foolio, on Feb 19 2009, 05:27 AM, said:
Sounds to me like you want blind acceptance. I dont normally disagree with posters, but it just seems that this theory, TO ME, is weak. You are grasping at straws. There is a motivational problem, and then to assume it was Kalam because Heavy weapons were used in a site of battle and a military camp just seems odd. I can hear it now, " look Kalam struck over there too, heavy weapons were used, and over there, and over there, oh yeah, over there as well."
I am not particularly attached to the Kalam/QB" theory, and to illustrate that this is the case I'll quote parts of previous posts, of my own...
Quote
I am, however, trying less to claim, definitively, that it was Kalam and QB, than I am attempting draw attention to what I see as a deliberate literary device used to focus our curiosity upon the killing of Mallick's favorite assasin.
...and...
Quote
As I mention above, I am not completely committed to the "Kalam and QB" solution. I am, however, convinced that the identities of the ultimate assailants in this case, are not trivial.
You're hung up on the "it was Kalam" claim you assume I'm committed to - which I am NOT - see my quotes above. You're taking issue with a theory that I've only tossed out to stimulate debate and which I'm offering *only* as a question and as a starting point for further discussion. The debate has, essentially, moved on and left you behind. And you still haven't come up with any original ideas of your own, just disagreed with mine.
You can either dismiss my claim that the identities are significant but hidden and render no opinion at all, leaving the discussion to others who find the issue interesting.
OR:
You can accept the premise that I've proposed and come up with some ideas of your own. But simply stating that it wasn't Kalam and then standing back, satisfied that you've actually offered an opinion of your own is hardly the stuff of creative debate.
OK - so you don't think it was Kalam - I could come up with several scenarios that *could* justify Kalam's involvement (i.e. he wasn't *for* Laseen, he was *against* Mallick Rel and thus rid the world of his most powerful agent, and ST arranged his release form the AH because he'd been cured of the spider venom) but I don't care if you agree with that theory. Offer one of your own that is at least marginally better than "It was probably just some guy" and I'll start paying attention.
OHA