Mafis 55.5 Uncle Ben's Revenge Game Thread
#441
Posted 06 January 2010 - 10:56 AM
There is 9 hrs 35 min before UB strikes again
there are 16 players left, 9 votes needed to lynch
Vote count
2 votes osseric- okaros
4 votes dris- tennes,silanah, serc,shadow
2 votes Eloth- telas,kalse
1 vote galain- osseric
1 vote serc- omtose
1 vote athrahal- galain
1 vote kalse-eloth
have not voted,Mockra,ruse,driss,alkend,atrahal
I have to go into work and may miss the lynch or time out. There are a bunch of people with access to spoilers....if one you can resolve I would be very thankful....
there are 16 players left, 9 votes needed to lynch
Vote count
2 votes osseric- okaros
4 votes dris- tennes,silanah, serc,shadow
2 votes Eloth- telas,kalse
1 vote galain- osseric
1 vote serc- omtose
1 vote athrahal- galain
1 vote kalse-eloth
have not voted,Mockra,ruse,driss,alkend,atrahal
I have to go into work and may miss the lynch or time out. There are a bunch of people with access to spoilers....if one you can resolve I would be very thankful....
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
#442
Posted 06 January 2010 - 10:56 AM
Osseric, on 06 January 2010 - 10:29 AM, said:
Cant access a translator at the minute so i'l have to let someone else sort that one out. The votes seem to be piling up on driss here, and he does seem a tad skitish or something.
I'm happier with the telas vote, but I may change when I check in later
I'm happier with the telas vote, but I may change when I check in later
vaj nuq ???
#443
Posted 06 January 2010 - 11:00 AM
#444
Posted 06 January 2010 - 11:17 AM
Tennes, on 06 January 2010 - 11:00 AM, said:
Well, it should be relevant if Bubba keeps hee-hee-ing about it. As to what else we can do than vote, well that IS the question. Since we know the dirty secret doesn't involve votes.
Anyways, like Silanah (I think) said, we'll worry about this when something bizarre happens.
I'll
remove vote
vote D'riss
#445
Posted 06 January 2010 - 11:55 AM
Ruse y Osseric estuvieron aquí, y no anunciaron. Mocosos perezosos.

#446
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:30 PM
hmpf... I can't be bothered using translators.. I'm actually, thinking about it some, not so sure that D'riss is UB. I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it just doesnt fit in my head. Mind you, there's a lot of things that dont fit in my head. I still dont believe that Bent's wife is pretty for instance. The pictures were obviously fake.
#447
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:38 PM
Yeah, D'riss really doesnt feel UB to me... Osseric or Telas seems much better as candidates I think.
#448
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:40 PM
Haha, "mocosos"
Well, Osseric posted once, but Ruse just skimmed and split.
Well, Osseric posted once, but Ruse just skimmed and split.
#449
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:40 PM
#450
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:53 PM
Telas, on 06 January 2010 - 12:38 AM, said:
Whew. That was interesting. I gotta admit, I laughed a little while reading Mockras posts, thats gotta be frustrating as hell to try and do. I'm not sure I like his self vote, I mean why go all emo like that, you're silenced, in a game that everyone would be as well for UB to win. Just strikes me as an odd thing to do.
And Eloth, I hate that you left, because I really want you to explain why you said
when in fact you said
Sure you qualified it by saying it might be forced, however, you DID say that if he isn't scum, he needs to die anyway. Also, I dont like how you hop on, find the 2 votes against you, drop an OMGUS vote on one person, and then once again scamper off.
Therefore
Keep my vote on Eloth
And Eloth, I hate that you left, because I really want you to explain why you said
Eloth, on 05 January 2010 - 11:56 PM, said:
You accuse Galain of being scum for voting Tulas even though he didn't think he was scum. I did not do the exact same thing-because I didn't say that I felt Tulas wasn't scum. I included the possibility he was being forced, but still stand by my vote.
As for leaving afterwards, I came on to vote, because we've had no-lynches quite a lot recently and wanted to avoid that.
As for leaving afterwards, I came on to vote, because we've had no-lynches quite a lot recently and wanted to avoid that.
when in fact you said
Eloth, on 04 January 2010 - 06:20 PM, said:
Ok.
Vote Tulas Shorn
Because even if he's not UB he's not helping anything at all.
I'm thinking that it is possible that this is the hidden mechanic however, some form of forcing a player to behave in a certain way. Can't tell at the moment, but if it crops up again, certainly worth thinking about.
Vote Tulas Shorn
Because even if he's not UB he's not helping anything at all.
I'm thinking that it is possible that this is the hidden mechanic however, some form of forcing a player to behave in a certain way. Can't tell at the moment, but if it crops up again, certainly worth thinking about.
Sure you qualified it by saying it might be forced, however, you DID say that if he isn't scum, he needs to die anyway. Also, I dont like how you hop on, find the 2 votes against you, drop an OMGUS vote on one person, and then once again scamper off.
Therefore
Keep my vote on Eloth
I said that even if he isn't scum he needs to die anyway. That is far from saying "I don't think he is scum". Stating they are the same thing is strawmanning.
Oh, and I like the defence of Kalses vote, the dismissing of mine as OMGUS.
Care to explain how his vote makes any sense at all then?
#451
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:58 PM
Kalse, I'd like an explanation of your vote on me, because from where i'm sitting it's a completely nonsensical vote, and you seem to have ignored my response to it beyond calling it OMGUS...The vote is not OMGUS. You're reasoning made no sense, the fact it was reasoning for voting me is not relevant to the fact it made no sense...
#452
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:02 PM
Eloth, on 06 January 2010 - 12:58 PM, said:
Kalse, I'd like an explanation of your vote on me, because from where i'm sitting it's a completely nonsensical vote, and you seem to have ignored my response to it beyond calling it OMGUS...The vote is not OMGUS. You're reasoning made no sense, the fact it was reasoning for voting me is not relevant to the fact it made no sense...
I explained how I thought UB would play, and you fit the bill. Sadly, I was also well aware I wasn't sure how he would play, since it might vary depending on how the game is balanced (I still think 1 vs 17 is quite unfair unless the "secret mechanics" relates to that)
I said that, despite my doubts, since you fit the bill of what I imagined, I voted you.
As for your vote, I called it OMGUS because you voted me for being "middle of the road". Well, I have news, everyone in this game so far is middle of the road (except some, like you, who are sleeping in the ditch

#453
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:14 PM
Kalse, on 06 January 2010 - 08:57 AM, said:
I'm sure Telas is a nice person, but he should work on his foreign language skills 
I will complete the translation of his original French comment:
"I do not always like how Driss plays, therefore I will keep my magic permanent vote on him. If it is not UB, then I must believes that the this is someone laying low."
As for Mockra, I'm a bit worried that since we can now read his posts, can't Bubba? Unless it was "if Bubba finds sense before you guys do" that he dies

I will complete the translation of his original French comment:
"I do not always like how Driss plays, therefore I will keep my magic permanent vote on him. If it is not UB, then I must believes that the this is someone laying low."
As for Mockra, I'm a bit worried that since we can now read his posts, can't Bubba? Unless it was "if Bubba finds sense before you guys do" that he dies
bgpbnt-bpbmtn:shrug:b[hn5h55hh55p:dunno:bygfejnv
gbpntbktpwg540-4heyouweittheyshethemusbvrg;vb tbr;5r'[pbgmadesaidrancleanedhadlost4pgght bgl;rtfb'9pbtji;hbtyouititheyshethemhewefpg;bhtnbrtli
haverunmakecanmayworkgogypr;bjgtl9p345patternorderwayimagecodesoundpicturegbuvh[t'jbpnhb
#454
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:16 PM
Kalse, on 06 January 2010 - 01:02 PM, said:
Eloth, on 06 January 2010 - 12:58 PM, said:
Kalse, I'd like an explanation of your vote on me, because from where i'm sitting it's a completely nonsensical vote, and you seem to have ignored my response to it beyond calling it OMGUS...The vote is not OMGUS. You're reasoning made no sense, the fact it was reasoning for voting me is not relevant to the fact it made no sense...
I explained how I thought UB would play, and you fit the bill. Sadly, I was also well aware I wasn't sure how he would play, since it might vary depending on how the game is balanced (I still think 1 vs 17 is quite unfair unless the "secret mechanics" relates to that)
I said that, despite my doubts, since you fit the bill of what I imagined, I voted you.
As for your vote, I called it OMGUS because you voted me for being "middle of the road". Well, I have news, everyone in this game so far is middle of the road (except some, like you, who are sleeping in the ditch

Not everyone is middle of the road enough to say that uncle ben is either playing cautiously or boldy. Why even bother stating something like that? You then voted because I fit the "cautious or bold" bill. That and I had apparently been lynch hungry; though you kindly explained how no-one could be blamed for that...
It's not an explanation of how you thought UB would play if you completely contradict every two seconds, it's just making an excuse to vote out of thin air...
#456
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:23 PM
Eloth, on 06 January 2010 - 01:16 PM, said:
Not everyone is middle of the road enough to say that uncle ben is either playing cautiously or boldy. Why even bother stating something like that? You then voted because I fit the "cautious or bold" bill. That and I had apparently been lynch hungry; though you kindly explained how no-one could be blamed for that...
It's not an explanation of how you thought UB would play if you completely contradict every two seconds, it's just making an excuse to vote out of thin air...
And you're the one whining that players strawman you with what you said when you voted Tulas.
I didn't say that UB was either cautious or bold, I said that I expected him to be cautious, with the provision that because of something we don't know he might be bolder than expected.
I also didn't say you were lynch-hungry, but that I would expect UB would want lynches, and you put Tulas at L+1. Again, with the provision that Tulas was a walking ass.
And now tell me why you would expect UB to "make excuses to vote out of thin air" someone, and I'll remove the IMGUS accusations.
#457
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:23 PM
Ruse sent comme un rat à moi. Le signal un pauvre de moi poste de RL. Si Driss n'est pas UB, alors Ruse est exactement la merde qui calcule et ne dit pas un mot jusqu' à prêt. Prouver me trompe la soufflerie de mouton.
#458
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:27 PM
And to answer your question why I still voted you despite the fact I wasn't sure of myself, well, your 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th post of the game were reactions to my vote.
Welcome in!
Welcome in!
#459
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:28 PM
Eloth chen jIH
Osseric vang !
Osseric vang !
This post has been edited by Tennes: 06 January 2010 - 01:29 PM
#460
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:37 PM