WhiskeyJackDaniels, on 17 October 2010 - 01:37 AM, said:
Silencer, on 17 October 2010 - 01:16 AM, said:
For example, if Kallor just killed 7 million people to curse the Elder Gods, and his had ruled this continent for more than however many years it is that took him to conquer it (i.e. he has been on the throne for at least 10 additional years), then does it not follow that, over the course of his conquest, he has had more than the present 7 million inhabitants of his empire under his power?
Essentially, K'rul is talking cumulative, not what he has at present.
Like, when we talk about Stalin having more than 40 million people killed during his reign, we don't mean he killed 40 million at once. Right?
Same thing here. Over the course of his conquest and rule, Kallor has had a total of 12 million people under his power. He just killed 7 million of the most recent subjects to curse the EG's, there's nothing to say the previous 5 million didn't die of natural causes, or during war, or by Kallor's cruelty prior to his mass genocide.
Discrepancy = solved?

Idk, its a nice semantic argument, but I think there is probably something wrong with him only having ruled over 12 million people if he ruled for 50 years or more. Considering there were 7 million there (at least) to be killed en masse at the end, it seems like over the period of that half century there would have been more than a total of 12 million people. I know he didn't start with an empire of a full continent, but I also didn't get the impression it was new at the time of the MoI prologue.
The exact quote is something about having enslaved 12 million souls, which I have a theory as meaning he somehow captured the souls of those people (perhaps similar to someone else we see later in the series). Which explains why the 7 million and 12 million dollar quotes are unrelated.
@HD Yea I think the Jaghut had some way of forcing their will upon people considering that was what Raest tried to do when he woke up (he said he couldn't to Silannah because she was a true Eleint and wouldn't be a slave or something like that. Also he tries to do it to Paran who refuses because of his Hounds blood only).
Well, I was thinking he only ruled for like ten years, but was conquering for fifty. Which makes the number a lot more sensible.
The question would be why he only bothered to use 7 of the 12 million souls he had enslaved in the curse, though.
@Illy - that's the other thing I was thinking, and it makes sense to me. But everyone else is disagreeing with your Korel theory...