[Kessobahn]

 Shadow, on Jan 22 2009, 07:45 PM, said:

@Kess. When do you get your message. during the night? or in the morning?

I get it when it's answered. So, when fener returns and decides what to say

[Kessobahn]

heh, what Omtose said

[Omtose]

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 07:49 PM, said:

heh, what Omtose said

Yeah, it was unavoidable that we'd agree when online at the same time.

[Shadow]

 Omtose, on Jan 22 2009, 10:43 AM, said:

 Shadow, on Jan 22 2009, 07:27 PM, said:

 Omtose, on Jan 22 2009, 09:59 AM, said:

Now, I could have typed all that and you could have essentially say the same: same blahblah we heard from everyone else. So I didn't, but I guess people prefer bleating about the obvious over silent agreement.

I am truly sorry I was unable to read between the lines of your silent agreement and infer from 1 sentence what it took you 3 paragraphs to write. My apologies. I will be sure to infer many things from what your don't say in the future. Cheers.

eta added "am"

 Kaschan, on Jan 22 2009, 07:33 PM, said:

L-1 I think.

@Omtose, calm down dear.

It's never good with you people, is it?

I made the statements (in the first post) as I made them from what was obvious to me. Now, you probably didn't think it was obvious, but hey, if you ask for clarification and throw in a WTF is that all you can come up with, don't act surprised/insulted if I then spell it out rather expansively - cause basically, these three paragraphs don't contain a thing you didn't know, and nothing you couldn't guess I would say, now do they?

Sorry for the WTF, uncalled for. But as soon as you start making arguments on what you guess people would say... well your argument is dead because they can always come back with "Well I never said that!" I prefer to have things written down and said out loud. That way there is much more for the person to answer too than "Well I'm pretty sure what you meant was this, so here's my argument" I guess I just like to go back and find inconsistencies and point them out. There's no loop holes if its written down (usually )



alright enought on that. back to the game.

This post has been edited by Shadow: 22 January 2009 - 06:50 PM

[Kaschan]

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 06:47 PM, said:

What are you talking about? It's quite amusing how you manage to read my post as saying that the CF is not important. But as they say, only the sith deals with absolutes and you are still my main suspect of being Fener's partner.

Lol, whatever. You just said the CF does not benefit the innos more than the scum, which is bullshit. The scum know who half the scum are. The rest of us don't know shit.

[Kessobahn]

 Omtose, on Jan 22 2009, 07:49 PM, said:

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 07:49 PM, said:

heh, what Omtose said

Yeah, it was unavoidable that we'd agree when online at the same time.

aye, it's inevitable. There is but one answer to this

[Kessobahn]

 Kaschan, on Jan 22 2009, 07:51 PM, said:

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 06:47 PM, said:

What are you talking about? It's quite amusing how you manage to read my post as saying that the CF is not important. But as they say, only the sith deals with absolutes and you are still my main suspect of being Fener's partner.

Lol, whatever. You just said the CF does not benefit the innos more than the scum, which is bullshit. The scum know who half the scum are. The rest of us don't know shit.

Well I disagree with you, but this still does not equal your statement earlier.

[Galayn Lord]

Ok seems Kesso was right about Fener then. I think il go back and check over Kaschan now see if I can see what makes you suspicious.

[Omtose]

 Shadow, on Jan 22 2009, 07:49 PM, said:

 Omtose, on Jan 22 2009, 10:43 AM, said:

 Shadow, on Jan 22 2009, 07:27 PM, said:

 Omtose, on Jan 22 2009, 09:59 AM, said:

Now, I could have typed all that and you could have essentially say the same: same blahblah we heard from everyone else. So I didn't, but I guess people prefer bleating about the obvious over silent agreement.

I am truly sorry I was unable to read between the lines of your silent agreement and infer from 1 sentence what it took you 3 paragraphs to write. My apologies. I will be sure to infer many things from what your don't say in the future. Cheers.

eta added "am"

 Kaschan, on Jan 22 2009, 07:33 PM, said:

L-1 I think.

@Omtose, calm down dear.

It's never good with you people, is it?

I made the statements (in the first post) as I made them from what was obvious to me. Now, you probably didn't think it was obvious, but hey, if you ask for clarification and throw in a WTF is that all you can come up with, don't act surprised/insulted if I then spell it out rather expansively - cause basically, these three paragraphs don't contain a thing you didn't know, and nothing you couldn't guess I would say, now do they?

Sorry for the WTF, uncalled for. But as soon as you start making arguments on what you guess people would say... well your argument is dead because they can always come back with "Well I never said that!" I prefer to have things written down and said out loud. That way there is much more for the person to answer too than "Well I'm pretty sure what you meant was this, so here's my argument" I guess I just like to go back and find inconsistencies and point them out. There's no loop holes if its written down (usually )



alright enought on that. back to the game.

fair enough, but you also know how people are fingered as 'just repeating the obvious' if they're number four saying it - and how that often is explained as laying low deliberately while seeming to be active, and how it's often used against them as well. So, basically, at some point, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[Kaschan]

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 06:52 PM, said:

Well I disagree with you, but this still does not equal your statement earlier.

Whatever.

[Omtose]

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 07:51 PM, said:

 Omtose, on Jan 22 2009, 07:49 PM, said:

 Kessobahn, on Jan 22 2009, 07:49 PM, said:

heh, what Omtose said

Yeah, it was unavoidable that we'd agree when online at the same time.

aye, it's inevitable. There is but one answer to this

:gaes-orfantal:

[Meanas]

 Path-Shaper, on Jan 22 2009, 07:40 PM, said:

It is day 2

20 players still playing, 11 votes to lynch, 10 votes for night

1 vote Galain (Fener)
1 vote Silanah (Shadow)
1 vote Tennes (Kaschan)
10 vote Fener (Kessobahn, Ruse, Galayn Lord, Liosan, Hood's Path, Meanas, D'riss, Mockra, Ampelas, Korlat)
1 vote Galayn Lord (Omtose)

6 have not voted: Anomandaris , Galain, Rashan, Silanah, Tennes, Thyrllan.
---

The day starts in turmoil. The death of a psychopath is celebrate by all, although you have this nagging feeling there should have been more people dying.

"I knew he was a killer", says Thyrllan smugly, "one of the 12 votes I made yesterday was for him".

After repeating this too many times, a heated fight starts involving him, D'riss and Ruse. If feels interminable, but after many attempts by other players to separate them they finally settle down.

"That made me hungry," says Ruse, taking out bags of dicks he seems to be keeping in his coat pockets
"I also have some ass munch" says Rashan, and passes it around.

A little later, Fener appears and points at Ruse.

"Yo, I think you and Galain have been shagging in that corner over there".

The remark is not well taken, as many wonder what kind of person walks around putting his nose in other people's briefs.
Suddenly, the voice of Kessobahn fills the room
"Ooooooh, I am a Medium. Emurlahn, I feel your presence. Who did you try to kill last night?"
…
"Well, that leaves Fener I guess. That's it, that confirms my suspicions. Fener is a Necromancer and he raised himself from the dead!"

"Necromancers can do that?" asks Ruse "Them's bad mofos!"

Others decide that it kind of makes sense, and start mobbing poor Fener. The already stiff body of Serc is brought down and quickly discarded.

Good thing you brought a tough rope…

Fener (morgoth45) has been lynched. He was undead.


It is now NIGHT. Please send/confirm your night actions if any

Ok well that was a good lynch. Looks like Kesso was right. That still doesn't make him a CI cause of the whole he could be recruited thing or a Necro sacrificing his new recruit to get CIed. The last one is highly doubtful especially as no one else has came forward to counter reveal. So now we wait for morning. Hopefully those of you with night actions have either sent in provisionals or are on and sending in your actions now.

[Ampelas]

Sorry, got called away from my PC again, have had a million things to do this evening.

I see Fener was undead. That means he could have been necro, recruit or killer right? I suppose one of those dancing banana things is probably in order either way.

I suppose that we should be able to decide who the double voter is in the next day or two - It's possible one's a symp I suppose, but I wouldnt take it as an absolute fact. Someone mentioned that innos have a finder that negates the need of a CF - does anyone think it's possible there might be a finder symp to offset the chance of losing the CF? It's a crazy idea but I thought I would put it out there.

Also, I would like to hear Kesso's suggestion as to how to deal with the fact that he will in all likelyhood be recruited tonight. He obviously wouldnt get one of his master lynched today, so I'm assuming he's still inno - tomorrow might be a completely different story, so I'd like his opinions while we can trust he is still inno.

That's pretty much all I can think of at the moment. I'm bushed and still need to study for a crappy test tomorrow, so I'm gonna say goodnight. Edit - didnt think he could have killed his recruit... Hmm, this is getting sticky. Anyway, goodnight again.

This post has been edited by Ampelas: 22 January 2009 - 07:06 PM

[Mockra]

hmm

well, good job Kess, I guess

though i am unconvinced you didn't just out one of your recruits to ensure we'd all think you're legit

[Meanas]

 Mockra, on Jan 22 2009, 08:03 PM, said:

hmm

well, good job Kess, I guess

though i am unconvinced you didn't just out one of your recruits to ensure we'd all think you're legit

You might if you had more then one recruit last night. If they had two and a case had been made on you that people were starting to agree with then yeah a gutsy scum might try it. If he could pull it off then what a good move. Something that JA would try.


Edit: Also he didn't kill him, just sacrificed him to CI his own skin. It would be a risky move but if pulled off then what a move. Of course I don't really think that he did that. The chances of a counter reveal would be to high. Yeah for WIFOM.

This post has been edited by Meanas: 22 January 2009 - 07:11 PM

[Shadow]

 Mockra, on Jan 22 2009, 11:03 AM, said:

hmm

well, good job Kess, I guess

though i am unconvinced you didn't just out one of your recruits to ensure we'd all think you're legit

He could have done that. But if he is alive after tonight...there is no way anyone will trust him. He would basically be taking all the pressure off of the Killer team and putting it on his own. While it definately is a possibility, I don't think it is likely. The risk/reward just isn't there.

[Shadow]

 Meanas, on Jan 22 2009, 11:09 AM, said:

 Mockra, on Jan 22 2009, 08:03 PM, said:

hmm

well, good job Kess, I guess

though i am unconvinced you didn't just out one of your recruits to ensure we'd all think you're legit

You might if you had more then one recruit last night. If they had two and a case had been made on you that people were starting to agree with then yeah a gutsy scum might try it. If he could pull it off then what a good move. Something that JA would try.


Edit: Also he didn't kill him, just sacrificed him to CI his own skin. It would be a risky move but if pulled off then what a move. Of course I don't really think that he did that. The chances of a counter reveal would be to high. Yeah for WIFOM.

And he's only CI'd for a 12hr night. Well, not even CI, but VPI. If he's Necro, I don't see the benifit.

[Shadow]

@Omtose- Following up on your suspicions of GL. Do you think killer or Necro or "unknown but scum"?

[Anomandaris]

The other point is that it doesn't CI him as far as I'm concerned. Now that he has revealed as RI, he moves to the top of the list of players most likely to get NKed/Necro Recruited. I'm not going to be taking him completely at his word from now on, that's for sure.

EDIT: Crosspost with Shadow x3.

This post has been edited by Anomandaris: 22 January 2009 - 07:26 PM

[Mockra]

hmm
i'd like a psychic to take a look at him, tbh.
that way we'd know for sure.