Korvalain, on Jun 9 2009, 05:47 PM, said:
To summarize my case on Fener,
1) Fener on day 1 mentioned Korlat was doing a helpful 'hiding in plain site' type of play. (Hardly original or a stretch)
2) Fener jumped onto the Sil train saying that he was obsessed with cult and therefore cult. (Pats me on the back for spotting it)
3) On day 2 Fener upped the ante on Korlat by saying "quite confident" he has a power role. (Why suddenly so confident?)
4) After I first stated my case and voted, Fener then refutes my case by claiming he said Korlat was a power role on Day 1. (This is not true. His references to Korlat Day 1 and 'confidently' claiming power role on Day 2 are not the same thing)
5) He also attempts to cast Ersimmon (Kesso) as a plausible cult role. (Not impossible, but a bit of a stretch. If accepted as truth however, this would, conveniently, undermine my case)
Misc: By making a nebulous argument on Korlat on day 1 (hiding in plain site), WIFOM kicks in and says Fener could have made this argument to set up a track record of accusation of Korlat while actually planning on recruiting him that night. I.e. proper distancing. But, Carnival couldn't be recruited.
You're still not thinking this through. I suspected Korlat of being a power role. Sure it wasn't the strongest based of suspicions, but I would hardly have picked a person I suspected of being immune instead of someone I knew nothing about now would I? Would a cult risk such a thing. I don't think so.