D'rek, on Jul 11 2009, 03:23 PM, said:
morgoth45, on Jul 11 2009, 03:21 PM, said:
D'rek, on Jul 11 2009, 03:19 PM, said:
morgoth45, on Jul 11 2009, 03:17 PM, said:
D'rek, on Jul 11 2009, 03:14 PM, said:
morgoth45, on Jul 11 2009, 03:12 PM, said:
D'rek, on Jul 11 2009, 03:10 PM, said:
Hmmm...not a bad idea, sah!
remove vote
:avote: Lisheo
Although, it would be more epic to lynch someone who hasn't posted yet...
"sah"??
and Yes, it would be. Maybe we should lynch Gem... considering there are suicide-bomb roles and all our spam, she's likely to not bother reading and suicide our most important member... again!
Sorry miss. Madam? Miss.
Definitely miss (there used to be a brit guy who used lass). I can't even imagine bein a missus, ewww. I'm not ready to put away the literal whip and chains
lmao. You're not the side of the marrage who traditionally has to worry about the whips and chains
one side gets chained up, the other side is the one doing the chaining! But I'm just not ready to be issuing that amount of nagging on a daily basis!
True. I suppose it takes a toll on both partners.