[Atrahal]

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 06:12 PM, said:

So Mockra's code is failed emoticons, and then 1st set of words = 1st word second set = second word and so on? Is that right?

[Telas]

It says seriously and then 3 wall bang emoticons

[Mockra]

Omtose, on 06 January 2010 - 05:01 PM, said:

Ok, so i just got called into a meeting. I will be gone a while. Other impressions in the 5 min I have.

I still don't think Atrahal is UB. I still Do think Mockra could be as well Tennes, but the likelyhood is very slim. We had, at the point they both were silenced, talked seriously about lynching off Silenced posters. Of the 3 silenced players, Mockra seems to be the most probable for being UB.. though I doubt it. Just throwing out there that we can't forget they could be UB. But my gut says he is still unsilenced.

Of the unsilenced players remaining my UB suspects would go:

Serc, Kalse, Galain. All fairly non descript, helpful, middling players.

ok gotta go back in a few.

vprvbtb['tnun80:orlly:vfyopwh[bn;gb:y:vf9[pbjnt;ebhgb?

[Mockra]

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 06:12 PM, said:

So Mockra's code is failed emoticons, and then 1st set of words = 1st word second set = second word and so on? Is that right? For some reason I cant see the image below the Mockra image (it comes up as "Posted Image"). Anyone else having that problem or is it just my shitty laptop?

vbf'btnbtbrbptnb:nods:gf'hbgng80r

[Atrahal]

Bubba, on 04 January 2010 - 10:40 AM, said:

3 votes Tulas Shorn (Osseric, Kalse, Serc)

http://115.124.110.1...ds/av-10254.jpg
http://115.124.110.1...ds/av-10251.jpg

[Mockra]

gvforpv[h'bnp['bt54donegonecametookgavehadvb[btn; bsvea[']apnbnapva[b'0bapn53travelworkplayrecreationsleepdacwo0cv-=[q]0'pVHBq31


v rpt[gbqb:back:bvr4y[]gh-t[ht6

This post has been edited by Mockra: 06 January 2010 - 06:36 PM

[Atrahal]

[Eloth]

Kalse, on 06 January 2010 - 01:23 PM, said:

Eloth, on 06 January 2010 - 01:16 PM, said:

Not everyone is middle of the road enough to say that uncle ben is either playing cautiously or boldy. Why even bother stating something like that? You then voted because I fit the "cautious or bold" bill. That and I had apparently been lynch hungry; though you kindly explained how no-one could be blamed for that...

It's not an explanation of how you thought UB would play if you completely contradict every two seconds, it's just making an excuse to vote out of thin air...

And you're the one whining that players strawman you with what you said when you voted Tulas.

I didn't say that UB was either cautious or bold, I said that I expected him to be cautious, with the provision that because of something we don't know he might be bolder than expected.

I also didn't say you were lynch-hungry, but that I would expect UB would want lynches, and you put Tulas at L+1. Again, with the provision that Tulas was a walking ass.


And now tell me why you would expect UB to "make excuses to vote out of thin air" someone, and I'll remove the IMGUS accusations.

I'm sorry, but you said I fit a pattern.

Why bother speculating whether he's cautious or bold when it's under specification from something we don't know. Because by extension that means we don't know whether he's being cautious or bold. So if we don't know how to expect UB to play, and have no way of telling, why vote based on it?

Also, you voted me for fitting both the patterns, after saying you expected UB to be lynch-hungry. That is the same as saying that I am lynch hungry(or there's no cause for the vote) and if Tulas deserved the votes(you said people couldn't be blamed for voting him) surely that means that the point about appearing to want a lynch by voting Tulas is somewhat nullified.

[Eloth]

Being kicked off, hoping to be back later.

[Atrahal]

[Atrahal]

Vote Serc

[Silanah]

Fucking love that David Lynch pic.

I don't really get that second=to-last post of Atrahal's, though. D'riss kill all silent to super for UB.

Fucking pictard

I'm going to go get booze food.

[Osseric]

right, dinners read up (fine bit of cooking if I do say so myself)

we've got like 2 hours left. I'm not overly convinced by any train so far, I still have a hankering for lyncihng Telas, I can't quantify why though.

[Kalse]

Whoever said I was he-said-she-said with Eloth and that I'm voting for him is wrong, I'm not voting him.

I made the mistake to do so when we had little to work with and he's now spent 75% of all his posts being a whiny bitch about it. It's the same fucking nightmare as last game, the fuck is with this place and early votes?

To restate, he had 4 posts at the time, one to over-hammer the day 1 lynch. I assumed UB would lay low and want lynches, and voted him. My mistake was to say I wasn't sure about this, and now EMOth just keep coming.

[Kalse]

It's been a while since a vote post, but I don't think it changed much. If there is time left, it should be very little.

[Kalse]

Silanah, on 06 January 2010 - 06:55 PM, said:

Fucking love that David Lynch pic.

I don't really get that second=to-last post of Atrahal's, though. D'riss kill all silent to super for UB.

D'riss' suggestion to kill all the silenced (to?) is super for UB in his opinion ?

[Mockra]

Kalse, on 06 January 2010 - 07:40 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 January 2010 - 06:55 PM, said:

Fucking love that David Lynch pic.

I don't really get that second=to-last post of Atrahal's, though. D'riss kill all silent to super for UB.

D'riss' suggestion to kill all the silenced (to?) is super for UB in his opinion ?

ytgf[0hbngbt5p0tooalsoandwithoutalongvct[0'bwnwte[0smartstupidcleverfoolishdumbtdcp[0'bpjwn

[w0bhbenbvcfto:imho:vbc5p0oi4j;wntedl

[Kalse]

too stupid to be UB.

[Mockra]

Kalse, on 06 January 2010 - 08:06 PM, said:

too stupid to be UB.

vyprqwvvbriow:nods:vyr9pwt9o

[Kalse]

Well, there's about 20 minutes, I reckon, and D'riss is the closest from lynch at L-4 or something.

I don't have any argument to convince everyone to jump aboard, besides the fact that there are no NKs, just silences, and the pool of suspects won't be getting thinner unless we do something about it. Also, we've been lucky so far, the silenced can be more or less understood, but if we keep needing 9 votes to lynch when the majority can barely express themselves, that won't be pretty.