[Tennes]

je ne l'aime pas = I don't like it

FYI

[Shadow]

Tennes, on Nov 24 2008, 11:08 AM, said:

je ne l'aime pas = I don't like it

FYI

kewl, I learned spanish!

[Tennes]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 04:09 PM, said:

Tennes, on Nov 24 2008, 11:08 AM, said:

je ne l'aime pas = I don't like it

FYI

kewl, I learned spanish!

That there be French, my friend .

[Rashan]

Tennes, on Nov 24 2008, 04:07 PM, said:

Shadow said:

Its day one, theres always spam early day one. Its been noted and now corrected. At least I have. And I think Rash has as well. Yet we still have 2 votes each. THAT is fishy.

Rashan has a vote from me because he posted 7th after me despite my warning that I would vote for whoever did that. I disliked his method (see above) so my vote stays on him until he convinces me otherwise or someone more suspicious comes along.

Then Sil voted for him because of that spate of aggression back there, so it's not really all that suspicious that he has two votes on him.

Not sure why there are two votes on you though Shadow - you're responses etc. seems reasonable and measured to me...

I won't lie, I simply didn't bother paying attention to the post order.
Edit: thanks for the translation, Tennes.

This post has been edited by Rashan: 24 November 2008 - 04:11 PM

[Shadow]

Im gonna do a re-read, back in a minute.

[Shadow]

Vote Silanah

case coming next

[Anomandaris]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:07 PM, said:

and Mandy has a vote on me "to get the game moving". Anyone else think this is a bad thing? 2 joke votes left on. hmmmmm.

My vote isn't a joke vote. You were spamming. And Rashan jumping to your defence makes it stick. Also I am not discounting the possibility that Sil's aggressiveness is distancing. My vote stays for now.

[Anomandaris]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:22 PM, said:

Vote Silanah

case coming next

Oh look, a counter distancing.

[Rashan]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 01:56 PM, said:

Hey, I thought it would be more than ~60 posts by now. Hopefully this won't be one of these games that drags on and on.

Ano displays possible knowledge of former games.

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:17 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 09:08 AM, said:

So Mandy, any thoughts thus far, or are you gonna play it safe and not commit to the game so early?

Lots of random stuff going on. I'd rather everyone got on at least once before I voice opinions. But I can speculate. People that post once and then goes off is much more likely to be a killer than the ones staying on thread. Correct, no?

Ano asks an obvious question despite seeming to at least have playing in one or two games before

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:25 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 09:20 AM, said:

Ano, generally yes. It's safer to play as a killer if you don't post much, and let your symps do more posting and thus more attention grabbing. However, it's possible for killers to spam, as seen in 32, where both methods are visible, with JA the loud, dominant symp, Lish the annoying spam-bot, and Mocker the quiet one.

Edit: changed 31 to 32.

Ah yes. I propose we lynch spammers. Fast.

Joking around in response to my spam.

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:49 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 09:37 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:37 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 09:33 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 09:30 AM, said:

Wonderful, that's settled then, we look carefully at spammers and non vocal players.

Don't forget the mid range posters, the ones that aren't helpful at all, and the ones that are too helpful. That should just about cover it.

I regard those players as spammers too, although not as obvious. But yeah.

So, the only ones who don't spam are the lurkers who are also equally likely to be killers?

To make it simpler you could say that. I know, I know, it's never that easy.

Joking around.

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:06 PM, said:

vote Shadow

for spamming. And to get things going until everybody is on.

Suspicious vote which i confront.

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:25 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:21 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:20 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:19 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:18 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:16 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:14 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:08 AM, said:

And Ano, Shadow for spamming!? Really?

Why, anything wrong with that? You want me to change to you?

Well, logically it would make more sense

Why? Not that I didn't consider it.

I have the higher ground. I mean, post count.

I could have gone for either one of you. So, you want me to change to you?

Whatever floats your boat
I was just curious as to why you voted Shadow over the guy who has spammed more. Distancing?

Hah, now you convinced me that your sympish looks might not just be my imagination.

Avoiding my question completely.

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:43 PM, said:

Also, Sil is indeed being aggressive. Don't think I'm not taking note on that.

Empty threat.


So, what do you all think.
Ano is avoiding really getting committed, and hasn't removed his "joke vote" on Shadow despite having two other possible suspects.

Edit: Sorry, that was a massive crosspost. I quoted pretty much all of his posts, the ones that aren't there are more joke posts in response to my spam, usually, but I had to remove the owing to IPB's quote limit.

This post has been edited by Rashan: 24 November 2008 - 04:29 PM

[Shadow]

Silanah, on Nov 24 2008, 10:21 AM, said:

surely rashan is the worse for spamming? Constant symp WIFOM as well.

vote rashan

You are trying too hard to appear as a hyper active inno, bored and making jokes. You over react to everything, not even votes, just everything, and your gonna post more in the first morning than most people post in an entire game.

Read all of Sil's post's and tell me that he wasn't spamming the shit out of the game, over reacting and making jokes. Up until this post, Sil hadn't said a single thing. I even asked before this why Sil got defensive when no one had even voted for him. And then he accused Rashan of the exact things he was doing. After this post it became a hard push on Rash, and over serious.

[Rashan]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:22 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:07 PM, said:

and Mandy has a vote on me "to get the game moving". Anyone else think this is a bad thing? 2 joke votes left on. hmmmmm.

My vote isn't a joke vote. You were spamming. And Rashan jumping to your defence makes it stick. Also I am not discounting the possibility that Sil's aggressiveness is distancing. My vote stays for now.

Aggressive, aggressive. And your vote was a joke vote. I have posted it above. No case whatsoever.

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:24 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:22 PM, said:

Vote Silanah

case coming next

Oh look, a counter distancing.

Counter-distancing? What are you at?

If your problem is spamming, surely I'm a better target, as I said. So why vote Shadow constantly? And also, WIFOM away, but valid point: its fairly suicidal to defend anyone in Mafia, you know.

Edit: unless you have a genuine case on their attacker. See above.

This post has been edited by Rashan: 24 November 2008 - 04:34 PM

[Shadow]

Ha! That doesn't look suspicious in the least, me building a case on Sil who voted for Rash, and Rash making a case on Mandy, who has a vote on me. Looks like were goners Rash! lol.

[Shadow]

Fener is not invisible, lets see what he thinks.

[Rashan]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 04:34 PM, said:

Ha! That doesn't look suspicious in the least, me building a case on Sil who voted for Rash, and Rash making a case on Mandy, who has a vote on me. Looks like were goners Rash! lol.

I started building my case before you even posted your re-read post, old boy. Unfortunatly I had to delete a good half of all my quotes, which is why there was a massive crosspost.
Oh well.

[Anomandaris]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 01:56 PM, said:

Hey, I thought it would be more than ~60 posts by now. Hopefully this won't be one of these games that drags on and on.

Ano displays possible knowledge of former games.

What's you point?

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:17 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 09:08 AM, said:

So Mandy, any thoughts thus far, or are you gonna play it safe and not commit to the game so early?

Lots of random stuff going on. I'd rather everyone got on at least once before I voice opinions. But I can speculate. People that post once and then goes off is much more likely to be a killer than the ones staying on thread. Correct, no?

Ano asks an obvious question despite seeming to at least have playing in one or two games before

Again, what's your point?

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:25 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 09:20 AM, said:

Ano, generally yes. It's safer to play as a killer if you don't post much, and let your symps do more posting and thus more attention grabbing. However, it's possible for killers to spam, as seen in 32, where both methods are visible, with JA the loud, dominant symp, Lish the annoying spam-bot, and Mocker the quiet one.

Edit: changed 31 to 32.

Ah yes. I propose we lynch spammers. Fast.

Joking around in response to my spam.

I was being deadly serious. No joke there.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:49 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 09:37 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 02:37 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 09:33 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 09:30 AM, said:

Wonderful, that's settled then, we look carefully at spammers and non vocal players.

Don't forget the mid range posters, the ones that aren't helpful at all, and the ones that are too helpful. That should just about cover it.

I regard those players as spammers too, although not as obvious. But yeah.

So, the only ones who don't spam are the lurkers who are also equally likely to be killers?

To make it simpler you could say that. I know, I know, it's never that easy.

Joking around.

Again, no fucking joke.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:06 PM, said:

vote Shadow

for spamming. And to get things going until everybody is on.

Suspicious vote which i confront.

It's a perfectly good day 1 vote and you know it. What happens after that confirms it.

---

...to be continued, I have to split up the post, since there's too many quote tags.

[Anomandaris]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:25 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:21 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:20 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:19 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:18 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:16 AM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:14 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:08 AM, said:

And Ano, Shadow for spamming!? Really?

Why, anything wrong with that? You want me to change to you? wink.gif

Well, logically it would make more sense

Why? Not that I didn't consider it.

I have the higher ground. I mean, post count.

I could have gone for either one of you. So, you want me to change to you?

Whatever floats your boat tongue.gif
I was just curious as to why you voted Shadow over the guy who has spammed more. Distancing?

Hah, now you convinced me that your sympish looks might not just be my imagination.

Avoiding my question completely.

I was ignoring it because it was so obvious you were trying to deflect. You reaction confirms my vote is correct.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 03:43 PM, said:

Also, Sil is indeed being aggressive. Don't think I'm not taking note on that.

Empty threat.

No, I am taking note on it, I think it's possible Sil is distancing too.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:28 PM, said:

So, what do you all think.
Ano is avoiding really getting committed, and hasn't removed his "joke vote" on Shadow despite having two other possible suspects.

Edit: Sorry, that was a massive crosspost. I quoted pretty much all of his posts, the ones that aren't there are more joke posts in response to my spam, usually, but I had to remove the owing to IPB's quote limit.

It was no joke vote.

[Rashan]

Why ask an obvious question if you've played the game before? Christ, it's like playing the n00b card.
Genuinely, change your vote to me Ano. If I get speed lynched, well, my CF will have you under a lot of pressure, I hope.
So, what exactly did you mean by saying spammers are mid-level and high-level posters? Are you saying the only normal way to play is to lurk? You also say let's get rid of spammers and low posters. And then you vote for the SECOND highest spammer. Not even the highest. I don't get that, Ano.

[Anomandaris]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:33 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:22 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:07 PM, said:

and Mandy has a vote on me "to get the game moving". Anyone else think this is a bad thing? 2 joke votes left on. hmmmmm.

My vote isn't a joke vote. You were spamming. And Rashan jumping to your defence makes it stick. Also I am not discounting the possibility that Sil's aggressiveness is distancing. My vote stays for now.

Aggressive, aggressive. And your vote was a joke vote. I have posted it above. No case whatsoever.

No I was not joking. Spamming is a good day 1 case.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:33 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:24 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:22 PM, said:

Vote Silanah

case coming next

Oh look, a counter distancing.

Counter-distancing? What are you at?

If your problem is spamming, surely I'm a better target, as I said. So why vote Shadow constantly? And also, WIFOM away, but valid point: its fairly suicidal to defend anyone in Mafia, you know.

Edit: unless you have a genuine case on their attacker. See above.

I already said I technically could have voted for you too, but Shadow has less content, and you seemed to defend him, so I went for him.

And nobody likes WIFOM in mafia.

Also if it's so suicidal to defend in mafia, why have to kept defending Shadow? Very suspicious.

[Fener]

Holy hell, 200 posts before I even log on. Grief and Lish must be playing I just skimmed through most, though it looks like we have started actual game play. Hurray. Though I am not sure about any of the "cases" so far I'll go back and start at page 3 and pay more attention

[Rashan]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:46 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:33 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:22 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:07 PM, said:

and Mandy has a vote on me "to get the game moving". Anyone else think this is a bad thing? 2 joke votes left on. hmmmmm.

My vote isn't a joke vote. You were spamming. And Rashan jumping to your defence makes it stick. Also I am not discounting the possibility that Sil's aggressiveness is distancing. My vote stays for now.

Aggressive, aggressive. And your vote was a joke vote. I have posted it above. No case whatsoever.

No I was not joking. Spamming is a good day 1 case.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:33 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:24 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:22 PM, said:

Vote Silanah

case coming next

Oh look, a counter distancing.

Counter-distancing? What are you at?

If your problem is spamming, surely I'm a better target, as I said. So why vote Shadow constantly? And also, WIFOM away, but valid point: its fairly suicidal to defend anyone in Mafia, you know.

Edit: unless you have a genuine case on their attacker. See above.

I already said I technically could have voted for you too, but Shadow has less content, and you seemed to defend him, so I went for him.

And nobody likes WIFOM in mafia.

Also if it's so suicidal to defend in mafia, why have to kept defending Shadow? Very suspicious.

Well, lynch me then, dear boy, and let's see who's under suspicion when my CF appears. See, I happen to know I barely had any content in my posts except for accusing you of distancing. There was no content to post!
I'm defending Shadow because I don't think he's scum.
Spam is not a valid day one lynch. Should we revisit the game where every post had to be a vote? Serious business, this internets.