[Gust Hubb]

Ok, that is night.

[ansible]

Tattersail, on 20 July 2011 - 09:27 PM, said:

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 07:22 PM, said:

Also, last night I found Grief again and he is not MH.

I wasn't around to do a find. Now I'm very confused. I thought there are two MH, because the second one "is MH as well". Maybe as a finder we can find the recruited as well as the original. Here is what it says when a find comes back.

In fact i'll ask Ansible to copy and paste what PS tells him when a find comes back just to be clear he is a finder. Sorry Ansible but I haven't cleared Grief once. I will clear you tonight to be certain you're not MH or in his faction.

I think you haven't been reading the thread.

[Tattersail_]

right when this comes back are we going to vote night again an me and ansible will find 2 more people? I'll put in a provisional to find Gust Hubb after ansible tonight. Then Ment. So effectively there will be 1 vote night i find ansible, 2 vote night i find GH and then the 3rd vote night i find Ment. Only if we are voting night that many times, is this okay with everyone?

[Tattersail_]

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 09:35 PM, said:

Tattersail, on 20 July 2011 - 09:27 PM, said:

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 07:22 PM, said:

Also, last night I found Grief again and he is not MH.

I wasn't around to do a find. Now I'm very confused. I thought there are two MH, because the second one "is MH as well". Maybe as a finder we can find the recruited as well as the original. Here is what it says when a find comes back.

In fact i'll ask Ansible to copy and paste what PS tells him when a find comes back just to be clear he is a finder. Sorry Ansible but I haven't cleared Grief once. I will clear you tonight to be certain you're not MH or in his faction.

I think you haven't been reading the thread.

I was replying as I go so we get a fresh feel and response to each post by me. I would still like you to copy and paste what PS says when you've done a find. You up for it? You do one and I'll do one straight away too.

[ansible]

Tattersail, on 20 July 2011 - 09:36 PM, said:

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 09:35 PM, said:

Tattersail, on 20 July 2011 - 09:27 PM, said:

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 07:22 PM, said:

Also, last night I found Grief again and he is not MH.

I wasn't around to do a find. Now I'm very confused. I thought there are two MH, because the second one "is MH as well". Maybe as a finder we can find the recruited as well as the original. Here is what it says when a find comes back.

In fact i'll ask Ansible to copy and paste what PS tells him when a find comes back just to be clear he is a finder. Sorry Ansible but I haven't cleared Grief once. I will clear you tonight to be certain you're not MH or in his faction.

I think you haven't been reading the thread.

I was replying as I go so we get a fresh feel and response to each post by me. I would still like you to copy and paste what PS says when you've done a find. You up for it? You do one and I'll do one straight away too.

Nope...go back and reread.

[Tattersail_]

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 09:38 PM, said:

Tattersail, on 20 July 2011 - 09:36 PM, said:

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 09:35 PM, said:

Tattersail, on 20 July 2011 - 09:27 PM, said:

ansible, on 20 July 2011 - 07:22 PM, said:

Also, last night I found Grief again and he is not MH.

I wasn't around to do a find. Now I'm very confused. I thought there are two MH, because the second one "is MH as well". Maybe as a finder we can find the recruited as well as the original. Here is what it says when a find comes back.

In fact i'll ask Ansible to copy and paste what PS tells him when a find comes back just to be clear he is a finder. Sorry Ansible but I haven't cleared Grief once. I will clear you tonight to be certain you're not MH or in his faction.

I think you haven't been reading the thread.

I was replying as I go so we get a fresh feel and response to each post by me. I would still like you to copy and paste what PS says when you've done a find. You up for it? You do one and I'll do one straight away too.

Nope...go back and reread.

I have re read, and I know you'll do a find on me tonight and i'll do one on you. However what would be the harm in you posting the line that PS gives us when someone is found?

[Tattersail_]

Like GH said earlier on today you never come back and confirmed what was said. I just took it for granted because Venge backed down and no one else disputed your claim.

[Tattersail_]

Right, I have set provisional for Ansible, GH, Ment and Venge in that order, i'm not saying you'll go to night 3 times in a row but if that is something you'd like to do then you'll have the option whilst i'm in bed.

[Path-Shaper]

End of Day 9

4 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

4 Votes for Night ( Gust Hubb, HiddenOne, Vengeance, Tattersail )

Players not voted: ansible, Grief, Mentalist

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 10. 27 hours and 59 minutes remaining
7 Players still alive: ansible, Grief, Gust Hubb, HiddenOne, Mentalist, Tattersail, Vengeance

4 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: ansible, Grief, Gust Hubb, HiddenOne, Mentalist, Tattersail, Vengeance

[Grief]

I was about to say verify on thread if possible (lynching MH being better than finding him) but that doesn't seem to matter now.

I'll wait for confirmation from finders of who's been cleared. Basically, we're now trying to narrow down the pool as small as possible with finds. Dunno what you guys think is good odds to aim for though.

[Gust Hubb]

Excellent. And the results Tat and ansible?

[ansible]

There was no sign of Meng Huo in Tattersail's camp.

That should about settle this finder business.

[ansible]

Grief, on 20 July 2011 - 10:39 PM, said:

I was about to say verify on thread if possible (lynching MH being better than finding him) but that doesn't seem to matter now.

I'll wait for confirmation from finders of who's been cleared. Basically, we're now trying to narrow down the pool as small as possible with finds. Dunno what you guys think is good odds to aim for though.

People not cleared right now: Gust Hubb, HiddenOne, Mentalist, Vengeance

I say we use 2 finds at first to narrow down the pool. We can afford to lose at least 1 FK before lynching again. However, Tatts is gone and put in some provisionals already...so not sure what to do about that.

Also, I've confirmed this with P-S - when MH dies, it happens at the end of the day, and so does the jump to the next successor. This means that if we lynch MH, and a find is placed on his successor on the same night, the find will kill the successor because he will already be MH when night falls.

[Grief]

Since tat said he was finding ans, and ans is alive, we can safely assume both finders are not MH then.

I'd also like to see on thread verification if possible though, to rule out a symp. I can't see any harm in it at this stage.

Our next move is to find a couple more people and try and lynch.

Atm, only I am clear I think.

That leaves, venge, ment, GH, and HO.

I reckon we ought to aim for 50/50 at least. Possibly even go for complete certainty on the first lynch(if we get a FK, go for slightly worse odds 2nd time around, since our odds improve after a couple of FKs anyhow.)

[Gust Hubb]

I mean, if we are really coordinated, we could go cautiously and do one find at a time. But that may be a better idea if we loose a FK

Edit: "a" not "and"

This post has been edited by Gust Hubb: 20 July 2011 - 11:11 PM

[Grief]

Not much point doing one at a time if we're planning on doing 2 before a lynch anyhow. Really it comes down to how much people want to try to find before lynching.

[Vengeance]

So are the finders set? I know that Tatter said that she had a bunch of provisionals in. Does Ansible?

Can't we just go to night and knock 2 of us off the list. Then figure out the next day lynch.

[Gust Hubb]

Sounds good to me.

Vote Night.

[Vengeance]

Ok good.


Vote Night.

I am going to eat dinner and go to bed. Walking around in the heat has exhausted me.



Edited for bold fail

This post has been edited by Vengeance: 20 July 2011 - 11:33 PM