The Walking Dead Spoilers to latest ep
#461
Posted 05 April 2016 - 03:30 AM
Anyone else starting to get the feeling this show isn't all it's cracked up to be?
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#462
Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:51 AM
#463
Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:18 PM
Kinda think they took one of the best moments in the show's history with an incredible introduction and intense moment, and then just butchered it just like the unseen victim
watching them try to justify it on talking dead was laughable
watching them try to justify it on talking dead was laughable
This post has been edited by Kruppe'sStainedClothing: 05 April 2016 - 07:25 PM
#464
Posted 06 April 2016 - 07:58 AM
Overall I really liked the episode - we watched it without ad breaks which I think probably contributed to an "overly long" feeling - I really didn't feel that. Sure, the roadblock idea has some holes in it but I still enjoyed it and I liked the build up of tension it created. I really bought that "penned in" feeling. Jeffrey Dean Morgan is brilliant and the whole introduction worked like a charm for me.
The final twenty seconds spoiled an otherwise strong episode for me. Cheap and unnecessary.
The final twenty seconds spoiled an otherwise strong episode for me. Cheap and unnecessary.
This post has been edited by TheRetiredBridgeburner: 06 April 2016 - 07:58 AM
- Wyrd biđ ful aræd -
#465
Posted 11 April 2016 - 08:27 AM
Fear doesn't have its own thread, right? Anyway, solid ep, and show is still so much better than TWD.
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#466
Posted 11 April 2016 - 08:01 PM
Oponn Relationship, on 11 April 2016 - 08:27 AM, said:
Fear doesn't have its own thread, right? Anyway, solid ep, and show is still so much better than TWD.
Still makes the same mistake as TWD...let's let character just talk to others and broadcast their position. I very certain someone can chime in better than than me on this tech, but wouldn't they be really easy to find that way?
http://www.boatingsf...is-on-your-boat
This post has been edited by Nicodimas: 11 April 2016 - 08:02 PM
-If it's ka it'll come like a wind, and your plans will stand before it no more than a barn before a cyclone
#467
Posted 13 April 2016 - 06:11 PM
That last episode was stupid from top to bottom. At least for once they ended a season differently than they normally do,
Error: Signature not valid
#469
Posted 24 October 2016 - 03:56 AM
That was pretty rad. It felt like actual horror. I imagine if they hadn't squandered these characters over all those terrible episodes, this one would have been even more of a doozy.
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#470
Posted 24 October 2016 - 04:03 AM
I've pieced together who Abraham was as a kid. He was South Park's Cartman. A foul mouthed ginger who grows up to be a bad ass in the zombie apocalypse. The "suck my nuts" phrase seals it.
Also, some uber-fan has stated on another forum that there are Easter eggs in early episodes (like back to season 1 ) that set the beginning of The Walking Dead soon after the 2016 presidential election. I haven't made that connection myself, but that is bonkers if it's true.
Also, some uber-fan has stated on another forum that there are Easter eggs in early episodes (like back to season 1 ) that set the beginning of The Walking Dead soon after the 2016 presidential election. I haven't made that connection myself, but that is bonkers if it's true.
#471
Posted 24 October 2016 - 04:10 AM
That seems odd, since FtWD sets the start of the zombie apocalypse as 2010 (at least according to some grave markers).
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#472
Posted 24 October 2016 - 04:28 AM
Yeah, he's probably just some supporter of one side or the other just trolling, I never bought into it myself, just though it would be crazy it it was true. Anyway, next week we get to see "The Kingdom" and a tiger and a King Ezekiel. Also, more Abraham! (according to Talking Dead)
#473
Posted 25 October 2016 - 01:10 PM
So here's my issue now, on the back of HATING the finale last season...both for it's pointlessness (wandering and encountering roadblocks as some jumped up attempt to push fear on us and the crew) and for it's Dallas-esque fucking cliffhanger (which shows that showrunner/writer Scott Gimple is more interested in gimmicky-string-alongs than telling a complete and satisfying story)...
The premiere did only one thing right...it showed us the outcome of the cliffhanger. I HONESTLY thought that episode 1 would have us watching Morgan and Carol in the Kingdom and we would not find out who was on the other end of Negan's bat till ep 2. Because that is the kind of shenanigans this show has gotten up to in the last few seasons. Forget drama from the narrative..let's make forced/fake drama by fooling the audience and pushing what they will choose to watch as far as keeping them hanging. The amount of times this show has ended an ep on a cliffhangery moment only to NOT show what happened for more than one more ep is STAGGERING. Like fuck you Scott Gimple. Tell your story, stop fucking around.
Spoilers for the ep
comics spoilers
EDIT: Hoisted this from the TOR review of the ep....and it's very fitting for how I feel.
Kirkman’s zombie apocalypse is designed to never end. While that seemed exciting in the first season, in the seventh it’s become a repetitive cycle of find a sanctuary, bicker with those already living there, get attacked by outsiders, destroy the sanctuary, spend time on the road, find a sanctuary, and on and on and on. In the absence of thematic tension, character development, or emotional growth is empty shock and torture porn-esque gore.
The premiere did only one thing right...it showed us the outcome of the cliffhanger. I HONESTLY thought that episode 1 would have us watching Morgan and Carol in the Kingdom and we would not find out who was on the other end of Negan's bat till ep 2. Because that is the kind of shenanigans this show has gotten up to in the last few seasons. Forget drama from the narrative..let's make forced/fake drama by fooling the audience and pushing what they will choose to watch as far as keeping them hanging. The amount of times this show has ended an ep on a cliffhangery moment only to NOT show what happened for more than one more ep is STAGGERING. Like fuck you Scott Gimple. Tell your story, stop fucking around.
Spoilers for the ep
Spoiler
comics spoilers
Spoiler
EDIT: Hoisted this from the TOR review of the ep....and it's very fitting for how I feel.
Kirkman’s zombie apocalypse is designed to never end. While that seemed exciting in the first season, in the seventh it’s become a repetitive cycle of find a sanctuary, bicker with those already living there, get attacked by outsiders, destroy the sanctuary, spend time on the road, find a sanctuary, and on and on and on. In the absence of thematic tension, character development, or emotional growth is empty shock and torture porn-esque gore.
This post has been edited by QuickTidal: 25 October 2016 - 01:23 PM
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
“Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone.” ~Ursula Vernon
“Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone.” ~Ursula Vernon
#474
Posted 25 October 2016 - 08:18 PM
Wow, that's just a totally different perspective from mine. IMO "torture porn" is always thrown around with such invective, like it's inherently a disparagement and not just another (post-)trending subgenre of horror. There's great torture porn (Martyrs; Audition), good stuff (Wolf Creek), mediocre (too many to list), and of course plenty of dismal stuff (imo the Saw movies). But that's true of all horror subgenres. Then you have TWD, a consistently bad show most weeks with shockingly infrequent horror given its premise, and "character" work they botch script after script (I do not pine for the days this show was "about people"). If anything this didn't go far enough in wiping the slate, but at least what we got was a real villain and some genuinely disgusting, grisly effects work. The last time they did anything even remotely as cool was when Noah died. Frankly the deaths in this one felt -- finally -- like a breath of fresh air. Which doesn't mean I'm optimistic about the season -- the show walks in circles, no doubt -- but Negan has already offered some villainous course-correction from that abysmal seasons-long Governor arc.
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#476
Posted 25 October 2016 - 09:54 PM
Malankazooie, on 25 October 2016 - 09:03 PM, said:
As far as the "graphic detail":
Spoiler
No, that was my point. The comic handled this in gruesome, but short order. It didn't lollygag on it for a whole episode.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
“Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone.” ~Ursula Vernon
“Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone.” ~Ursula Vernon
#477
Posted 25 October 2016 - 10:19 PM
QuickTidal, on 25 October 2016 - 09:54 PM, said:
According to Scott Gimple and Robert Kirkman on the Talking Dead after show, they really wanted to convey that this season is a reset. Everything before Negan (seasons 1 to 6) and every thing after Negan (season 7 to season ?). So I think that is why they included the extras:
Spoiler
#478
Posted 26 October 2016 - 11:44 AM
Malankazooie, on 25 October 2016 - 10:19 PM, said:
QuickTidal, on 25 October 2016 - 09:54 PM, said:
According to Scott Gimple and Robert Kirkman on the Talking Dead after show, they really wanted to convey that this season is a reset. Everything before Negan (seasons 1 to 6) and every thing after Negan (season 7 to season ?). So I think that is why they included the extras:
Spoiler
I loathe Gimple...the guy does stupid ass things as a writer....and then jumps into the media and basically tells everyone what his intentions were....no, if you were a better writer Gimple you would not have to explain yourself.
Kirkman is little better. The only writer I know who hates that people come to love his characters.
I'm also not willing to buy that they needed a whole episode to do what took the comic 3 pages. Most reviews that are hard on the ep seem to agree with me that it didn't need to be an hour of basically the one point. That was excessive and indulgent.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
“Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone.” ~Ursula Vernon
“Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone.” ~Ursula Vernon
#479
Posted 26 October 2016 - 11:53 AM
I watched it, and loved it.
Spoiler
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#480
Posted 26 October 2016 - 02:59 PM
QuickTidal, on 26 October 2016 - 11:44 AM, said:
Malankazooie, on 25 October 2016 - 10:19 PM, said:
QuickTidal, on 25 October 2016 - 09:54 PM, said:
According to Scott Gimple and Robert Kirkman on the Talking Dead after show, they really wanted to convey that this season is a reset. Everything before Negan (seasons 1 to 6) and every thing after Negan (season 7 to season ?). So I think that is why they included the extras:
Spoiler
I loathe Gimple...the guy does stupid ass things as a writer....and then jumps into the media and basically tells everyone what his intentions were....no, if you were a better writer Gimple you would not have to explain yourself.
Kirkman is little better. The only writer I know who hates that people come to love his characters.
I'm also not willing to buy that they needed a whole episode to do what took the comic 3 pages. Most reviews that are hard on the ep seem to agree with me that it didn't need to be an hour of basically the one point. That was excessive and indulgent.
Yeah, I don't know. I think if they would have covered the Negan brutality in just like the first 1/4 or 1/3 of the hour and then moved on to something else (like Carol and Morgan at The Kingdom), I dunno, I think it would have watered down the impact and the breaking down of Rick that it accomplished (or even lamer, if they would have jumped back between the two). It was brutal sure, and I didn't need Gimple or Kirkman to explain what they were accomplishing with the episode. When they stated such on Talking Dead, they did so matter of factly, meaning they got that the audience got what they were trying to do.