[Meanas]

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:29 AM, said:

Good morning, all
wow, talk about desperately stringing a case out of nothing, Meanas.


yes, I presented two options.
yes, I explained why we never follow the first one. At no point did I "push" for either.
In fact, I've made it clear I was voting for shadow for being overly jumpy, i.e, gut feeling, i.e, option 2.

I will probably vote someone else soon, but first, it's breakfast time.

Lio - I can see how you are confused about my point. Let me try and clarify what I am saying. You brought up the fact that we never lynch the low posters, and then in your next post, in response to Korlat asking why that is, you say, because we don't want to hit a roled player that is hiding. I just don't understand why you even brought it up, if you obviously know that it wont happen so early because of that fear. It seemed to me that you were just looking for an easy lynch.

[Ruse]

Well....silanah got his rubber arm twisted rather easily there...no?

[Shadow]

Ruse, on May 27 2009, 10:39 AM, said:

Well....silanah got his rubber arm twisted rather easily there...no?

Somewhat, but if he had to run and would be gone past the deadline, than it makes sense to throw down a vote. But more justification would have been nice!

[Ruse]

Shadow, on May 27 2009, 10:42 AM, said:

Ruse, on May 27 2009, 10:39 AM, said:

Well....silanah got his rubber arm twisted rather easily there...no?

Somewhat, but if he had to run and would be gone past the deadline, than it makes sense to throw down a vote. But more justification would have been nice!

what gets me is he seesm to not like his own vote....or at least felt the need to show on thread that he "hopes he wont regret this"
weird statement to make if you ask me.

[Liosan]

Meanas, on May 27 2009, 10:34 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:29 AM, said:

Good morning, all
wow, talk about desperately stringing a case out of nothing, Meanas.


yes, I presented two options.
yes, I explained why we never follow the first one. At no point did I "push" for either.
In fact, I've made it clear I was voting for shadow for being overly jumpy, i.e, gut feeling, i.e, option 2.

I will probably vote someone else soon, but first, it's breakfast time.

Lio - I can see how you are confused about my point. Let me try and clarify what I am saying. You brought up the fact that we never lynch the low posters, and then in your next post, in response to Korlat asking why that is, you say, because we don't want to hit a roled player that is hiding. I just don't understand why you even brought it up, if you obviously know that it wont happen so early because of that fear. It seemed to me that you were just looking for an easy lynch.

What's the harm in bringing up all possibilities? Oh, wait. This is mafia--i'll get labelled scum for that.

Meanas, if I was in fact looking for an "easy" low-poster lynch, wouldn't it have made more sense to do something like Mockra did--vote a fairly low-poster (Telas) with little to no explanation?

my retaingi of my vote on Shadow (who's one of the top posters) contradicts your theory.

[Shadow]

Ruse, on May 27 2009, 10:47 AM, said:

Shadow, on May 27 2009, 10:42 AM, said:

Ruse, on May 27 2009, 10:39 AM, said:

Well....silanah got his rubber arm twisted rather easily there...no?

Somewhat, but if he had to run and would be gone past the deadline, than it makes sense to throw down a vote. But more justification would have been nice!

what gets me is he seesm to not like his own vote....or at least felt the need to show on thread that he "hopes he wont regret this"
weird statement to make if you ask me.

Yeah. It's not like the rest of us were all "I love this vote and have no regrets!" So it is a tad odd that he would feel the need to declare that.

[Shadow]

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:49 AM, said:

Meanas, on May 27 2009, 10:34 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:29 AM, said:

Good morning, all
wow, talk about desperately stringing a case out of nothing, Meanas.


yes, I presented two options.
yes, I explained why we never follow the first one. At no point did I "push" for either.
In fact, I've made it clear I was voting for shadow for being overly jumpy, i.e, gut feeling, i.e, option 2.

I will probably vote someone else soon, but first, it's breakfast time.

Lio - I can see how you are confused about my point. Let me try and clarify what I am saying. You brought up the fact that we never lynch the low posters, and then in your next post, in response to Korlat asking why that is, you say, because we don't want to hit a roled player that is hiding. I just don't understand why you even brought it up, if you obviously know that it wont happen so early because of that fear. It seemed to me that you were just looking for an easy lynch.

What's the harm in bringing up all possibilities? Oh, wait. This is mafia--i'll get labelled scum for that.

Meanas, if I was in fact looking for an "easy" low-poster lynch, wouldn't it have made more sense to do something like Mockra did--vote a fairly low-poster (Telas) with little to no explanation?

my retaingi of my vote on Shadow (who's one of the top posters) contradicts your theory.

But it does reveal your bias sexism towards auto-fellatio (thanks for that word Kesso!)!

[Liosan]

Anyhow.
I have an appointment I must run to, and I will not be back till deadline.

remove vote

vote Telas

since that's where the wind's blowing. and since the other possibility appears to be my humble self,

[Liosan]

Shadow, on May 27 2009, 10:50 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:49 AM, said:

Meanas, on May 27 2009, 10:34 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:29 AM, said:

Good morning, all
wow, talk about desperately stringing a case out of nothing, Meanas.


yes, I presented two options.
yes, I explained why we never follow the first one. At no point did I "push" for either.
In fact, I've made it clear I was voting for shadow for being overly jumpy, i.e, gut feeling, i.e, option 2.

I will probably vote someone else soon, but first, it's breakfast time.

Lio - I can see how you are confused about my point. Let me try and clarify what I am saying. You brought up the fact that we never lynch the low posters, and then in your next post, in response to Korlat asking why that is, you say, because we don't want to hit a roled player that is hiding. I just don't understand why you even brought it up, if you obviously know that it wont happen so early because of that fear. It seemed to me that you were just looking for an easy lynch.

What's the harm in bringing up all possibilities? Oh, wait. This is mafia--i'll get labelled scum for that.

Meanas, if I was in fact looking for an "easy" low-poster lynch, wouldn't it have made more sense to do something like Mockra did--vote a fairly low-poster (Telas) with little to no explanation?

my retaingi of my vote on Shadow (who's one of the top posters) contradicts your theory.

But it does reveal your bias sexism towards auto-fellatio (thanks for that word Kesso!)!

wat?
my vote was for you grossly misinterpreting the key Buddhist mantra,



in any case, now i'm really off.

[Liosan]

Shadow, on May 27 2009, 10:50 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:49 AM, said:

Meanas, on May 27 2009, 10:34 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:29 AM, said:

Good morning, all
wow, talk about desperately stringing a case out of nothing, Meanas.


yes, I presented two options.
yes, I explained why we never follow the first one. At no point did I "push" for either.
In fact, I've made it clear I was voting for shadow for being overly jumpy, i.e, gut feeling, i.e, option 2.

I will probably vote someone else soon, but first, it's breakfast time.

Lio - I can see how you are confused about my point. Let me try and clarify what I am saying. You brought up the fact that we never lynch the low posters, and then in your next post, in response to Korlat asking why that is, you say, because we don't want to hit a roled player that is hiding. I just don't understand why you even brought it up, if you obviously know that it wont happen so early because of that fear. It seemed to me that you were just looking for an easy lynch.

What's the harm in bringing up all possibilities? Oh, wait. This is mafia--i'll get labelled scum for that.

Meanas, if I was in fact looking for an "easy" low-poster lynch, wouldn't it have made more sense to do something like Mockra did--vote a fairly low-poster (Telas) with little to no explanation?

my retaingi of my vote on Shadow (who's one of the top posters) contradicts your theory.

But it does reveal your bias sexism towards auto-fellatio (thanks for that word Kesso!)!

wat?
my vote was for you grossly misinterpreting the key Buddhist mantra,



in any case, now i'm really off.

[Meanas]

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:49 AM, said:

Meanas, on May 27 2009, 10:34 AM, said:

Liosan, on May 27 2009, 10:29 AM, said:

Good morning, all
wow, talk about desperately stringing a case out of nothing, Meanas.


yes, I presented two options.
yes, I explained why we never follow the first one. At no point did I "push" for either.
In fact, I've made it clear I was voting for shadow for being overly jumpy, i.e, gut feeling, i.e, option 2.

I will probably vote someone else soon, but first, it's breakfast time.

Lio - I can see how you are confused about my point. Let me try and clarify what I am saying. You brought up the fact that we never lynch the low posters, and then in your next post, in response to Korlat asking why that is, you say, because we don't want to hit a roled player that is hiding. I just don't understand why you even brought it up, if you obviously know that it wont happen so early because of that fear. It seemed to me that you were just looking for an easy lynch.

What's the harm in bringing up all possibilities? Oh, wait. This is mafia--i'll get labelled scum for that.

Meanas, if I was in fact looking for an "easy" low-poster lynch, wouldn't it have made more sense to do something like Mockra did--vote a fairly low-poster (Telas) with little to no explanation?

my retaingi of my vote on Shadow (who's one of the top posters) contradicts your theory.

I guess thats fair. Although, we'll have to agree to disagree on the point of what good does it do to bring up lynching low posters Day 1.

[Meanas]

I just alted Lio, lol

[Shadow]

Meanas, on May 27 2009, 10:56 AM, said:

I just alted Lio, lol

I think I know why you think that, but I think you're wrong!

[Ruse]

ok...i have to go
got a function on now till late tonight i will try be back on before deadline.

cheers

[Meanas]

Well, admittedly I suck at alt guessing.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 3 hours and 6 minutes remaining

18 Players still alive: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Korlat, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Ruse, Shadow, Silanah, Telas, Tellan, Tennes

10 votes to lynch, 9 votes to go to night

5 votes for Telas: ( Mockra, Meanas, Ampelas, Silanah, Liosan )
1 vote for Shadow: ( Ruse )

Players not voted: D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Korlat, Korvalain, Shadow, Telas, Tellan, Tennes

[Tennes]

So both of these cases are bullshit. I hate day 1 cases.

[D'riss]

Okay I'm here and it appears Telas is getting quite a fan club. Let me review what has been said to vote him.

[Meanas]

Tennes, on May 27 2009, 11:10 AM, said:

So both of these cases are bullshit. I hate day 1 cases.

I agree on both points.

[Korlat]

I was hoping to see a little more happen, like an appearence from Telas, but I have to get going and I won't be here for deadline.

Vote Telas