[Telas]

D, on 06 January 2010 - 04:34 PM, said:

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 04:33 PM, said:

Kalse, on 06 January 2010 - 09:01 AM, said:

I don't think the carrying over of the votes is the secret mechanism, because I remember Bubba mentioning it before, either in the MOD thread or the mysterious vanished sign-up thread (I'm still wondering wtf is with that by the way)

I appologize Sil. My post should have been directed at this post of Kalse's above yours. Sorry.

Oh my, aren't we kissing ass.

Meh, I was wrong. By the way, that Serc post was obviously sarcasm. I was actually agreeing with him, cause no ones ever around when I am, either.

[Omtose]

Back and Read up.. quite the Clusterfuck. The more I see D'riss post, the more I think that he is just a bit confused with this game. It doesn't deem feigned to me. I see the train building, but honestly I think other options would be better.

I think This comment by Eloth is a valid point:

Eloth, on 06 January 2010 - 12:23 AM, said:

Kalse, on 05 January 2010 - 09:54 AM, said:

I'm a little lost currently. If it's indeed 1 vs 17, without any symp or partner, then there's little to read about the interactions on thread.

I would tend to think UB would be lynch-hungry, so that might be a place to look, but thanks to his douchebaggery I don't think anyone can be blamed for wanting Tulas Shorn out of this thread. If I remember well, the guy even managed to get to L+2, which is quite of a feat for day 1.

The other thing might be that at 1 vs the rest UB might feel the pressure and be extra cautious, so the low-posters way might be valid in this game. However, if he knows the "hidden mechanics" and if it involves some kind of protection for him (or respawn, or whatever) then he might be bolder than expected.

So, for this

vote Eloth

since he fits the two patterns I just mentioned.

This post is entirely middle of the road.

"I would tend to think UB would be lynch-hungry, so that might be a place to look, but thanks to his douchebaggery I don't think anyone can be blamed for wanting Tulas Shorn out of this thread. If I remember well, the guy even managed to get to L+2, which is quite of a feat for day 1."

I think the scum will be lynch hungry-but we can't balem anyone for being lynch hungry. His second point entirely contradcits his first, it is a completely middle of the road statement.

"The other thing might be that at 1 vs the rest UB might feel the pressure and be extra cautious, so the low-posters way might be valid in this game. However, if he knows the "hidden mechanics" and if it involves some kind of protection for him (or respawn, or whatever) then he might be bolder than expected."

So, Uncle Ben might be bold, or he might be cautious. Based on something we have utterly no way of knowing. Completely middle of the road, and completely useless.

He then votes me, as I fit these two patterns.

So, I am apparently lynch-hungry, except that's a blameless activity, so why vote me on it?

And I am also either cautious or bold.

This post is entirely useless, entirely middle of the road, and entirely trying to appear to be doing something while saying nothing.

Vote Kalse

For a middle of the road, contradictory post.

I read that Post by Kalse and thought the exact same thing. As no one is willing, it seems, to vote Serc (who still rings bells for me) for now I will:

remove vote

Vote Kalse

He does seem to be playing middle of the road. I will be off and on all day and around lynch time.

[Omtose]

Ok, so i just got called into a meeting. I will be gone a while. Other impressions in the 5 min I have.

I still don't think Atrahal is UB. I still Do think Mockra could be as well Tennes, but the likelyhood is very slim. We had, at the point they both were silenced, talked seriously about lynching off Silenced posters. Of the 3 silenced players, Mockra seems to be the most probable for being UB.. though I doubt it. Just throwing out there that we can't forget they could be UB. But my gut says he is still unsilenced.

Of the unsilenced players remaining my UB suspects would go:

Serc, Kalse, Galain. All fairly non descript, helpful, middling players.

ok gotta go back in a few.

[Galain]

Omtose what exactly is your definition of middling because the people youve named there are the top poster (Kalse), one of the middle ones (Serc) and one of the lowest (me) so i dont see how were all middling players unless your using a different definition to me.

I will say im not sure on D'riss now after reading his stuff he does seem to be coming off as just confused now rather than scum but the two are quite easily confused so if theres no other option near day end i will go for him as it is possible that he is UB.

Of the silenced players i still believe Atrahal is probably a more likely UB than Mockra as some of the stuff he said yesterday didnt ring right with me (hence my vote on him).

Other than that ive really got no idea but i am slightly worried about all the people i keep forgetting about because it really doesnt seem like weve still got what 16 players on.

[Alkend]

Sorry about completely missing yesterday guys, something came up on this end. This post is just to avoid modkill, don't have the time to catch up right now either. I promise I'll do a complete catch-up and rejoin the game this afternoon when I get back home. And I am not silenced in any way.

[Telas]

Galain, on 06 January 2010 - 05:22 PM, said:

Other than that ive really got no idea but i am slightly worried about all the people i keep forgetting about because it really doesnt seem like weve still got what 16 players on.

I agree with this more than anything else said today, Galain. There are 8 people (including you) who have under 20 posts. To me thats unbelievable. Its almost as if there are roled innos out there hiding. And provides general cover for a lurking UB.

[Telas]

Blah.

[Telas]

Heh, just noticed Tulas is 4th in posting.

[Atrahal]

[Telas]

Sup dawg! (I think thats what you meant by yo-yo.) Ima let you finish, but Pepsi has the greatest tasting soda in the world!

[Atrahal]

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 05:42 PM, said:

Sup dawg! (I think thats what you meant by yo-yo.) Ima let you finish, but Pepsi has the greatest tasting soda in the world!

[Okaros]

D, on 06 January 2010 - 03:50 PM, said:

Well, I can't really defend against that kind of bullshit case, now can I? Besides people seems stuck on focusing on me, and not on finding UB, so I'm actually fine getting lynched (not personally, but for the game). Here I am trying to do my best having fun and thinking on ideas that might help us win, and I get shit on repeatedly. Hey that is just part of mafia, I get that, but there is no way for me to defend against paranoid team members at this point. All I can say is that you're FUCKING WRONG. And I do think they are team members - I doubt UB would be so obvious. But I might be wrong, so please, when I'm gone (or if, keep being optimistic here despite my own knowledge of mafia), just keep an eye out. Well I guess you were going to do that anyway (blah).

Okaros, why do you think Osseric or Telas would be good votes?


Edit: forgot a 'be'

First of all. Cry me a fucking river. Get of your buhuh everyone should feel sorry for me because I receive pressure for something I don't feel I should receive pressure from horse. It happens to everyone at times, its certainly part of the game and in your case not entirely undeserved.

When it comes to Osseric and Telas. Osseric is pure gut. I can't point to anything but that early post that caused my original vote. After that its just been the general feeling that rubs me the wrong way. Can't guarantee there's some meta involved, but I do believe its more than that.

Telas is a case of faulty logic. First because of his reasoning for voting shadow day one, then his claim that Eloth's reason for voting Tulas = him thinking Tulas was innocent, which is absurd if one actually reads Eloth's post. I also just noticed that Telas elegantly ignored that last part and tried to portray my suspicion of him being purely based on his early vote on Shadow.

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 04:24 PM, said:

D, on 06 January 2010 - 03:50 PM, said:

Okaros, why do you think Osseric or Telas would be good votes?


Edit: forgot a 'be'

And I can answer this, day one he didn't like my vote on Shadow. So he still finds me to be suspicious, not sure about Osseric though.

Read above.

[Telas]

I think we are running short on time now. Less than 3 hours maybe. I really hate to vote for Driss, but as there arent any symps in this game, I might not. I am just not really convinced by the evidence.

I am however realizing that I havent given the slightest thought to the silenced people, I guess its because I cant really figure out their posts on my own, except for Atrahal's. The translated ones really dont help anything, because you cant really build a case other than "he's silenced, and UB might have silenced himself."

Anyway, I'll think about the Driss vote.

[Telas]

Okaros, on 06 January 2010 - 05:50 PM, said:

I also just noticed that Telas elegantly ignored that last part and tried to portray my suspicion of him being purely based on his early vote on Shadow.

I dont recall you ever voicing your suspicion of my Eloth case. Can you find the quote?

[Telas]

Also, being an asshole doesn't help matters Okaros, if you actually read my case it was the fact that Eloth came on and echoed Galain dropping a L+1 vote and then disappeared. The "strawmanning" part of the post was only part of my point. Then Eloth came on, disputed the 2 points against him, and disappeared yet again.

[Atrahal]

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 05:50 PM, said:

I think we are running short on time now. Less than 3 hours maybe. I really hate to vote for Driss, but as there arent any symps in this game, I might not. I am just not really convinced by the evidence.

I am however realizing that I havent given the slightest thought to the silenced people, I guess its because I cant really figure out their posts on my own, except for Atrahal's. The translated ones really dont help anything, because you cant really build a case other than "he's silenced, and UB might have silenced himself."

Anyway, I'll think about the Driss vote.

Mockra, on 06 January 2010 - 01:14 PM, said:

bgpbnt-bpbmtn:shrug:b[hn5h55hh55p:dunno:bygfejnv

gbpntbktpwg540-4heyouweittheyshethemusbvrg;vb tbr;5r'[pbgmadesaidrancleanedhadlost4pgght bgl;rtfb'9pbtji;hbtyouititheyshethemhewefpg;bhtnbrtli
haverunmakecanmayworkgogypr;bjgtl9p345patternorderwayimagecodesoundpicturegbuvh[t'jbpnhb

This post has been edited by Atrahal: 06 January 2010 - 06:02 PM

[Atrahal]

Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 01:27 AM, said:

Tennes 1st post translated from french

I n' always do not like how Driss plays, therefore I will keep my magic permanent vote on him. S' it n' is not UB, then I must believe that the c' is quelqu' one embanking.

2nd post

ghobe' vetlh ghaH ghobe' [Spanish.]

je vetlh ghaH ghobe' nuq jIH ja'ta'

3rd

Ciò E perched not E spagnolo.

4th
No ES español RETARDA

5th

Which qu' one embanking is most probable, if Driss n' is not UB. I go for a race. Of return in a little.


Thats all of them. Only the first and fifth even resemble anything English. I really don't think its french.

This post has been edited by Atrahal: 06 January 2010 - 06:06 PM

[Telas]

So Mockra's code is failed emoticons, and then 1st set of words = 1st word second set = second word and so on? Is that right? For some reason I cant see the image below the Mockra image (it comes up as "Posted Image"). Anyone else having that problem or is it just my shitty laptop?

Here's a screenshot

[Telas]

Im doing the best I can Atrahal, english is the only language I speak, and apparently I dont do that very well.

[Galain]

the other image on that post was example, and yeah thats basically how Mockras seem to work. Now could anyone tell me what atrahals last one was because i can only see the first image