Malazan Empire: Spycraft 63, Trouble in Tokyo - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 136 Pages +
  • « First
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Spycraft 63, Trouble in Tokyo game thread, opens 18th of may.

#561 User is offline   Mockra 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:24 PM

I think it's completely inane to make a case on Day 1 and then dig your heels in as if it were ironclad. :)

What happens tomorrow if Galain is lynched today and comes up non-scum? Do you offer a mea culpa and we move on? Do we get to lynch you for pushing it forcefully? Do we have to lynch more people in the theory to prove they are or are not teamed?

It's quite silly. Galain has just as much of a chance of being on my team as you do (Kaschan), so I see just as good a reason to lynch him. The case based upon his discussion of Spycraft 1 is ridiculous, Tapper said so himself.

#562 User is offline   Liosan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:26 PM

Here.

Re: Galain. I was one of those who said there were no "symps" last game. It was my bad memory that caused it, and I quickly realized it after it was brought up and I went back and looked at SC1. Now, the debate here seems a bit muddled through. I'm rather unsure as to whether it was a contradiction or misunderstanding, but as I fucked it up as well I'll believe Galain. For now.

Kaschan: So you believe that Galain is known to the 3 people "defending" him?

#563 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:27 PM

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:26 PM, said:

Here.

Re: Galain. I was one of those who said there were no "symps" last game. It was my bad memory that caused it, and I quickly realized it after it was brought up and I went back and looked at SC1. Now, the debate here seems a bit muddled through. I'm rather unsure as to whether it was a contradiction or misunderstanding, but as I fucked it up as well I'll believe Galain. For now.

Kaschan: So you believe that Galain is known to the 3 people "defending" him?


2 people and yes.

#564 User is offline   Liosan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:32 PM

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:27 PM, said:

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:26 PM, said:

Here.

Re: Galain. I was one of those who said there were no "symps" last game. It was my bad memory that caused it, and I quickly realized it after it was brought up and I went back and looked at SC1. Now, the debate here seems a bit muddled through. I'm rather unsure as to whether it was a contradiction or misunderstanding, but as I fucked it up as well I'll believe Galain. For now.

Kaschan: So you believe that Galain is known to the 3 people "defending" him?


2 people and yes.


Do you agree that there are, if any, very few people who people would have a knowledge of to start the game? I.e.: If it's faction, that faction starts off stronger; or if it's not faction knowledge, that person starts off weaker?

#565 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:32 PM

My reasoning is quite simple - The "case" was weak, and a single vote was cast. Driss and I added pressure and started questioning Galain. Galain made a few responses, but Eloth and Sil immediately stepped up to his defense. This was in my opinion, uncalled for based on a single vote and the back and forth between me and Galain. He was perfectly capable of defending himself against 2 people. Hell Driss and Emu basically disappeared so really it was just me and him, yet Eloth and Sil kept jumping in and answering for him.

#566 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:35 PM

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:32 PM, said:

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:27 PM, said:

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:26 PM, said:

Here.

Re: Galain. I was one of those who said there were no "symps" last game. It was my bad memory that caused it, and I quickly realized it after it was brought up and I went back and looked at SC1. Now, the debate here seems a bit muddled through. I'm rather unsure as to whether it was a contradiction or misunderstanding, but as I fucked it up as well I'll believe Galain. For now.

Kaschan: So you believe that Galain is known to the 3 people "defending" him?


2 people and yes.


Do you agree that there are, if any, very few people who people would have a knowledge of to start the game? I.e.: If it's faction, that faction starts off stronger; or if it's not faction knowledge, that person starts off weaker?


I dunno to be honest, but the agressive nature of his defese by Eloth and Sil leads me to believe that this is in fact the case. It may or may not be the case for every faction, but in this instance, I believe it is so. Make sense?

#567 User is offline   Mockra 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:37 PM

Honestly, I see nothing wrong with defending another player by attacking a weak case. Maybe the attacked player is scum, but it's equally likely that that the person making the case is actually scum and the case is being attacked for being not worth the vote.

I don't see any particular reason to agree that it's vote worthy.

#568 User is offline   Liosan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:39 PM

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:35 PM, said:

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:32 PM, said:

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:27 PM, said:

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:26 PM, said:

Here.

Re: Galain. I was one of those who said there were no "symps" last game. It was my bad memory that caused it, and I quickly realized it after it was brought up and I went back and looked at SC1. Now, the debate here seems a bit muddled through. I'm rather unsure as to whether it was a contradiction or misunderstanding, but as I fucked it up as well I'll believe Galain. For now.

Kaschan: So you believe that Galain is known to the 3 people "defending" him?


2 people and yes.


Do you agree that there are, if any, very few people who people would have a knowledge of to start the game? I.e.: If it's faction, that faction starts off stronger; or if it's not faction knowledge, that person starts off weaker?


I dunno to be honest, but the agressive nature of his defese by Eloth and Sil leads me to believe that this is in fact the case. It may or may not be the case for every faction, but in this instance, I believe it is so. Make sense?


I can see why what you consider to be unnecessary defense would signal that these were perhaps teammates, yes. I can understand that reaction. But, I also find it fairly improbable that two separate people knew who Galain was to start the game, and that their mutual defense would signal they were teammates, that two teammates of Galain knew who he was to start the game. That seems like a fairly substantial initial benefit to a single faction, considering the realities of a faction game.

#569 User is offline   Mockra 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:43 PM

For posterity's sake, in SC1, 2 members of the Syndicate knew all of the members, but neither one was much of a killer. The Russians had 2 spies that knew each other from the start, but that's it. None of the teams really had a defined 'leader' that several people in the team knew right from the start. Some teams had the ability to learn that over time, but not initially.

This is a different game, but I think with 5 factions + Syndicate, that would be incredibly powerful for a faction to know its members... I COULD see the Syndicate knowing its members... one of the reasons they lost last game was they interfered with each other at a crucial time and one was killed in the process. Possible Tapper didn't want that to occur again, but I really have to agree with Liosan that it's just highly unlikely... they'd all have to be on the same team, know Galain as some kind of leader, and then be online at the same time. Quite a co-incidence...

#570 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:50 PM

1 hour and 10 minutes remaining.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#571 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:55 PM

So these two consecutive posts from Kaschan, spaced 35 minutes apart, seem odd to me:

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 12:02 PM, said:

32 posts left.

That was a pretty good catch by Emurlahn. I could go with that, but right now I really like my vote on Mockra. I'll be around in a few hours to expand on that, but I have work to do now. Until then.


Edit - 32 posts not 33 - damn you PS.


View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 12:37 PM, said:

Are you guys being serious?

Galain clearly stated in his first post - there were symps, then says A SYNDICATE MEMBER (Bwgan as the temptress) CFed as A SPY! - then states - he doesnt recall a SYNDICATE MEMBER CFing as A SPY!

Galain said:



Last game there was definitly proper symps in the game. One of the people who CFed as being French, as someone correctly pointed out as Bwgan/The Temptress, they were working for the scum. So we should expect the same in this game.



Galain said:

I don't recall any syndicate members appearing as Spies upon CF,




In fact - this might be the extra alt. A couple of members in the same alt would do this as well.

The fact that neither Eloth or Silanah see this is quite curious. Quite.


In between are 7 posts, mostly from Driss:

View PostD, on 19 May 2010 - 12:10 PM, said:

View PostEloth, on 19 May 2010 - 11:48 AM, said:

Im still not clear on what these scenes are meant to be.

Are they clues?
I understand that you are supposed to look out for traits that align with your own.

But i dont see what us dissecting the scene will accomplish since we will never know who they are referring to unless it is about yourself.


It is a good idea in that we may identify the syndicate agents by their actions within the scenes and if a player recognises the person from a scene where they targetted that person they will know who is the syndicate agent. Also it will help us keep track of the number of players having actions. Once the number of players goes down and we have more scenes to look at if people divulge suspicions of who is in which scene it will make the our job much easier. By the end of the last game we had put almost everyone playing against a person in a scene and it was a simple matter of going through those left to discover the identity of the syndicate. This time we are slightly hampered by the fact we cannot reveal, but a few factions clearly have the abiltiy to form off thread comms and people can reveal through proxy which is not against the rules.


View PostD, on 19 May 2010 - 12:29 PM, said:

In the first quote galain mentions how in the last game there were symps as syndicate members appeared with a nationality. In the second quote Galain claims not to remember if syndicate members appeared as spies. It is fairly ambigious as in his second statement you could argue that a syndicate member appearing as a spy is the definition of symp which he had made a point of addressing in post one. On the other hand the first post may simply refer to nationality and not spy or syndicate.

Lets look at bwgan from the last game then as this is the player he actively mentions in his first post.

First her abilities which from level 0 show she is immune to finds but a cf check might aid us.

Quote

Isabelle Paix – Infiltrator (French) -- Syndicate
Level 0:
Spy in the Web: passive. knows the identity of all syndicate players, and their code-names.
Infiltrated: passive. comes up as a spy on finds
Level 1:
Seductress: night only . Limited number of uses (1). Establish a lover link with a player of your choice (this may be another syndicate player or a spy). You do this by sending a PM containing the players name to the mods, they will inform your target and then get back to you. From there on, you can send each other messages directly, CCing H&M.
Level 2:
Inside Information: day only: send a PM from a lover you have to the Mastermind. Useable any number of times per day, but precludes using other day abilities.
Level 3:
Menage-a-trois: night only. Limited number of uses (1). establish a lover link with a second player of your choice.
Level 4:
Secrets betrayed: Limited number of uses (1). When you receive this ability, send the name of a single player you have a lover relationship with to the mods. You learn all of his abilities and may broadcast them to another player of your choice (does not have to be a lover or syndicate player) upon receiving this ability. This counts as your night/ day action for this phase.
Level 5:
Wine in front of me: Day only: kill one of your lovers.


View PostPath-Shaper, on 25 September 2009 - 11:58 AM, said:

"Presidente, we have received a tip-off of a spy operating on our grounds. We have detained her, but rumors on the street are strong of her actually being in league with your... off-shore investments. What do you want us to do?"

"Did you interrogate her?"

"We did, Presidente."

"And?"

"She denies all involvement with your international backers."

"She looks like Greta Garbo..." Hugo Gremio mused, chewing on the tip of his moustacho.
he lit a cigar. "If the rumors are true, I am sure a lapse would be forgiven in these times of crisis, wouldn't you agree? Besides, it is not like my friends in the world informed me of her presence. So, because she is a trespassing spy, and because I hate that thirties-look, let's make an example of her. Kill her."

Meanas is dead. She was Isabelle Paix, a French spy.

It is now night.


Interestingly meanas appeared as a french spy upon death even though the ability doesnt seem to cover that. So although galain recalled that bwgan was a symp and remembered they appeared in the previous game he does seem to forget that in his second post.


View PostD, on 19 May 2010 - 12:33 PM, said:

Scratch that sorry, Galain says someone else mentioned bwgan. When first reading through it after emurhlan made the link i had though that he had brought her role up himself.


View PostD, on 19 May 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:

View PostPath-Shaper, on 19 May 2010 - 12:31 PM, said:

^^^^

CF = coroner finder = find.

In my book, that is....


By that token of information then we will most certainly have syndicate members cf as spies int his game, unless our coroner finder has five levels too...


IF Kaschan were deflecting with his about-face, stampy-feet maneuver, I'd say it would have been away from Driss, though I can't see why.

That last Driss post is the most suspicious of the 4, as how can anybody be certain of what abilities a syndicate has unless... But it's more of a semantic issue, really, as I agree with him that it is highly likely that at least one syndicate member will CF as a spy considering two had the ability last game. Plus, that post was made only 2 minutes before Kaschan's second post, so it was most-likely a cross-post.

Another interesting fact is that once Kaschan starts abusing his shift-key privileges, Driss stops posting. It seems to me that all signs point to Kaschan covering for Driss, but the content's not there. I'm wondering if anyone else sees anything in those posts or if it's all coincidence.

I guess Kaschan's second post could have just been a reaction to Eloth's post:

View PostEloth, on 19 May 2010 - 12:17 PM, said:

Im dont get what ehmurlan has supposedly discovered.


seems like galain in saying a similar thing.


But it seems like quite the overreaction. Our spelling-challenged friend was just looking for more explanation about what was going on.

#572 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:58 PM

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:39 PM, said:

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:35 PM, said:

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:32 PM, said:

View PostKaschan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:27 PM, said:

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 05:26 PM, said:

Here.

Re: Galain. I was one of those who said there were no "symps" last game. It was my bad memory that caused it, and I quickly realized it after it was brought up and I went back and looked at SC1. Now, the debate here seems a bit muddled through. I'm rather unsure as to whether it was a contradiction or misunderstanding, but as I fucked it up as well I'll believe Galain. For now.

Kaschan: So you believe that Galain is known to the 3 people "defending" him?


2 people and yes.


Do you agree that there are, if any, very few people who people would have a knowledge of to start the game? I.e.: If it's faction, that faction starts off stronger; or if it's not faction knowledge, that person starts off weaker?


I dunno to be honest, but the agressive nature of his defese by Eloth and Sil leads me to believe that this is in fact the case. It may or may not be the case for every faction, but in this instance, I believe it is so. Make sense?


I can see why what you consider to be unnecessary defense would signal that these were perhaps teammates, yes. I can understand that reaction. But, I also find it fairly improbable that two separate people knew who Galain was to start the game, and that their mutual defense would signal they were teammates, that two teammates of Galain knew who he was to start the game. That seems like a fairly substantial initial benefit to a single faction, considering the realities of a faction game.


Its day 1 and thats what I have to go on - improbable is not impossible.

#573 User is offline   Mockra 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:02 PM

@Liosan, a lot of people were making the "D'riss is suspicious" comments... I think Kaschan may even have been one of them. Your claims would be logical if Kaschan did want to deflect away from D'riss before he ended up getting votes (because when everyone says so-and-so is suspicious, it's only a matter of time before they all drop a vote).

Still, I don't know if I buy it. Would be a pretty dangerous maneuver by Kaschan to risk outing two of his team like that.

#574 User is offline   Liosan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:10 PM

Yes, improbable is not impossible. Merely seeing if you recognized there was a very valid reason to think otherwise, Kaschan.

@Mockra: Eh? You mean Ruse?

#575 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:11 PM

View PostMockra, on 19 May 2010 - 06:02 PM, said:

@Liosan, a lot of people were making the "D'riss is suspicious" comments... I think Kaschan may even have been one of them. Your claims would be logical if Kaschan did want to deflect away from D'riss before he ended up getting votes (because when everyone says so-and-so is suspicious, it's only a matter of time before they all drop a vote).

Still, I don't know if I buy it. Would be a pretty dangerous maneuver by Kaschan to risk outing two of his team like that.


But thats just it. You would be assuming that I know Driss is on my team. Yet I cant assume that Sil and Eloth know Galain? I guess I am so frustrated because I made an argument and eventually voted based on that argument. And more people are focusing on me based on that, than those looking at the points I made. It doesnt make sense. If you disagree, then dont vote the same way and tell me Im an idiot. But to defend Galain and discedit me because I presented an argument is only going to convince me how right I am.

#576 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:12 PM

View PostMockra, on 19 May 2010 - 06:02 PM, said:

@Liosan, a lot of people were making the "D'riss is suspicious" comments... I think Kaschan may even have been one of them. Your claims would be logical if Kaschan did want to deflect away from D'riss before he ended up getting votes (because when everyone says so-and-so is suspicious, it's only a matter of time before they all drop a vote).

Still, I don't know if I buy it. Would be a pretty dangerous maneuver by Kaschan to risk outing two of his team like that.

Well, I assume you are @ing me. I am inclined to believe it is just coincidence, as I can't find anything overly suspicious in Driss' posts, but I wanted to point it out in case someone with more deductive reasoning than I could find something incriminating.

#577 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:14 PM

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 06:10 PM, said:

Yes, improbable is not impossible. Merely seeing if you recognized there was a very valid reason to think otherwise, Kaschan.

@Mockra: Eh? You mean Ruse?


I do agree with you here Lio. there are plenty of things that can pick apart my argument, but Galain wasnt the one picking it apart. I find that conveniently suspicious

#578 User is offline   Mockra 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:14 PM

View PostLiosan, on 19 May 2010 - 06:10 PM, said:

Yes, improbable is not impossible. Merely seeing if you recognized there was a very valid reason to think otherwise, Kaschan.

@Mockra: Eh? You mean Ruse?


Ooops, you're right. I didn't realize Ruse snuck in there... I thought you were continuing your post right above about Kaschan.

#579 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:15 PM

Double post fucking POS wireless service

This post has been edited by Kaschan: 19 May 2010 - 06:16 PM


#580 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:15 PM

It is Day 1. The clock has been frozen with 00 Hours and 45 Minutes remaining.

23 Players still alive: D'riss, Eloth, Emurlahn, Fener, Galain, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kaschan, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Olar Ethil, Omtose, Rashan, Ruse, Serc, Shadow, Sheltatha Lore, Silanah, Spite, Tellan

12 votes to lynch, 12 votes to go to night.

3 Votes for Galain ( Emurlahn, Kaschan, Silanah )
1 Vote for Hood's Path ( Omtose )
1 Vote for Ruse ( Tellan )
1 Vote for Kaschan ( Olar Ethil )
1 Vote for Olar Ethil ( Serc )

Players not voted: D'riss, Eloth, Fener, Galain, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Rashan, Ruse, Shadow, Sheltatha Lore, Spite
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

Share this topic:


  • 136 Pages +
  • « First
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users