Silencer - entitled re:korv
Fener said:
Quote
Gotta love how his credibility is on the rocks after his 2 points. The thing is, I do really understand them...does that make me weird?
Probably. But you know my lolz before? This is making my day!
Korvalain, on May 30 2009, 12:18 AM, said:
D'riss, on May 29 2009, 04:16 PM, said:
Korvalain, on May 29 2009, 12:14 PM, said:
Okay, in my opinion there are only two reasons to kill Emurlahn:
1. He was too close to comfort on nailing the killers, so they needed to take him out. However, this is mitigated by the fact that he was also the next most probable lynch, and therefore, less of a threat to them.
2. He was completely off in naming the killers, and by killing him they try to raise suspicion on those who he was fingering as likely killers. Like, Silanah.
So, I don't think it's 1 because of the mitigated situation, therefore, I think it's probably two, and we need to look at those other than who Emurlahn was fingering.
Does that make sense at all to anyone but me? (Probably not.) I'm going to go ahead and look at who Emurlahn has been ignoring.
I'm not sure I understand #2 Korv because Silanah was lynched before Emur was killed. I don't see how Emur's death puts any frame of reference around Silanah's potential innocence or symp-guilt.
Also, in your previous list, I'm willing to look at the two people you have (other than me, obviously), with Mockra probably being my biggest question mark.
Shadow, on May 29 2009, 05:05 PM, said:
Hi folks (or absence of folks)!
D'riss, on May 29 2009, 04:16 PM, said:
Korvalain, on May 29 2009, 12:14 PM, said:
Okay, in my opinion there are only two reasons to kill Emurlahn:
1. He was too close to comfort on nailing the killers, so they needed to take him out. However, this is mitigated by the fact that he was also the next most probable lynch, and therefore, less of a threat to them.
2. He was completely off in naming the killers, and by killing him they try to raise suspicion on those who he was fingering as likely killers. Like, Silanah.
So, I don't think it's 1 because of the mitigated situation, therefore, I think it's probably two, and we need to look at those other than who Emurlahn was fingering.
Does that make sense at all to anyone but me? (Probably not.) I'm going to go ahead and look at who Emurlahn has been ignoring.
I'm not sure I understand #2 Korv because Silanah was lynched before Emur was killed. I don't see how Emur's death puts any frame of reference around Silanah's potential innocence or symp-guilt.
Also, in your previous list, I'm willing to look at the two people you have (other than me, obviously), with Mockra probably being my biggest question mark.
Gotta go with D'riss on this one, Korv what on earth are you thinking?! Emur didn't do anyything close to killer-naming except Sil and Korlat, both of whom were already dead. The only others he even mentions are that he had "gut scum feelings" from Lio and Ruse (post 324). And since he'd done so little finger-pointing your first case makes no sense either! You are way out to lunch on this Korv!
It was a theory. The experiment would have proven it false! I hadn't looked at Emu's posts close enough to see if he had been casting suspicions on lots of people.
So, Shadow, why kill Emurlahn then? For shits and giggles? There is always a reason, even if it is hard to spot.
YES FOR SHITS AND GIGGLES. IT WAS TOTALLY RANDOM CHOICE. tongue.gif
And many from Hoosier, who is quite articulate when drunk
Korv said:
Been a symp. But... maybe killer's think I'm one? I don't fucking know. I wish I could cheat. How long until I remove my vote on Liosan? Not too long, because only after I do dumb shit do I figure it out. I should be looking for people playing clean and remaining low-key. Like Fener and Gamelon.
korv said:
So what's the difference between me and a wino? The wino doesn't talk, just sits there with his sign, whereas, I'm a loudmouthed, douchebagged, dumb mother trucker who is worth his weight in suppositories.
I wish there was a silencer (you said it is a possibility), so I could be silenced. Then I could just start posting random fucking pictures. Like a flower. And point at it, and confuse the fuck out of people. Cause they deserve it. Then I'd post a picture of a mother and a pizza. Lol, yeah, they wouldn't know what that meant. That I was one hungry mother fucker.
In the key of C#, courtesy of Adam Sandler...
I hope you know
What you've done to me
I sit down on the couch
Searching for the scummies
They leave me here
All day long
So damn confusingly
You murdered two
On the first night and
Some figured it was vig, but
I know t'was a merry band
I think and think
All day long
Night two's one kill was planned
Somebody kill me please
Somebody kill me please
I'm on my knees
Pretty, pretty please
Kill me.
I want to die.
Put an inno vig through my heeeeaaaaaaaddddddddd.
Korv said:
So... why is it that I am much more suspicious of those who are on at the same time as me? Could it be their low posting? Could it be that I'm drunk? Could it be that I believe in life after love?
Your guess is my best question. I think. Maybe. I wish I was a finder.
I'm flailing away
Set an open course
For the real forum
Cause I got to be free
Free to face the death
That's ahead of me
I'll try a case tomorrow
On a random poster
And I'll try, Mafia
I'll try, to kill the scum!
A gathering of drunkards
Appeared upon my screen
They sang to this inno
That this is what they mean
They said, "Come lynch a scum"
Come lynch a scum,
Come lynch a scum with me
Come lynch a scum,
Come lynch a scum,
Come lynch a scum, with me!
korv said:
You know you are a Mafia player if...
1. You think voting for someone kills them, as opposing to electing them.
2. You think being scummy is fun!
3. You spend all day at the local Wal-Mart missing children's wall trying to Find people.
4. You don't expect anything from actually symping your boss.
5. You actually expect your pro-se case to get attention at court.
6. You think Cults are a fun way to go about business.
7. You think the Mafia IS NOT serious business.
8. You think being innocently killed serves a purpose.
9. You are reminded of murder when a train leaves a station.
10. You belive TMDI is a life lesson.
korv said:
How about a "torturer" role. Wherein, you question a person about his position, but in so doing kills them? Just sounds like a fun role to throw in. Would, in best lights, require a player willing to wait for a real tell, then say, if he catches a symp, divulges his scum master. Of course, it would be a a very easily abused role, but could also be used on both sides as a way to divulge information, like a scum torturer could pulled out the other side of a pair and whatnot.
Yes. I am sick. And drunk.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
Help
