[Shadow]

well, it seems everyone's been on since morning, and we all seem equally lost, lovely.

I'm guessing, since there's no CF, we might have finders but since they can't reveal, well, I find it difficult to imagine how they'd be able to convey their findings.

[D'riss]

Dunno, make cases?

Anyhow, ive g2g now.

This post has been edited by D'riss: 17 December 2008 - 09:52 PM

[Mockra]

Shadow, can you please point me to your case on Korlat?

[Shadow]

it wasn't a case, tbh--not a proper one.
it's paragrahp 2 of my rant in post 383

I'll look for actual quotes now.

this

Korlat, on Dec 15 2008, 10:59 AM, said:

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

no offense...


but


ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


no offense but really...



AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH


shortest game of mafia ever , you poor bastard, shadow.

someone playing has a twisted sense of humour.

and, his next post, some 6 hours later.

Korlat, on Dec 15 2008, 04:14 PM, said:

actually it was a joke, but when pathshaper put them up i decided to leave, them, i have a perverse idea that if we do vote for ja, something mad will happen

as for the shadow - did i mention - ahahahahhahahahahah

cause despite all the grumbles, getting day vigged or modkilled after 3 hours is very funny.

how are we supposed to know what we are looking for? if we are looking for scum, god knows. we have ages yet, maybe something will be visible tomorrow.

now, I obviously know this isn't strong, but the fact that he was the ONLY one who expressed any amusement, not to mention how VOCALLY he expressed it, it just strikes me as something a killer would do, calling attention towhat he did, while trying to stay out of the spotlight at the same time.

it's weak, and it's biased, but that's the kind of vibe i'm getting from Korlat.

[Korlat]

actually i am just a bit of a cunt

as for tennes, vote hoping??? weird play.

[Shadow]

Korlat, on Dec 17 2008, 05:12 PM, said:

actually i am just a bit of a cunt

as for tennes, vote hoping??? weird play.

sure, you WOULD say that now,

but otoh hand, Tennes doesn't trust anyone that hasn't died. by that logic, I'm the only trustworthy one here. Could he be symping me?

*wait, was that out loud?*

I mean, what?

anyhow, since Tennes doesnt' find himself trustworthy, i would have no problem lynching him.

[Shadow]

Korlat, on Dec 17 2008, 05:12 PM, said:

actually i am just a bit of a cunt

as for tennes, vote hoping??? weird play.

sure, you WOULD say that now,

but otoh hand, Tennes doesn't trust anyone that hasn't died. by that logic, I'm the only trustworthy one here. Could he be symping me?

*wait, was that out loud?*

I mean, what?

anyhow, since Tennes doesnt' find himself trustworthy, i would have no problem lynching him.

ETA: lousy touchpad, maing a double-click.... mods, delete, plz?

This post has been edited by Shadow: 17 December 2008 - 10:25 PM

[Korlat]

well mostly other people say it about me

but i don't understand tennes gameplan one bit, he has decided because players died that is a justifiable reason to lynch them?? And switches vote. Not sure if thats scummy, but then given how many night kills there were i have a feeling this is just a survivalist game with shitloads of vigs, guards, and healers all dookin it out to last longest.

anyway going to bed, be like 9 hours before i am back, will drop my vote now, in case people want to push on, because i honestly cant see any way we can have a strategy in this game other than lynch, and frankly given that in a 36 hour day we had two day kills, perhaps waiting isnt recommended.

vote tennes

[Shadow]

well that's 3 on Tennes already

I von't switch just yet, because thatt will just let someone hammer and it's too early for that I feel

Ruse, Rashan, Omtose, any thoughts on this?

[Rashan]

I have no problem lynching Tennes, his vote hasn't exactly been helpful to us. And the fact that he actually thought it was a good vote speaks volumes.

I'll be around for another half hour or so.

[Tennes]

Shadow, on Dec 17 2008, 10:24 PM, said:

Korlat, on Dec 17 2008, 05:12 PM, said:

actually i am just a bit of a cunt

as for tennes, vote hoping??? weird play.

sure, you WOULD say that now,

but otoh hand, Tennes doesn't trust anyone that hasn't died. by that logic, I'm the only trustworthy one here. Could he be symping me?

*wait, was that out loud?*

I mean, what?

anyhow, since Tennes doesnt' find himself trustworthy, i would have no problem lynching him.

Korlat, on Dec 17 2008, 11:05 PM, said:

well mostly other people say it about me

but i don't understand tennes gameplan one bit, he has decided because players died that is a justifiable reason to lynch them?? And switches vote. Not sure if thats scummy, but then given how many night kills there were i have a feeling this is just a survivalist game with shitloads of vigs, guards, and healers all dookin it out to last longest.

anyway going to bed, be like 9 hours before i am back, will drop my vote now, in case people want to push on, because i honestly cant see any way we can have a strategy in this game other than lynch, and frankly given that in a 36 hour day we had two day kills, perhaps waiting isnt recommended.

vote tennes

Right. Just one more post before bed.
-Killers-
the goal of the innos is to elimanate all killers, yes?
But they can only do that by lynching.

-Innos-
Can be killed at LEAST once per night and can have their votes misdirected easily enough by the killers.
Lose if they all die.

This IS a town vs scum game, aye?

You are assuming that the revivals in this game are triggered by a REVIVER role. If so, then yes, I am completely wrong, however, I think its more likely that it is a mechanic responsible, as it could only really be a mechanic that killed Shadow in the first place.


It would be just a weensy bit unfair if the killers could be resurrected. In fact, as they already have the advantage, it would make the game unbalanced. And I don't think Bent would have that

Now, roles can change, according to the rules.

What are the possibilities that a revival doesn't trigger a role-change? I suspect that is unlikely

Unless we have killlers that change every day, for the present, I am cosidering Shadow RI.

I will not remove my vote on Mockra because his jokey attempt at WIFOM/OMGUS is a typical experienced killer move, making light of any pressure placed upon him.

Feel free to lynch me if you wish, however, but with the amount of kills we get a night, its on your head if we lose.

Oh, and lastly I switched vote because I feel that Mockra is making too much of an effort to be helpful and post cases, when we don't even really know what we're going by. I'm simply assuming by the number of nks that there is at least one killer.

I originally voted Ruse because I have limitted time, and looked over his posts, and viewed them the scummiest of the few people I'd seen.

My apologies for that.

Yours with sincerity, Tennes.

[Shadow]

im valianly combatting sleep right now, dunno how much longer I'll last though
i'l wait for Ruse to do his re-read and submit his findings, afterwrds, if nothing new comes up, i'll switch to Tennes.

[Tennes]

Oh, and also, I have used myself as a target by posting a vote the way I originally did. It makes me an easy vote. But I've been playing a quiet game for that exact purpose.

As the killers have no CF, I suspect there will be at least one FM in the first few on my train. They can play like symps, after all, as they have nothing that gives them away.

If I am lynched, take pains to look at them very carefully.

[Tennes]

Mockra, on Dec 17 2008, 04:46 PM, said:

Reading Silanah was not fun....

Whoever killed him has my thanks.
He spent forever discussing day kills and decided it was all wifom then exploded on us for the 'JA' lynch.

Mockra, on Dec 17 2008, 04:55 PM, said:

Besides symping a little Korlat, I see nothing to get Kess killed.

So either I am missing something or these deaths were mostly random.... either way I am sick and tired of looking at the dead.

Vote: D'riss

Because I want you to get your ass in here and say something....

Mockra, on Dec 17 2008, 05:07 PM, said:

SUMMONING COMPLETE
Remove vote


Good to see you, but now I have to leave for about an hour at least..... sorry

Mockra, on Dec 17 2008, 09:11 PM, said:

Omtose, on Dec 17 2008, 11:06 PM, said:

@ mokra oh right sorry then, I saw the "if only i could find this omtose fellow" and thought the second bit was about me.

Sorry about that, I should have put a smiley or something to show that first bit was a joke.

As for what we are supposed to do, I am lost, which makes me think this is another of those Pompei/lost type games.
Which is somewhat annoying, with the dead not staying dead and all. Honestly though, I would lynch Tennes, not just out of OMGUS, but because his posts are a big pile of nothing.

Mockra, on Dec 17 2008, 09:52 PM, said:

Shadow, can you please point me to your case on Korlat?

All of Mockra's most recent posts.

"Whoever killed him has my thanks?" Nice subtle clearing, there. And a very Inno way of thinking.

One vote on D'riss for pressure, and then calling all the kills WIFOM. And he calls my posts a big load of nothing. He sounds like he's been reading the "How To Act Innocent Handbook- For FM".

Next post is pointless and really just fluffing his previous post.

"Not just out of OMGUS" OMGUS is NEVER a reason to vote someone. Not even part opf a reason.

Again, I explained previously why my posts were devoid of content. Tactics, I suppose you could call it. Also he debates roles in a very pointless manner. Really just spam under the guise of role-discussion.

"Can you please..." A nice polite question asking.

Scum ask questions.

Its a fact. Look helpful, look understandable, and people will not feel like lynching you.

I may be making enemies here, but what can I say.


From Tennes with love...

[Rashan]

Tennes, on Dec 18 2008, 01:00 AM, said:

Right. Just one more post before bed.
-Killers-
the goal of the innos is to elimanate all killers, yes?
But they can only do that by lynching.

-Innos-
Can be killed at LEAST once per night and can have their votes misdirected easily enough by the killers.
Lose if they all die.

This IS a town vs scum game, aye?

You are assuming that the revivals in this game are triggered by a REVIVER role. If so, then yes, I am completely wrong, however, I think its more likely that it is a mechanic responsible, as it could only really be a mechanic that killed Shadow in the first place.


It would be just a weensy bit unfair if the killers could be resurrected. In fact, as they already have the advantage, it would make the game unbalanced. And I don't think Bent would have that

Now, roles can change, according to the rules.

What are the possibilities that a revival doesn't trigger a role-change? I suspect that is unlikely

Unless we have killlers that change every day, for the present, I am cosidering Shadow RI.

I will not remove my vote on Mockra because his jokey attempt at WIFOM/OMGUS is a typical experienced killer move, making light of any pressure placed upon him.

Feel free to lynch me if you wish, however, but with the amount of kills we get a night, its on your head if we lose.

Oh, and lastly I switched vote because I feel that Mockra is making too much of an effort to be helpful and post cases, when we don't even really know what we're going by. I'm simply assuming by the number of nks that there is at least one killer.

I originally voted Ruse because I have limitted time, and looked over his posts, and viewed them the scummiest of the few people I'd seen.

My apologies for that.

Yours with sincerity, Tennes.

Your post reeks, Tennes. I bolded the parts I found weird. A threat and a lame excuse that I don't buy.

vote Tennes

Edit: actually, there's probably more I could pull out, but I'm too tired.
Edit: cross post!

This post has been edited by Rashan: 18 December 2008 - 12:21 AM

[Shadow]

interesting
intentionally leaving yourself wide open for training? gutsy claim, to say the least.

i'd like to hear what others say about it...

[Shadow]

oh, crap, seems there was a cross-post and a mini case that i've missed.. gah, I need sum sleep soonish

[Shadow]

Rash, can I ask you to remove your vote before you leave, I don't want Tennes ahmmered just yet, we still ahve time and he's willing to give content, I'd liek to hear waht he has to say.

[Rashan]

Ah, that could be an after construction by a scum too, Shadow. Just the kind of thing a scum would pull to try to save his ass. But yes, it's interesting.



Edit: cross post - yeah, but it's wifom.

This post has been edited by Rashan: 18 December 2008 - 12:25 AM

[Rashan]

Wth, discussion is always good. I can try to stay a bit longer.

remove vote