[Jump Around]

Good spotting, actually, I didn't realize he had 20 posts.

is it the "IDK" or the "DK" syndrome?

[drinksinbars]

idk - imitating dk

[alt146]

Lol, no I'm not the killer.

Thought we were still at the "let's make ridiculous cases" stage of day one, so I was stuffing around.

Four scum seems likely in a game this size. Three killers seem a bit excessive, so I'm thinking 2 killers, two symps. Each symp only knows one killer, or at least, that's what the role list suggests.

The other distribution that seems likely is one killer, two or three symps. It says in the role list that the symps are part of the killer's 'crew'. That implies a leader and more than one follower. Or it least it does in my mind.

[Giles]

Have just finished reading through it, seems to just be mostly random voting atm.
DISCO TIME !

[drinksinbars]

alt146, on Oct 17 2008, 01:01 PM, said:

Lol, no I'm not the killer.

Thought we were still at the "let's make ridiculous cases" stage of day one, so I was stuffing around.

Four scum seems likely in a game this size. Three killers seem a bit excessive, so I'm thinking 2 killers, two symps. Each symp only knows one killer, or at least, that's what the role list suggests.

The other distribution that seems likely is one killer, two or three symps. It says in the role list that the symps are part of the killer's 'crew'. That implies a leader and more than one follower. Or it least it does in my mind.

didnt i just say something like that ^ there? You trying to steal my ideas...

[alt146]

No, just adding my thoughts as to the specifics.

[drinksinbars]

1 killer is too risky for a start, the game cant be played with just symps, so there has to be more than just one killer or its unbalanced toward the innos.

[Path-Shaper]

6 hours 20 minutes left...

[Tapper]

Aye, 2 killers, 2 symps. 1 killer seems excessively dangerous... gameover with a lucky shot in the dark.
It then seems likely that each symp knows only 1 killer... a team of four working together from the start would also be slightly unbalanced in my humble opinion.

[Tapper]

As for lynching the lowest post-count: of the experienced players, Yellow is on 1.

[alt146]

You think so? Lots of room to hide and three or four symps would prob stop you getting lynched early in the game.

Three killers would be way too much. The game would be over in a couple of days.

I'm still leaning more towards one, but we'll know after the first scum CF. Assuming symps CF as inno like they normally do.

[Morgoth]

Tapper, on Oct 17 2008, 11:48 AM, said:

Morgoth, on Oct 17 2008, 10:54 AM, said:

Tapper, on Oct 17 2008, 10:48 AM, said:

Hey, stop symping me, Morgoth

shut up, master. You don't want them to find you out now do you? Just follow my lead and everything will be all right.



Seriously though. The fact that I am defending someone that's not myself does not equall bloody symping. Jeez, my desperate atempts to keep poor Piper alive must surely be proof of that.. bah

See the smilie, my angry lackey, it means I was joking. Sheesh, I prefer my servants a bit more docile. Grief's help for hire clearly has trouble getting good quality personell these days.

I was refering to you being named a symp for not buying DiBs' arguments. Not the other way around. I was obviously not clear enough


.. and I'm at work, so should be available to deadline, or close up to it at any rate. It all depends naturally on how much actuall work I get to do

[Lisheo]

Well, I'm back after failing my media exam, woo... Alt146? Seriously?

[Lisheo]

Woops, missed out the last page, my bad, he's defended himself, but I thought it would be too much a shot in the dark.

[Lisheo]

So are we set on two pairs? Two killers and two symps?

[drinksinbars]

alt146, on Oct 17 2008, 01:15 PM, said:

You think so? Lots of room to hide and three or four symps would prob stop you getting lynched early in the game.

Three killers would be way too much. The game would be over in a couple of days.

I'm still leaning more towards one, but we'll know after the first scum CF. Assuming symps CF as inno like they normally do.

3 killers isnt over powered, they still only get 1 kill a night, so with 4 evil and eighteen players it would take 5 days of lynch then nk for them to get a majority and we would have to be really dense to miss four players for so long.

[Morgoth]

alt146, on Oct 17 2008, 02:15 PM, said:

You think so? Lots of room to hide and three or four symps would prob stop you getting lynched early in the game.

Three killers would be way too much. The game would be over in a couple of days.

I'm still leaning more towards one, but we'll know after the first scum CF. Assuming symps CF as inno like they normally do.

1 killer would just be too risky. A lucky vig, or a random day 1 lynch and the game goes to the innos

[Lisheo]

I agree with Morgoth, one killer would be hardly enough. Like he said, a random lynch could kill them off. I think two killers and two symps would be best, but then I read the rules again, and it seems to me that as the innocents could have more than three roled players, perhaps three killers and three symps?

[drinksinbars]

hell no, six evils???? that would be way to much. you can have 1 symp to multiple killers, the reason i suggested something else was that the role for symp says master not masters in pathspaers post.

[Lisheo]

Ah that'd make sense, one killer with three or four symps?