Tapper, on 30 November 2011 - 04:43 PM, said:
Mezla PigDog, on 30 November 2011 - 02:48 PM, said:
Is this debate definitely happening? I can't find any credible information that there really is a debate going on about whether to publish it. Is the Netherlands coming into some stick over it or something? I can't imagine they have done anything that radical, the paper will be a logical step in an ongoing line of investigation supported by the global influenza scientific community (hence the NIH and CDC collaborating with the dude with the ferret lab in the Netherlands to produce this data). I moved into flu research a few months back and while I'm admittedly still bringing myself up to speed on the current position, this is NOT news in the flu research community.
They submitted it to
Science, and Science has turned the research over to the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to see whether or not it can be published without being a security risk. That board's chair(Paul Keim) has already gone to press saying it is worse than anthrax.
So the scare and debate is not so much in the flu community as it is in the arms/ bio-weapon industry.
Here's an article with the relevant info, although it is hardly first-hand:
http://gizmodo.com/ron-fouchier/
Thank you, sir. So much to say and nobody to aim a rant at! I'll go ahead anyway
First off, the research is perfectly valid and not at all irresponsible. It is proving a theory that avian flu (that I think has about an 80% mortality rate when it does get into humans) can evolve human-to-human transmission. I'm pretty sure everyone was confident this could happen and didn't necessarily need to see it to believe it but understanding the
mechanism of how it can happen is very very useful as then scientists can watch for real avian flu starting down the path to being transmissable and co-ordinate public health resources accordingly. Predicting a pandemic would enable serious attempts to prevent it and potentially save millions of lives. I would be confident that the research was performed in a safe manner and people really shouldn't be concerned. A purposefully designed facility and then some simple measures can enable this kind of research to be conducted very safely (under the assumption that the people involved are competent and take their role in Biosafety seriously of course....).
Secondly, if people think that the NSABB and Biosecurity industry is at all credible, they've got another thing coming!! There is no well informed, professional panel of experts lead by the military and/or government anywhere in the world. Biosecurity is a very new concept and a handful of government selected individuals merely meet occasionally and speculate. I doubt more than a handful of people in the world even have careers based solely on Biosecurity, it's a non-subject. "Experts" are usually involved in Infectious Disease research from a healthcare perspective and apply for the occasional cushy Biosecurity grant to prop up their real research interests. The Biosecurity industry is even more pathetic. I worked for 18 months for a business that was 1 of 2 competing businesses for all Biosecurity contracts in the US and UK and the level of the scientific knowledge and technology there was embarrassingly low. It would be terrifying if it wasn't for the lack of a credible bioterrorist threat. IMO there are only 2 ways a significant bioterrorist event could happen. The first is theft from a research facility like the one in the Netherlands, but that would need collusion from the research team inner circle (nobody can ever find samples in research facility freezers, a random thief would have no luck!) and the second is serious investment by some kind of rogue state. Neither is going to happen, we can all sleep safely in our beds content in the knowledge that a killer pandemic could hit at any time so there's no point worrying about it.
/rant