Malazan Empire: Mafia 38: Haunted House Massacre (Game thread) - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 126 Pages +
  • « First
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Mafia 38: Haunted House Massacre (Game thread)

#2081 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:02 AM

View PostSilanah, on Jan 29 2009, 10:00 AM, said:

4.5 hours left... I don't have any idea where this day went.
Ruse, you seem to bite back quite hard, never really thought much of you but that really makes me worried O.o
Im going to sleep and won't be back before day ends so I will leave my vote on Mockra.



Whats wrong with biting back?
Play to win or dont play at all.

#2082 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:06 AM

View PostSilanah, on Jan 29 2009, 10:00 AM, said:

4.5 hours left... I don't have any idea where this day went.
Ruse, you seem to bite back quite hard, never really thought much of you but that really makes me worried O.o
Im going to sleep and won't be back before day ends so I will leave my vote on Mockra.



Since it would seem we are getting nowhere with regards to discussing any killers or would it not be possible to lynch one even if we think we have found one with the time we have left...
I will vote my symp suspect

Remove vote
Vote Mockra


#2083 User is offline   D'riss 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:12 AM

Morning all, time for a catch up.

#2084 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:19 AM

View PostRuse, on Jan 29 2009, 11:02 AM, said:

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 09:37 AM, said:

I adressed the reveal and counterreveal and the foolishness (as I see it) in lynching both or either of them: we might well lynch two innos, we might start with the inno and leave the symp alive cause something happens tomorrow... etc. So, no, I don't leave it out of consideration - but I think the tactic isn't all that smart if there's no CF.


CF would not help in any case...CF is not the issue at all with regards to this.
The CF comes up inno for symps you know.

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 09:37 AM, said:

Also, it being far fetched... it's something everyone will say. No-one's going to say that any reasoning against them is 'the logical deduction' 'spot-on' or 'the absolute if inconvenient truth'.


You are logically deducing stuff for your own needs. It IS far fetched. I know you are wrong, badly so.
So trying to suck deductions out of thin air and then selling it as the real deal is not what inno's should be doing, that is what scum need to do.

You dont remember that mockra not only has a counter reveal, but he also heavily defended a known killer.
That is real tangible evidence of being a symp.

Yet you chose to believe that I have "done my math" and need an inno dead to win? So why didnt i just smack my vote down on mockra? Your reasoning is flawed, and you know it yet you choose to stick to your guns.
You are the one that could very well have done his math and realized the same thing and therefore are gunning for me.
It works both ways these fantastical theories or "reasoning" you know.


edit- crappy typos

So you're aiming for someone you think is a symp, I do the same, and yet I am branded because you know I am badly wrong? Why, you know the contents of your PM, I don't.

Where did he defend, and who? Emurlahn? I don't remember it, but then, you don't remember when and where I posted, voted, made cases, either :) - so let's say no-one's perfect, so be a good chap and point me towards it, please. It would go a long way towards helping me evaluate the stuff against Mockra on its true value, I guess.

Quote

Whats wrong with biting back?
Play to win or dont play at all.

It's a team game. Is your team's survival directly tied to your own?

#2085 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:26 AM

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

So you're aiming for someone you think is a symp, I do the same, and yet I am branded because you know I am badly wrong? Why, you know the contents of your PM, I don't.


Correct, I know my pm, I know you could only make a case on me by making up a scenario that paints me as scum out of nothing but scenarios that you make up in your head and then portray as being possible, with no real evidence.

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Where did he defend, and who? Emurlahn? I don't remember it, but then, you don't remember when and where I posted, voted, made cases, either :p - so let's say no-one's perfect, so be a good chap and point me towards it, please. It would go a long way towards helping me evaluate the stuff against Mockra on its true value, I guess.


He defended ehmurlan, the only person we KNOW is a killer.
I made a case loooong ago...you must have "missed it" i suppose.

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Quote

Whats wrong with biting back?
Play to win or dont play at all.

It's a team game. Is your team's survival directly tied to your own?


You never know, as you said yourself the math points to a possibility of scum winning with one more inno death, or have you now forgotten your own arguments conveniently to keep discrediting me?


edit- typos typos typos, i have this big fucking blister on the tip of my middle finger that is hindering me :)

This post has been edited by Ruse: 29 January 2009 - 10:27 AM


#2086 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:36 AM

Here is the case

View PostRuse, on Jan 21 2009, 12:41 PM, said:

Alright i found something rather interesting
Look how badly Mockra defends Ehmur.
Might have found a symp over here.

Here Thyr votes for Ehmur, for placing a vote while giving no input into the game.
Thyr reckons Ehmur is just bidding his time, hiding, and trying to add to a train to get a easy lynch going.

View PostThyrllan, on Jan 19 2009, 05:37 PM, said:

View PostSerc, on Jan 19 2009, 07:31 PM, said:

Huh, Emurlahn appeared in the space of six minutes, bad timing, or lurking looking for an easy target?
I wonder.

Thats another possibility, that he's scum, looking for an inconspicious train, sees kesso gaining votes, on a little bit of evidence, jumps on with no more explanation than "I agree".

So, either he genuinely agrees, yet doesn't expand on it etc, and seems to be lurking a bit, he's symping you, or he's scum.

remove vote, vote emurlahn

because he could be scum looking for easy train, or a symp.

Also, "symps don't symp their masters"

Well, yes they do. They can draw attention away etc, but: If everyone just think "Symps don't symp their masters" then it doesnt matter if they do.


Here comes Mockra to the rescue

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 05:40 PM, said:

wow, thyr, that's your fourth vote already.... lynch-happy killer is eager?


Now this is harmless in itself.
But then

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 05:44 PM, said:

huh
all right then, remove vote

Summoning was succesful anyhow

Thyr has already changed his vote 4 times, maning he's clearly lynch happy.

vote Thyr


He votes for Thyr!!! Like a reverse symp OMGUS vote...haha

View PostThyrllan, on Jan 19 2009, 05:46 PM, said:

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 07:44 PM, said:

huh
all right then, remove vote

Summoning was succesful anyhow

Thyr has already changed his vote 4 times, maning he's clearly lynch happy.

vote Thyr


Care to explain then, why you're attacking when 2 of those were fairly obvious joke votes.
That makes 2 serious votes.
Thats the same as you.
Kettle, pot etc?

And im sure there are people changing far more than I, if we're counting jokes.

And you thought I was lynch happy?


Thyr bites back

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 05:50 PM, said:

you jump out at me as one of the top posters.
posting and switching votes so much is bound to grab people's attention, so I'm currently thinking symp.

Thing is, in this game a symp can also be the creature role of the cult, and just as dangerous as the killers.

untill I can figure out who (if anyone) you are symping for, my vote'll stay


Here he starts talking about the cult and also attacking the person who is voting for his master perhaps?
Classic symp behaviour

View PostOmtose, on Jan 19 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 06:44 PM, said:

huh
all right then, remove vote

Summoning was succesful anyhow

Thyr has already changed his vote 4 times, maning he's clearly lynch happy.

vote Thyr

Well, lynching seems about the only way you're sure to get rid of someone with the necromancers around, and is the chosen method of elemination for the town. To imply you're not looking for a lynch is a bit weird in my opinion... what else are you looking for? I definately have no qualms at all about lynching.

Lastly, voting is pressuring. Granted, Thyr may be fluttering a bit too fast from one player to another to make an impression and get info out of the pressured, but well, none of us is perfect. Moreover, Thyr changed votes 4 times, but, dear Mockra, you voted twice in 3 posts. :) Not exactly a paragon of steadfastness yourself, are you? And yet it is exactly why you vote.

Remove vote
Vote Mockra.


For being holier-than-thou.


I put this in to show there also seems to be a bit of "camaraderie" between Omtose and Thyr...interesting

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 06:03 PM, said:

ok, where are you getting tunnelvision from?
lol, ffs, we're 6 hourrs into day 1,6 people haven't posted at all yet, some of those who did only did so to tell us they won't be on for a while.

you honestly expect to find a "slip" by scum in the first 5 hours?
lol, the only time that's ever happened was when a killer pretended to be drunk at the end of a day and people read too much into it and jumped tot he right conclusions for the wrong reasons (i.e., 100% by sheer luck)

most of the time Day 1 lynch hits an inno.

so far the only interesting tings we've heard was the supposed "killer reveal". I find it difficult to take that seriously.
you being symp-like all over the place jumps out, because like I said, you and Omtose are top posters.


More defending of Ehmur and his "slip on day 1"
Claiming that the only time we get slips is when we have drunk posters, utter bollox by the way.

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 06:13 PM, said:

well, you know, I just got here, gimme a break, :p

i'll get to attacking other people soon enough


Here he seems to want to push attention else where, by attacking "someone else"

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 06:16 PM, said:

View PostThyrllan, on Jan 19 2009, 01:11 PM, said:

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 08:03 PM, said:

ok, where are you getting tunnelvision from?
lol, ffs, we're 6 hourrs into day 1,6 people haven't posted at all yet, some of those who did only did so to tell us they won't be on for a while.

you honestly expect to find a "slip" by scum in the first 5 hours?
lol, the only time that's ever happened was when a killer pretended to be drunk at the end of a day and people read too much into it and jumped tot he right conclusions for the wrong reasons (i.e., 100% by sheer luck)

most of the time Day 1 lynch hits an inno.

so far the only interesting tings we've heard was the supposed "killer reveal". I find it difficult to take that seriously.
you being symp-like all over the place jumps out, because like I said, you and Omtose are top posters.

Well, the tunnelvision bit is the bit about you attacking only one person.
You voted Meanas for lurking, and after that, it has only been me, essentially.
Thats what tunnelvision means. You accused me of jumping about solely to attract attention. And then essentially drew even more attention to me by only attacking me.

Who else do you suspect?

And just because we don't often find scum day one, is no reason we shouldn't look, or attack who we find suspicious.



you know, for someone who claims half his votes were joke ovtes, you don't recognise them too well..

I guess I should've put a smiley of some sort after "stop lurking" thing

but yes, imagin what: THAT was a joke vote.
voting for you was the vting for the first mildly suspicious person off the topp of my head.


More attacking of the person who is voting ehmurlan

there is more....

This post has been edited by Ruse: 29 January 2009 - 10:37 AM


#2087 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:36 AM

View PostRuse, on Jan 21 2009, 12:45 PM, said:

Sorry, Last Quote wouldn't fit and i removed a HUGE quote from kessoh.

View PostMockra, on Jan 19 2009, 06:20 PM, said:

wow, it never ceases to amaze me how people can say someone's not "acting inno" from only two posts...



Here He defends ehmur yet again when kessoh says ehmur is acting inno.



All in all a very stern defense for ehmur.
Defenately something to consider.



and the last bit i couldnt fit in

#2088 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:43 AM

So you think now that I...as a Symp, will trawl through my masters posts, looking for signs of scum and then make a case on my fellow symp?

Bah

#2089 User is offline   Liosan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:51 AM

Right i am back, and thoroughly confused.

#2090 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:53 AM

This is day 6, 3.5 hours to go

12 players still playing, 7 votes to lynch, 6 votes for night

3 votes Mockra (Rashan,Silanah, Ruse)
2 votes Ruse (Omtose, Shadow)
1 vote D'riss (Meanas)



6 have not voted: D'riss, Galain, Hood's Path, Liosan, Mockra, Thyrllan.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#2091 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:54 AM

View PostLiosan, on Jan 29 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

Right i am back, and thoroughly confused.



I dont blame you

#2092 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:56 AM

View PostRuse, on Jan 29 2009, 11:26 AM, said:

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

So you're aiming for someone you think is a symp, I do the same, and yet I am branded because you know I am badly wrong? Why, you know the contents of your PM, I don't.


Correct, I know my pm, I know you could only make a case on me by making up a scenario that paints me as scum out of nothing but scenarios that you make up in your head and then portray as being possible, with no real evidence.

Oh yes, evidence. Kaschan was also big on that, I recall.

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Where did he defend, and who? Emurlahn? I don't remember it, but then, you don't remember when and where I posted, voted, made cases, either :p - so let's say no-one's perfect, so be a good chap and point me towards it, please. It would go a long way towards helping me evaluate the stuff against Mockra on its true value, I guess.


He defended ehmurlan, the only person we KNOW is a killer.
I made a case loooong ago...you must have "missed it" i suppose.

Oh fucking hell. You don't have time for cases or quotes and we should respect it, you don't know where and with what I was involved, yet * I * now should remember you made a case against Emurlahn. Fuck that. You could have spent the past 2 hours that we're discussing stuff to make a decent case, but you prefer to enter a fucking mudslinging competition while hiding behind the 'fact' that you don't have time to make cases. Controversy? Not in your universe, apparently.

* rant incoming *
You sir, employ double standards by implying I deliberately forget this, and when I do mention that I appreciate a pointer to it, you don't even fucking care to point me towards it, but rather go for the extremely cheap shot of a badly veiled implication.

Fucking hell, I don't even fucking care if I get lynched for the day 1 stuff I pulled - I rather expect it, even pointed out today would be a good day for it - but if this is the fucking way we try to get this game going and win it for team inno, then I wish scum the best of luck in trying to turn it around, cause I think employing double standards like you do here is a fucking miserable way to play, and damned obstructive to evaluation of points as well.


View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Quote

Whats wrong with biting back?
Play to win or dont play at all.

It's a team game. Is your team's survival directly tied to your own?


You never know, as you said yourself the math points to a possibility of scum winning with one more inno death, or have you now forgotten your own arguments conveniently to keep discrediting me?

Learn to read. Seriously.

I never said 'win with one more inno death.' I said 'to lynch an inno'. I quoted the fucking post where I said it for your own fucking convenience, but reading comprehension zero, I assume. It's perfectly reasonable what I write. It is what team evil will want: 2 inno's gone per day/night cycle, and lead the fucking pack of fucking sheep.

But hey, if you want to interprete things this way, be my fucking guest. I'm not going to reply to you anymore after this so please continue your little smear campaign - you have no time to read, no time to do any fucking thing, but enough time to misread and misquote and twist words.

edit- typos typos typos, i have this big fucking blister on the tip of my middle finger that is hindering me :)


In my current mood, I will not comment on this.

---

As a sidenote: I'm terribly sorry to everyone who has to read this, especially our new players and people from other fora.
I'm normally a civilized person, but currently my blood is boiling and I actually should just walk away from my keyboard. Which is exactly what I am going to do now.

Mods, if this is inappropriate, please delete & warn me.

#2093 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:59 AM

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 11:56 AM, said:

Mods, if this is inappropriate, please delete & warn me.


I'll accept the swear words for now, but "people from other fora"?? Now that's just insane!
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#2094 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:06 AM

ooooo pretty colours :)

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:56 AM, said:

View PostRuse, on Jan 29 2009, 11:26 AM, said:

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

So you're aiming for someone you think is a symp, I do the same, and yet I am branded because you know I am badly wrong? Why, you know the contents of your PM, I don't.


Correct, I know my pm, I know you could only make a case on me by making up a scenario that paints me as scum out of nothing but scenarios that you make up in your head and then portray as being possible, with no real evidence.

Oh yes, evidence. Kaschan was also big on that, I recall.


Uhm....since when is kaschan proven scum? Whats your point?

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Where did he defend, and who? Emurlahn? I don't remember it, but then, you don't remember when and where I posted, voted, made cases, either :p - so let's say no-one's perfect, so be a good chap and point me towards it, please. It would go a long way towards helping me evaluate the stuff against Mockra on its true value, I guess.


He defended ehmurlan, the only person we KNOW is a killer.
I made a case loooong ago...you must have "missed it" i suppose.

Oh fucking hell. You don't have time for cases or quotes and we should respect it, you don't know where and with what I was involved, yet * I * now should remember you made a case against Emurlahn. Fuck that. You could have spent the past 2 hours that we're discussing stuff to make a decent case, but you prefer to enter a fucking mudslinging competition while hiding behind the 'fact' that you don't have time to make cases. Controversy? Not in your universe, apparently.

* rant incoming *
You sir, employ double standards by implying I deliberately forget this, and when I do mention that I appreciate a pointer to it, you don't even fucking care to point me towards it, but rather go for the extremely cheap shot of a badly veiled implication.

Fucking hell, I don't even fucking care if I get lynched for the day 1 stuff I pulled - I rather expect it, even pointed out today would be a good day for it - but if this is the fucking way we try to get this game going and win it for team inno, then I wish scum the best of luck in trying to turn it around, cause I think employing double standards like you do here is a fucking miserable way to play, and damned obstructive to evaluation of points as well.


No indont have time to sift through peoples posts, and then make a case.
I DO have time to answer as we go, like we are doing now, in between my work.
You know very well how much more time consuming and how much attention it takes of a person to make a case

SO... kindly fuck off


View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Quote

Whats wrong with biting back?
Play to win or dont play at all.

It's a team game. Is your team's survival directly tied to your own?


You never know, as you said yourself the math points to a possibility of scum winning with one more inno death, or have you now forgotten your own arguments conveniently to keep discrediting me?

Learn to read. Seriously.

I never said 'win with one more inno death.' I said 'to lynch an inno'. I quoted the fucking post where I said it for your own fucking convenience, but reading comprehension zero, I assume. It's perfectly reasonable what I write. It is what team evil will want: 2 inno's gone per day/night cycle, and lead the fucking pack of fucking sheep.

But hey, if you want to interprete things this way, be my fucking guest. I'm not going to reply to you anymore after this so please continue your little smear campaign - you have no time to read, no time to do any fucking thing, but enough time to misread and misquote and twist words.

Lynch an inno, inno death, whats the fucking difference?
I meant that i am going to defend myself because as you say, one more inno LYNCH could lead to a scum victory.
My point still stands


edit- typos typos typos, i have this big fucking blister on the tip of my middle finger that is hindering me :p



In my current mood, I will not comment on this.

You can be glad you didnt, this thing is about to pop


---

As a sidenote: I'm terribly sorry to everyone who has to read this, especially our new players and people from other fora.
I'm normally a civilized person, but currently my blood is boiling and I actually should just walk away from my keyboard. Which is exactly what I am going to do now.

Mods, if this is inappropriate, please delete & warn me.


Naaa....there is nothing wrong with getting hot headed.
And the newbs should get the full experience of mafia :p


edit - forgot to answer the first color thingy

This post has been edited by Ruse: 29 January 2009 - 11:14 AM


#2095 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:06 AM

View PostPath-Shaper, on Jan 29 2009, 10:59 AM, said:

View PostOmtose, on Jan 29 2009, 11:56 AM, said:

Mods, if this is inappropriate, please delete & warn me.


I'll accept the swear words for now, but "people from other fora"?? Now that's just insane!



I lol'd

#2096 User is offline   D'riss 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:13 AM

OK, my final attempt at defending myself


View PostShadow, on Jan 28 2009, 05:49 PM, said:

Omtose, why would you want an investigation on D'riss and Mockra? Thats just a bad mistake. (hypnotoad psycic person please don't do that) They would just come back inno. If you think a Killer is going to blatently call down this kind of pressure on themselves you are nuts. SOP is to lynch both claimants. Killers know this. Why would they do that?

Underlined is mine and I have said this several times. What did I have to gain by revealing, the most likely outcome is an early death, but I was happy to take one for the team.

View PostLiosan, on Jan 28 2009, 06:24 PM, said:

View PostThyrllan, on Jan 28 2009, 05:05 PM, said:

Liosan seems to have dropped completely off the radar.


actually if you read my posts you will see that i was off work today and so don't have internet access. I am currently in my in laws using their computer to check the thread.

As for the two reveals, if mockra was a symp why didnt he jump on ano's train yesterday? If driss is a symp what would he hope to achieve revealing? Mockra though came to emurlahn's defence day 1 when some pressure was put on him, so if one is a symp it would be him. Again though we are faced with the possibility of two recruits on either night 3 or last night so we could be in trouble. Sadly i am an advocate of the lynch both camp, we cant risk them being recruited and it is likely that if we don't we will be forced to lynch one tomorrow as we cannot be sure of their allegiance then.

Two witches though possible if not in a role heavy team is possible, but we definitely have two double voters (lynch 1), a medium, a witch and more than likely a finder(possible loss of cf demands it). Thats a strong inno team, without even a guard or a vig let alone a second witch. For there to be two witches one would have to be a symp, now that isnt as odd as it sounds, because they dont have to use it to protect people but it would stop them dying by the hand of their master.

I will leave voting to others, i am unsure what way to look at this, and don't have time to properly examine the last few days to see what motivated this reveal. If i was going to vote i would vote mockra, there is a possibility they are a witch, but i am unsure. I will be back on in the morning when i am back in the office.

Again, underlined is mine, again, what do I gain?

View PostMockra, on Jan 28 2009, 10:14 PM, said:

hmm looking at day 1-2 behavior of Driss, he voted for Omtose (following Ruse)
I voted for Omtose because he told us he was a killer. A bunch of us called him on it and he went quiet for a while.

then he voted Serc, based on the liosan case
Liosan makes very good cases

and then day 2 he went on giving Thyr flak supposing that Thyr thought Serc was his Creature, and was gonna vote him off then recruit him, wtf?
Pretty sure my reasoning was different, but no time to check now. Anyway, I put some pressure on Thyr (along with Ruse) and Thyr exploded in righteous indignation, had a right old tear up with Ruse so something must have hit the spot
going onto page 2 now...

day 2
Tennes makes an attempt of a case on Rashan, who has been trying to get a kesso train going.
so D'riss votes Tennes for lack of contribution and making 0 sense.

later switches to Fener, following the reveal.
then comes up with a weird "kesso is the necromancer" theory... while I entertained the possibility of Kesso being a recruited medium, that's just too far-fetched.
votes Fener in the end, no snags so far.
It was a weird theory on Kesso I admit, there was something fishy about him but I couldn't quite put my finger on the problem, hence my major fuck up in not using my BP that night.

Day 3
votes Tennes. again. admire the consistency.
then removes vote.
tehn he's gone for days 3, comes back day 4 to vote on another Liosan case.
Once again, Liosan makes good cases

then he's gone for a long time, nearly gets modslain, comes back and makes a case on me pushing HP to distract people from the Ano lynch
conveniently omitting that I posted the HP case during the night, and voted as soon as I came back to the thread from getting some sleep, as I have said I would (I don't vote and go to bed--either stay up till day timeout, or vote once I get up). but I digress
Conveniently, no, erroniously, more likely :p
Your sleeping patterns aren't really relevant imho,


suggests I revealed roled to get "inno cred". with all the reactions, we can see that THAT would have been a poor idea.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it? As it is, I can only post based on my perceptions of the game and the play of others.

and then he counter-reveals. and the thread degenerates

meh, not much to go on here, in terms of symp behaviour.
if I was told D'riss was a symp form looking at his posts, I'd say his master's either Rashan (for that attack on Tennes who placed a Rash vote on day 2--his ONLY vote, iirc, :) ) or Liosan, since D'riss seems to follow religiously on every train that Liosan votes on. gotta check the Fener train for that, but both on Serc and GL's trains, D'riss made sure to point out how good Liosan's cases were at convincing him. that COULD be a possible inexperienced symp clue. not saying it is, but if I was to look for D'riss masters, i'd look there.

ok, looked it up, Liosan voted Fener before D'riss, too

so here are my ruminations, lol
obviously it's hard to look for any connections since after the Kesso reveal, we lose most of the interaction between players that were not labelled as cultists. gonna make it much much harder to actually find scum.

Bold bits are my thoughts, dunno how to do red!

View PostMeanas, on Jan 28 2009, 10:48 PM, said:

That brings up an interesting question, Why did D'riss automatically think that you were lying. I mean if he had used up his BP over the weekend and there was no night kill last night then wouldn't D'riss have at least been hmmm you might be right. But no his first reaction was to say that you were lying scum and vote for you.

Also I think that one of the reasons that people aren't voting for anyone and that you don't have more votes Mockra is that with both you and D'riss revealing and most people suspecting one of you two as being either a symp or a Necro recruit we are trying to get you guys to give out as much information as possible before we lay down our vote.

To answer the first question, why did I think he was lying?
I had never even vaguely entertained the notion that there could be two witches in this game and that one could be a symp (and from some of the other reactions others had problems with this too). So as a result, when Mockra revealed as The witch (suggesting he also had no idea there could be two) I immediately shout "SCUM!", because I know I am The witch. Then as we see it all turns into a clusterfuck with no-one having a bloody clue as to roles in the game.

I neither ask for nor expect any quarter for being a n00b, but you should be able to understand my reasoning on this one. Two witches, WTF??!!
As for the second para, I'm here on and off all day, happy to answer questions.


View PostMeanas, on Jan 29 2009, 04:35 AM, said:

I am torn. I really feel that we shouldn't let Mockra and D'riss live due to shit that I have already gone over and am to tired to do again. :p

I don't really see the case for Ruse. I have been over his posts several times and I just didn't see something that jumped out at me. I did not like how D'riss countered and I find him to be the more suspicious of the two. But honestly I could go either way. I am going to bed and probably won't be back before the day runs out. So

Vote D'riss


Night all.

For why I countered, see above.

Really don't know what else I can say here, but I'll be around.... :p

#2097 User is offline   D'riss 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:15 AM

Bugger, forgot to add my vote.

If there are two witches, I don't believe both would be inno, I know I am inno so for me the best course of action is

Vote Mockra

#2098 User is offline   Liosan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:19 AM

ok, i am going to sit this one out, you two slug away.

As regards to driss and mockra, i want to leave them there as they are likely both roleless innocent. i have read over it a few times and see no benefit in either reveal, but it would be too easy for the killers to force our hand, that the longer we wait the more danger they pose. The possibility that one is a symp, or that one has been recruited will make leaving them to end game, impossible. Added to this we do have other players that are by their admission dangerous to leave around until the end, and as this list is growing rather than shrinking we are going to have to face up to it at some point.

Of the two i think mockra is the most likely symp, but the counter reveal by driss could be an opportunistic move to attempt to PI himself. If driss is lying he could have been recruited night 3 and is using his fake witch reveal to cover that fact, while if mockra is lying he must have been recruited last night so isn't a symp and is using a fake witch reveal to protect himself and his master.

There is no reason for a psycho symp to have revealed as the natural course of action must be to remove both players and having been one killer down, i doubt that team psycho have been highly active, one of the reasons i strongly suspected tennes.

I am leaning toward driss at the moment, i think he has more to gain from fake revealing and i was always a little dubious about someone using the witch bp as early as night 3. I would vote for mockra though, if it was the only possible lynch as despite what everyone says we will not be able to take these two until the end and keeping a possible symp around seems ludicrous without a valid killer suspect.

if i was to pinpoint a killer suspect, i have been suspicious of omtose and galain since the day 1 rp. galain drifted into the background after the emurlahn night kill as well so that moves him up the list. The only problem is there is so little to go off for many players. A few other players just seem to be coasting without making waves, and hp since his noob announcement has fallen off the radar. If people are innocent i do not understand why they are all being so quiet as our only ability for finding the scum is case making.

#2099 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:23 AM

View PostLiosan, on Jan 29 2009, 11:19 AM, said:

if i was to pinpoint a killer suspect, i have been suspicious of omtose and galain since the day 1 rp. galain drifted into the background after the emurlahn night kill as well so that moves him up the list. The only problem is there is so little to go off for many players. A few other players just seem to be coasting without making waves, and hp since his noob announcement has fallen off the radar. If people are innocent i do not understand why they are all being so quiet as our only ability for finding the scum is case making.



Woooaaw there. You cant say this without backing it up, thats "scummy".

:)

#2100 User is offline   D'riss 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 29 January 2009 - 11:25 AM

@Omtose and Ruse

Don't worry about me chaps, a bit of harsh language can often be amusing :)

Edit, changed Mockra to Ruse

This post has been edited by D'riss: 29 January 2009 - 11:26 AM


Share this topic:


  • 126 Pages +
  • « First
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users