Help
Korlat, on Mar 12 2009, 08:06 AM, said:
Anomandaris, on Mar 12 2009, 04:27 AM, said:
Korlat, on Mar 10 2009, 05:22 PM, said:
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 11:13 PM, said:
Korlat, on Mar 10 2009, 05:08 PM, said:
And Silanah is the best option. At least better than Korlat, who's a terribly misunderstood but good man.
If you were lying any lower today the roots from the grass would be tickling your nose doh.gif
Yesterday I was not busy and in a not of best moods, today I am in equally if not worse mood but have more to do. So, better then to lay low for a little while, I've given enough of myself to this thread for you to judge my alignment many times over. At least compared to most others here.
After the heat, and since then he has basically vanished.
I wont bother with more quotes, most of you don't like the wall of texts and wont be bothered to read it.
Key points first post, Korlat already knew that team evil would want to stick together. As if he knew their winning conditions. He picked me out while voting for my "case", and then attacked, he got heat and ran away, then came back to piss and defended himself until the heat was removed, he then links me with sil who has the most votes. Since the sil thing I haven't been mentioned once, as a matter of fact I don't think he suspects anyone anymore. Typical lay low since the pressure is already on Telas. Hope the pub was fun scum, you wont be celebrting your victory much longer if I have anything to say about it.
I don't even know how to respond to this. Anomandaris' case is a long line of quotes with little or no value apart from being seen as impressive. His whole case is based on three quotes and even those are pretty weak. He's trying to hide the weakness of his case by making it massive. It has worked in past. DiBs did it as scum only a few games ago, and people bought it even though there was no actuall content to the case. Just a lot of quotes.
I'll try to explain my approach to this game a little closer, there seems to be some confusion generally as to what I try to accomplish. To an extent I get tunnel vision, but that does not happen right away. I ask a lot of questions early, pointing out flaws I see, or just stuff that intrigues me in other posts. Generally these are answered a way that satisfies me or they're ignored. If they're ignored I just keep poking until I get a response. Now and then though, I get a response that rings false to me. Anomandaris' post was like that. The tone was all... wrong. And the blood thirsty comment topped it. Say what you want, but that's not an innocent thing to throw out like that. It's calculated, consciously or subconsciously. So I go for that and I up the pressure. Sometimes it ends there but with Anomandaris it did not. You could practically taste how he tensed up, and nothing he's done since has even partially convinced me I'm off track.
As for my inactivity. That's what happens when you've got other things to do. I can't prove it to you because that would be meta and all, so you'll just have to decide for yourselves what you think.
Well, I am totally convinced now that you must be inno. (sarcasm). Stop compareing me to Dibs when he's scum! You do that alot, you know, say things like, You use the term bloodthirsty when you are a symp or killer. Or say, dibs acts just like me, when he is scum. WTF? As for your inactivity, its a basic scummy thing to do, gather attention day 1 and then hide until nothing but sheep are left.
