[Anomandaris]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

Why ask an obvious question if you've played the game before? Christ, it's like playing the n00b card.

I don't understand what you're asking.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

Genuinely, change your vote to me Ano. If I get speed lynched, well, my CF will have you under a lot of pressure, I hope.

Are you serious? Are you really asking me to spare Shadow?

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

So, what exactly did you mean by saying spammers are mid-level and high-level posters? Are you saying the only normal way to play is to lurk? You also say let's get rid of spammers and low posters. And then you vote for the SECOND highest spammer. Not even the highest. I don't get that, Ano.

I didn't say spammers are mid-level and high-level posters, what I meant was that mid- and high-level posters can be spammers too, if they don't add content. No content=spam. That's all I said.

And as I said, I felt Shadow had less content than you.

[Shadow]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 11:46 AM, said:

I already said I technically could have voted for you too, but Shadow has less content, and you seemed to defend him, so I went for him.

And nobody likes WIFOM in mafia.

Also if it's so suicidal to defend in mafia, why have to kept defending Shadow? Very suspicious.

O'Rly?

Its suicidal, but only if the sheeple think its symping.

[Anomandaris]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:49 PM, said:

Well, lynch me then, dear boy, and let's see who's under suspicion when my CF appears. See, I happen to know I barely had any content in my posts except for accusing you of distancing. There was no content to post!
I'm defending Shadow because I don't think he's scum.
Spam is not a valid day one lynch. Should we revisit the game where every post had to be a vote? Serious business, this internets.

You're trying to coerce me into doing what you want me to do. Do not like!

[Fener]

One observation, I find it rather unlikely that a true killer would get involved this early on in a "You're a spammer" "No! You are! I am voting you!!" 'You're a symp!!" "You are a killer!!" war this early. Proabbly 2 innos and a symp duking it out. Killer might have been involved early but would pull back so as not to be in the spot light too much...who fits that description?

[Rashan]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:50 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

Why ask an obvious question if you've played the game before? Christ, it's like playing the n00b card.

I don't understand what you're asking.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

Genuinely, change your vote to me Ano. If I get speed lynched, well, my CF will have you under a lot of pressure, I hope.

Are you serious? Are you really asking me to spare Shadow?

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

So, what exactly did you mean by saying spammers are mid-level and high-level posters? Are you saying the only normal way to play is to lurk? You also say let's get rid of spammers and low posters. And then you vote for the SECOND highest spammer. Not even the highest. I don't get that, Ano.

I didn't say spammers are mid-level and high-level posters, what I meant was that mid- and high-level posters can be spammers too, if they don't add content. No content=spam. That's all I said.

And as I said, I felt Shadow had less content than you.

1) It's like pretending you don't know how to play so that you're let away with little mistakes. It's how the Killers won Mafia 32. I don't tolerate it.
2) No, I'm saying if your going to vote for spamming, vote they guy who has more than a quarter of all the posts in the game.
3) Alright. I will give you that one. Grudgingly, but you were unclear as to meaning, so fair game.

[Anomandaris]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 12:50 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 11:46 AM, said:

I already said I technically could have voted for you too, but Shadow has less content, and you seemed to defend him, so I went for him.

And nobody likes WIFOM in mafia.

Also if it's so suicidal to defend in mafia, why have to kept defending Shadow? Very suspicious.

O'Rly?

Its suicidal, but only if the sheeple think its symping.

So you think you're safe as long as you don't make it look like symping? Did you just admit to being scum?

[Rashan]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:51 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:49 PM, said:

Well, lynch me then, dear boy, and let's see who's under suspicion when my CF appears. See, I happen to know I barely had any content in my posts except for accusing you of distancing. There was no content to post!
I'm defending Shadow because I don't think he's scum.
Spam is not a valid day one lynch. Should we revisit the game where every post had to be a vote? Serious business, this internets.

You're trying to coerce me into doing what you want me to do. Do not like!

I hardly want to be lynched!!!!!

[Shadow]

Rash, I appreciate the defense, but I don't think its needed at this time. Kess has on a joke vote, and Mandy has no case on me at all. I do however think your plight is more serious, as Sil has a more serious case on you (weak, but at least serious) and you might want to adress his and the other(can't remember who) vote on you. I 'll hammer you if it comes to it, hope you know that, lol.

[Kaschan]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:18 AM, said:

Kaschan, on Nov 24 2008, 03:16 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 11:11 AM, said:

Kaschan, on Nov 24 2008, 03:10 PM, said:

By the way Rash did you every have that thing looked at. I don't think that it is suppose to be Hot yellow with piss oozing out

No, sir. I couldn't get around to getting you an appointment. I'm sorry sir. You'll have to make do with it as it is.

Fine bring it over here and I will cut it off. Other wise it might spread to that sweet sweet mouth of yours

Sir, I'm sorry, but I won't suck your slightly diseased penis. It's just not in my contract.

That's not what you were mumbling last night . Contract? You are my slave we have no contract Now get over here. I have the butchers knife sharp enough to split a hair.

[Tennes]

Anomandaris said:

I felt Shadow had less content than you.

Seemed like no contest that Shadow had more content than Rashan as far as I'm concerned...it was very clear that he stopped spamming and started actually playing a lot earlier. That you can't see that is either means you need to do a reread or you're going after Shadow unnecessarily, in my eyes. Consider yourself under suspicion! I'll keep my vote on Rashan for the moment, but I could quite easily change it...

[Anomandaris]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:53 PM, said:

1) It's like pretending you don't know how to play so that you're let away with little mistakes. It's how the Killers won Mafia 32. I don't tolerate it.

What are you on about. I don't even get what you're accusing me of, I haven't commented anything about my previous mafia experience.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:53 PM, said:

2) No, I'm saying if your going to vote for spamming, vote they guy who has more than a quarter of all the posts in the game.

The post count has nothing to do with it.




Edit: fixed quote tags

This post has been edited by Anomandaris: 24 November 2008 - 04:56 PM

[Path-Shaper]

It's day 1. There's 28 and a half hours left of the day.

13 players remain:
Thyrllan, Rashan, Anomandaris, Kaschan, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Liosan, Gamelon, Shadow, Tennes, Fener, Silanah

7 votes needed to lynch
7 votes needed to go to night

1 vote Driss - Gamelon
2 vote Shadow - Kessobahn, Anomandaris
2 vote Rashan - Tennes, Silanah
1 vote Silanah - Shadow

Players who have not voted:
Thyrllan, Kaschan, D'riss, Korlat, Liosan, Fener, Rashan

[Shadow]

Fener, on Nov 24 2008, 11:52 AM, said:

One observation, I find it rather unlikely that a true killer would get involved this early on in a "You're a spammer" "No! You are! I am voting you!!" 'You're a symp!!" "You are a killer!!" war this early. Proabbly 2 innos and a symp duking it out. Killer might have been involved early but would pull back so as not to be in the spot light too much...who fits that description?

I would guess any of these 3

Sil, Kess, and Gamelon.

Sil, did a bit of distancing early by jokingly callin Gamelon a symp. Kess voted for me, and left it. I dunno.

[Rashan]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 04:55 PM, said:

Rash, I appreciate the defense, but I don't think its needed at this time. Kess has on a joke vote, and Mandy has no case on me at all. I do however think your plight is more serious, as Sil has a more serious case on you (weak, but at least serious) and you might want to adress his and the other(can't remember who) vote on you. I 'll hammer you if it comes to it, hope you know that, lol.

Tennes vote was for being seventh after his post. I'm not too worried
Sil's might gather momentum, but I'd be surprised.
And I would do the exact same for you. It's Mafia, not Happy Happy Forum Game.

[Anomandaris]

Tennes, on Nov 24 2008, 12:55 PM, said:

Anomandaris said:

I felt Shadow had less content than you.

Seemed like no contest that Shadow had more content than Rashan as far as I'm concerned...it was very clear that he stopped spamming and started actually playing a lot earlier. That you can't see that is either means you need to do a reread or you're going after Shadow unnecessarily, in my eyes. Consider yourself under suspicion! I'll keep my vote on Rashan for the moment, but I could quite easily change it...

Ah, fine I'll do a reread. But when I read through the thread, I felt that both of them were spamming, and I could have voted for either of them on equal terms. It's what happened after my vote that makes me more suspicious of Shadow. Rashan has defended Shadow aggressively for seemingly no reason.

[Rashan]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 04:55 PM, said:

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:53 PM, said:

1) It's like pretending you don't know how to play so that you're let away with little mistakes. It's how the Killers won Mafia 32. I don't tolerate it.

What are you on about. I don't even get what you're accusing me of, I haven't commented anything about my previous mafia experience.

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 12:53 PM, said:

2) No, I'm saying if your going to vote for spamming, vote they guy who has more than a quarter of all the posts in the game.

The post count has nothing to do with it.




Edit: fixed quote tags

You said, Oh, I hope it won't be a slow game. You actually expected more than a certain number of posts. That does suggest evidence of playing before.
Then you ask how do killers usually play?
Does that sound right?
Paranoid, and weak as cases go, but there's something there I don't like.

[Shadow]

Anomandaris, on Nov 24 2008, 11:59 AM, said:

Tennes, on Nov 24 2008, 12:55 PM, said:

Anomandaris said:

I felt Shadow had less content than you.

Seemed like no contest that Shadow had more content than Rashan as far as I'm concerned...it was very clear that he stopped spamming and started actually playing a lot earlier. That you can't see that is either means you need to do a reread or you're going after Shadow unnecessarily, in my eyes. Consider yourself under suspicion! I'll keep my vote on Rashan for the moment, but I could quite easily change it...

Ah, fine I'll do a reread. But when I read through the thread, I felt that both of them were spamming, and I could have voted for either of them on equal terms. It's what happened after my vote that makes me more suspicious of Shadow. Rashan has defended Shadow aggressively for seemingly no reason.

Here is a good reason. I am not scum, haven't played like scum, and I have 2 votes on me for no good reason. Keep it there, its just 2 votes.

[Rashan]

There is at least three other members lurking besides me, Ano and Shadow. Comments on this?

This post has been edited by Rashan: 24 November 2008 - 05:08 PM

[Rashan]

Right, I have to go. I should be on later, but the home computer seems to have contracted some kind of irratating but minor(I hope) virus, so there is no telling I'm afraid.

[Shadow]

HA! there reading all your spam Rash! ;P