Ye Big Movie thread
#4701
Posted 27 April 2011 - 06:22 PM
Apocalypse Now... finally.
I am... shaken. That does not happen very often. I really can't think of any further words.
The horror.
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
I am... shaken. That does not happen very often. I really can't think of any further words.
The horror.
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
#4702
Posted 27 April 2011 - 07:20 PM
Gothos, on 27 April 2011 - 06:22 PM, said:
Apocalypse Now... finally.
...
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
...
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
In the 2001 cut, the robots win.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#4703
Posted 27 April 2011 - 07:29 PM
Gothos, on 27 April 2011 - 06:22 PM, said:
Apocalypse Now... finally.
I am... shaken. That does not happen very often. I really can't think of any further words.
The horror.
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
I am... shaken. That does not happen very often. I really can't think of any further words.
The horror.
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
I was most disturbed when I watched it by the Water Buffalo beheading...which is real and the crew got in MEGA trouble for showing a Water Buffalo snuff clip. I was rather disturbed by that.
I think the whole film has this bizarre sickening dream-like vibe that I can't stand. I would never openly subject myself to that film ever again.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
#4704
Posted 27 April 2011 - 08:08 PM
If I remember correctly, Redux has the scene where Captain Willard (Martin Sheen) and crew have lunch/dinner with a French family deep in the jungle.
I recommend the documentary about the making of the movie, Hearts of Darkness.
I recommend the documentary about the making of the movie, Hearts of Darkness.
#4705
Posted 27 April 2011 - 08:14 PM
General Pattonhammer, on 27 April 2011 - 08:08 PM, said:
If I remember correctly, Redux has the scene where Captain Willard (Martin Sheen) and crew have lunch/dinner with a French family deep in the jungle.
I recommend the documentary about the making of the movie, Hearts of Darkness.
I recommend the documentary about the making of the movie, Hearts of Darkness.
Yeah, Redux has 49 minutes put back in including that French family bit.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
#4706
Posted 28 April 2011 - 03:40 AM
QuickTidal, on 27 April 2011 - 07:29 PM, said:
Gothos, on 27 April 2011 - 06:22 PM, said:
Apocalypse Now... finally.
I am... shaken. That does not happen very often. I really can't think of any further words.
The horror.
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
I am... shaken. That does not happen very often. I really can't think of any further words.
The horror.
As a side note though... I've watched the 1979 version - is the 2001 cut much different?
I was most disturbed when I watched it by the Water Buffalo beheading...which is real and the crew got in MEGA trouble for showing a Water Buffalo snuff clip. I was rather disturbed by that.
I think the whole film has this bizarre sickening dream-like vibe that I can't stand. I would never openly subject myself to that film ever again.
I had to study it for a uni course this semester so I watched it 4 times in a month.
That water buffalo scene was real? Shit, I knew it looked pretty fucking real, but figured it was a masterful fake.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
#4707
Posted 28 April 2011 - 06:23 AM
I might give the 2001 cut a look at some point, then.
As for dream/nightmare vibe... I kept thinking of Dante's Inferno throughout the film.
As for dream/nightmare vibe... I kept thinking of Dante's Inferno throughout the film.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
#4708
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:33 AM
It's supposed to feel like a (bad?) acid trip apparently, and I can definitely see where Coppola was going with it. Not sure how well it works with the book or even on its own, but that's a lengthy scholarly discussion I don't want to get into right now.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
#4709
Posted 28 April 2011 - 11:28 AM
Gothos, on 28 April 2011 - 06:23 AM, said:
I might give the 2001 cut a look at some point, then.
Don't. The 49 extra minutes are almost entirely excruciatingly boring.
It's a brilliant, brilliant film otherwise; I love the vibe of it that QT seemed to hate. Part fever-dream, part (very) dark fairytale- it's a masterpiece in cinematic theatricality.
Who here's seen Fitzcarraldo? It's not quite as good, but it has a slightly similar vibe, is also brilliant, and also has a documentary about how difficult it was to make.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#4710
Posted 28 April 2011 - 07:57 PM
Just watched Grave of the Fireflies.
While I did not break down into sobbing like a girl, it did make me all glassy eyed, which counts for a lot, I guess.
I wouldn't, however, precisely call it an anti-war film. While, naturally, Seita loses everything due to the war, to me, the war isn't the focus, it's the setting. It has a strong anti-war message, but more important than what caused it, is the struggle to survive, I think. The way I received it, it didn't matter why all this happened, all that was important is that it did, and coping with loss, living on somehow... I don't know, maybe I misunderstood, but that's how I see this film.
While I did not break down into sobbing like a girl, it did make me all glassy eyed, which counts for a lot, I guess.
I wouldn't, however, precisely call it an anti-war film. While, naturally, Seita loses everything due to the war, to me, the war isn't the focus, it's the setting. It has a strong anti-war message, but more important than what caused it, is the struggle to survive, I think. The way I received it, it didn't matter why all this happened, all that was important is that it did, and coping with loss, living on somehow... I don't know, maybe I misunderstood, but that's how I see this film.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
#4711
Posted 28 April 2011 - 08:31 PM
Gothos, on 28 April 2011 - 07:57 PM, said:
Just watched Grave of the Fireflies.
While I did not break down into sobbing like a girl, it did make me all glassy eyed, which counts for a lot, I guess.
While I did not break down into sobbing like a girl, it did make me all glassy eyed, which counts for a lot, I guess.
That is a sad effing film! Great, but sad.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
#4712
Posted 29 April 2011 - 11:29 PM
Watching Maniac Cop 3 at the moment. Amazing, found another Cohen brother!
Para todos todo, para nosotros nada.
MottI'd always pegged you as more of an Ublala
MottI'd always pegged you as more of an Ublala
#4713
Posted 02 May 2011 - 01:28 AM
I cam across this on the Awesomer.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
The Pub is Always Open
Proud supporter of the Wolves of Winter. Glory be to her Majesty, The Lady Snow.
Cursed Summer returns. The Lady Now Sleeps.
The Sexy Thatch Burning Physicist
Τον Πρωτος Αληθη Δεσποτην της Οικιας Αυτος
Proud supporter of the Wolves of Winter. Glory be to her Majesty, The Lady Snow.
Cursed Summer returns. The Lady Now Sleeps.
The Sexy Thatch Burning Physicist
Τον Πρωτος Αληθη Δεσποτην της Οικιας Αυτος
RodeoRanch said:
You're a rock.
A non-touching itself rock.
A non-touching itself rock.
#4714
Posted 02 May 2011 - 01:47 AM
Darkwatch, on 02 May 2011 - 01:28 AM, said:
I cam across this on the Awesomer.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
I caught the trailer yesterday, and it looks truly shite, in a way that surpasses even how shite the Clash of the Titans remake was.
Clash of the Tits however - I would watch the shit out of that film.
"Fortune favors the bold, though statistics favor the cautious." - Indomitable Courteous (Icy) Fist, The Palace Job - Patrick Weekes
"Well well well ... if it ain't The Invisible C**t." - Billy Butcher, The Boys
"I have strong views about not tempting providence and, as a wise man once said, the difference between luck and a wheelbarrow is, luck doesn’t work if you push it." - Colonel Orhan, Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City - KJ Parker
"Well well well ... if it ain't The Invisible C**t." - Billy Butcher, The Boys
"I have strong views about not tempting providence and, as a wise man once said, the difference between luck and a wheelbarrow is, luck doesn’t work if you push it." - Colonel Orhan, Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City - KJ Parker
#4715
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:17 AM
Sombra, on 02 May 2011 - 01:47 AM, said:
Darkwatch, on 02 May 2011 - 01:28 AM, said:
I cam across this on the Awesomer.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
I caught the trailer yesterday, and it looks truly shite, in a way that surpasses even how shite the Clash of the Titans remake was.
Clash of the Tits however - I would watch the shit out of that film.
I'm sure it exists somewhere, though I'm not going to type it in to Google to find out.
The Pub is Always Open
Proud supporter of the Wolves of Winter. Glory be to her Majesty, The Lady Snow.
Cursed Summer returns. The Lady Now Sleeps.
The Sexy Thatch Burning Physicist
Τον Πρωτος Αληθη Δεσποτην της Οικιας Αυτος
Proud supporter of the Wolves of Winter. Glory be to her Majesty, The Lady Snow.
Cursed Summer returns. The Lady Now Sleeps.
The Sexy Thatch Burning Physicist
Τον Πρωτος Αληθη Δεσποτην της Οικιας Αυτος
RodeoRanch said:
You're a rock.
A non-touching itself rock.
A non-touching itself rock.
#4716
Posted 02 May 2011 - 05:24 AM
So, the Immortals were that elite masked unit that the Spartans faced in 300 right?
Is this supposed to be tied together?
From the trailer I didn't really understand who the Immortals were. An army? or the Gods?
Still, that bow is awesome.
Is this supposed to be tied together?
From the trailer I didn't really understand who the Immortals were. An army? or the Gods?
Still, that bow is awesome.
This post has been edited by Battle Plaptypus: 02 May 2011 - 05:24 AM
#4717
Posted 02 May 2011 - 06:02 AM
Movies watched recently:
The King's Speech: Brilliant. Firth deserved the nod. Unsurprising it won Best Picture, considering it was British, well acted, and a great story. Well done all-around. 8.5/10.
Skyline: Holy fuck this was bad. I mean, even hoping all I could get was decent special effects it was bad. So bad, it's verging on be funny. Took itself to seriously to get that honor, though. 2.5/10. Was barely worth the dollar.
Hereafter: Cool premise. Nice story lines. 15 to 20 minutes to short, IMO. A little more resolution would have made it a solid flick, as opposed to a decent one. That being said, I can dig what the writer and director was going for with the film. 6/10. Really liked Damon in this film.
The King's Speech: Brilliant. Firth deserved the nod. Unsurprising it won Best Picture, considering it was British, well acted, and a great story. Well done all-around. 8.5/10.
Skyline: Holy fuck this was bad. I mean, even hoping all I could get was decent special effects it was bad. So bad, it's verging on be funny. Took itself to seriously to get that honor, though. 2.5/10. Was barely worth the dollar.
Hereafter: Cool premise. Nice story lines. 15 to 20 minutes to short, IMO. A little more resolution would have made it a solid flick, as opposed to a decent one. That being said, I can dig what the writer and director was going for with the film. 6/10. Really liked Damon in this film.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#4718
Posted 02 May 2011 - 06:45 AM
Darkwatch, on 02 May 2011 - 01:28 AM, said:
I cam across this on the Awesomer.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
They say to lower one's expectations, though I'm not sure we can go that low...
Same producers as 300 but without the director that made 300 work. Though that hasn't stopped them from trying to copy the style wholesale.
The plot seems... well I'm going to be honest it doesn't seem to make sense. And unlike Clash of the Titans which clearly did not take itself seriously (even in the trailer) this movie does and it looks bad.
Hell they've even got Greek soldiers using Roman swords.
Oh you know this is going to be bad. Like shockingly, terrifyingly bad. It looks like they've hamfisted together Theseus and the Minotaur with the Titanomachy, and placed a Titan that is never mentioned in said war as the antagonist to get around the fact that he should be in the very place he's trying to free his companions from. Oh, and Greek soldiers fighting in Roman gear? I think if I watch this movie my head will explode from the complete butchering of history and mythology that is guaranteed to take place here.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
#4719
Posted 02 May 2011 - 10:52 PM
I reckon Immortals looks better than Clash of the Titans - it looks like it has more visual imagination and genuine epic stuff. Not that I think it looks really good (Clash of the Titans was a film with one good second, courtesy of Mads Mikkelsen), but it could be okay. Except that Henry Cavill looks like he carries none of the charisma and gravitas necessary to carry off that sort of role, which is a very bad sign for Superman if that bears out.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#4720
Posted 02 May 2011 - 11:59 PM
Are we even sure it's not some sick joke someone's making? Because if that's real ...
This post has been edited by Garak: 02 May 2011 - 11:59 PM
The meaning of life is BOOM!!!