Help
Mockra, on Dec 11 2008, 11:11 AM, said:
Emurlahn, on Dec 10 2008, 02:07 PM, said:
D'riss, on Dec 10 2008, 02:48 PM, said:
Oh, interesting.
Well, we can see it this way: out of the two (Emur, Mockra), right now, one of them is good roled and one of them is evil roled. Lynching them both guarantees we kill a scum, and a good role.
But since Slimer is a guard and there was a kill, then neither of them is the missing killer, so maybe we can let them both be for now and focus on the missing killer?
Well, we can see it this way: out of the two (Emur, Mockra), right now, one of them is good roled and one of them is evil roled. Lynching them both guarantees we kill a scum, and a good role.
But since Slimer is a guard and there was a kill, then neither of them is the missing killer, so maybe we can let them both be for now and focus on the missing killer?
Well, I think one reason why Mockra doesn't want me to reveal, is because my night action worked last night. So, ladies and gents, we have ourselves a liar.
My role is both trivial and not trivial. It's not trivial once I understand exactly what it does, but it is trivial up until then. I think if I reveal, the killer probably can't ignore me, so I'd buy the GB another day.
1) you claima finder is a trivial role.
Emurlahn, on Dec 10 2008, 02:34 PM, said:
Oki, I'm Peck, from the US Environmental protection agency, send to investigate the crisis.
Yes, that's right, I'm the little bastard who got the GB arrested and was then referred to as Dickless by one of the GB (had a youtube moment there), but I'm a Goodie none the less(and even if you refuse to believe that, the fact that I'm human means I don't have to be eliminated). I'm a Finder.
You spot the trouble, neh?
Peck was adamant in refusing to acknowledge ghosts and the need for the GB to be around and fighting them.
So, maybe I am an insane finder, but if so, who do I identify as what? There are 3 categories I think: normal human beings, paranormals, and GBs.
If insane, I'll spot GBs as bad guys, but that still leaves the ghosts, that I refuse to believe in...
Last night, I seized the opportunity to investigate a known RI (so VPI) and see how they came up, so I investigated HP.
He came up as 'not being involved in unpleasantries'.
That's all I wish to say for now. I'll also say that I have a person who gave a 'was causing problems' result.
EDIT: to paraphrase and not get suck into clause B7
Yes, that's right, I'm the little bastard who got the GB arrested and was then referred to as Dickless by one of the GB (had a youtube moment there), but I'm a Goodie none the less(and even if you refuse to believe that, the fact that I'm human means I don't have to be eliminated). I'm a Finder.
You spot the trouble, neh?
Peck was adamant in refusing to acknowledge ghosts and the need for the GB to be around and fighting them.
So, maybe I am an insane finder, but if so, who do I identify as what? There are 3 categories I think: normal human beings, paranormals, and GBs.
If insane, I'll spot GBs as bad guys, but that still leaves the ghosts, that I refuse to believe in...
Last night, I seized the opportunity to investigate a known RI (so VPI) and see how they came up, so I investigated HP.
He came up as 'not being involved in unpleasantries'.
That's all I wish to say for now. I'll also say that I have a person who gave a 'was causing problems' result.
EDIT: to paraphrase and not get suck into clause B7
you claim finder but at the same time you say you may be insane, people arent told they are insane finders what would be the point you just look at the opposite of what you got. this is such bullshit reveal. Oh peck was adamant he didnt believe in ghosts?? 2) is that what it says in your pm or are you just guessing here emurlahn? 3) Yet investigating a RI comes up not being involved, and let me guess korlat wa causign problems???
Emurlahn, on Dec 10 2008, 08:01 PM, said:
D'riss, on Dec 10 2008, 04:53 PM, said:
Haha reading the double-post heavy is funny. 
Emur, I get your point, in which case please keep your "involved" find secret.
I found you suspect with your attitude during Gozer's lynch yesterday, and that hasn't changed that much. Why did you reveal so quickly? We were still discussing things, you didn't even have a vote on you.
For someone that claims finder, which is quite of a role, I find this... unnatural. And until now, both Gamelon's and Kaschan's plays which I found unnatural turned out to be scummy.
Hmm.
Still, I believe you're Pecker, even though I'm not convinced you're playing purely for town. In any case, that makes you not killer.
Should we look somewhere else, then, Rashan, or Korlat, for example?
Emur, I get your point, in which case please keep your "involved" find secret.
I found you suspect with your attitude during Gozer's lynch yesterday, and that hasn't changed that much. Why did you reveal so quickly? We were still discussing things, you didn't even have a vote on you.
For someone that claims finder, which is quite of a role, I find this... unnatural. And until now, both Gamelon's and Kaschan's plays which I found unnatural turned out to be scummy.
Hmm.
Still, I believe you're Pecker, even though I'm not convinced you're playing purely for town. In any case, that makes you not killer.
Should we look somewhere else, then, Rashan, or Korlat, for example?
I revealed for 4 reasons.
1) to let people know there's a finder, but with a 'less than crystal clear' result. We have a large crowd of claimed RIs around who all identified each other, but we had no way to thin out the remaining group, aside from elemination by lynch. I now offer a less than perfect alternative.
Sure, I can be NKed, in which case, well, the GB isn't killed.
2) to gauge reactions and see who says what in response to a finder reveal.
3) to counter Mockra's claim he guarded me, when somehow, he didn't. I judged that valuable info, seeing how's an important fixture of the game right now, and has been since his reveal.
4) seeing how I had a non-inno find, that person now knows I'm watching (out for) him, and that may lead to a slightly different playstyle that may provide clues in and off itself. Also, if I reveal who I did finds on, and with which results, I can probably speed up play a bit and have us less stumbling around.
Lastly, I'm not sure what the day-kill means, and whether the killer planned it all along, but it looks to me like he wants to make haste with his killings, seeing how we're catapulted into night when there was heat on Rashan and there was a finder reveal. Right now, I'm having the fingers of one hand crossed that the killer is getting nervous, and the other into a warding sign against impending death
Altho, as Peck, I should say that it probably is a lightshow only
so you have a non inno find but you dont reveal it yet you hinted on it and thread.
so your reveal is as finder.
you say you got an inno result on a known inno.
4) you say you got a guilty but dont reveal it.
Korlat, on Dec 10 2008, 08:34 PM, said:
Actually cancel my provisional. If Emurlahn is telling the truth we need him alive.
So:
Heal Emurlahn
Even if he thinks I am scum, if he is our finder, we need him around, I just hope I am not making a big mistake.
~Winston out.
So:
Heal Emurlahn
Even if he thinks I am scum, if he is our finder, we need him around, I just hope I am not making a big mistake.
~Winston out.
then we have our fake gb claim. admitted fake as well.
Emurlahn, on Dec 10 2008, 08:36 PM, said:
Omtose, on Dec 10 2008, 09:29 PM, said:
Wondering why the scum did not kill the 'finder' in the day kill? Obviously the only guaranteed kill they will get? Why an unknown like ruse? I find that strange.
He may hope I vpi him. It's not going to take a genius to realize that my find is going to be on either Korlat, D'riss, Tennes or Rashan, as they are the unknowns and the killer is hiding amongst them. It also does not take a real good reader to realize that at least 1 previous find might be on one amongst them, as HP was the first certified RI I targeted. The question is: do I or do I not recognize ghosts, and if I don't, are they recognized as inno's?
Say, for example, that I have a result on the killer as an inno because I'm unable to recognize ghosts, and I reveal that. He would NK me then, for I have served my purpose and given him what he wants to hear.
why would the killer hope you vpi him, you have cleared a roleless inno and said you have a guilty result? well where is it? cause if its korlat he has since admitted to NOT being a ghost buster.
Emurlahn, on Dec 11 2008, 07:08 AM, said:
Didn't receive a result for my night action, so I'm quite curious as to what Mockra has to say.
With the Gatekeeper, the big evil overlord and Mockra still alive, it's now high tide for us, guys. If Mockra blocked me yesterday, he may be evil due to that, whatever he did this night, he didn't block the killer, so he is evil.
I'd say that the best course of action, to buy ourselves another day, is to lynch Mockra, seeing how he is likely evil and a supernatural.
Vote Mockra.
With the Gatekeeper, the big evil overlord and Mockra still alive, it's now high tide for us, guys. If Mockra blocked me yesterday, he may be evil due to that, whatever he did this night, he didn't block the killer, so he is evil.
I'd say that the best course of action, to buy ourselves another day, is to lynch Mockra, seeing how he is likely evil and a supernatural.
Vote Mockra.
i didnt block you, i blocked korlat so your lying when you say you were blocked. So i didnt block the killer and i am evil, thats smart that is, cause theres only a killer left?
Emurlahn, on Dec 11 2008, 07:59 AM, said:
I inquired at P-S. My investigation yielded no results. So, either guarded, or my target was a ghost.
Remove vote for now.
I can say straightaway: I investigated Tennes, since I already had a result for Korlat.
Remove vote for now.
I can say straightaway: I investigated Tennes, since I already had a result for Korlat.
And now you infer again, does your pm tell you what result you will get? cause surely if you investigated me, a giant blob of ectoplasm you would hardly go, well theres nothing really there then si there. and here he says he already has a result for korlat, yet hes voting me so its obvious he is tryign to clear you.
1) I claim a finder who doesn't understand whether he is insane or not is dangerous to his own team and should thus not be relied on as one would on a straight finder. The speculation whether or not I am insane is indeed my own and based on the behaviour of everything I could find about Peck.
2) see above
3) see above
4) because he might be a GB, as Peck got them arrested.
