[Silanah]

Being late is fun, I have decided, after much research and ponderin'.

[Liosan]

Greetings red five.

[Tulas Shorn]

Silanah, on 24 January 2012 - 02:55 AM, said:

Being late is fun, I have decided, after much research and ponderin'.

So is posting naked is seems.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 18 Hours and 7 minutes Left.

20 Players still alive: Atrahal, Eloth, Fener, Galayn Lord, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Korvalain, Liosan, Merrid, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Omtose, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Shadow, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn

11 Votes to Lynch. 10 to go to night.

1 Vote Osseric: Karatallid
1 Vote Atrahal: Tulas Shorn
1 Vote Tulas Shorn: Atrahal
1 Vote Merrid: Eloth

Players not voting: Fener, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korlat, Korvalain, Liosan, Merrid, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Omtose, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Shadow, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha

[Silanah]

The Oss-Ts thingie was funny, but I would prefer not having to scroll half the page past the quotes you guys made.

Thanks.

[Silanah]

Aren't I a buzzkill?

[Liosan]

Night ol' chaps

[Atrahal]

Silanah, on 24 January 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:

Aren't I a buzzkill?

somewhat.
nowhere near as much as my textbooks, though.

[Merrid]

I'm here I'm here I'm here!!!

[Merrid]

I'm really sorry if I'm late, I got here just as soon as I could I promise!

Please don't be just me...

[Path-Shaper]

Me too, but I'm not allowed to say much.

[Merrid]

Silanah, my love (Ano's not here right?), come back to meeeee!!!

[Merrid]

So much sad!

[Merrid]

Reading up...

Okay, seriously, if you have to rant on day 1 you are doing it wrong. And by "it" I mean playing mafia. Rants are for late in the game when you just KNOW that Silencer is a lurky scum but he's too smooth that no one's listening to your case and you need to MAKE people fixate.

Ranting about google translate on day 1 is just bad play, as is whatever got you to that point.

[Atrahal]

well, i'm one of the 3 anons

does anyone else have anyhting to say?

any other thoughts about the GL case?

[Merrid]

Atrahal, on 24 January 2012 - 04:26 AM, said:

well, i'm one of the 3 anons

does anyone else have anyhting to say?

any other thoughts about the GL case?

I think Tulas is having a bad day. I don't really think GL's vote is anything more than what it seems at face value and if I thought it was suspicious I'd have to think every vote so far is suspicious on the same principle.

Nothing really jumping out at me so far, I think my preference is to vote Fener for statistical reasons.

[Atrahal]

Merrid, on 24 January 2012 - 04:27 AM, said:

Atrahal, on 24 January 2012 - 04:26 AM, said:

well, i'm one of the 3 anons

does anyone else have anyhting to say?

any other thoughts about the GL case?

I think Tulas is having a bad day. I don't really think GL's vote is anything more than what it seems at face value and if I thought it was suspicious I'd have to think every vote so far is suspicious on the same principle.

Nothing really jumping out at me so far, I think my preference is to vote Fener for statistical reasons.

see, the flaw with that reasoning, is that I don't see there being "scum" per se in this game.
in fact, i'm currently leaning to there being 4 factions of 5.

which would make a fener lynch counterproductive.

[Olar Ethil]

Atrahal, on 24 January 2012 - 05:32 AM, said:

Merrid, on 24 January 2012 - 04:27 AM, said:

Atrahal, on 24 January 2012 - 04:26 AM, said:

well, i'm one of the 3 anons

does anyone else have anyhting to say?

any other thoughts about the GL case?

I think Tulas is having a bad day. I don't really think GL's vote is anything more than what it seems at face value and if I thought it was suspicious I'd have to think every vote so far is suspicious on the same principle.

Nothing really jumping out at me so far, I think my preference is to vote Fener for statistical reasons.

see, the flaw with that reasoning, is that I don't see there being "scum" per se in this game.
in fact, i'm currently leaning to there being 4 factions of 5.

which would make a fener lynch counterproductive.

but by your reasoning that would make any lynch on day 1 counter-productive, cause we dont have enough information to make educated decisions. in a town game any lynch is preferable to no lynch, but that may not be true here. in that case, what do you suggest?

[Atrahal]

Olar Ethil, on 24 January 2012 - 05:50 AM, said:

Atrahal, on 24 January 2012 - 05:32 AM, said:

Merrid, on 24 January 2012 - 04:27 AM, said:

Atrahal, on 24 January 2012 - 04:26 AM, said:

well, i'm one of the 3 anons

does anyone else have anyhting to say?

any other thoughts about the GL case?

I think Tulas is having a bad day. I don't really think GL's vote is anything more than what it seems at face value and if I thought it was suspicious I'd have to think every vote so far is suspicious on the same principle.

Nothing really jumping out at me so far, I think my preference is to vote Fener for statistical reasons.

see, the flaw with that reasoning, is that I don't see there being "scum" per se in this game.
in fact, i'm currently leaning to there being 4 factions of 5.

which would make a fener lynch counterproductive.

but by your reasoning that would make any lynch on day 1 counter-productive, cause we dont have enough information to make educated decisions. in a town game any lynch is preferable to no lynch, but that may not be true here. in that case, what do you suggest?

the usual cat and mouse games.
random pressure votes, observe reactions to such votes, try to find leaders.

[Sorrit]

It figures that the game started just after I went to bed. I am here and reading up. Just 6 pages? I am disappointed.