The USA Politics Thread
#2041
Posted 14 October 2015 - 03:23 AM
All I know about O'Malley is that he hates The Wire and that Tommy Carcetti is partially (largely?) inspired by him.
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#2042
Posted 15 October 2015 - 02:11 AM
Terez, on 14 October 2015 - 03:17 AM, said:
I couldn't make it 20 minutes. God, what a terrible slate of candidates. None of them would be a good president. Good ideas, terrible people.
Elizabeth Warren ftw!!
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#2043
#2044
Posted 15 October 2015 - 02:14 AM
I so wish she'd run.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#2045
Posted 15 October 2015 - 06:17 PM
Gnaw, on 15 October 2015 - 02:14 AM, said:
I so wish she'd run.
Basically the situation now is what it would have been if Obama had decided not to run in 2008. I am still holding out hope that Warren will change her mind, but I suspect the only thing that could make her do that is an epic collapse of Hillary's campaign, and time for that is running short. Filing deadlines start next month, as early as the 10th.
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I知 not talking about Donald Trump. I知 talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#2046
Posted 21 October 2015 - 12:42 AM
My understanding of it is: They think he is the only one who can save them from chaos. He doesn't want the job because he thinks it will ruin his presidential ambitions.
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I知 not talking about Donald Trump. I知 talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#2047
Posted 21 October 2015 - 01:01 AM
Terez, on 21 October 2015 - 12:42 AM, said:
My understanding of it is: They think he is the only one who can save them from chaos. He doesn't want the job because he thinks it will ruin his presidential ambitions.
That pretty much agrees with my reading of the situation. If he takes the job, he'll be forced to piss off enough people to torpedo his current presidential run regardless of whatever happens while he's Speaker. IF he's very careful he might be able to turn that into a 2020 run. But wise, risky and ballsy. I consider none of those conditions native to him so in my humble opinion he should decline the offer as graciously as possible.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#2048
Posted 21 October 2015 - 01:33 AM
Briar King, on 21 October 2015 - 01:08 AM, said:
People were terrified of him becoming VP for Mitt. That's pretty much all I know about him.
I'm not sure who was terrified of that, but anyway.
Paul Ryan is just another walking, breathing, joke of a politician in a tailored suit. He toes the party line, panders to the extremists, and will say/do anything to get elected and keep getting elected.
He is neither the politician the US wants or needs.
Monster Hunter World Iceborne: It's like hunting monsters, but on crack, but the monsters are also on crack.
#2049
Posted 21 October 2015 - 02:18 AM
The only people terrified of Paul Ryan were those who believed he could actually pass the budget he wanted, and they were on the left. Conservatives love him.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#2050
Posted 21 October 2015 - 02:33 AM
HoosierDaddy, on 21 October 2015 - 02:18 AM, said:
The only people terrified of Paul Ryan were those who believed he could actually pass the budget he wanted, and they were on the left. Conservatives love him.
Some do, but the rebellious far right does not like him at all because of his work on immigration reform. That includes Louisiana rednecks.
Two down, one to go.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62486/62486165b98205f8a45b852241679299e4ee5a4b" alt="Posted Image"
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I知 not talking about Donald Trump. I知 talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#2051
Posted 21 October 2015 - 02:55 AM
That's scarier than not.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#2052
Posted 21 October 2015 - 07:39 AM
Of course it is.
I have to admit I'm impressed with Ryan's flair for negotiation. He has demanded the endorsement of all Republican caucuses, including the terrorist Freedom Caucus, before he'll agree to run, and he expects their endorsements by Friday. He's also demanded changes to the procedural rules that allow the Speaker to be challenged with a no confidence vote mid-session. There were some other terms, but those were the main ones, and if he actually gets those demands met he'll be in a relatively safe position regarding his ambitions. That doesn't mean it will be easy for him; I do mean relatively.
Of course, it's more likely that his demands won't be met by his proposed deadline (Friday) and that chaos will ensue. But he can come out of that looking like the reasonable guy who offered to save the party, who could have saved the party if not for the terrorists.
I have to admit I'm impressed with Ryan's flair for negotiation. He has demanded the endorsement of all Republican caucuses, including the terrorist Freedom Caucus, before he'll agree to run, and he expects their endorsements by Friday. He's also demanded changes to the procedural rules that allow the Speaker to be challenged with a no confidence vote mid-session. There were some other terms, but those were the main ones, and if he actually gets those demands met he'll be in a relatively safe position regarding his ambitions. That doesn't mean it will be easy for him; I do mean relatively.
Of course, it's more likely that his demands won't be met by his proposed deadline (Friday) and that chaos will ensue. But he can come out of that looking like the reasonable guy who offered to save the party, who could have saved the party if not for the terrorists.
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I知 not talking about Donald Trump. I知 talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#2053
Posted 21 October 2015 - 10:45 PM
Jim Webb also dropped out so now we're down to 4 (only 2 of whom are real candidates).
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I知 not talking about Donald Trump. I知 talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#2054
Posted 22 October 2015 - 01:01 AM
Who is the 4th?
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#2055
Posted 22 October 2015 - 01:03 AM
I suppose it depends on who the 3rd is. We have Hillary and Bernie, and Martin O'Malley, and Lincoln Chaffee.
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I知 not talking about Donald Trump. I知 talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#2056
Posted 22 October 2015 - 01:04 AM
Lincoln Chafee does't count. Okay. So 3 (2).
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#2057
#2058
Posted 22 October 2015 - 01:17 AM
I like Chafee. In a non-insane country, he'd be a real candidate.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#2059
Posted 22 October 2015 - 01:25 AM
Gnaw, on 22 October 2015 - 01:17 AM, said:
I like Chafee. In a non-insane country, he'd be a real candidate.
Please tell me you didn't watch the debate.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#2060
Posted 22 October 2015 - 02:12 AM
HoosierDaddy, on 22 October 2015 - 01:25 AM, said:
No I didn't. I've seen him interviewed a couple of times. And didn't have too much trouble with his Senate record. Compared to the rest of the Republicans.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl