Total War
#1
Posted 17 May 2010 - 07:58 PM
anyone knowanything about that game? Is it good? It looks pretty badass, you get to control armys and monevour them and stuff. Im thinking about getting it so anyone know anything?
-
#2
Posted 17 May 2010 - 08:29 PM
The series is very good. The most recent (Empire: TW) had a lot of issues, but was still fun. I'd suggest either Rome: TW or Medieval: TW. They were two of the better games, Rome because I'm very into history and the Roman legion was awesome. Medieval because it is, imo, the best of the series to date.
This thread, http://forum.malazan...showtopic=14008, talks a lot about the Total War games, as well as other good strategy games.
This thread, http://forum.malazan...showtopic=14008, talks a lot about the Total War games, as well as other good strategy games.
This post has been edited by Stalker: 17 May 2010 - 08:30 PM
#3
Posted 17 May 2010 - 08:36 PM
Which one are you looking at?
Shogun
Rome
Medieval
Rome
Medieval 2
Empire?
Personally, I love them all.
repeatedly mentioned (and raved/loathed) in this thread
Edit - Damn you Stalker!
Shogun
Rome
Medieval
Rome
Medieval 2
Empire?
Personally, I love them all.
repeatedly mentioned (and raved/loathed) in this thread
Edit - Damn you Stalker!
This post has been edited by Cocoreturns: 17 May 2010 - 08:36 PM
meh. Link was dead :(
#4
Posted 17 May 2010 - 08:39 PM
hehe, I am too quick.
but hey, second is only the first loser. Imagine if Tapper rushed in now, then we'd both be on top.
but hey, second is only the first loser. Imagine if Tapper rushed in now, then we'd both be on top.
#5
#6
Posted 17 May 2010 - 08:49 PM
Wait. Aren't you forgetting Napoleon TW? Or is that game just an addon to the Empire TW game?
I've got Empire in my Steam Folder but I just can't get around to playing it. I tried the tutorial and spent 10 minutes trying to position an artillery unit and failing while the computer mocked me.
I've got Empire in my Steam Folder but I just can't get around to playing it. I tried the tutorial and spent 10 minutes trying to position an artillery unit and failing while the computer mocked me.
#7
Posted 17 May 2010 - 09:11 PM
Napoleon is an add on. There are plenty of them, like Viking Invasion, Barbarian Invasion, Alexander etc. etc. etc. Have been playing this series since Shogun came out, am a huge fan. Rome is definitely the best so far, though not had vast experience on MTW:2
A Haunting Poem
I Scream
You Scream
We all Scream
For I Scream.
I Scream
You Scream
We all Scream
For I Scream.
#8
Posted 18 May 2010 - 07:46 AM
Alexander was actually alot of fun. I enjoyed winning battles outnumbered ten to one
#9
Posted 18 May 2010 - 09:21 AM
also realism mod for Rome is awsome, its a total reramp of the game, not one unit that is the same as the old one!
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels
#10
Posted 18 May 2010 - 09:25 AM
Napoleon is a new stand-alone game, you do not need Empire to run it. It looks better than Empire, and has a few nice additions, but it does concentrate on a specific time, and the map is Europe only, not the whole British Empire.
Medieval 2 is probably my favourite, but Empire is awesome if you like the time period, and have a decent PC to run it on. Medieval 2 looks quite dated now I've been on Empire and Napoleon.
Medieval 2 is probably my favourite, but Empire is awesome if you like the time period, and have a decent PC to run it on. Medieval 2 looks quite dated now I've been on Empire and Napoleon.
So that's the story. And what was the real lesson? Don't leave things in the fridge.
#11
Posted 18 May 2010 - 09:29 AM
thats a shame realy as that game is awsome, but i have to say the same thing happend to me...
and they sould make a rome total war 2 soon...
and they sould make a rome total war 2 soon...
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels
#12
Posted 18 May 2010 - 09:41 AM
I would love a fantasy Total war. The problem with empire is every troop type is the same bar some slight stat differences. The problem with every total war game is despite scores of historical accuracies so often they bollock 2 things for everyone they get right. Use the same engine, the same design but just make it pure fantasy.
I would also love to see more options. Send single units to enemy territories to wage guerrilla wars and just mess stuff up. Cut off an enemy armies route back to its own territory and have it lose its supply lines.
I would also love to see more options. Send single units to enemy territories to wage guerrilla wars and just mess stuff up. Cut off an enemy armies route back to its own territory and have it lose its supply lines.
#13
Posted 18 May 2010 - 09:51 AM
a warhammer (fantasy) total war would be great! i mean, its balanced (more or less), it got a map, and it builds on another francise (wich may be a problem, but if they get it trugh with GW they would get even more people to by it! espeasly considering there havent been a good warhammer fantasy strategy game! (that i can think of))
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels
#14
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:25 AM
Mark of Chaos tried to do something like this but as far as I know, it failed. Medieval 2 was my favorite from this series, I especially enjoyed playing as the Germans - and the Teutonic Order in the add-on.
The meaning of life is BOOM!!!
#15
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:29 AM
mark of chaos is okay if you dont mind loading a damned loding screen (after every map no less), and they also forgot the whole straegy part of the game (tactics yes strategy not so much..)
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels
#16
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:36 AM
beru, on 18 May 2010 - 09:51 AM, said:
a warhammer (fantasy) total war would be great! i mean, its balanced (more or less), it got a map, and it builds on another francise (wich may be a problem, but if they get it trugh with GW they would get even more people to by it! espeasly considering there havent been a good warhammer fantasy strategy game! (that i can think of))
Heresy! I still rank Warhamme: Dark Omen to be one of the best games to date.
Legalise drugs! And murder!
#17
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:37 AM
TBH I was a bit disappointed in Empire all things considered. I'm not a big fan of the time peroid.
Maybe I should give it more than 7 hours though...
Maybe I should give it more than 7 hours though...

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
#18
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:42 AM
Brynjar, on 18 May 2010 - 11:36 AM, said:
beru, on 18 May 2010 - 09:51 AM, said:
a warhammer (fantasy) total war would be great! i mean, its balanced (more or less), it got a map, and it builds on another francise (wich may be a problem, but if they get it trugh with GW they would get even more people to by it! espeasly considering there havent been a good warhammer fantasy strategy game! (that i can think of))
Heresy! I still rank Warhamme: Dark Omen to be one of the best games to date.
having never played the game (and only heard of trugh an old warhammer rulebook) i dont know how good that game is...
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels
#19
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:53 AM
try Shadow of the Horned Rat. it's hardcore.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
#20
Posted 18 May 2010 - 11:56 AM
but is it good?
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels