue as you want to make it seem.
Emurlahn, on 15 March 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:
After several people said that they where suspicous of Barghast and since I felt the same I looked through his post.
He starts with a lot of spam and then points out more and more usefull things and gives more and more serious comments. Just seems like normal day 1 of an outspoken player.
The only post that really stood out for me was this one:
Barghast, on 14 March 2012 - 01:27 AM, said:
I have returned. I see that there are quite a few votes being flung around, with a number of likely suspects. I shan't list them, but suffice it to say, I am yet to see a case that would truly compel me.
as such, for now, I shall honour the venerable traditions of the Court and
vote Fener
Unless I should see some other example of seditious bahaviour, my vote shall remain here.
So because you see no case you like to vote on and you can't come up with any one, you vote for a player that hasn't even posted at that point. Making that player the largest train with three votes.
How is that more sensible than not voting for a flimsy case or not at all?
Help
