[Galayn Lord]

Although it's obviously conflicting with my current working hypothesis, I have to admit I do see Anomandaris' point about Korlat, and approve his comment about not having much in the game so far except "revealing finder".

And still, he managed to survive until now, and that's at least 5 NK dodged. Something is fishy just because of that.

[Korlat]

Anomandaris, on Mar 12 2009, 09:22 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:11 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Mar 12 2009, 08:36 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 02:29 PM, said:

I ooze of scum do I? Pardon me for not being particularly impressed. And if the content of your case is what made you think I'm a certain scum then you must be either somewhat slow or not entirely honest in your intentions.

I anm a bit slow at times, but you're personality traits are the ones that have changed from day 1. You started out very agressive, got a little heat, then left, came back on and was still aggressive, then suddenly, you haven't made a case, you havent asked any questions, you havent pushed anyone, you havent done anything but add your vote. Slow i may be, but you sir are caught.

Heh, yeah because I haven't been here. Such an odd thing, aint it. I'll try to keep my blackberry with me at all times to avoid this travesty in the future. Come on Anomandaris, try to find some kind of argument that actually has an ounce of value, this is getting a little embarassing.

Whats embarassing is the fact that you continue to use sarcasm to disregaurd everything I've said. I mean really Korlat, since your day 1 pointing at me, Kas, and Sil, you havent contributed an ounce to the game, even in the 2 hours you have been around. No suspects(I imagine I am still one, of course) but you haven't done anything to help find scum, don't deny it, I mean come on.

Now that is true. I haven't spent enough time on today or yesterday to truly be an asset to this game. I admit that fully. However, your continous attempts to slander me with ridiculously weak arguments that are just repeated over and over and over annoy me to the extent that sarcasm becomes the only appropriate response.

[Korlat]

Galayn Lord, on Mar 12 2009, 09:31 PM, said:

Although it's obviously conflicting with my current working hypothesis, I have to admit I do see Anomandaris' point about Korlat, and approve his comment about not having much in the game so far except "revealing finder".

And still, he managed to survive until now, and that's at least 5 NK dodged. Something is fishy just because of that.

I've survived I would think because I'm a good lynch target. No one buys me being a finder, not even the killers I am sure. If they had I would've been dead.

Not being killed just makes me a better target.

[Serc]

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 12:34 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on Mar 12 2009, 09:31 PM, said:

Although it's obviously conflicting with my current working hypothesis, I have to admit I do see Anomandaris' point about Korlat, and approve his comment about not having much in the game so far except "revealing finder".

And still, he managed to survive until now, and that's at least 5 NK dodged. Something is fishy just because of that.

I've survived I would think because I'm a good lynch target. No one buys me being a finder, not even the killers I am sure. If they had I would've been dead.

Not being killed just makes me a better target.

Wait ... what?

Frankly, you've survived too many NKs as too obvious a target. You also survived a Day 1 lynch push, which just sort of melted away, and have largely slid by low-key since then.

Something's not right, there. I don't buy Anomandaris' case because it's fairly thin, regardless of its length, but I do agree that you stink.

[Korlat]

Serc, on Mar 12 2009, 09:45 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 12:34 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on Mar 12 2009, 09:31 PM, said:

Although it's obviously conflicting with my current working hypothesis, I have to admit I do see Anomandaris' point about Korlat, and approve his comment about not having much in the game so far except "revealing finder".

And still, he managed to survive until now, and that's at least 5 NK dodged. Something is fishy just because of that.

I've survived I would think because I'm a good lynch target. No one buys me being a finder, not even the killers I am sure. If they had I would've been dead.

Not being killed just makes me a better target.

Wait ... what?

Frankly, you've survived too many NKs as too obvious a target. You also survived a Day 1 lynch push, which just sort of melted away, and have largely slid by low-key since then.

Something's not right, there. I don't buy Anomandaris' case because it's fairly thin, regardless of its length, but I do agree that you stink.

Well, nothing of this really conflicts with what I just said.

As for the day 1 lynch, it was built on such a flimsy base that people seemed well willing to move towards the Silanah case which had more content than the Korlat made a joke yes/no thing.

Now, I've pulled through pressure for a few days, and that's always suspicious and I don't begrudge you that. However, why I –on the presumption that I'm not a killer– have not been killed is, as I stated above, most likely because I'm such a good target for a lynch.

This post has been edited by Korlat: 12 March 2009 - 07:52 PM

[Tennes]

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

[Serc]

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 01:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

Which is why I'm so reluctant, personally, to go after Korlat - I'm completely uncertain as to whether Silanah was guilty or not. It all depends on whether one of the Killer teams had paired Killers. This effects my judgement on Telas, as well.

[Korlat]

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

[Kaschan]

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

He was lynched was for fake symping you but it is only fake symping if the person who is being symped is not the master...
As it seems, Sil was not a killer and more likely a symp. All fingers now point to you and you shrug every thing off.
Vote Korlat

[Serc]

Well, I'll be out for a bit.

I'm going to

Vote Telas

Sort of as a placeholder - but his odd behavior still deserves some pressure, and in fact probably a lynch. Though I can't help but feel the entire Silanah-Korlat-Telas group might be a red-herring. Might be worth seeing what Galain had to do with it ...

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 10:50 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

He was lynched was for fake symping you but it is only fake symping if the person who is being symped is not the master...
As it seems, Sil was not a killer and more likely a symp. All fingers now point to you and you shrug every thing off.
Vote Korlat

Haha, I'd like you to point to those fingers, Kaschan. As it stands you only seem to have Anomandaris' joke of a case, a case he himself admitted to be weak, and surprise that I've not been night killed.

Now, we both know that you're the symp, and anyone else doubting should just read through the last pages before the end of day 1 and the whole move to lynch Silanah day 2 to pick that up. I'm definitly not susprised that you agree with anomandaris, nor that you fail to present any compelling reason to do so apart from agreeing with anomandaris.

[Kaschan]

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:56 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 10:50 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

He was lynched was for fake symping you but it is only fake symping if the person who is being symped is not the master...
As it seems, Sil was not a killer and more likely a symp. All fingers now point to you and you shrug every thing off.
Vote Korlat

Haha, I'd like you to point to those fingers, Kaschan. As it stands you only seem to have Anomandaris' joke of a case, a case he himself admitted to be weak, and surprise that I've not been night killed.

Now, we both know that you're the symp, and anyone else doubting should just read through the last pages before the end of day 1 and the whole move to lynch Silanah day 2 to pick that up. I'm definitly not susprised that you agree with anomandaris, nor that you fail to present any compelling reason to do so apart from agreeing with anomandaris.

Well im sick of talking to you, same thing every day... you were wrong about Sil being a killer so you are going after the other 2 on your day 1 list.

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 11:01 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:56 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 10:50 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

He was lynched was for fake symping you but it is only fake symping if the person who is being symped is not the master...
As it seems, Sil was not a killer and more likely a symp. All fingers now point to you and you shrug every thing off.
Vote Korlat

Haha, I'd like you to point to those fingers, Kaschan. As it stands you only seem to have Anomandaris' joke of a case, a case he himself admitted to be weak, and surprise that I've not been night killed.

Now, we both know that you're the symp, and anyone else doubting should just read through the last pages before the end of day 1 and the whole move to lynch Silanah day 2 to pick that up. I'm definitly not susprised that you agree with anomandaris, nor that you fail to present any compelling reason to do so apart from agreeing with anomandaris.

Well im sick of talking to you, same thing every day... you were wrong about Sil being a killer so you are going after the other 2 on your day 1 list.

Oh, that's precious. You know that, do you?

[Kaschan]

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 04:06 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 11:01 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:56 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 10:50 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

He was lynched was for fake symping you but it is only fake symping if the person who is being symped is not the master...
As it seems, Sil was not a killer and more likely a symp. All fingers now point to you and you shrug every thing off.
Vote Korlat

Haha, I'd like you to point to those fingers, Kaschan. As it stands you only seem to have Anomandaris' joke of a case, a case he himself admitted to be weak, and surprise that I've not been night killed.

Now, we both know that you're the symp, and anyone else doubting should just read through the last pages before the end of day 1 and the whole move to lynch Silanah day 2 to pick that up. I'm definitly not susprised that you agree with anomandaris, nor that you fail to present any compelling reason to do so apart from agreeing with anomandaris.

Well im sick of talking to you, same thing every day... you were wrong about Sil being a killer so you are going after the other 2 on your day 1 list.

Oh, that's precious. You know that, do you?

I thought I already discussed this at the beginning of day 3 when there were 2 kills...
Learn to follow the game

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 11:08 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 04:06 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 11:01 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:56 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Mar 12 2009, 10:50 PM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 03:24 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 10:12 PM, said:

Um Korlat, the Silanah case was built solely around perceived defense of YOU; if he was guilty then it's likely he was your symp.

then I think you've misunderstood the Silanah case completly, Tennes. The argument was never that he was my symp, if that was the case I would've been the one lynched. Why lynch a symp when you see him as a symp because you found his master?

Silanah was lynched because it was assumed that no innocent would act as he did. At the best he was a symp seemingly fake symping me, but he could also very well be a killer. Then, with all the completly illogical behaviour from players who seemingly did anything not to vote for Silanah, it became more likely that he was a killer.

He was lynched was for fake symping you but it is only fake symping if the person who is being symped is not the master...
As it seems, Sil was not a killer and more likely a symp. All fingers now point to you and you shrug every thing off.
Vote Korlat

Haha, I'd like you to point to those fingers, Kaschan. As it stands you only seem to have Anomandaris' joke of a case, a case he himself admitted to be weak, and surprise that I've not been night killed.

Now, we both know that you're the symp, and anyone else doubting should just read through the last pages before the end of day 1 and the whole move to lynch Silanah day 2 to pick that up. I'm definitly not susprised that you agree with anomandaris, nor that you fail to present any compelling reason to do so apart from agreeing with anomandaris.

Well im sick of talking to you, same thing every day... you were wrong about Sil being a killer so you are going after the other 2 on your day 1 list.

Oh, that's precious. You know that, do you?

I thought I already discussed this at the beginning of day 3 when there were 2 kills...
Learn to follow the game

Heh, yeah, I guess I should. My distinct impression was that people accept the possiblity, but most seem to assume to scum distribution is 2 killer 1 sym team 1 and 2 killer 1 symp for team two.. possibly variations such as 2 killers and 1 killer etc.. But hey, it's not like I read this thread or anything..

Your certainty when there should be quite a bit of doubt is interesting.

[Korlat]

but I'm off to a party. Have fun. My mac will remain on

[Tennes]

vote korlat
for using a mac


and for being scummy and somehow still alive; even if he's right and killers are using him to distract, us it'll just remain a distraction as long as he's alive.

[D'riss]

I"m home for a min before diiner with friends. Having read up to this point and I see a lot of finger pointing and finger flipping. I will wait untill later to put some thoughts out on players.

[Mockra]

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 11:16 PM, said:

vote korlat
for using a mac


and for being scummy and somehow still alive; even if he's right and killers are using him to distract, us it'll just remain a distraction as long as he's alive.

Then again, if used as a distraction and lynched for it, we buy the killers at the least 1 free NK.
It's a lose/lose situation especially since the same thing goes for Telas (at the least, imho). As I undoubtedly said before, it's not the fact that there was no lynch - if he was firmly believing we didn't need it, I would have accepted it. It is that he (alledgedly) left it to chance... and that lady fortune decided (alledgedly) to decide to let Silanah live (probably wouldn't have made such a fuss if it was decided he would lynch). It sounded too much like a fake excuse, and it keeps haunting me (and GL with me), to the point where it is a distraction AND where Telas is reduced also to defending himself full time, thus unable to contribute more.

Which, if he is a symp, suits him just fine.

[Tennes]

Mockra, on Mar 12 2009, 05:39 PM, said:

Tennes, on Mar 12 2009, 11:16 PM, said:

vote korlat
for using a mac


and for being scummy and somehow still alive; even if he's right and killers are using him to distract, us it'll just remain a distraction as long as he's alive.

Then again, if used as a distraction and lynched for it, we buy the killers at the least 1 free NK.
It's a lose/lose situation especially since the same thing goes for Telas (at the least, imho). As I undoubtedly said before, it's not the fact that there was no lynch - if he was firmly believing we didn't need it, I would have accepted it. It is that he (alledgedly) left it to chance... and that lady fortune decided (alledgedly) to decide to let Silanah live (probably wouldn't have made such a fuss if it was decided he would lynch). It sounded too much like a fake excuse, and it keeps haunting me (and GL with me), to the point where it is a distraction AND where Telas is reduced also to defending himself full time, thus unable to contribute more.

Which, if he is a symp, suits him just fine.

hmm well at this point, if there wasn't a withheld kill last night we're dealing with only 1 killer now. if korlat is a potential symp, i think it's best if we take him out--otherwise, he'll be causing distraction/disruption regardless of whether a train's forming on him.

btw can we get a vote count?